« Nannies In The News | Main | Stupid is as Stupid Does »

Bloggers Set For Supreme Court Nominee

USAToday's Peter Johnson notes that the blogosphere is getting its first chance at a Supreme Court nominee in Bloggers, on your mark.

No matter whom President Bush nominates to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court or whether Bush must replace her and ailing Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who says he has no plans to step down, nominees are going to be fair game for bloggers.

This is a first; the Internet was in its infancy and bloggers weren't around the last time there was an opening on the high court. That was in 1994, when Stephen Breyer was nominated by President Clinton and later confirmed to the court.

Gone are the days when it would usually take disparaging information from an insider to derail a judge's nomination.

Of course I'm mentioning the column because Johnson had the good sense to quote me, but his column begs the question, "What effect will the blogosphere's coverage of the nominee have on the process, and will set a good (or bad) precedent for the future?"

On the whole I'm optimistic that the debates on the nominee in the blogosphere will be an overall positive, but partisanship and knee-jerk negativity may beat my optimism into submission. What's worrisome is that the bar as to what constitutes an "unconfirmable nominee" has been set pretty low based on past Supreme Court confirmations.

At the Supreme Court level nominees like Robert Bork and Douglas Ginsburg were scuttled over ideology and marijuana use (respectively), and Justice Clarence Thomas barely made it through a confirmation hearing focused on a charge of sexual harassment. Looking beyond Supreme Court nominees, Clinton Attorney General nominees Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood, and Bush Secretary of Homeland Security nominee Bernard Kerik, were all done in by failure to pay Social Security taxes on illegal aliens they employed as nannies. The Bush White House will presumably have the foresight to not nominate someone with a "nanny problem" or a drug history. The wild card is that, outside of those recent examples, no one quite knows what a mortal blow to a nominee looks like anymore.

The real question is not whether a cumulative dribble of defamatory information will accompany the President's forthcoming nominee - past confirmation battles indicate that it will - but how far Senate Democrats will go in parroting the research of anti-nominee bloggers. Given their current state of cozying up the DailyKos's of the left side of the blogosphere, it's not unimaginable that Democrats, lead by Sen. Edward Kennedy, will become a sounding board for any and all Gannon-esq slime campaigns.

If you're looking for an example of how the Internet will change the nomination process consider the 1987 confirmation battle of Robert Bork. During the Bork confirmation battle a row broke out over the release of his video rental records from a local DC video store. In 2005 the clerk at that video store will probably be a blogger, and will have anonymously posted the porn preference of the forthcoming nominee long before Blockbuster can seal those records from prying eyes. The real question is what the media and Senate Democrats would do with that kind of ill-gotten information today.

With all the money lined up, itching for a fight, I expect we'll find out...

Update: Is Judge Edith Clement of the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans going to be the choice? AP is reporting she's a leading candidate, and The Washington Post reports that 5 of the names mentioned as possible nominees are from the the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bloggers Set For Supreme Court Nominee:

» Conservative Outpost linked with Is today the day?

» Outside The Beltway linked with Bloggers Changing Court Nomination Process?

» bRight & Early linked with New News is SCOTUS News

» Myopic Zeal linked with John G. Roberts, Jr. Roundup

Comments (7)

It will be interesting to s... (Below threshold)

It will be interesting to see how the blogs affect this nomination. There is no doubt that mainstream journalists read the blogs.
I just don't see how Bush can win either way. No one will be happy unless he can find a judge with no record on abortion or the other social issues and then refuses to answer the questions on them, I don't see this as being anythng but a mud fight that will make the Clarence Thomas hearings look like a love fest.

Y'know, I just had a though... (Below threshold)

Y'know, I just had a thought, considering if he's up to it....
What if President Bush nominated JUDGE BORK! AGAIN! The Donks would shit their pants!

Not a bad idea Macker, but ... (Below threshold)
fatman:

Not a bad idea Macker, but I'm afraid you're crying stale fish, as the saying goes. A certain handsome, charming, witty, urbane and super-intelligent (ahem) commenter made that very suggestion when Sandra Day O'Connor anounced her retirement.

"I can tell from reading al... (Below threshold)
Toby928:

"I can tell from reading all the various political blogs that we are all ready for battle when the moment is at hand"

It does have a sitzkrieg feel to it, or more like the cold war in CFE. Mountains of munitions stockpiled on both sides of the Fulda Gap. Its going to be pure carnage.

Tob

First, destroy their ammo d... (Below threshold)

First, destroy their ammo dumps, then cut off their supply lines and escape routes.

Oh wait -- we're not talking actual war here, are we. Dang.

- This is one case where it... (Below threshold)

- This is one case where its doubtful the real direct effect of the yammering and mass of print spewing from the blogos will be significant, beyond the single possibility of "outing" a candidates personal skeletons. A lot of money and energy for the basic purpose of what amounts to a blog-o-Monster truck meet....

- FOX must be getting fed insider info. They are making noises that Bush is momentarily about to announce His candidate for replacement of Justice Sandra Day Oconnor. Their take; Both of the leading names are women. If its Jones expect hyperventilating, frothing at the mouth, and earth shaking bloviating from the left....

McGehee, you always make me... (Below threshold)

McGehee, you always make me laugh..!




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy