Apparently Air America is getting John Kerry to write their press releases. In a really lame attempt to throw bloggers off the scent, last week they hinted they had paid the money back months ago:
The current owners of Air America Radio have no obligation to Progress Media,s business activities. We are very disturbed that Air America Radio's good name could be associated with a reduction in services for young people, which is why we agreed months ago to fully compensate the Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Club as a result of this transaction.
But this week they told FoxNews:
"We're committed to paying this money and the terms are being worked out... We are awaiting direction from the investigation into how to proceed."
That must come as crushing news to the Kos Kid who said the story "appears to be phoney" If it's a phony, it's a good one because Air America is now saying they are going to pony up a half a million dollars. But hey- Kos Kids don't think rationally.
In the end, the blogosphere cost Air America a half a million dollars.
The story was sure to be ignored until the blogs started pushing it. Now CNN mentioned it. (and us) and FOXNews got the commitment that they'd pay it back.
Now it's just a matter of when they write the check. They do have the money... Right? Right?
Update: I'm starting to feel left out. Usually when irrational people hurl insults rather than fact based arguments around the blogosphere it is aimed at me. But this time Brian Maloney is having all the fun. Read his take... It's basically the same as mine but he wrote a few more words... and as an added bonus, you get to see the liberals going bonkers.
Comments (51)
It should be paid back with... (Below threshold)1. Posted by bullwinkle | July 31, 2005 11:45 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It should be paid back with interest, and the interest should be calculated to return the amount they promised the club was going to earn. Then everyone involved should be tried on fraud charges. I don't want Air America taken off the air, as long as they there with their pathetic and pathetically small audience they aren't hurting anyone but I don't want my tax dollars subsidizing moonbattery. Some of our commenting moonbats could put their money where their ample mouths are and donate a little to the leftist cause. If they had any or the sense and ambition to make any, that is.
1. Posted by bullwinkle | July 31, 2005 11:45 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 11:45
2. Posted by TC@LeatherPenguin | July 31, 2005 12:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
In the end, the blogosphere cost Air America a half a million dollars.
WRONG!
in the end, the Bloggers might cost that Drobny character more time in a five-by-nine then Ken Lay."
2. Posted by TC@LeatherPenguin | July 31, 2005 12:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 12:28
3. Posted by TC@LeatherPenguin | July 31, 2005 12:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
and you right: Maloney's "Assault of the Kossaks" in his comments is hilarious. It's like "Yowser, ScrappleFace could mock this!"
3. Posted by TC@LeatherPenguin | July 31, 2005 12:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 12:32
4. Posted by TC@LeatherPenguin | July 31, 2005 12:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
final note: I've bee whacking Air Idiot's business plan from the getgo...not like Tea ever looked.
4. Posted by TC@LeatherPenguin | July 31, 2005 12:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 12:38
5. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | July 31, 2005 12:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I tells ya', youse guys get no respect. CNN misspelled [WhizbangBlog.com] your name. It's a conspiracy. ;)
5. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | July 31, 2005 12:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 12:41
6. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 12:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I am sorry that the left hasn't been denigrating you. If you send me a sort of templete, I will be happy to write a nasty comment questioning your heritage, your intelligence, and your politics. I need guidance, how many words must I misspell, should I always confuse there and their? Should my ranting include ALL CAPS or just a CAP here and THERE (their?)? And how many scare quotes should I include per paragraph (should I use paragraphs?). Should I compare you to fascists or Nazis? Am I to conclude you are a tool (flying monkey) of Karl Rove? Any guidance on this issue would be appreciated, err apriciated.
Just trying to be helpful.
6. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 12:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 12:49
7. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 12:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh, by the way, if you think I am going to dumpster dive over at Kos or DU just to get a template to insult you, you have another think coming. Look forward to guidance on my snarky tirade.
7. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 12:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 12:56
8. Posted by bullwinkle | July 31, 2005 1:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You intend to insult us how? By telling how wrong we are to care that the liberal trash at Air America did this? By defending their attempt at theft? Are you going to tell us how cruel we are for trying to get something about it? I can't wait, this should be just chock full of moonbat nuttiness.
8. Posted by bullwinkle | July 31, 2005 1:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 13:11
9. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 1:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Bullwinkle, you misunderstand me, I think Paul is feeling left out and I wanted to be helpful. I REALLY want AAR to shrivel up and die. (ooh, ooh, CAPS).
9. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 1:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 13:19
10. Posted by McGehee | July 31, 2005 2:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
David, I think he's merely offering a template suggestion... ;-)
10. Posted by McGehee | July 31, 2005 2:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 14:04
11. Posted by Paul | July 31, 2005 2:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
David,
As long as you mention Rove, Hitler, abortion and a chimp you probably won't be wrong.
P
For an added bonus stolen elections, and Iraq are nice too.
11. Posted by Paul | July 31, 2005 2:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 14:10
12. Posted by bullwinkle | July 31, 2005 2:33 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Don't forget Halliburton, The Downing Street Memo, PNAC, Abu Ghraib, or Osama's relatives. Might as well cover all the bases. And if you can figure some way to make it sound good, or even if you can't, work in some mention of the TANG documents.
12. Posted by bullwinkle | July 31, 2005 2:33 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 14:33
13. Posted by B Moe | July 31, 2005 2:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What I want to know:
How long had Gloria Wise been in business before the loan?
Was this the only "charity" that laundered money to AAR?
Is anybody else fantasizing about Franken and Rhodes getting stuck in jail and only having each to talk to?
13. Posted by B Moe | July 31, 2005 2:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 14:53
14. Posted by -S- | July 31, 2005 3:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, and Kerry didn't fall on those skiis, some stupid guy pushed him over, "made him" fall. Yeah, that's the ticket.
14. Posted by -S- | July 31, 2005 3:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 15:28
15. Posted by Lesley | July 31, 2005 3:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barbara O'Brien from Maha Blog is an interesting character. She and Betsy Newmark from "Betsy's Page" were recently featured in a WAPO piece on women bloggers.
I first recall running across MahaBlog during Rathergate. Ms O'Brien said, based on her extensive expertise, the Tang documents were, infact, not forgeries and went to elaborate lengths to prove it.
15. Posted by Lesley | July 31, 2005 3:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 15:42
16. Posted by david drake | July 31, 2005 3:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"We Paid it Back Before We Didn't Pay it Back"
You so s-n-a-r-k-y !
GREAT TITLE WizB!! That's why I love your blog so much. Keep at it!
16. Posted by david drake | July 31, 2005 3:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 15:57
17. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | July 31, 2005 4:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RE: B Moe's inquiry (July 31, 2005 02:53 PM)
How long had Gloria Wise been in business before the loan?
From the Gloria Wise online history, here are some relevant edited excerpts:
Under the leadership of Gloria Wise, a renowned social worker and community leader, the committee helped create educational cultural and recreational programs for the youth of Co-op City.
Riverbay Youth Activities Committee (YAC) was born late '70s.
Before Gloria Wise died in June of '93 from cancer, she transferred the directorship of YAC to longtime colleague and renowned Co-op City community leader Charles Rosen. Rosen renamed the agency after Gloria Wise in 1993 and began an affiliation with the Boys and Girls Clubs of America.
Shortly after the affiliation with the Boys and Girls Clubs of America began, the club, in 1993, expanded its service area to include the neighboring northeast Bronx communities of Williamsbridge, Edenwald and Baychester.
The very young began to fall under the service umbrella of the Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Club in 1995 as it merged with the Goose Bay Nursery.
The Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Club began serving the full spectrum of society in the northeast Bronx in 1999 as they incorporated the Co-op City Senior Services Program into their expanding network of services.
In 2000, the Handicapped Adults Association of Co-op City merged with the Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Club.
The Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Club proved its preparedness for the new millennium when, with the support of the Riverbay Corporation and philanthropic foundations, it opened the Gloria Wise Clubhouse at 950 Baychester Avenue in the spring of 2000.
So it began as a community program headed by a local, social service advocate who passed on the directorship to Mr. Rosen just prior to her death. Mr. Rosen immediately teamed up with the national B&GCA and began expanding reach and scope. Mergers ensued as did its public funding. It started as YAC and grew into a merged social services web (for Co-op City, Williamsbridge, Edenwald and Baychester) under the B&GCA umbrella to incorporate Goose Bay Nursery, Co-op City Senior Services Program, and Handicapped Adults Association of Co-op City. Technically, its business under Rosen and the new name began in '93, but its foundations were laid many years prior in the '70s.
It reads like it began as an honest and legitimate endeavor from local patrons that ultimately became a political tool... or that is what the questionable "loan(s)" would indicate.
Your concern that this may not be the only charity that sent money to AAR (or a political action committee) is not unique. Is the NY DOI recruiting a team of auditors to review the books on their entire public subsidy channels? That might be overkill - but then again it might be entirely reasonable given our desire for transparency in government. What other "investments" are these community programs financing, and what restrictions have been placed on funds meant for direct aid to the needy rather than speculation by directors? And are the contributors, public or private, aware of the destination of such speculation, if any?
I should think this would raise the eyebrows of many on both the philanthropic receiving as well as giving end of the process. It sure is a nice reminder either way. This questionable act on the part of Rosen and AAR (whomever the ownership) will have ripples and that would be the silver lining in this cloud.
17. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | July 31, 2005 4:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 16:04
18. Posted by Bill M | July 31, 2005 4:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I tells ya', youse guys get no respect. CNN misspelled [WhizbangBlog.com] your name. It's a conspiracy. ;)
Aren't we so glad the MSM has all those layers of editors so that they never make mistakes......
18. Posted by Bill M | July 31, 2005 4:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 16:31
19. Posted by lin | July 31, 2005 4:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The Kos Kids speak:
Maha, in her diary, goes through the “evidence” and says that she isn’t trying to determine whether the “allegations are true or false, but is looking at the sourcing. She decides that “uninformed sources” by a small obscure “newspaper” means as she says, that it is a story that “appears to be phony”
The Kos Kidz then chime in:
1) Since it's a PREVIOUS owner it doesn't have anything to do with AA. Without any facts to back it up of course.
2) Evan Montvel Cohen, a previous owner who used to be a Republican from Guam was a "republican operative", and swindled AA.
3) It's a plot by Karl Rove.
4) It's meant as a distraction from Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh's drug investigation, or something else not yet identified.
5) They assume AA paid the money back. (Of course AA has admitted they haven't.
Then they congratulate Maha for the high quality of investigative work, which of course conservatives “wouldn’t bother to do” and for giving them all the FACTS. Now they know the real truth and can go out and dispute the allegations with rightwingers and the media.
Read it and laugh.
19. Posted by lin | July 31, 2005 4:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 16:50
20. Posted by lin | July 31, 2005 4:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry that should be anonymous "imformed sources". Paragraph 1
20. Posted by lin | July 31, 2005 4:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 16:53
21. Posted by lin | July 31, 2005 6:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh, I forgot the funniest one.
6. Rightwingers are smearing AAR, making up a "scandal" becase they are scared. They see that AAR is gaining traction so they are counter attacking AAR to try to destroy it.
21. Posted by lin | July 31, 2005 6:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 18:08
22. Posted by B Moe | July 31, 2005 6:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
After reading the Kos link what I now what to know is who outed Evan Cohen as a "known Republican operative" and can we do anything about this breach of securtity.
I'm thinking it was Carville.
22. Posted by B Moe | July 31, 2005 6:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 18:59
23. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 10:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry, touring Northern New Mexico, this was writen to help Paul get his share of the Moonbattiness, this is just a drill:
Paul you loathsome, inconpetant piece of crap. Your mother is a hamster and your father smells of elderbery wine. You just don’t get it, you are an embarrasment to America you traitorous BASTURD. The TANG of it is you are trying to bring down the very voice of reason when it is finally starting to SUCKCEDE. If you think your pathetic ATTEMPT to take the eyes of good AMERICANS everywhere from the IMPENDING impeachment of The McCHIMPEROR for covering up for that lieing weasel KARL ROVE, you can just flush your sorry head down the CRAPPER. YOU worthles slugs stoal two elections, but that didn’t make you happy. Now you are spreading your wothles lies about a truly GREAT American institution that is going TO CRUSH your Abu Ghrab loving talk radio. We all know Bushitlerhaliburton is a liar and a traitor as proven by the Downing Stret Memos. We know who you filthy pieces of dog crap are and when the REVOLUTION comes you are going to pay for all your work as a subverter of the AMERICAN WORKER. DIE YOU WORTHLESS WANKER.
How did I do? Do you feel included now? BY the way I need to take a long shower now.
23. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 10:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 22:06
24. Posted by Jim Jones | July 31, 2005 10:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm afraid you're mistaken if you think AA flip-flopped. They said they "agreed" to pay it off and then they said they are still "committed" to paying it off. It would have been different if the first comment was that they did pay it off. SO they were gonna pay it off then and they're gonna pay it off now.
BTW, after a year-and-a-quarter, AA has the 5th highest rated radio station in Portland. Even better, though, is that Brit Hume's son killed himself.
24. Posted by Jim Jones | July 31, 2005 10:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 22:16
25. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 10:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gad, I just can't hold a mirror to a nasty, ignorant moonbat.
25. Posted by David | July 31, 2005 10:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 22:47
26. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | July 31, 2005 10:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RE: Jim Jones' repugnance (July 31, 2005 10:16 PM)
What's with the concluding bile? Sampling too much Kool-Aid?
And don't think your diversion will stymie those interested in exposing dubious action. Air America Radio will lose support should the NY DOI (or US DOJ) discover a laundering operation, and Wizbang among many others will see that it makes headlines.
Flap your wings and flail away.
26. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | July 31, 2005 10:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 22:56
27. Posted by Jim Jones | July 31, 2005 11:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Aren't you guys the political wing of Ann Coulter and Michael Weiner? I didn't think you got offended so easily.
And I wasn't trying to create a diversion. I don't usually traverse blogs and have never posted to one. So I was just giving you a piece of news you weren't gonna see in the Washington Times while I had an opportunity.
27. Posted by Jim Jones | July 31, 2005 11:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 31, 2005 23:41
28. Posted by vesti | August 1, 2005 12:00 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm a regular Franken Blog commenter that has been saying this since the story came out:
Even though Cohen appears fully responsible (along with some colluding corrupt idiots at the non-profit) AAR's board of directors likely has "dirty hands" for not performing the necessary due diligence to ascertain where their "investors'" money was coming from.
They should rightly be raked over the coals for their lack of institutional control, and an investigation into other sources of investment may be warranted (if only to confirm that there are no other similar deals - on or off the books).
The things that I've complained about are
1. The constant hyperbole - on a few blogs, comparisons have been made to Ken Lay and Enron, and that's not even in the top 5 of silliest comparisons.
2. The attempts to advance the imagery that AAR "stole from poor kids". If the money is returned and the kids received all required services, that's a bit difficult to substantiate - even if the money was returned only under duress, which has also yet to be substantiated ... in fact, I have yet to see any evidence (or even conjecture) that AAR defaulted on the loan in any way.
3. The attempts to make it seem like the on-air talent had any knowledge or culpability. Grow up.
Everyone knows the blog game - there will be cheap shots and non-sequiturs, and folks on the right can feel free to be gleeful about this situation if it makes them feel good. I would humbly request that the glee is accompanied with an honest attempt to put the magnitude of the episode into its proper perspective.
28. Posted by vesti | August 1, 2005 12:00 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 1, 2005 00:00
29. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 1, 2005 12:08 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hat tip from Hugh Hewitt
From Form 990 - Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax
Tax Period 7/01/02 to 6/30/03 [signed/filed 5/14/04]
Part V List of Officers, Directors, Trustees, and Key Employees
(A) Charles Rosen
(B) Executive Director (23 hours/week)
(C) Compensation $147,996.00
(D) Benefit plans/Def.Comp. $15,000.00
(E) Expense account $0.00
Mr. Rosen was the only officer receiving documented compensation. It totalled $162,996.00 for 23 hours of work per week (self-reported) in the Bronx, New York, for the 12 month period reported. Does this seem like reasonable compensation for administering a charity part-time? Seems high but maybe that's the going rate in the Bronx.
RE: Jim Jones' post (July 31, 2005 11:41 PM)
Aren't you guys the political wing of Ann Coulter and Michael Weiner? I didn't think you got offended so easily.
Well, this isn't Howard Dean's backyard, if that's what you mean, but there are barriers that everyone should recognize. How is the news of Brit Hume's son "even better"? What does it have to do with anything? And why the apparent glee in something as tragic as that? It's just so charming that in your first post to a blog that you would break into the art by presenting something so obscene. Next time you have an "opportunity" to disclose that which the WaTimes won't, according to you, maybe you could rub two neurons together and reconsider.
29. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 1, 2005 12:08 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 1, 2005 00:08
30. Posted by vesti | August 1, 2005 12:14 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Mr. Rosen was the only officer receiving documented compensation. It totalled $162,996.00 for 23 hours of work per week (self-reported) in the Bronx, New York, for the 12 month period reported. Does this seem like reasonable compensation for administering a charity part-time? Seems high but maybe that's the going rate in the Bronx.
As a former administrator for a large human services firm, I would say that the compensation package is excessive. When I left my agency in 2002, our CEO made roughly $280K (including bennies and deferred compensations) - but that was a full-time gig, and the company did $75 Million in revenue annually. This Bronx-based non-profit supposedly does only $10M/year, and only a full-time Executive Director would be likely to receive the compensation that Rosen received for a company that size.
30. Posted by vesti | August 1, 2005 12:14 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 1, 2005 00:14
31. Posted by Jim Jones | August 1, 2005 12:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The "piece of news" I had the "opportunity" to tell you wasn't the Hume's son thing. It was the AA rating. The Hume's son part was just meant to be a smartass comment.
And no, this isn't Howard Dean's backyard. This is Ann Coulter's - where crazy lies and awful rhetoric are the norm. No?
31. Posted by Jim Jones | August 1, 2005 12:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 1, 2005 00:41
32. Posted by bullwinkle | August 1, 2005 1:20 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
2. The attempts to advance the imagery that AAR "stole from poor kids". If the money is returned and the kids received all required services, that's a bit difficult to substantiate - even if the money was returned only under duress, which has also yet to be substantiated ... in fact, I have yet to see any evidence (or even conjecture) that AAR defaulted on the loan in any way.
This is almost too stupid to reply to, almost. AAR did take money earmaked for poor kids, and earmarked for them in the year it was given, not at some future date. It will never be used for those kids in anything close to the time frame it was intended for, it can't be, the Boy's and Girl's Club had to close it's doors. They are obviously returning the money under duress, they had the opportunity to return it before the Club had to close it's doors and failed to do so. Some things are so clearly implied the reporters don't feel the need to spell them out, but even a supporter of AAR would have a hard time convincing me they are mentally retarded enough to believe for a minute that nobody asked AAR to please return the money before the lack of funds forced the Club's closure. It will also prevent any such programs from taking place until someone steps in and creates a new club to operate the programs. Even if that happens the kids who would have and should have benefitted from the program will have had it delayed significantly. Some of the kids may no longer be kids by the time a new club is established and gains the confidence of those willing to donate. They DID steal from kids, to promote a ideology that is so incredibly corrupt that it's supporters readily accept it's dishonesty and even go out of their way to defend it, Vesti being one fine example.
32. Posted by bullwinkle | August 1, 2005 1:20 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 1, 2005 01:20
33. Posted by David | August 1, 2005 6:30 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I am sorry, but I can't let this go. Jim Jones, you are a disgusting, revolting human being devoid of intelligence and compassion. Just what does the suicide of a dipolar young man have to do with AAR. I have to deal with this stuff on a daily basis and it is not pretty. It knows no politics, it happens to the sweetest families and leaves loving parents in tatters.
But guess what, as vile, disgusting, loathsome as you are, I would never wish this on you, you compassionless troll.
33. Posted by David | August 1, 2005 6:30 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 1