« The 500mpg Carburetor and the 250mpg Hybrid | Main | Troops Getting Upgraded Armor »

The NY Times and the Half Empty Glass

Lemme take a stab at this story before you read the NY Times version.:

U.S. Upgrading Soldiers Armor Again

DATELINE WIZBANG: For the second time since the Iraq war began, the Pentagon is upgrading the body armor of U.S. troops to better protect the soldiers from insurgent attacks.

The effort to upgrade the existing armor began in May 2004, just months after the Pentagon finished the previous upgrade to ceramic plates which provided greater protection than the armor used at the start of the war.

The Pentagon had no timeline when the upgrade would be complete.

"We are working as fast as we can to complete it as soon as we can," Maj. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sorenson, the Army's deputy for acquisition and systems management, said Wednesday in an interview at the Pentagon.

But of course this is the New York Slimes we're talking about...

U.S. Struggling to Get Soldiers Updated Armor

For the second time since the Iraq war began, the Pentagon is struggling to replace body armor that is failing to protect American troops from the most lethal attacks by insurgents.

The ceramic plates in vests worn by most personnel cannot withstand certain munitions the insurgents use. But more than a year after military officials initiated an effort to replace the armor with thicker, more resistant plates, tens of thousands of soldiers are still without the stronger protection because of a string of delays in the Pentagon's procurement system.

The effort to replace the armor began in May 2004, just months after the Pentagon finished supplying troops with the original plates - a process also plagued by delays. The officials disclosed the new armor effort Wednesday after questioning by The New York Times, and acknowledged that it would take several more months or longer to complete.

Citing security concerns, the officials declined to say exactly how many more of the stronger plates were needed, or how much armor had already been shipped to Iraq.

Obviously we don't need a news media that specializes in blowing wind up our skirts. (like they did with the "Clinton" economy) But this story by the NY Times is just ridiculous. I didn't even know we had developed a better type of armor until I read we we're "struggling" to get it to soldiers. If we did find a way to save more soldiers' lives, shouldn't that be the news?

Isn't it obvious to a third grader that if you have a new product to develop and ship to thousands of people half a planet away it might take a while? I think the fact that the Pentagon has developed, approved and started making a new product this fast is actually quite impressive!

If Clinton were in office, there'd be a photo-op of him when the first one came off the line and the media would be telling us how it was a joint effort between Al Gore and Hillary. But with a Republican in office, the New York Times makes sure the glass is half empty and has a hole in the bottom.

I expect a certain level of bias in the media but this is just absurd.


Comments (5)

Well, your first, next, and... (Below threshold)
AnonymousDrivel:

Well, your first, next, and last mistake was picking up the paper. If I catch its title out of the corner of my eye, I don't even believe it's from New York.

I once lined a birdcage wit... (Below threshold)

I once lined a birdcage with the New York Times. The bird wouldn't crap on it -- he was convinced it was already full.

It is obvious "body armor" ... (Below threshold)
Corky Boyd:

It is obvious "body armor" and "armored Humvees" are DNC focus group tested phrases that lets them show empathy for the troops without actually supporting the war. As new varieties of armor are introduced, there is always a "shortage" which of course reflects badly on the uncaring Republicans. High positives for Democrats, high negatives for Republicans are of course what the game is all about.

During the campaign "body armor" and "Humvee armor" were staples for the Democrats.

Again the NY Times, looking to fill their weekly quota of cheap shots at the administration, is taking one more cue from the DNC playbook.

Crosby Boyd
Sanibel FL

In other news...A ... (Below threshold)
kbiel:

In other news...

A bi-partisan commission will be formed to study why the Dept. of War did not replace the notoriously shoddy M4 Sherman Tank with the more modern M1-A1 Abrams during WWII.

Also...
Archeologist are still puzzling over the French tatics used at the Battle of Agincourt. Specifically, they will be looking to writings from the time of the battle to find out why the French did not use M1 Garand rifles and allowed the British to win with the long bow.

well done kbiel... (Below threshold)
Paul:

well done kbiel




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy