Go vote in the Ruffini straw poll.
He is sorting results by referring blog.
It ought to be interesting to see how the Wizbang folks lean on the 2008 presidential race.
UPDATE:
The results are right here.
Will Franklin draws straws at WILLisms.com.
« Holding out for a zero | Main | The President Responds To Sheehan »
Go vote in the Ruffini straw poll.
He is sorting results by referring blog.
It ought to be interesting to see how the Wizbang folks lean on the 2008 presidential race.
UPDATE:
The results are right here.
Will Franklin draws straws at WILLisms.com.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 2008 GOP Straw Poll.:
» WunderKraut.com linked with I Have A Lot of Catching Up To Do
Send e-mail tips to us:
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Visit the new Palin as President website. It's a riot. Click around on different objects for sound files of Sarah being her "Presidential Best."...
7:26 PM |
0 comments
The rally was organized by a small group of women, talking over coffee. It made me wonder what other things have started with small groups of women talking over coffee. It's probably an impressive list. These women hatched the...
5:16 PM |
0 comments
Signs are pointing towards "No"...
2:02 PM |
0 comments
The LA Times reports: In the e-mail, which was obtained by the Baltimore Sun, Joe McCain uses a naval analogy to make his point. (He is, after all, the son and grandson of four-star Navy admirals. John McCain graduated from...
12:15 PM |
0 comments
The economic bad news just keeps translating into more and more bad news for the McCain Campaign which has wasted days with mean-spirited, absurd conspiracy theory attacks on Senator Obama while the Obama Campaign has gained critical ground with independent...
11:40 AM |
0 comments
Why are John McCain and Sarah Palin afraid to engage on the issues? Why do they insist instead on dragging the campaign into the mud?
11:39 AM |
2 comments
Did John McCain knowingly employ someone this slimy? Or is this just another example of John McCain making really, really bad choices? It's hard to tell -- he's so erratic it's hard to tell what the real John McCain is thinking these days, ping-ponging from one bad decision to the next bad decision.
9:46 AM |
0 comments
The last of the quarters in a 10-year series commemorating the 50 states was minted in Denver yesterday and the featured state is Hawaii. Hawaii's coin features King Kamehameha...
9:24 AM |
0 comments
The Jim Henson Co. has picked up a spec script that may signal a daring turn into adult territory for the company behind Kermit the Frog and Fozzie Bear....
9:13 AM |
1 comments
According to her manager, the veteran pop star will be returning to her Rock Witchu tour Wednesday night at the Verizon Center in Washington, D.C., after being forced to...
8:40 AM |
0 comments
Publisher: Kevin Aylward
Section Editor: Jay Tea
Comment Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Jim Addison, Charlie Quidnunc, Jayson Javitz, Cassy Fiano
All original content copyright © 2003-2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.
Powered by Movable Type 3.35
Hosting by ServInt
Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.
Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.
Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.
Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.
Comments (6)
I think we're being a bit p... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Lew Clark | August 23, 2005 7:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think we're being a bit premature. It's a long way til 2008. I predict that, before the Republican primary, there will be a bitter, bloody, but tastefully done, faceoff between Jay Tea and Jeff Goldstein and we'll have our frontrunner.
Although I'm not sure either is actually a citizen. Hell, I'm not totally sure either is human!
1. Posted by Lew Clark | August 23, 2005 7:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 23, 2005 19:32
2. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 24, 2005 2:34 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So far (8/24/05, 2:31A):
The timing of the poll was particularly bad for Hagel. I don't know where he has been rated previously, but he was at the bottom of the "Wizbang" Main ballot this time and pretty near the bottom everywhere. Ya' think it might have something to do with his weekend (paraphrased) "Iraq is Vietnam" nonsense? Wow, campaign sabotaged before it started. It's still early but this can't help.
2. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 24, 2005 2:34 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 24, 2005 02:34
3. Posted by Will Franklin | August 24, 2005 2:43 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, Hagel, who was hanging on by a thread to the possibility that he might somehow eek out the nomination, is done.
Unfortunately, Sanford and Pawlenty and a few other good candidates were not mentioned (which is actually fortunate for them-- publicity this early is not all that great).
3. Posted by Will Franklin | August 24, 2005 2:43 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 24, 2005 02:43
4. Posted by -S- | August 24, 2005 12:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Wow, five percent of Wizbang would vote for Tancredo. Very interesting. I also found it noteworthy that Tancredo hovered right in the middle of all of the stats, showing far over Hagel and Pitaki, thank Heavens.
What concerns me is the McCain showing. I can't explain it, given that no one I know of now takes him seriously for the Presidency, based upon the unreliability-to-issue factor.
And Jeb Bush! No way. Not at present, not after recent events, particularly as to most voters not desiring globalization and the Bush's leading the way in that regard.
I voted for President Bush and am a Republican, just to be square here.
4. Posted by -S- | August 24, 2005 12:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 24, 2005 12:16
5. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 24, 2005 12:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RE: -S-'s post (August 24, 2005 12:16 PM)
Wow, five percent of Wizbang would vote for Tancredo. Very interesting.
What percent were you expecting?
I'm one of those 5%ers. Tancredo seems like a sincere, serious, passionate guy without all of the historical political maneuverings typical of most candidates - at least as far as I know. I'm not saying that is necessarily good or bad from a political machine or electability POV. It's just that he seems like a typical American who seems to have a love of country and isn't too full of himself. Call it a gut reaction. Further, he isn't a Senator who has to defend every last motion or vote (the death knell for so many), and he has proven his independence from both Right and Left dogma.
I like Giuliani and Rice as well, so either of them would be good choices too. However, to make sure the conservative gene pool remains viable, a little outside influence that maintains the common touch is always desirable. Gingrich is a brilliant idea man, but he has too much baggage and will present too easy a target to smear however unjustified.
Oh yeah, and then there's that illegal immigration issue... THE issue of the upcoming elections. Tancredo is the premier advocate of changing the nation's policies and has not played any political correctness games to advance it. That earns points and shows that he has a pair. I figure him to be a walk-softly-but-carry-a-big-stick kind of guy.
Jeez, you'd think I was on his steering committee.
5. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 24, 2005 12:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 24, 2005 12:58
6. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 24, 2005 3:54 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Obviously I'm not on Tancredo's campaign troupe. Yikes. About that record thing, he certainly has a Congressional one, just not a Senatorial one. What was I thinking?
6. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | August 24, 2005 3:54 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 24, 2005 15:54