« Kyl and Kohl Play Nicely | Main | Washington's Katrina Fiasco To Cost Taxpayers Millions »

Feinstein Not Formidable

Dianne Feinstein does her darndest to look silly by spending most of her allotted time asking about toads and women jokes.

Perhaps the saddest part of the exchange was when she opened with a question about Roberts' notorious, "sexist" joke, first freaked out about by the Washington Post:

In a July 31, 1985, memo, Roberts noted that, as an assistant dean at the University of Richmond law school before she joined the Reagan administration, Arey had "encouraged many former homemakers to enter law school and become lawyers." Roberts said in his memo that he saw no legal objection to her taking part in the Clairol contest. Then he added a personal aside: "Some might question whether encouraging homemakers to become lawyers contributes to the common good, but I suppose that is for the judges to decide."

And we're the humorless conservatives, right? Seriously, this was clearly a lawyer joke, not a slight of women. I can't tell you how ridiculous it looked for Feinstein to follow a line of questioning that required him to explain this fact to her. I think she realized that about halfway through Roberts' answer (which was essentially, "duh, that was a joke" in nicer terms), because she started saying "well, I don't want to belabor it."

Translation: "Ummm, this is making me look rather humorless and foolish, as well as having the effect of making my case against you look increasingly weak, so let's back this train up, shall we?"

Feinstein also harped on a couple of other writings Roberts has done, which as far as I can tell, she deemed kind of mean. She wondered aloud if his writings represented an acerbic pen or something more sinister...(perhaps a hatred of women? Hmmm?!?).

She then asked about Roberts' "hapless toad" comments from a commerce clause case with regard to the Endangered Species Act. Lesson to be learned: asking a Supreme Court nominee about a lawyer joke and a toad does not make one look like a formidable senator.

Preospective Round 2 Question from Feinstein:

"So, Judge Roberts, let's go over this one more time. Because you will be taking a life appointment on this all-important bench, I simply must insist that you explain to me one more time--what is it that comes after "knock, knock" and what are the implications of that on Roe v. Wade?"

Update: The Corner finds Feinstein's facts are also less than formidable.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Feinstein Not Formidable:

» Secure Liberty linked with Roberts Cruises

Comments (7)

"...and, of course, you mus... (Below threshold)

"...and, of course, you must answer our Very Serious Questions about why the chicken crossed the road, and how it might contribute to the legal precedent of Roe v. Wade v. Walk."

Feinstein: The Homer Simpso... (Below threshold)
Ed:

Feinstein: The Homer Simpson of the U.S. Senate.

Give Feinstein a break. Sh... (Below threshold)

Give Feinstein a break. She is upset about Murray, Boxer and now Landreau get all the votes for dumbest female senator. She is back in the running now.

Feinstein: "Vat iss ze big... (Below threshold)

Feinstein: "Vat iss ze big joke?"

Roberts: "I can only give you my name, rank, and why did the chicken cross the road?"

Feinstein: "Ach! Zat iss not FUNNY!"

That's outrageous, a... (Below threshold)


That's outrageous, a sense of humor!?! ;-)

In the last few days I've heard some of the comments and sound bytes from Pelosi, Kennedy, and yesterday, Joe Biden.

These three are absolutely incorrigible. They truly no limits of indecency. Despicable.


Chris
http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/

I hadn't been watching/read... (Below threshold)
BR:

I hadn't been watching/reading any Roberts coverage because I knew it would be the usual dem circus, but I'm glad I read this thread - you guys and gals above are tooo funnyyy!

But what do gum owners have to do with chickens?! Can chickens wade across the roe'd and chew gum at the same time?

How weird, I could have swo... (Below threshold)
BR:

How weird, I could have sworn there was a post about gum owners just before mine... now it's gone ?




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy