A while ago, I wrote a piece where I collected links to a bunch of the various outrageous statements Cindy Sheehan has made. I didn't judge her; I simply cited her own words, then stood back and let them do all the work.
In the wake of Hurricane Katrina pushing her off the national stage, she appears to have grown more and more out of touch with reality. And her handlers and exploiters have done nothing, simply letting the train wreck continue.
Apparently in the spirit of "if you can't beat it, join it," their latest attempt to regain prominence is to hitch their wagon to Hurricane Katrina. And Mrs. Sheehan is shouting loudly, finding any excuse to blame President Bush for all that is wrong and evil and just plain bad about it.
Even to the point of singling out one thing that nearly everyone else agrees is a good thing.
I don't care if a human being is black, brown, white, yellow or pink. I don't care if a human being is Christian, Muslim, Jew, Buddhist, or pagan. I don't care what flag a person salutes: if a human being is hungry, then it is up to another human being to feed him/her. George Bush needs to stop talking, admit the mistakes of his all around failed administration, pull our troops out of occupied New Orleans and Iraq, and excuse his self from power. The only way America will become more secure is if we have a new administration that cares about Americans even if they don't fall into the top two percent of the wealthiest.
The military, nearly everyone agrees, has been the only body that has shone in the wake of Katrina. But not Mrs. Sheehan.
Comments (44)
Well at least she's consist... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Meezer | September 17, 2005 7:45 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well at least she's consistant. It does seem like she's working hard to get to that top 2%, herself.
1. Posted by Meezer | September 17, 2005 7:45 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 07:45
2. Posted by Lew Clark | September 17, 2005 8:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah,
But she has moved out of "Occupied Crawford". I wonder if her exit from Texas has anything to do with our 70,000 new residents that have a different opinion of George Bush than she does.
2. Posted by Lew Clark | September 17, 2005 8:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 08:23
3. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 9:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
We've observed the whole transformation:
Passive Activism -> Sympathetic Figure -> Public Activism -> Desperate Activism -> Moonbatism -> Nuts, just plain Nuts
Let's see who finances her speaking tours or cameos now.
3. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 9:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 09:02
4. Posted by spurwing plover | September 17, 2005 9:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ms sheehan has discovered a big wind bigger then all the hot air that her and her freinds at camp crazy has taken her right off the big time news too bad
4. Posted by spurwing plover | September 17, 2005 9:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 09:27
5. Posted by McGehee | September 17, 2005 9:54 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Darth Rove strikes again. She really should've used mylar in her hat instead of mere supermarket tinfoil.
5. Posted by McGehee | September 17, 2005 9:54 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 09:54
6. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 10:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The real story to me is why the "elite media" has stopped covering her. Especially as they covered her almost exclusively for several weeks. Everyone with half a brain knew who and what whe was long ago. Now that it is so blatant, even the elite media has abandoned her. What does that say for the elite media? I cannot call them MSM anymore. They are NOT mainstrean. They are only "elite" in their owm minds.
6. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 10:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 10:13
7. Posted by Jim | September 17, 2005 10:19 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The sad little woman has had a taste of fame and liked it. With the hurricane pushing her out of the news she had to say something insane like that to get back into the news.
I am not sure if she is nuts or is actually so stupid she believes what she says.
7. Posted by Jim | September 17, 2005 10:19 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 10:19
8. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 10:31 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jim, does it really matter. Either way she has lost all credibility. That is if you thought she had any to begin with. Poor woman, she really has lost it.
8. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 10:31 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 10:31
9. Posted by Zsa Zsa | September 17, 2005 10:38 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Cindy Sheehan Sucks!...If you will pardon the expression?
9. Posted by Zsa Zsa | September 17, 2005 10:38 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 10:38
10. Posted by Todd | September 17, 2005 10:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Give an idiot a stage and enough time and they will make a fool out of themselves. She has...
10. Posted by Todd | September 17, 2005 10:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 10:56
11. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 11:06 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have made a fool out of myself many times during my lifetime. But this poor woman has completely lost her mind. She has become so pathetic I no longer dislike her. I just feel sorry for her.
11. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 11:06 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 11:06
12. Posted by the wolf | September 17, 2005 11:39 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ntv--The MSM has stopped covering her (for the moment) because her associations have gotten quite a bit more sinister. Read Power Line:
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011697.php
Once she resurfaces in the media, her new associations will be quickly forgotten.
12. Posted by the wolf | September 17, 2005 11:39 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 11:39
13. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 11:42 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RE: NtvAmrcn's post (September 17, 2005 11:06 AM)
...But this poor woman has completely lost her mind. She has become so pathetic I no longer dislike her. I just feel sorry for her.
My swing in sentiment is just the reverse. I had empathy, initially, which turned to disgust as she exploited her son's death. There's a method to her "madness" as she presses her increasingly irrelevant memes. She'll be marching in NY (this w/e I believe) and the Katrina disaster expunged her from the front page to her certain disappointment. To attract the swarm that abandoned her during summer doldrums to cover the storm, she must become more shrill. Her handlers certainly suggested she try to work in Katrina to keep her relevant and to hit the contemporaneous keywords needed for timely exposure.
As you might notice, I have but disdain for this evolving charlatan. She'll have her audience and hopefully they'll find solace (and hopefully no coin) in their moonbattery. Fortunately, rational people will move forward, solve problems to the best of their abilities, and shake their heads at the growing trainwreck ever grateful they weren't aboard.
13. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 11:42 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 11:42
14. Posted by Michael Gersh | September 17, 2005 11:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Wait a minute. We have got this all wrong. What the poor demented Ms. She-Hen is saying is that she wants to see Dick Cheney elevated to the presidency. That is what the result would be if Bush resigns or is removed from office.
Of course, I am assuming that she knows what the hell she is saying in the first place. Which assumes facts not in evidence....
14. Posted by Michael Gersh | September 17, 2005 11:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 11:56
15. Posted by Jim | September 17, 2005 11:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I just went to Michael Mooreon's site to checkout what Cindy was writing and the idiot is actually complaining about the people beind 'forced' to leave. She said "The people in LA who were displaced have nice, if modest homes that are perfectly fine. I wonder why the government made them leave at great expense and uproot families who have been living in their communities for generations."
Gads, this woman is beneath contempt! The government forced them to leave????
The woman is not only stupid, but she is dishonest.
15. Posted by Jim | September 17, 2005 11:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 11:56
16. Posted by wavemaker | September 17, 2005 12:01 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The MSM's initial attraction to, increasing celebritization of, and subsequent abandonment of Cindy Sheehan reminds me very much of Franz Kafka's A Hunger Artist.
16. Posted by wavemaker | September 17, 2005 12:01 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 12:01
17. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 12:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Perhaps the wall-to-wall Sheehan coverage was also the answer to an MSM prayer: "Please Gaia, take the blogosphere's attention off Plame/Wilson, Judith Miller, Air America and Able Danger before we're called the ex-MSM !"
17. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 12:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 12:18
18. Posted by Faith+1 | September 17, 2005 12:36 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
She didn't just go nuts. She always was. Her track record of being a moonbat precedes her son's death. I was never sympathetic to her. She exploited her son's death for her own pseudo-fame. To me, she actually comes across as glad her son was killed because it gave her a reason to get in front of a mike and camera.
She's just a pethetic waste of a human.
18. Posted by Faith+1 | September 17, 2005 12:36 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 12:36
19. Posted by OregonMuse | September 17, 2005 12:44 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The real story to me is why the "elite media" has stopped covering her. Especially as they covered her almost exclusively for several weeks. Everyone with half a brain knew who and what whe was long ago. Now that it is so blatant, even the elite media has abandoned her. What does that say for the elite media?
Actually, it says that August is a slow news month. This is why Mrs. Sheehan's PR handlers blitzed the media during that month and not at some other time. Notice what has happened now that the MSM has real news to deal with, like Katrina and the Roberts hearings. Cindy has been pushed right off the radar screen and she's is resorting to saying more and more loopier things in order to try to get back into the spotlight. Her 15 minutes are up and she knows it.
19. Posted by OregonMuse | September 17, 2005 12:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 12:44
20. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 12:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Wavemaker, thanks for the literary reference :)
I went and read it here just now, and what a stunning comparison to the Sheehan circus!
20. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 12:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 12:52
21. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 1:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
OregonMuse,
If that is the best they can come up with, my unsaid contention is correct. There has been plenty of real news all along. It is just not covered by the "elite media". And Mrs. Sheehan has become an embarrasment for them and none of them are going to touch her now with the proverbial "ten foot pole". She is toast. Done.
The real beauty of this is that the "elite media" is toast too. It might take a few years, but they are toast. Nobody believes them anymore. At least nobody who reads a little. And that number is growing daily!!!
21. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 1:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 13:42
22. Posted by Les Nessman | September 17, 2005 1:45 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
NtvAmrcn
' I cannot call them MSM anymore. They are NOT mainstream. '
Perhaps we should start referring to them as the ' Exempt Media ', since they are exempt from the Campaign Finance Reform laws and exempt from a lot of the other rules that the rest of us must follow. Captain's Quarters blog calls them the Exempt Media and I think that's a good term.
22. Posted by Les Nessman | September 17, 2005 1:45 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 13:45
23. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 2:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hee, Les, I've been noticing more and more people are looking for an improvement to the "MSM" acronym, needing a stronger expression, almost like a barometer of our frustration with them. In a comment at Macsmind, a long-time newspaperman, Ron Franscell, wrote:
"...Clearly, things have changed. The idealism of young journalists has lost its edge, the world doesn't care too much what we say anymore, and the typewriter is a dusty decoration on my credenza. And now I -- and many like me -- have been demoted from "knight" to "MSM." This blogging acronym for "mainstream media" oozes a certain flippant disrespect, as if a life in journalism is not merely the least qualification for a blogger, but might even connote to Blogospherians an intolerable cowardice, arrogance or treachery."
[End of excerpt - it's worth reading his whole comment.
It was in this section at Macsmind.blogspot.com.]
My feeling on "Exempt Media" is that the left will take it literally and believe they have carte blanche to say anything as usual, without scrutiny or restraint, exempt from all discipline. I'm leaning more towards the concept of ex-mainstream, or XMSM, or has-been MSM, something like that. At least until they've gotten their ethics straightened up enough to rejoin the human race and provide a valuable, desired product.
23. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 2:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 14:21
24. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 3:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RE: BR's post (September 17, 2005 02:21 PM)
...I'm leaning more towards the concept of ex-mainstream, or XMSM, or has-been MSM, something like that...
XMSM seems apropos. Or how about Sidestream Media? Media that is becoming a smokescreen of decreasing volume and of increasing toxicity.
24. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 3:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 15:26
25. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 3:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hi there, AD!
I get such a sense of relief when someone says it...
exactly!
"Smokescreen of decreasing volume and of increasing
toxicity"
Now you've tickled the rhyming imp in me :)
Sidestream Media
Slimestream Media...
Hee hee.
25. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 3:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 15:40
26. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 3:54 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
AnonymousDrivel,
" I had empathy, initially, which turned to disgust as she exploited her son's death. "
That is the way I felt for a long time at first. Then I felt the same discust as you. But now, I just feel sorry for her. Like I say, and maybe I'm wrong, The poor woman has simply lost her mind and is allowing those "handlers" to take over her life. Notwithstanding, her life was pretty much the same before her son was killed as it is now. At least that is what I think now.
26. Posted by NtvAmrcn | September 17, 2005 3:54 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 15:54
27. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 4:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh, this is funny. I just Googled XMSM and came up with all sorts of gobbledygook - looks like it might be related to some sort of disease! XMSM = sick MSM :) Soon to be the late MSM if not cured!
However, the site name XMSM.com is still for sale... :)
27. Posted by BR | September 17, 2005 4:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 16:00
28. Posted by Mr. Snitch! | September 17, 2005 5:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hey there Les - re MSM, that never was such a well-targeted moniker... how about Commercial Media?
28. Posted by Mr. Snitch! | September 17, 2005 5:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 17:29
29. Posted by Laurence Simon | September 17, 2005 6:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Is her divorce final, or does her husband still have the power to have her committed?
29. Posted by Laurence Simon | September 17, 2005 6:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 18:03
30. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 8:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RE: BR's impishness (September 17, 2005 03:40 PM)
Now you've tickled the rhyming imp in me...
Imp? Ha! I fear I've awakened a sleeping giant. ;)
30. Posted by AnonymousDrivel | September 17, 2005 8:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 20:00
31. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
My reaction/response to/about Sheehan was parallel with that expressed by AnonymousDrivel, early in this thread.
Without any knowledge of what she intended, represented, whatever, I responded initially to a crying middle aged woman on the news with compassion and sympathy, from a point of humanity alone.
THEN I listened to what she was saying and found nearly all of it self pitying and worse, irrational. THEN I read about the groups and interests involved that had made her a media presence and was repulsed. Repulsed by Sheehan as a human being, repulsed that she would use the life of her now deceased son, who served in the military voluntarily and appears to have not had reservations about his service there, to promote her own emotional chaos and disorder...
She just seemed and certainly does now to be a person who is extremely self centered. Thus, tears about anything, aggression when denied the attention she seems to assume is deserved her (she's "a mother"), irrational statements about our country and leadership...
She seemed and still does to categorize all the worst things that the Secret Service needs to keep a focus and handle on in our world. Cindy Sheehan has always impressed me as threat level one and from types like that, you can expect any and all possible affiliation and damage to and about others. And that includes, most awfully, her own son becauase Sheehan has done more to negate and denigrate his life than anyone else could ever or would ever do, save but for the Al Qaeda, some in Iran and elsewhere.
She reminds me of cancer.
31. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 22:19
32. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why not refer to "them" as Media X?
XM
MX
I've never cared for the "mainstream media" nomer because I've never considered MSNBC, CBS, the wire services and ABC, NBC to be "mainstream."
They have ALWAYS been excessively angled, in my experience. And many people have ALWAYS regarded them so.
It's just that doing what XM does and does well (unless and until exposed as doing), they use their monopoly of resources and utilities to ridicule to the point of exhaustion people who have attempted to expose their deeds, or even discuss them.
Which is another reason that I think it's not productive to mirror their behaviors in new media, especially the blogosphere. Because it's the moral depravity model that XM/MX has used since just about Watergate times...under the guise of being "new," XM/MX simply became more adept at covert espionage to and about social (mostly) and politico-economic memes (to assist the social) interests.
I guess I should include the BBC in that list of the XM/MX group, what with Murdoch's recent statements confirming the obvious.
32. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 22:30
33. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
XM = "sick media"...works to my read.
The "MSM" is wrong on so many levels but first as an acronym because "mainstream media" is only two words, none of which begin with an "S" such that the "MSM" acronym is misleading on a literary sense alone.
MXM also works well...as in, "Media Not/None/Without Media."
33. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 22:35
34. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
XM = "sick media"...works to my read.
The "MSM" is wrong on so many levels but first as an acronym because "mainstream media" is only two words, none of which begin with an "S" such that the "MSM" acronym is misleading on a literary sense alone.
MXM also works well...as in, "Media Not/None/Without Media."
34. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 17, 2005 22:35
35. Posted by -S- | September 17, 2005 10:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)