« Crime and punishment, Boston-style | Main | About 12,000 words worth of commentary... »

Quote Of The Day - Historical Context Edition

"It is also interesting, historically ... Of the 110 people who have sat on the Supreme Court, only half have been sitting judges when selected ... History is filled with people with backgrounds similar to Harriet Miers."

NBC's Tim Russert, on Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers. Whether or not she becomes the 111th to be seated is now the question.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Quote Of The Day - Historical Context Edition:

» Overtaken by Events linked with So I Married a Supreme Court Justice

» Reaganites Unite! linked with Bush Picks Harriet Miers, Drudge Says SHE'S A Dem!

» ReidBlog linked with It's Annoy a Conservative Day!

Comments (11)

A frequent commenter here, ... (Below threshold)
Mark:

A frequent commenter here, "Ed," has suggested several times that legal training is not, or should not be, a prerequisite for people who earn a living interpreting the Consitution. In his view, "above average intelligence" and the ability to "think critically" suffice.

I'm curious to know his views on whether prior bench experience, or even prior legal experience, are valuable or important credentials for a Supreme Court nominee? Would "Ed" put a non-lawyer on the court?

Mark said:"I'm cur... (Below threshold)

Mark said:

"I'm curious to know (Ed's) views on whether prior bench experience, or even prior legal experience, are valuable or important credentials for a Supreme Court nominee? Would "Ed" put a non-lawyer on the court?"


I'm not Ed, nor do I play him on t.v., but IMHO, the answers to your questions should be no and yes, respectively. At least when it pertains to interpreting the Constitution, which is one of the simplest and easiest to read documents I've ever come across. Interpreting the tortuous and convoluted logic our esteemed congresscritters use to craft our nation's laws is something else entirely.

To Tim Russert:

So you like Harriet Miers. That just warms the cockles of my heart.

Of the 110 people who have ... (Below threshold)
Wayne:

Of the 110 people who have sat on the Supreme Court, only half have been sitting judges when selected

Sound like one of those misleading stats to me. Out of the 110 judges, how many were never a judge?

Wayne,That's the w... (Below threshold)
Mark:

Wayne,

That's the way I read it, too. In other words, "how many had no judging experience whatsoever at any time prior to their nomination?" That's a different question from, "how many were not sitting when selected." I suspect the answers are different, but I don't know.

Hmmmm.I'm not "Ed"... (Below threshold)
ed:

Hmmmm.

I'm not "Ed" but my opinion is that to nominate a non-lawyer you'd have to have someone who would have a Spine of Iron and a willingness to fight anyone and everyone over every single detail. And even then you're talking about someone who would largely be at a huge disadvantage when it comes to the internal debate within the Supreme Court.

And let's face facts here. This is yet another backstab by Bush and the GOP towards conservatives.

I've repeated myself many times. I've had some people call me a shill for the DU. But twenty-five years of carrying the GOP on our backs and we get Roberts and Miers?

Yeah I'm really f-ing rewarded now.

COME ON NOW! CAN'T YOU SEE ... (Below threshold)
oliver bush:

COME ON NOW! CAN'T YOU SEE WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? THE SUPREME COURT IS JUST ANOTHER POKER GAME TO SMIRKY MCCHIMPLERBURTON. MIZ HARRIET IS A BLUFF. SHE WON'T GET CONFIRMED IN A MILLION YEARS. IF SHE DOES, PRETZEL BOY WINS. SHE IS HIS MOST LOYAL ASSOCIATE. IF SHE DOESN'T GET CONFIRMED, (MOST LIKELY) THE AWOL TANGSTER STILL WINS. THE GOP WILL DELAY THE NEXT NOMINEE'S CONFIRMATION - UNTIL SWAGGERING SMIRKSTER CAN RAM SOMEBODY LIKE PAT ROBERTSON OR JOHN ASHCROFT THRU WITH A "RECESS APPOINTMENT". WITH THE COURT SO PACKED, BUSH WILL THEN HAVE THE POWER TO OVERTURN THE PRESIDENTIAL TERM LIMIT ORDNANCES, AND THEN SELECT HIMSELF FOR HIS THIRD CONSECUTIVE (STOLEN) TERM.

BUSH HAS THE NUTS ON THIS ONE, FOLKS.

--
OHB

[email protected]

I find it amusing that thos... (Below threshold)
Matt:

I find it amusing that those who are bleating because Bush didn't select a known contructionist are also complaining because she hasn't been a judge. The founding fathers apparently didn't think it was necessary to reserve SCOTUS appointments for members of the legal industry.

As to interpreting the drivel that comes out of Congress, just give me a good critical thinker, esteemed member of the bar, or not.

<a href="http://www.thegrea... (Below threshold) Not "Ed" but ed:Wh... (Below threshold)
Mark:

Not "Ed" but ed:

What concerns you about Roberts?

In my opinion, his liberal critics don't understand the constitutionaly prescribed role of the Supreme Court.

What are the conservative criticisms? --and how can they be reconciled with the role of the court?

Hmmmm."What concer... (Below threshold)
ed:

Hmmmm.

"What concerns you about Roberts?"

Roberts is supposed to be a solid conservative. Yet when he was questioned he stated emphatically that all of the work he did as a lawyer, in furtherance of conservative issues, was on behalf of his clients and did NOT reflect his own beliefs.

Roberts is supposed to be a solid conservative. Yet Roberts has *never*, not once, ever chosen to support a conservative issue by way of pro bono work. On the other hand Roberts has several times supported liberal groups with pro bono work.

If you can find me any instances of where Roberts, when given a free choice, has supported conservatives then please list them. All of the ones I've been able to find were when he was acting as a lawyer on his client's behalf.

This does NOT scream "conservative" to me.

Please tell me that Cousin ... (Below threshold)
bws:

Please tell me that Cousin Oliver's comments were intended as humor/parody.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy