I've always been skeptical of Obama's "consensus-building" skills, wondering how he'll be able to bridge the divide between Republicans and Democrats when it seems as if he's unable to bridge the divide between Democrats.
1:40 PM |
5 comments
Republicans are willing to put American lives in peril in order to protect their pals in the energy industries.
12:06 PM |
6 comments
Drew Barrymore and Justin Long have broken up, her rep confirms to PEOPLE. "I can confirm the split with no additional comment," said the spokesperson. Barrymore, 33, and Long,...
8:12 AM |
0 comments
Jennifer Aniston is reping Smart Water and her latest billboard has gone up on Sunset blvd....
7:59 AM |
0 comments
Former ESPN stars Keith Olbermann and Dan Patrick will reunite in September to call highlights for NBC's "Football Night in America" on Sundays. Olbermann and Patrick are legendary in...
7:58 AM |
4 comments
Oscar-winner Nicole Kidman gave birth on Monday to her first biological child, a daughter named Sunday fathered by her husband and country music star Keith Urban. Earlier this morning,...
7:34 AM |
0 comments
Matthew McConaughey and Camila Alves welcomed their first child into the world Monday afternoon in Los Angeles, his rep confirmed to Usmagazine.com. Alves, 24, gave birth to the as-yet-unnamed...
7:17 AM |
0 comments
The AFL-CIO officially endorsed Senator Barack of Illinois for president after representatives of the 56 member unions representing 10.5 million members voted on the General Board. During the primary process, these 56 member unions were split among support for Obama,...
6:33 PM |
7 comments
Just like Kobe Bryant did when he was caught cheating on his wife. But apparently the New York Yankees $350-million man Alex Rodriguez's didn't figure that out as his wife...
1:30 PM |
1 comments
Before your next party, consult the latest edition of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, which now includes edamame (immature green soybeans), pescatarian (a vegetarian who eats fish), prosecco (a sparkling Italian...
7:36 AM |
0 comments
Comments (9)
I saw this live on the news... (Below threshold)1. Posted by caltechgirl | October 21, 2005 2:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I saw this live on the news and laughed my butt off. It was unreal.
1. Posted by caltechgirl | October 21, 2005 2:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 02:25
2. Posted by Adam | October 21, 2005 8:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yes, we Farkers can be a little mean ;)
Of course, it only requires about two months of constant Fark viewing to learn all of our cliches -- but at least you can see how they come about :D
2. Posted by Adam | October 21, 2005 8:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 08:27
3. Posted by BlogDog | October 21, 2005 9:04 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Somebody got paid for writing that?
Makes my blogging read like Faulkner.
3. Posted by BlogDog | October 21, 2005 9:04 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 09:04
4. Posted by andy | October 21, 2005 9:37 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
While it's inane to us, I still think the average person probably doesn't know much about blogs. I've often asked people in real life if they happened to see something on Instapundit, and they just stare at me blankly. So, I won't be too harsh on the guy.
I will however be harsh on the commenter at the blog that said " Very nice first blog." Uh, all he said was "Hello world!" and announced whose blog it was. Why, I bet that took tons of effort to craft so precisely and eloquently. Very nice indeed!
And, hey, are you suggesting that picture sharing isn't fun? :)
4. Posted by andy | October 21, 2005 9:37 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 09:37
5. Posted by McGehee | October 21, 2005 10:15 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Apparently a new wrinkle at Ric's blog:
Comments on this blog are restricted to team members.
Dang -- and I was hoping he;d explain to me this newfangled "television" thing.
5. Posted by McGehee | October 21, 2005 10:15 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 10:15
6. Posted by No One of Consequence | October 21, 2005 10:51 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did anyone notice the date on those blog posts? They're two and a half months old! Either that, or there's a severe system clock error somewhere.
6. Posted by No One of Consequence | October 21, 2005 10:51 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 10:51
7. Posted by Mr. F. | October 21, 2005 4:36 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"...we Farkers..
Oh dear God, that makes blogs sound like online clubs. What's the special handshake? Two long double clicks of your mouse, followed by 3 short ones? It's the ultimate in geek fiefdom.
Oh brother...
7. Posted by Mr. F. | October 21, 2005 4:36 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 16:36
8. Posted by Jeff | October 21, 2005 4:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I missed the disclaimer in his story:
"Now, I am not an expert with computers, so I asked a friend that works for AOL to help me..."
8. Posted by Jeff | October 21, 2005 4:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 16:57
9. Posted by chris holland | October 21, 2005 5:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
as mentioned on the blog entry you link to, kabc came over and shot their bit back in august. the purpose of the "exercise" was to briefly show what blogs were, and how easy it was to put one "out there". nothing more.
I guess one of their producers stumbled upon my blog, and asked whether i'd help them with illustrative fodder for a story they were looking to do on that blogging thing.
being the sucker for 5 seconds of fame that i am, i accepted. duh.
While they were shooting, i posted those 2 cheesy blog entries on their behalf as part of the exercise.
This wasn't by any stretch of the imagination meant to be any attempt at kabc's big foray onto t3h "blogosphere", or any attempt at displaying online journalistic prowess.
We might have made the blog more personal and called it "rick's blog" instead of "kabc". We didn't exactly have all day to weigh out the options, some of us do have a daytime job. All they wanted to do was show how easy it was to just "put stuff out there", and that's exactly what we did during the exercise.
With all this said, it's indeed very funny to us geeks to see a local tv station "discovering" and doing a "special consumer coverage" on what many have been doing for years. I did try to convey a sense of "hey this has been going for quite a long time" during the interview, but that got largely scrapped. "Yesterday's news" doesn't exactly foster ratings: "coming-up next, we'll tell you about what you should already know! STAY TUNED and be sure to endure our commercials!". Shyeah.
But as another poster mentioned above, what may seem "so 5 years ago" to geeks, is actually, as inconceivable as it may seem, still new many, whose notion of media consumption is still stuck in the 1960's almighty broadcast era. Of those who have heard about blogging, many perceive this activity as the past-time of choice of a nerdy fringe. Seeing a famed news anchor guy, many grew-up watching on TV, "boldly" enter the blogosphere just might make them reconsider their position. Do we need more noise on the blogosphere? Some might argue we don't.
I argue that anything beats passive media consumption. When we start to write, no matter how dumb, silly, cheesy, uninteresting, nerdy it starts out ... or stays, we start to think.
Naive, low-brow bits on blogging such as this one that are likely to reach a wider audience, just may one day get us closer to a tipping point at which the whole concept of participatory culture turns into a profoundly society-changing pandemic.
Let your local tv station cash-in on the blogging-hype. It'll only help a wider audience realize that there is life beyond TV.
9. Posted by chris holland | October 21, 2005 5:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 17:39