The keys to Michael Jackson's kingdom have just been ripped from his mother's hands. Over the objections of Katherine Jackson, a Los Angeles probate judge today ruled that Michael...
1:54 PM |
1 comments
The fact that Barack Obama was elected President is a pretty clear indicator that Politics is not scientific. That is, with all due respect to the President, his resume was...
1:31 PM |
3 comments
8:05 AM |
1 comments
Karl Malden, the bulbous-nosed character actor who won a Best Supporting Oscar for his role as Mitch, the guiless suitor of Blanche DuBois in the 1951 classic A Street...
8:02 AM |
6 comments
Visitors to the Sears Tower's new glass balconies all seem to agree: The first step is the hardest. The balconies are suspended 1,353 feet in the air and jut...
7:50 AM |
0 comments
Angelina Jolie's was named highest-paid actress on Forbes' annual Celebrity 100 list. Coming in second behind Angie is Jennifer Aniston. Which would have the rag mags in a tizzy...
7:42 AM |
2 comments
It's still unclear what David Carradine was doing when he died, but a doctor knows what technically killed him. Having already ruled out suicide by hanging, the private pathologist...
7:37 AM |
2 comments
Dimension Films has acquired the remake rights to "An American Werewolf in London", John Landis' 1981 horror-comedy. Landis spoke to bloodydisgusting.com and said "Yes, Dimension is now in negotiation...
7:30 AM |
1 comments
article here!! Jackson was not the biological father of any of his three children, it was claimed yesterday - a revelation that may herald new complications in his family's...
10:06 PM |
4 comments
SELLER: Alan Jackson LOCATION: Moran Road, Franklin, TN PRICE: $38,000,000 SIZE: 19,000 square feet (approx.), 6 bedrooms, 7 full and 2 half bathrooms DESCRIPTION: Magnificent offering w/o compare. Bordered by...
7:57 AM |
1 comments
Comments (9)
I saw this live on the news... (Below threshold)1. Posted by caltechgirl | October 21, 2005 2:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I saw this live on the news and laughed my butt off. It was unreal.
1. Posted by caltechgirl | October 21, 2005 2:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 02:25
2. Posted by Adam | October 21, 2005 8:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yes, we Farkers can be a little mean ;)
Of course, it only requires about two months of constant Fark viewing to learn all of our cliches -- but at least you can see how they come about :D
2. Posted by Adam | October 21, 2005 8:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 08:27
3. Posted by BlogDog | October 21, 2005 9:04 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Somebody got paid for writing that?
Makes my blogging read like Faulkner.
3. Posted by BlogDog | October 21, 2005 9:04 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 09:04
4. Posted by andy | October 21, 2005 9:37 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
While it's inane to us, I still think the average person probably doesn't know much about blogs. I've often asked people in real life if they happened to see something on Instapundit, and they just stare at me blankly. So, I won't be too harsh on the guy.
I will however be harsh on the commenter at the blog that said " Very nice first blog." Uh, all he said was "Hello world!" and announced whose blog it was. Why, I bet that took tons of effort to craft so precisely and eloquently. Very nice indeed!
And, hey, are you suggesting that picture sharing isn't fun? :)
4. Posted by andy | October 21, 2005 9:37 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 09:37
5. Posted by McGehee | October 21, 2005 10:15 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Apparently a new wrinkle at Ric's blog:
Comments on this blog are restricted to team members.
Dang -- and I was hoping he;d explain to me this newfangled "television" thing.
5. Posted by McGehee | October 21, 2005 10:15 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 10:15
6. Posted by No One of Consequence | October 21, 2005 10:51 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did anyone notice the date on those blog posts? They're two and a half months old! Either that, or there's a severe system clock error somewhere.
6. Posted by No One of Consequence | October 21, 2005 10:51 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 10:51
7. Posted by Mr. F. | October 21, 2005 4:36 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"...we Farkers..
Oh dear God, that makes blogs sound like online clubs. What's the special handshake? Two long double clicks of your mouse, followed by 3 short ones? It's the ultimate in geek fiefdom.
Oh brother...
7. Posted by Mr. F. | October 21, 2005 4:36 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 16:36
8. Posted by Jeff | October 21, 2005 4:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I missed the disclaimer in his story:
"Now, I am not an expert with computers, so I asked a friend that works for AOL to help me..."
8. Posted by Jeff | October 21, 2005 4:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 16:57
9. Posted by chris holland | October 21, 2005 5:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
as mentioned on the blog entry you link to, kabc came over and shot their bit back in august. the purpose of the "exercise" was to briefly show what blogs were, and how easy it was to put one "out there". nothing more.
I guess one of their producers stumbled upon my blog, and asked whether i'd help them with illustrative fodder for a story they were looking to do on that blogging thing.
being the sucker for 5 seconds of fame that i am, i accepted. duh.
While they were shooting, i posted those 2 cheesy blog entries on their behalf as part of the exercise.
This wasn't by any stretch of the imagination meant to be any attempt at kabc's big foray onto t3h "blogosphere", or any attempt at displaying online journalistic prowess.
We might have made the blog more personal and called it "rick's blog" instead of "kabc". We didn't exactly have all day to weigh out the options, some of us do have a daytime job. All they wanted to do was show how easy it was to just "put stuff out there", and that's exactly what we did during the exercise.
With all this said, it's indeed very funny to us geeks to see a local tv station "discovering" and doing a "special consumer coverage" on what many have been doing for years. I did try to convey a sense of "hey this has been going for quite a long time" during the interview, but that got largely scrapped. "Yesterday's news" doesn't exactly foster ratings: "coming-up next, we'll tell you about what you should already know! STAY TUNED and be sure to endure our commercials!". Shyeah.
But as another poster mentioned above, what may seem "so 5 years ago" to geeks, is actually, as inconceivable as it may seem, still new many, whose notion of media consumption is still stuck in the 1960's almighty broadcast era. Of those who have heard about blogging, many perceive this activity as the past-time of choice of a nerdy fringe. Seeing a famed news anchor guy, many grew-up watching on TV, "boldly" enter the blogosphere just might make them reconsider their position. Do we need more noise on the blogosphere? Some might argue we don't.
I argue that anything beats passive media consumption. When we start to write, no matter how dumb, silly, cheesy, uninteresting, nerdy it starts out ... or stays, we start to think.
Naive, low-brow bits on blogging such as this one that are likely to reach a wider audience, just may one day get us closer to a tipping point at which the whole concept of participatory culture turns into a profoundly society-changing pandemic.
Let your local tv station cash-in on the blogging-hype. It'll only help a wider audience realize that there is life beyond TV.
9. Posted by chris holland | October 21, 2005 5:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 21, 2005 17:39