« Levelling the playing field | Main | Online Freedom Of Speech Action Alert »

Everybody was Kung-Fu Talking...

Years ago, I discovered a debate tactic that I utterly fell in love with. I've heard it most often called "verbal judo," but from my admittedly skimpy knowledge of martial arts, "verbal aikido" might be a better analogy. It involves taking your opponent's own words and actions and turning them back against them, much like a judo or aikido artist uses their opponent's strength and attacks against them.

It can be wonderfully fun, and I've indulged it quite a bit in the last few days. I took the liberals' own terms of highest praise, and found a way to apply them to President Bush. I perverted some of the arguments in favor of rights for illegal aliens into an endorsement of the 2nd Amendment. And this morning I took their despicable race-baiting against a black Republican and turned it into a threat to some of their staunchest supporters.

It's probably not a good idea to spell out one of my favorite tactics, but after a couple of people who usually agree with me questioned my sanity, I thought it might be safer to let the curtain slip a little.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Everybody was Kung-Fu Talking...:

» NIF linked with Blah Blah Blah

Comments (5)

It's a great tactic, and ev... (Below threshold)
LCVRWC:

It's a great tactic, and even better when you use their exact words. The Chinese students in Tienanmen Square (sp?), before the massacre, quoted Chairman Mao constantly.

I used to try to reason wit... (Below threshold)
Paul:

I used to try to reason with them. Then I tried use various analogies. Then I tried reason again.

Now I just call them a dumbass and move on.

I don't make many friends but it does wonders for the blood pressure. (smirk)

P

<a href="http://sharpmarble... (Below threshold)

This is a tactic I do all the time. It's fun to watch people wriggle and squirm as they try to justify why their positions are correct, even though I only changed a single word or two.

The danger in such a tactic... (Below threshold)
Faith+1:

The danger in such a tactic is to avoide appearing to just degenerating into a:

"I know you are but what am I?" or a "I'm rubber you're glue..." style of argument.

This is an example of Kant'... (Below threshold)
John:

This is an example of Kant's Categorical Imperative, stating (paraphrased) if a rule applies one way, it also applies the other way. It's nothing new, but it is effective at exposing the flaws in ones argument.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy