I've always been skeptical of Obama's "consensus-building" skills, wondering how he'll be able to bridge the divide between Republicans and Democrats when it seems as if he's unable to bridge the divide between Democrats.
1:40 PM |
5 comments
Republicans are willing to put American lives in peril in order to protect their pals in the energy industries.
12:06 PM |
6 comments
Drew Barrymore and Justin Long have broken up, her rep confirms to PEOPLE. "I can confirm the split with no additional comment," said the spokesperson. Barrymore, 33, and Long,...
8:12 AM |
0 comments
Jennifer Aniston is reping Smart Water and her latest billboard has gone up on Sunset blvd....
7:59 AM |
0 comments
Former ESPN stars Keith Olbermann and Dan Patrick will reunite in September to call highlights for NBC's "Football Night in America" on Sundays. Olbermann and Patrick are legendary in...
7:58 AM |
4 comments
Oscar-winner Nicole Kidman gave birth on Monday to her first biological child, a daughter named Sunday fathered by her husband and country music star Keith Urban. Earlier this morning,...
7:34 AM |
0 comments
Matthew McConaughey and Camila Alves welcomed their first child into the world Monday afternoon in Los Angeles, his rep confirmed to Usmagazine.com. Alves, 24, gave birth to the as-yet-unnamed...
7:17 AM |
0 comments
The AFL-CIO officially endorsed Senator Barack of Illinois for president after representatives of the 56 member unions representing 10.5 million members voted on the General Board. During the primary process, these 56 member unions were split among support for Obama,...
6:33 PM |
7 comments
Just like Kobe Bryant did when he was caught cheating on his wife. But apparently the New York Yankees $350-million man Alex Rodriguez's didn't figure that out as his wife...
1:30 PM |
1 comments
Before your next party, consult the latest edition of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, which now includes edamame (immature green soybeans), pescatarian (a vegetarian who eats fish), prosecco (a sparkling Italian...
7:36 AM |
0 comments
Comments (11)
What do you think will make... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Ztp | February 28, 2006 2:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What do you think will make them madder, the origional cartoons, or the fact that no matter how hard they try, we will not get upset over their attempts to infuriate us, as we have outrageous stuff in the media every day. Heck, we are the kings of outrageous publicity stunts.
1. Posted by Ztp | February 28, 2006 2:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 14:18
2. Posted by spacemonkey | February 28, 2006 2:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh, they know what infuriates us, but is it just my imagination or has there been a moratorium on beheadings?
2. Posted by spacemonkey | February 28, 2006 2:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 14:53
3. Posted by RA | February 28, 2006 3:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I am neutral on Israel and the Jews who support them. Yes, a lot of Arabs and Euopeans are anti-Semetic. But a majority of Israelis and American Jews are anti-Christian.
I do not see how the US is a safer place because of our support for Israel. In fact Americans are in far more danger because we support Israel. It would be smarter if we were neutral in this conflict. Cut off aid to Israel and all Arab states. Let them solve their own problems.
This would also help Christians in America. A lot of the Jewish money going to anti-Christian groups like the ACLU and NARAL would loose funding because American Jews would pick up the slack from our lack of foreign aid.
Backing Israel is a loosing proposition for all Americans.
3. Posted by RA | February 28, 2006 3:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 15:06
4. Posted by diversity day | February 28, 2006 3:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
loosing??
4. Posted by diversity day | February 28, 2006 3:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 15:48
5. Posted by jab | February 28, 2006 5:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RA, you say you're neutral on Israel, but your comments are anti-semitic. the USA will never turn it's back on Israel, and shouldn't. we've supported israel much longer than we've been in the war on terror. the terroists are coming after us, regardless of who we support, and isolationism, is not the answer.
5. Posted by jab | February 28, 2006 5:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 17:00
6. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | February 28, 2006 5:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RA, you must know a whole different (or no) species of Israeli than I.
In fact, I suspect you pronounce that certain word as joooo.
6. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | February 28, 2006 5:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 17:09
7. Posted by SilverBubble | February 28, 2006 5:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What's up with all the Christian babies' blood? I thought they drank Palestinian babies' blood! Can't they get their lies straight anymore?
7. Posted by SilverBubble | February 28, 2006 5:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 17:59
8. Posted by crosscheck | February 28, 2006 6:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Let them solve their own problems"
Seems to me that Israel can solve its own problems rather well. They are surrounded by enemies who cannot solve their own problems no matter how much assistance they are given. They aren't able to form a stable economy, much less an adequate military, and know that Israel could crush them at will as they did in the past. One scenario, albeit an unlikely one: Hamas attacks Israel, Israel utterly destroys the palestnians, Iran attacks Israel and the US in response (because we support Israel), US in turn wipes out Iran and any local players stupid enough to interfere. After all, the US military isn't necessarily 'stretched thin' in the Iraq war - we're playing nice and trying to build something of value in the region, which is pretty much the last resort after diplomacy and foreign aid failed for the last 40 years. That effort is expensive and time consuming, as nation-building tends to be. Destroying a nation is much easier, cheaper and faster than tearing it down, occupying and rebuilding it. If nukes were to be involved, history is on our side; the US only used nukes to end a war - Iran wants to use nukes to start one. Big difference.
8. Posted by crosscheck | February 28, 2006 6:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 18:29
9. Posted by kurt | February 28, 2006 6:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You do realize these are not the cartoons solicited as retaliation for the Danish cartoons. These were solicted (by Israelis) as retaliation for the retaliation.
The link you provide does not go to those "fight[ing] back against one Danish newspaper."
9. Posted by kurt | February 28, 2006 6:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 18:34
10. Posted by Synova | February 28, 2006 7:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think kurt has it right. Didn't Iran solicit anti-Semitic cartoons to make a point? And instead of getting offended and angry people said, hey, we can do better ones, just watch...
The one linked to above made me laugh too. Out loud even. ;-)
10. Posted by Synova | February 28, 2006 7:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 19:08
11. Posted by Daniel | February 28, 2006 9:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, I'm with kurt and Synova... that's about what I heard.
11. Posted by Daniel | February 28, 2006 9:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 28, 2006 21:21