« Breaking News: Judge Considering Moussaoui Mistrial | Main | What the hell does it take to get locked up in Massachusetts? »

DPW Terminals Deal May Not Be Over Yet

Updated

Senator Bill Frist says that if an American buyer can not be found to purchase DPW's stake in US terminals, the DPW deal may still go through:

Congress will closely watch a Dubai-owned company to be sure it transfers its U.S. port operations to an American company, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said Sunday.


But Frist, R-Tenn., acknowledged that if an American buyer is not found, and the Bush administration determines there are no security risks, a deal for DP World to manage and operate major U.S. ports still could go through.

"If everything that the president, the administration has said, and that is that there is absolutely no threatening or jeopardy to our security and safety of the American people ... I don't see how the deal would have to be canceled," Frist said on ABC's "This Week."

And Dubai Ports World is trying a PR push:

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates: A group representing U.S. companies in the United Arab Emirates said it would invite Oprah Winfrey and other U.S. talk show hosts to the Gulf to try to alter American public opinion, which helped block Dubai's takeover of five U.S. ports.


The American Business Group of Abu Dhabi, which has more than 500 members including Boeing and Exxon Mobil, wants Winfrey to do her show from the Gulf sheikdom as it seeks to persuade Americans that the country is not a threat to national security, Kevin Massengill, a board member of the group said by telephone Saturday from Abu Dhabi.

"We want to reach out to the average guy in the U.S. and explain why the U.A.E. is important," said Massengill, a former adviser to the U.S. Embassy in Abu Dhabi.

The UAE is also considering converting its holdings from dollars to euros:

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- The central bank governor of the United Arab Emirates suggested the country may switch up to 10% of its $22.5 billion in currency reserves into euros, in a sign of fallout from Congress' hostility to the acquisition of some U.S. ports by a Dubai-based firm.

Hat tip: The American Thinker

AJ Strata is blogging about this as well.

Update: Even though Dubai Ports World said it would sell its stake in terminals in the US, said that it will not immediately sell its interest in a terminal in Miami:

The Dubai-owned company that promised to surrender its U.S. port operations has no immediate plans to sell its U.S. subsidiary's interests at Miami's seaport, a senior executive wrote Monday in a private e-mail to business associates.


Even if DP World were to sell its Miami operations to quell the congressional furor over an Arab-owned company managing major U.S. ports, "that would probably take a while," wrote Robert Scavone, a vice president for DP World's U.S. subsidiary.

The e-mail, obtained by The Associated Press, added to questions raised since DP World's announcement last week that it will divest U.S. port operations it acquired when it bought London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DPW Terminals Deal May Not Be Over Yet:

» Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with Frist: Ports Deal Could Work Without Buyer

Comments (5)

Maybe now that Congress has... (Below threshold)

Maybe now that Congress has *won* they'll sit back and be objective about it.

....and that is that there ... (Below threshold)
Rich:

....and that is that there is absolutely no threatening or jeopardy to our security and safety of the American people...

What a meeley mouthed twit. Of course there is going to be some security risk entailed. I doubt there are any real limitations on what a sufficiently determined terrorist could find out about security arrangements at our ports and how to circumvent them. I would guess giving control to a Muslim country will give somewhat easier access, but how much is anyone's guess.

Hmmm.I do... (Below threshold)
ed:

Hmmm.

I doubt there are any real limitations on what a sufficiently determined terrorist could find out about security arrangements at our ports and how to circumvent them.

Why would anyone bother?

Historically AQ has close ties to criminal gangs, who are often subcontractors for AQ work, so it's much more logical to think that AQ will use the same techniques and conduits that the criminal gangs use.

I.e. private aircraft and boats.

How about Martha Stewart?</... (Below threshold)
Mark:
There are far more security... (Below threshold)
Wayne:

There are far more security risk out there now. How about all those foreign ships and crews that comes into our ports and watch and partake in operations? Also they can easily jump ship but then again our borders aren't secure anyway.

What the freedom of information act? The government itself is require to send anyone information that can be use in an attack.

How about the MSM? They can give away information with impunity. Remember they told the world we were tracking Bin Laden by his cell phone.

Maybe we should past legislation to solve these far more dangerous issues?




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy