Freepers at Free Republic have started going through the documents and posted this one labeled CMPC-2003-001488 and translated by jveritas:
In the Name of God the Merciful
Presidency of the RepublicIntelligence Apparatus
To the respectful Mr. M.A.M.
Subject: Information
Our source in Afghanistan No 11002 (for information about him see attachment 1) provided us with information that that Afghani Consul Ahmad Dahestani (for information about him see attachment 2) told him the following:
1. That Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban in Afghanistan are in contact with Iraq and it that previously a group from Taliban and Osama Bin Laden group visited Iraq.
2. That America has proof that the government of Iraq and Osama Bin Laden group have shown cooperation to hit target within America.
3. That in case it is proven the involvement of Osama Bin Laden group and the Taliban in these destructive operations it is possible that American will conduct strikes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
4. That the Afghani Consul heard about the subject of Iraq relation with Osama Bin Laden group during his stay in Iran.
5. In light of this we suggest to write to the Commission of the above information.
Please view... Yours... With regards
Signature:......, Initials : A.M.M, 15/9/2001
Foot note: Immediately send to the Chairman of Commission
Signature:.............
These documents are being released by Foreign Military Studies Office Joint Reserve Intelligence Center.
Others blogging:
Permalink | Linking Blogs | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Iraq, War On Terror
Comments (14)
Yeah? But what about Hallib... (Below threshold)1. Posted by http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/ | March 16, 2006 8:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah? But what about Halliburton, and KBR?!? ;-)
1. Posted by http://amateureconblog.blogspot.com/ | March 16, 2006 8:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 16, 2006 20:03
2. Posted by JD | March 16, 2006 8:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Even if Allah came down from on high, stating that he commanded Saddam to allow AQ safe harbor in his country (which he did), the left would ignore it, or claim that Allah was a tool of the party.
2. Posted by JD | March 16, 2006 8:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 16, 2006 20:27
3. Posted by JEFF | March 16, 2006 8:36 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Right On JD , or they would say that he own,s stock in Halliburton..He, rove and cheney are in cahoots to keep the american people in the dark..
3. Posted by JEFF | March 16, 2006 8:36 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 16, 2006 20:36
4. Posted by Tim | March 16, 2006 9:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I just read the Britney Spears blog and I'm wondering ... Is there anyway we can get Osama to attack her?
4. Posted by Tim | March 16, 2006 9:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 16, 2006 21:32
5. Posted by bryanD | March 16, 2006 10:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Dear Boss,we're BUSTED" (Re: point 2) No qualifiers, no in-between-the-lines flowery araby , no code, no microdot , no XYZ (Didn't we train these people?) Oh! and Iran's feet are visible 'neath the curtains, stage right! The scenario is marginally more believable than the discredited Prague-Manila connection. Yet that invented evidence and these new releases align so closely to the line hewn in 1996 after Bibi's "Clean Break" from the U.S.'s dual containment Iraq/Iran policy (REMEMBER?); from balancing powers to isolating and defeating each in it's turn (plus Syria - coincidence! coincidence!). An excellent backgrounder that cuts through the hooey: //www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html
5. Posted by bryanD | March 16, 2006 10:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 16, 2006 22:04
6. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | March 16, 2006 11:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And once again, with bryanD, is all because of the joooooooooos.
6. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | March 16, 2006 11:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 16, 2006 23:07
7. Posted by epador | March 16, 2006 11:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have reviewed the memo and it is obvious that it was not typed on an IBM Seletric and must be a phony.
7. Posted by epador | March 16, 2006 11:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 16, 2006 23:39
8. Posted by jp2 | March 17, 2006 12:44 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
lol
I don't think lefties need too stretch too far for this one: the source is Free Republic.
8. Posted by jp2 | March 17, 2006 12:44 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 17, 2006 00:44
9. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | March 17, 2006 1:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Source of the quoted translation, but not the documents, jp2.
9. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | March 17, 2006 1:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 17, 2006 01:23
10. Posted by jp2 | March 17, 2006 9:39 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, I don't know...
On one hand you have Free Republic and the well known mid-East scholar "jveritas", the other, the 9/11 commission. Hmm. Free Republic. 9/11 Commission.
A tough choice.
10. Posted by jp2 | March 17, 2006 9:39 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 17, 2006 09:39
11. Posted by OregonMuse | March 17, 2006 9:59 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So, jp2, how does it feel to be living in a state of constant denial?
"NO! NO! There was NO connection between Iraq and Al-Qaeda! None! La-la-la, I can't HEEEAAARR you!"
11. Posted by OregonMuse | March 17, 2006 9:59 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 17, 2006 09:59
12. Posted by JEFF | March 17, 2006 10:09 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The choice is easy ! believe neither , You can clearly see with your own eye,s what is happening in the world ..
12. Posted by JEFF | March 17, 2006 10:09 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 17, 2006 10:09
13. Posted by jp2 | March 17, 2006 3:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Muse: it's possible there was a connection, albeit very slight. I'll go with the 9/11 commission on this one though, as opposed to Free Republic.
Connections in Saudi Arabia, UAE and Pakistan, our "allies," are far much greater however.
13. Posted by jp2 | March 17, 2006 3:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 17, 2006 15:19
14. Posted by OregonMuse | March 17, 2006 4:45 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Connections in Saudi Arabia, UAE and Pakistan, our "allies," are far much greater however.
I think you're probably right about this. Sooner or later the Saudi funding of Wahabi terrorism and whack job imams and Pakistan's allowing terrorists to operate within their borders is going to have to be addressed.
14. Posted by OregonMuse | March 17, 2006 4:45 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 17, 2006 16:45