I can't think of a better example of how communism forces its citizens to live for the good of the state than this one:
The joke goes in China that if you call out the name Wang Wei in the street at least one person is bound to answer. The personal name Wei, or "mighty", is so popular that parents have been turning to ancient and esoteric dictionaries to find more unusual names for their child.
No longer. The Ministry of Public Security has drawn up a new regulation on registration of names. In future, babies' names must be drawn from a list that excludes tens of thousands of rare Chinese characters. With the introduction of electronic identity cards, the authorities will only register names that can be stored in their police database.
That's the Chinese government at work: individuality squashed at every opportunity.
Hat tip: The Corner



Comments (13)
Scandanavia has been doing ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by jp2 | March 19, 2006 2:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Scandanavia has been doing this for years. Those poor people. So oppressed!
Any breaking news on that explosive Iraqi document Kim? Haven't heard much...
1. Posted by jp2 | March 19, 2006 2:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 14:37
2. Posted by SATerp | March 19, 2006 2:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It seems to me that it would be a lot easier for the government to just assign numbers, and get away from bourgeois artifacts like "names."
#342,764 Jr.
2. Posted by SATerp | March 19, 2006 2:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 14:43
3. Posted by smitty | March 19, 2006 4:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I believe the the French government limits given names, just like the Scandinavians and Chinese. Government efficiency comes before personal choice. I wonder what the bases for determining acceptable names might be? Can you imagine American bureaucrats poring over manuals to determine if "Shawan" is an acceptable variation of "Sean"?
3. Posted by smitty | March 19, 2006 4:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 16:10
4. Posted by Chase | March 19, 2006 4:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
SATerp, that sounds a lot like social security...
4. Posted by Chase | March 19, 2006 4:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 16:17
5. Posted by ed | March 19, 2006 5:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hmmm.
The Japanese also have a government run board that must approve all names of Japanese infants before a birth certificate is issued. The problem is, with China and Japan, a serious issue.
Both countries use the calligraphic form of the written language for official documents. The problem isn't necessarily the recording of the names but the fact that not everyone knows every single pictographic character in either language. So the available set of calligraphic characters for names, which must be used all the time, have to be restricted to the most common set.
The rather amusing thing about both countries is that parents are also trying to use Western names to differentiate their children simply because there are so many children with exactly the same name. It's amusing when 3,000 kids are named Li Wei. It's not so amusing when you've got 3,000 businessmen in the Beijing airport all answering a public announcement for a Mr. Li Wei of Beijing. It can also be difficult for Westerners who have to deal with a few hundred Mr. Li Wei's within a Chinese company.
It's kinda interesting. Kinda funny. Kinda amusing in a way.
5. Posted by ed | March 19, 2006 5:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 17:10
6. Posted by tyree | March 19, 2006 8:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
jp2:
Are we to take from your remark that you support government dictated children names?
6. Posted by tyree | March 19, 2006 8:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 20:10
7. Posted by Michael Friedman | March 19, 2006 8:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Far be it from me to defend the Chinese government, but in this case the requirement is not as unreasonable as it sounds.
The Chinese language is ideographic and, depending on who you ask and how, exactly, you define a character (as opposed to just a variant ideogram for the same character), may have more than 50,000 characters. They've already given the Unicode standards bodies conniptions and forced them to extend Unicode to more than 2 bytes, something that they originally believed would not be necessary.
Characters that cannot be typed or stored in computer systems give everyone major problems. Believe me - I know - I've been involved in building systems for the Hong Kong government which requires support for about 2,000 additional characters beyond the normal Chinese standard that are only used in Hong Kong.
Saying that you can't register a name that does not use one of the standard characters isn't that unreasonable. After all, how far would you get in the US trying to persuade the US government that your name includes a Euro symbol or one of those Scandinavian 'O's with bars through them?
7. Posted by Michael Friedman | March 19, 2006 8:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 20:25
8. Posted by Nicholas | March 19, 2006 10:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Japanese has both Katakana and Hiragana character sets which are phonetic. With those it's possible to write/store any name.
If a computer system can't handle a name like Bjørn you can always just put Bjorn, or else use a convention to use regular characters to indicate the accent, such as Bj/orn. No problem.
I'd say it's the government's job to adapt to store people's names, not tell them what those names can be. Adaption is not difficult. If they can't use phonetic or other techniques to get around these limiations then they're incompetent.
8. Posted by Nicholas | March 19, 2006 10:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 22:24
9. Posted by Michael Friedman | March 19, 2006 10:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Umm... Maybe... want to try registering for a Social Security card in the US as Bj/orn?
9. Posted by Michael Friedman | March 19, 2006 10:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 19, 2006 22:32
10. Posted by Faith+1 | March 20, 2006 1:10 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I have 26 employees. 9 of them are Chinese or Taiwanese. Of the 9, 5 are named Wei with one of them being named Wei Wei. The youngest, Wei Sun, is married and her husband's name is---Wei Sun. I'm not so sure it's a sign of communism as much as it is practicality...
10. Posted by Faith+1 | March 20, 2006 1:10 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 20, 2006 01:10
11. Posted by anachronda | March 20, 2006 11:42 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You might ask the artist formerly known as "The Artist Formerly Known as Prince".
11. Posted by anachronda | March 20, 2006 11:42 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 20, 2006 11:42
12. Posted by Michael Friedman | March 20, 2006 7:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Bet he didn't have that symbol on his driver's license.
12. Posted by Michael Friedman | March 20, 2006 7:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 20, 2006 19:11
13. Posted by virgo | March 21, 2006 4:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sounds like mass confusion to me ! to many robot models all with the same lable and model #s
13. Posted by virgo | March 21, 2006 4:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 21, 2006 16:00