« Morgan Spurlock, Super-Sized Ass | Main | Immigration reform: a modest proposal »

Political Speech on Internet to Remain Unregulated

Bloggers are off the FEC hook:

The Federal Election Commission decided Monday that the nation's new campaign finance law will not apply to most political activity on the Internet.


In a 6-0 vote, the commission decided to regulate only paid political ads placed on another person's Web site.

The decision means that bloggers and online publications will not be covered by provisions of the new election law. Internet bloggers and individuals will therefore be able to use the Internet to attack or support federal candidates without running afoul of campaign spending and contribution limits.

"It's a win, win, win," Commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub said, adding that the rule would satisfy concerns of campaigns, individuals and the Internet community about whether the campaign finance law applies to Internet political activity.

Michael Toner, FEC Chairman, spelled out details about the new FEC regulations on RedState. Here's a snippet:

The exemption for individual Internet activity in the final rules is categorical and unqualified. Individual online political activity will be protected from FEC restriction regardless of whether the individual acts alone or as part of a group, and regardless of whether the individual acts in coordination with a candidate or acts independently. The exemption applies no matter who owns the computer equipment the individual uses and no matter where the Internet activities are performed. The final rules, thus, avoid disparate treatment of individuals who may not be able to afford to purchase their own computer and explicitly protect individuals who may borrow a computer from a friend, neighbor, family member, or anyone else to do political activity.


The exemption in the final rules protects Internet activities by individuals in all forms, including emailing, linking, blogging, or hosting a website. The exemption encompasses all types of Internet equipment and services, including computer hardware, software, ISP services, and Internet domain names. The exemption also includes "any other technology that is used to provide access to or use of the Internet," to ensure that future innovations in computer equipment and services are protected. Under the exemption, an individual or group of individuals can spend whatever money they wish on their Internet activities without any of the expenditures being considered a contribution to the candidates they support, even if the activities are done in direct consultation with the candidates or with the candidates' campaign staff. In all these respects, the final rules recognize that the online political speech of individuals should not be restricted by the Commission in any way, and I strongly support this result.

Excellent news for all those who opine about politics and politicians on the internet.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Political Speech on Internet to Remain Unregulated:

» Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with FEC Won't Regulate Internet Politics

» Conservative Culture linked with Roll on Bloggers - Free Speech Rules

» Conservative Outpost linked with Daily Summary

Comments (4)

Hurray!Our kind an... (Below threshold)

Hurray!

Our kind and benevolent masters have decided to let us speak.

For now.

"For now" is right... this... (Below threshold)
Omni:

"For now" is right... this is FAR from over.

(sigh)

Gee, the palace eunuchs dei... (Below threshold)
bryanD:

Gee, the palace eunuchs deign to suffer our 1st amendment rights! Let's bake cookies!

I almost wish they had trie... (Below threshold)
Veeshir:

I almost wish they had tried to regulate it.
Seeing them try to enforce those laws would have been interesting.
Who do they regulate? Only the Right Blogs? Only the Left? Only those who aren't "journalists"? What happens if they went after Hugh Hewitt and Wizbang and Hugh said, "Hey, I'm a journalist" and they left him alone but kept after Wizbang?
Would any MSM outlet be on our side? Would Foxnews be on our side? It would have made for some interesting times. If they had said they would regulate blogs, I planned on starting one and writing exactly what they said I couldn't.

I don't like the idea of thanking iceholes for allowing me to retain my rights.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy