Updated with video
Scroll to see updates
And the Capitol Hill police plan to issue an arrest warrant for her later today.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Capitol Hill police plan to issue an arrest warrant today for Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.).
The warrant is related to the incident Wednesday when McKinney allegedly slapped a Capitol Hill police officer.Charges could range from assault on a police officer, which is a felony carrying a possible five year prison term, to simple assault, which is a misdeamenor.
McKinney has canceled a news conference that she had scheduled for this morning to discuss the incident.
McKinney issued a statement yesterday saying she "deeply regrets" the confrontation with the police officer.
The six-term congresswoman apparently struck a Capitol Police officer when he tried to stop her from entering a House office building without going through a metal detector. Members of Congress wear identifying lapel pins and routinely are waved into buildings without undergoing security checks. The officer apparently did not recognize McKinney, she said in a statement.
Asked on-camera Thursday by Channel 2 Action News whether she intended to apologize, McKinney refused to comment.
So, is she going to deck the person who presents her with the warrant?
Additional: No Agenda reminds us that this is Rep. McKinney's fifth run in with law enforcement.
Update: Tim Dees at Officer.com, a website dedicated to police news and issues, provides interesting information:
Now, if anyone else [hit a police officer], they would find themselves in handcuffs and on their way to the slammer. Hitting a cop for any reason has some serious consequences, and rightly so. But congresspersons are protected from arrest under Article I, Section 6 of the Constitution so long as Congress is in session. This clause does not protect Members once the session ends, and warrants for crimes committed during the session can be served on them at any time afterward.
Some critics of the conduct of the police in this incident have declared that the officers of the Capitol Police should simply know what their protectees look like. There are 535 Members of Congress, and 435 of them get reshuffled every two years. Each one of these Members has a complement of staffers, and then there are the lobbyists, other government employees, and constituents that come through the Capitol on business. This makes for an unmanageable number of faces to memorize (especially if they change their appearance, as Ms. McKinney did), and the reason that Members are given those little pins to wear. Most Members don't seem to regard the wearing of these as a burden. Ms. McKinney refuses to wear hers.
Update II: This is unbelievable. Rep. McKinney's attorney is saying she is a victim of racism.
WASHINGTON Mar 31, 2006 (AP) -- A lawyer for Rep. Cynthia McKinney, the Georgia congresswoman who had an altercation with a Capitol Police officer, says she was "just a victim of being in Congress while black."
...Her lawyer, James W. Myart Jr., said, "Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, like thousands of average Americans across this country, is, too, a victim of the excessive use of force by law enforcement officials because of how she looks and the color of her skin."..."Congresswoman McKinney, in a hurry, was essentially chased and grabbed by the officer," Myart said. "She reacted instinctively in an effort to defend herself." (all emphasis mine)
Let's examine the language her attorney used to spin this situation: victim, excessive force, chased and grabbed, reacted to defend herself. Is Rep. McKinney's attorney getting ready to file a law suit against the Capitol Hill Police?
So let's recap: Rep. McKinney, not wearing her congressional ID pin, bypasses the metal detector in a congress office building. When the police officer asks her to stop to confirm who she is, Rep. McKinney ignores him. When the police officer finally catches up with her, McKinney becomes aggressive and hits the police officer. And her attorney has the nerve to say the police officer used excessive force.
Update III: Apparently the news conference is back on and will take place at Howard University.
Update IV: My speculation was correct. Fox News Channel is saying that McKinney's office says that a lawyer and staffer are going to file an excessive force claim against the Capitol Hill police. They are saying that the police used excessive force against McKinney and roughed her up
Update V: At the press conference Rep. McKinney said this: "Apparently the case against me may be referred for prosecution. Therefore, I have been advised by my attorneys not to discuss the facts of the case. However, let me be clear. This whole incident was instigated by the inappropriate touching and stopping of me, a female, black congresswoman. I deeply regret that this incident ocurred and I am certain that after full review of the facts I will exonerated"
Expose the Left has the video.
Others blogging:
Comments (93)
It's obviously racism you s... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Field Moron | March 31, 2006 12:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's obviously racism you stupid white crackers. Now can we get back to a respectful debate here?
1. Posted by Field Moron | March 31, 2006 12:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 12:08
2. Posted by hmmmm | March 31, 2006 12:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
She should file charges right back. Cop grabbed her from behind, without verbally identifying himself. That's assault, pure and simple, cop or no. Believe it or not, the assault laws _do_ apply to police, and once upon a time, even applied to the president.
What, you wouldn't get jumpy if someone grabbed _you_ from behind?
2. Posted by hmmmm | March 31, 2006 12:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 12:13
3. Posted by SmartGuy | March 31, 2006 12:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"What, you wouldn't get jumpy if someone grabbed _you_ from behind?"
Not if I just jumped the metal detector and walked away without identifying myself. I would expect to be detained until the situation was cleared up. The cop did what a cop is supposed to do. And Cynthia McKinney does what she is supposed to do - lose her temper and yell RACISM whenever some lowly white person dares to question her actions.
3. Posted by SmartGuy | March 31, 2006 12:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 12:17
4. Posted by wavemaker | March 31, 2006 12:33 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
hmmmmmm, you've got to be putting us on.
4. Posted by wavemaker | March 31, 2006 12:33 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 12:33
5. Posted by mantis | March 31, 2006 12:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Apparently it's a slap now. Should we call her Zsa Zsa McKinney?
5. Posted by mantis | March 31, 2006 12:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 12:51
6. Posted by Corro'll Driskell | March 31, 2006 12:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Obviously, Ms. McKinny didn't think about the repercusions of her actions.
6. Posted by Corro'll Driskell | March 31, 2006 12:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 12:57
7. Posted by EdMcGon | March 31, 2006 1:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
As a citizen of the state of Georgia, I apologize to the rest of the country for the aberration known as Cynthia McKinney.
I swear I never voted for her.
7. Posted by EdMcGon | March 31, 2006 1:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 13:13
8. Posted by field-negro | March 31, 2006 1:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
field, house, and all around moron; you made the "stupid white cracker" remark, not me. (But a little soul searching is good)
And EdMcGon, you don't have to apologize for the citizens that voted for Ms. Mckinney. They have a right to vote for whoever they want. If the people of Louisiana sent David Duke to congress that would be their right, because it would mean that he won their election by a majority vote. That's called a democracy.
Why don't you run against Ms. McKinney if you are so embarrassed by her actions? If she is just an aberration as you claim, then you should win.
8. Posted by field-negro | March 31, 2006 1:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 13:31
9. Posted by DREW | March 31, 2006 1:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Tru Dat field-negro!! everyone knows it's BUSHs Fault!!!!!!!
9. Posted by DREW | March 31, 2006 1:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 13:40
10. Posted by docjim505 | March 31, 2006 1:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Most Members don't seem to regard the wearing of these as a burden. Ms. McKinney refuses to wear hers.
One hopes that the people of her district will see to it that she never has that problem again when they go to the ballot box in November.
But, given the sorry state of racially gerrymandered districts in our country, I'm not betting on it.
10. Posted by docjim505 | March 31, 2006 1:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 13:56
11. Posted by yo | March 31, 2006 1:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Wait, wait .. wanna' see a completely pig headed response from the left?
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2006/3/30/215110/601
Dudes, I haven't stopped laughing.
I don't give a whit what her ethnicity is - you simply don't slug a cop. Ever. For any reason other than you want to get arrested. The fact that she didn't get locked up on the spot is enough to tell me this isn't a racial issue; but an issue of someone thinking they're above the law.
Sorry .. tough to concentrate when I'm laughing so hard.
11. Posted by yo | March 31, 2006 1:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 13:57
12. Posted by yo | March 31, 2006 2:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Maybe this was the meeting she was in such a rush to get to:
http://www.thuglifearmy.com/news/?id=2214
Again, apologies for getting hung up this, but hypocracy and false senses of entitlement just give me the giggles.
... but, just as long as Tupac gets his props - who cares about homeland security?
12. Posted by yo | March 31, 2006 2:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:24
13. Posted by RA | March 31, 2006 2:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Didn't you know that Democrats, especially black Democrats are above the law. Oh yes, Mexicans are above the law too.
13. Posted by RA | March 31, 2006 2:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:25
14. Posted by Field Marshall | March 31, 2006 2:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
FN you're reflexive defense of a known racist, anti-semitic, elitist and all around b%#$@ is quite telling.
Say hi to Malik Shabaz for me will ya!
14. Posted by Field Marshall | March 31, 2006 2:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:27
15. Posted by smitty | March 31, 2006 2:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's obvious that this "incident" was a CIA/Mossad black ops job. The same people who brought down the Trade Center are now trying to bring down Congresswoman McKinney.
15. Posted by smitty | March 31, 2006 2:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:37
16. Posted by Falze | March 31, 2006 2:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"But congresspersons are protected from arrest under Article I, Section 6 of the Constitution so long as Congress is in session."
So if a member of Congress sneaks in a gun and blows away everybody else they could just sit in there and keep the session open, since they're the only one alive, and not be arrested? Yes, I'm thinking of the Simpsons episode with the Mel Gibson/Homer collaborative movie.
16. Posted by Falze | March 31, 2006 2:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:43
17. Posted by JLawson | March 31, 2006 2:44 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Only person bringing down McKinney stares at her in the mirror each morning.
(And is it just me, or does her expression in damn near every photo I've seen of her remind you of someone looking around for the men in the white coats carrying a long-sleeved jacket?)
Nah, it's probably just me.
J.
17. Posted by JLawson | March 31, 2006 2:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:44
18. Posted by jack | March 31, 2006 2:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Wow, I see a whole lot of talk about race here. What I don't see is McKinney saying this was racist, or at least no one has pointed to such a claim.
Yes, someone's playing the race card, but that would be the racists. Of course, not that anyone here is.
18. Posted by jack | March 31, 2006 2:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:50
19. Posted by Timmo | March 31, 2006 2:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The big racist sistah Mckinney should be friggin fired !!! Next time a black security guard questions me...I'll will scream racism !!!
19. Posted by Timmo | March 31, 2006 2:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:53
20. Posted by Timmo | March 31, 2006 2:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The big racist sistah Mckinney should be friggin fired !!! Next time a black security guard questions me...I'll will scream racism !!!
20. Posted by Timmo | March 31, 2006 2:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:53
21. Posted by Timmo | March 31, 2006 2:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The big racist sistah Mckinney should be friggin fired !!! Next time a black security guard questions me...I'll will scream racism !!!
21. Posted by Timmo | March 31, 2006 2:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:53
22. Posted by CuriousGeorge | March 31, 2006 2:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Just for shits and giggles, a thought experiement. Suppose Hastert or Frist or Raid or Pelosi did the exact same thing. Would they be arrested? I for one doubt it. Not saying which one is right.
22. Posted by CuriousGeorge | March 31, 2006 2:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:59
23. Posted by the wolf | March 31, 2006 2:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Merle Black, a professor of politics at Emory University, says that while the scuffle was rare for an elected politician, it's unlikely to cost McKinney more than a few votes."
Yeah, anyone dumb enough to vote for her before isn't going to be swayed by this.
23. Posted by the wolf | March 31, 2006 2:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 14:59
24. Posted by SmartGuy | March 31, 2006 3:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jack - if you don't see McKinney playing the race card, you are either dumb or illiterate. Here is what she said in her first official statement:
--
Sadly, there are only 14 black women Members of Congress. And surely our faces are distinguishable. But why my face is continually unrecognizable can only be answered by these offending police officers. Capitol Hill Police are given face recognition instructions as a part of their official training. Capitol Hill Police are required to recognize, greet, and distinguish Members of Congress as a part of their official role and responsibilities. In fact, according to the US Capitol Police, their mission is to protect and support the Congress in meeting its Constitutional responsibilities. The US Capitol Police mission statement makes no distinction about selective application of its mission depending upon whether a Member of Congress is black, woman, or has a new hairstyle.
But, honestly, this incident is not about wearing a Congressional pin or changing my hairstyle.
It is true that I have changed my hairstyle. It is true that at the time I was not wearing my pin. But many Members of Congress aren't wearing their pins today. Just in the last hour at least 8 Members of Congress have been spotted speaking from the well of the House without their pins and even more have been seen on the Hill today not wearing their Congressional pin. How many of them were stopped by Capitol Hill Police? Do I have to contact the police every time I change my hairstyle? How do we account for the fact that when I wore my braids every day for 11 years, I still faced this problem, primarily from certain white police officers.
--
You can read the whole sad rant here:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/8361195/detail.html
Incidentally, Capitol Hill cops are NOT "required" to recognize members of Congress. She lost the word "required" in her second statement. But she still refuses to comment on whether she plans to apologize to the cop she assaulted. She is nothing more than scum who thinks she is entitled to whatever she wants, when she wants it, regardless of the law. I am embarassed for the people of Georgia.
24. Posted by SmartGuy | March 31, 2006 3:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 15:06
25. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 3:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Excuse me Jack, but she DID cry racism. It was in her original statement. However she decided not to post it on her website, "proboly smarter people around her, told her it was stupid" she posted a very different statement apoligizing. Her original statement was very rude, with no apoligy and it screamed racism.
25. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 3:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 15:18
26. Posted by smitty | March 31, 2006 3:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
jack,
You obviously don't know anything about Congresswoman McKinney, it's alway about race, whether it's "certain white police officers" or Jewish money.
26. Posted by smitty | March 31, 2006 3:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 15:20
27. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 3:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Amen Smartguy!
27. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 3:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 15:21
28. Posted by kbiel | March 31, 2006 3:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
No. Article I, section 6 says that no member shall be arrested during session or going to or coming from a session of congress except for high crimes, treason, or breach of the peace. The Capitol Police could have arrested her at the time of the assault, but they probably decided not to because the assault was minor and congress members do receive defferential treatment, right or wrong.
28. Posted by kbiel | March 31, 2006 3:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 15:27
29. Posted by jack | March 31, 2006 3:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, hopefully she at least hit the cop who illegally arrested Sheehan.
29. Posted by jack | March 31, 2006 3:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 15:58
30. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh give me a break. Sheehan is milking her son's death for her own benefit. There are plenty of mothers who have lost their son's in this war, and arn't making jackasses of themselves.
30. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 16:13
31. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
oh and by the way Jack, Mckinneys lawyer just released a statement. They ARE using the race card now. She has changed her mind! She has taken back her apoligy! She is now a victim of racism! I am soooooo surprised.
31. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 16:18
32. Posted by SmartGuy | March 31, 2006 4:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sounds like Jack is a Michael Moore wannabe, in enemy territory.
32. Posted by SmartGuy | March 31, 2006 4:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 16:18
33. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
oh and by the way Jack, Mckinneys lawyer just released a statement. They ARE using the race card now. She has changed her mind! She has taken back her apoligy! She is now a victim of racism! I am soooooo surprised.
33. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 16:19
34. Posted by jack | March 31, 2006 4:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ok, you're right. Thanks for the references. McKinney is a racist. By all appearances, so are many of you. So, what's your beef with her?
Btw, Angela, how exactly is Sheehan benefiting from her son's death? Now I'll grant you that a _lot_ of people in this country are making serious bank off this war. But, they don't tend to be ordinary folk like her.
34. Posted by jack | March 31, 2006 4:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 16:51
35. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jack,
Let me answer that question for you. Go to google. Type in Cindy Sheehan movie in the works. You WILL get you answer to that. She is a attention seeker. Her son is probably rolling in his grave. What is our beef with McKinney? She is painting a good man who was doing his job as a racist to cover up her own racism. End of story.
35. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 4:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 16:56
36. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 5:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What, no responce Jack?
36. Posted by Angela | March 31, 2006 5:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 31, 2006 17:21
37. Posted by yo | March 31, 2006 5:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Cindy
Son's Grave
Sleeping On Top