« Another Spring, Another DEA Agent Shooting Himself in Foot Post | Main | Iran Successfully Enriched Uranium for the First Time »

Blogger Hosting "Boy Love" Site

Blogger is hosting a pedophilia site called "Paiderastia" The Boy Love Revival, which promotes sexual relationships between men and adolescent boys.

The site tries to portray these relationships are "mentoring." Just take a look at the blog's description:

Pederasty, as idealized by the ancient Greeks, was a relationship and bond between an adolescent boy and an adult man outside of HIS immediate family. This is modernized in today's culture as gender neutral by a relationship and bond between an adolescent child and an adult outside of their immediate family. In a wider sense this refers to erotic/mentor/spiritual love between adolescents and adults. Building Bridges!

Building bridges?

World Net Daily published an article about this site today:

A marriage and family therapist intern is trying to convince Google to drop a website from its popular, free blog host that promotes "boy love," sexual relationships between men and adolescents.


Stacy L. Harp of Orange, Calif., told WorldNetDaily one of the readers of her weblog pointed out the site, called "Paiderastia: The Boy Love Revival."

At the top of its homepage, the site explains it's all about "erotic/mentor/spiritual love between adolescents and adults."

Harp said, however, that not long after she exposed it yesterday morning, the "Paiderastia" site removed its most recent posts, including one dated April 9.

Also removed, according to Harp, was a podcast - a file with a radio-style report - that mocked the FBI. It was created through the podcast provider Liberated Syndication.

The site now begins with a Feb. 15 post that outlines the "Boylove Code of Ethics," which includes this rule: "Intimacy with a boy should never develop into a sexual relationship without the boy fully consenting and understanding the social, legal, and health implications of the relationship."

The site, in fact, has a new post dated today listing the Bill of Rights. A commenter responded with this:

I don't see an amendment that would justify in any fashion vampirism of innocents.


Someone like you infested my family years ago. Inspiring my younger brother to suicide before he left his teens, and planted a deep psychological infection in myself that has discolored my entire life.

The history of this evil in ancient Greece cannot be considered a justifcation of this cultural poison considering the fact that this once great society collapsed under the preasure of massive societal ills.

Chaos Magical theory suggests the following:

"When everything is permitted Nothing is True."

Lies cannot support any positive spin on blind evil.

The Jawa Report has even more about this blog's filth.

If you are just as revolted about this blog as the rest of the civilized world, Stop the ACLU has actions you can take:

Give blogger a wake up call! Flag the site! Email them, and let them know how you feel. If you have a blog there, consider moving it. Their service sucks anyway. Try out blogsome. It is a free wordpress site, or get your own host...


...You can contact Google at their company headquarters either by writing directly, or calling or emailing them.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
phone: 650-253-0000
fax: 650-253-0001

You can also report this perverted site to the following online agencies.

Fill out a report at the Cyber Tipline website and ask them to follow up on the isp's and other information found on this website.

You may also email Google's blogger at [email protected] or [email protected] and let them know you want this site removed and others like it.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blogger Hosting "Boy Love" Site:

» Stop The ACLU linked with Blogger Hosting ‘Boy Love’ Site

» chez Diva linked with Do No Evil is our Motto…

Comments (40)

Aww, c'mon, ya wanna take d... (Below threshold)

Aww, c'mon, ya wanna take down another FBI sting site???

People, people, people! Wh... (Below threshold)

People, people, people! Where's your tolerance? This man is only practicing an alternative lifestyle! Who are you to try to foist your Judeo-Christian morals on him (morals responsible, I might add, for the deaths of billions in the past 2000 years). Why won't you allow this man to express the natural love he feels?

Sorry, making myself sick... For those who support gay marriage, why isn't this the next logical step if you get your way?

epador could be right, that... (Below threshold)
Mac Lorry:

epador could be right, that it's an FBI ruse. The government puts out more misinformation than information on a verity of topics such as the plans for Air Force 1, and who do you think staged Roswell?

Then again, it could be another pervert political movement. People thought the gay movement was an outrage a few decades ago. The path has been blazed by the gays, so any pervert group just needs to keep claiming all they want is the same right as everyone else, to love someone of their choice, and it won't be long and some court will decide it's their constitutional right.

The path has been blazed... (Below threshold)
mantis:

The path has been blazed by the gays, so any pervert group just needs to keep claiming all they want is the same right as everyone else, to love someone of their choice, and it won't be long and some court will decide it's their constitutional right.

NAMBLA was founded in 1977. Very nice equating homosexuals (the gays) with perverts by the way.

Very true Mac Lorry that i... (Below threshold)
virgo:

Very true Mac Lorry that is exactly how they work their sickness into society..

"Very nice equating homosex... (Below threshold)
toby928:

"Very nice equating homosexuals (the gays) with perverts by the way."

At the risk of showing my age, since when did homosexuality stop being a perversion? Now mind you, I've always been a live-and-let-live guy but its certainly not a normal mode.

Tob

I was JUST KIDDING! Its di... (Below threshold)

I was JUST KIDDING! Its disgusting. Nuke the site, and remove the link, PLEASE!

Its just a joke! Really!

-Vito Spatafore

At the risk of showing m... (Below threshold)
mantis:

At the risk of showing my age, since when did homosexuality stop being a perversion? Now mind you, I've always been a live-and-let-live guy but its certainly not a normal mode.

Homosexuality naturally occurs throughout the animal kingdom. Some may adhere to a strict definition of perversion being anything which deviates from sex for procreation (though much, if not most of heterosexual sex does not fit that description nowadays), but common usage of pervert (n.) today denotes people who engage (or wish to engage) in deviant sexual acts of the unnatural, disturbed, and/or criminal variety (see also the verb form). Homosexuality is a natural, if not dominant, sexual variation.

In answer to your question as to when, it probably started around 1973 when the APA removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or thereabouts.

mantis:Infanticide... (Below threshold)

mantis:

Infanticide, cannibalism and homicide also occur naturally in the animal kingdom.

Or did your biology education stop at Disney?

What does that have to do w... (Below threshold)
mantis:

What does that have to do with the topic, epador? None of those things could be called sexual variance, or am I missing something?

"In answer to your question... (Below threshold)
toby928:

"In answer to your question as to when, it probably started around 1973 when the APA removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or thereabouts."

Since, I started out as a psych-anthro major I was actually aware of that decision. (odd as it may seem to the layman, homosexuality was removed as a mental illness by a show of hands, although, as any psych major could tell you, that may have been an act of self-preservation by the profession.)

Regarless of what the talking profession may say, I think that most people still see homosexuality for the fetish that it is. Personally, I'll stick with the classic definition of perversion for this rare condition. (rare in the sense of pure same sex attraction. Obviously, the poke anything with a pulse variety of human sexuality is more common).

Tob

The ignorance on display he... (Below threshold)
jp2:

The ignorance on display here is astounding. Comparing homosexuals, approximately 10% of the population, with cannibals? Very, very scary and sad. But hey, welcome to Wizbang.

Have you guys ever consider... (Below threshold)
B Moe:

Have you guys ever considered a weekly "Reading for Comprehension" class for folks like mantis and jp2? I mean damnation, these posts are starting to seem like a cry for help to me.

Regarless of what the ta... (Below threshold)
mantis:

Regarless of what the talking profession may say, I think that most people still see homosexuality for the fetish that it is. Personally, I'll stick with the classic definition of perversion for this rare condition. (rare in the sense of pure same sex attraction. Obviously, the poke anything with a pulse variety of human sexuality is more common).

Fair enough. Interesting that you call homosexuality both a fetish and a condition. Seems to me those are pretty different things, but whatever. In any case most polls I've seen have people pretty evenly split as far as homosexuality being a natural occurrence (as opposed to a choice). I've never seen a poll asking whether people consider homosexuality a perversion.

Have you guys ever consi... (Below threshold)
mantis:

Have you guys ever considered a weekly "Reading for Comprehension" class for folks like mantis and jp2? I mean damnation, these posts are starting to seem like a cry for help to me.

Did I misread something? The only possibility I see is that Mac did not explicitly call homosexuals perverts, though the implication seems pretty clear to me.

As far as jp2 goes, you're right, epador did not compare homosexuality with cannibalism (even if his/her comment was irrelevant).

Don't get it. Why the free ... (Below threshold)
bryanD:

Don't get it. Why the free advertising or have you just recieved your Junior G-Man badge in the mail? Way too boring to be a sting site and there's far worse out there. Oscar Wilde and Oliver Willis are at best Rated-T-for-Teen challenges. How about the skulls of CHILDREN they play with at Yale? http://www.yaleherald.com/article.php?Article=2523

LOLLets see, manti... (Below threshold)

LOL

Lets see, mantis uses the natural occurrence of a behavior as part of an attempt at a logical argument about whether that"unnatural" behavior [I won't even begin to dissect the imperfections of this attempt at use of logic). Then I attempt to discount this initial statement by mentioning other "natural" behaviors. Then I get slammed, but no actual response to my point, only accused of things I did not say (I do not believe I've made any pronouncements one way or the other on homosexuality), of being irrelevant or of going off topic.

Thanks for your post B Moe, but I think it went over their heads.

Fine if it needs to be said... (Below threshold)
Cro:

Fine if it needs to be said...Homo's are perverts. There are you happy now?

Thank you for picking up on... (Below threshold)

Thank you for picking up on this story, I am so happy to see that part of the blogosphere has finally heard what I've been trying to get out. Thanks to WND too for helping me!

All that to say, the info that Stop the ACLU gave you actually came off of an earlier post I put up. Unfortunately, the [email protected] email does not work. The best thing I have found is calling them up. They will tell you to go to their help desk and report it, but if enough of us call them, eventually they will have to do something about this.

You may also want to listen to my podcast that I did today as it will tell you about another blog I didn't mention before. You can listen to that at http://sharp.libsyn.com

Thanks!

Then I attempt to discou... (Below threshold)
mantis:

Then I attempt to discount this initial statement by mentioning other "natural" behaviors. Then I get slammed, but no actual response to my point, only accused of things I did not say (I do not believe I've made any pronouncements one way or the other on homosexuality), of being irrelevant or of going off topic.

I didn't "slam" you, I asked you two questions, and called your question irrelevant (not off topic), which it is. If you think sexual activity and eating and killing are comparable activities, you must have an interesting social life. And I didn't accuse you of saying anything you didn't.

Mmm, I love to eat dead bur... (Below threshold)

Mmm, I love to eat dead burnt bodies, I mean I want to have veins in my teeth, and KILL, KILL, KILL .... [I guess I belong on the group W bench]

LOL

Still avoiding dealing with your fallacious argument?

Yes we should all be happy ... (Below threshold)
Tim:

Yes we should all be happy for those gay cockroaches. It's so "natural" for them to not breed. I thank God every day that 10% of the ebola virus is flaming gay and doesn't wish to spread. And PETA sleeps better at night knowing that every gerbil shoved up a gay's ass, wants to be there because it knows the pleasures of being gay.

Have you noticed we spend l... (Below threshold)
Mac Lorry:

Have you noticed we spend lots of time arguing about the literal verses the implied meaning of each other's comments? I'm as guilty as anyone, and I expect that this is typical anywhere everyone is invited to comment. I'm not sure that type of argument can be avoided, but perhaps it should be a goal, at least for regular Wizbang commenters.

While I didn't explicitly say homosexuals are perverts I did imply it (mantis is correct in that regard). The question then is what makes something a perversion? The dictionary defines prevision as "a sexual practice regarded as abnormal." Apart from personal views, I expect that like the definition of pornography, it's a community standard. What's considered perversion in the Midwest may be considered acceptable on the west cost. Obviously, homosexuality is gaining acceptance in our society among a large segment of the population. That acceptance doesn't translate into political support for marriage and adoption, but it does translate into support for equal right in many other areas. Ultimately, their can be no agreement among a widely disperse group as to the question of whether or not homosexuals are perverts. I'll just refer to them as gays and let each reader decide for themselves if they are perverts or not.

My point then is that gays have shown the way for other groups to gain public acceptance of their unusual sexual practices. The technique is to equate distained for their sexual practice as discrimination, ignorance's, and hate. Many people, particularly people who think of themselves as progressive are susceptible to that argument. Over time society becomes more accepting of the next group wanting to normalize their sexual practices. Some dismiss that as the slippery slope argument, but sometimes the slope really is slippery.

While I think polygamy has a chance of gaining acceptance, I doubt if boylove will do so apart from the general fall of civilization as we know it. I believe that few if any adolescent boys are really interested in having a sexual relationship with an adult man. I believe that even gay adolescent boys are likely attracted to other adolescent boys, not mature men. I suspect the man boy relationship is based on the man offering money and other benefits to the boy and the boy's family in exchange for an intimate relationship with the boy. Poor families may even have pressured their sons into such relationships in ages past. A good son not willing to see his family suffer in poverty may squash his natural repulsion (if he's straight) and submit for the benefit of his family. That likely messed up the boy's mind for the rest of his life. Boys grow up into men and so the attraction of the boylover fades and may switch to a younger boy in the same family. The damage done to so many by so few likely motivated the occasional murder.

My conclusion is that the boy love site is a perversion to the vast majority of people. The real question is are such sites protected by freedom of speech? Does the fact that any man boy sexual relationship constitutes a crime impact the freedom to express that relationship?

...homosexuals, approxim... (Below threshold)

...homosexuals, approximately 10% of the population...

The 10% figure is a well-known myth. The correct percentage is actually 2-3%, max. Complaining about ignorance, were you?

Returning to our regularly ... (Below threshold)
Gmac:

Returning to our regularly scheduled topic...

I think that the site should be taken down. Promotion of a perverse relationship as mentioned with a minor may be every homosexual's fondest fantasy but it's still illegal, and it *is* a homosexual act by definition.

epador raises an exc... (Below threshold)
docjim505:

epador raises an excellent point (April 11, 2006 08:19 PM), and I've yet to see a satisfactory reply. Some follow-on points / questions:

1. If homosexuality is "normal" (i.e. not a perversion or "sexual variance") because it is observed in the animal kingdom, then why should not cannibalism, homocide, and infanticide also be considered "normal"?

2. Killing / eating and sexual behavior (reproduction) ARE comparable activities in that all organisms have an inherent drive to perform them in the interests of self-preservation and propogation of the species. I will grant that most people don't mix the two...

3. We eschew cannibalism, for example, but there are other (primitive) societies that deem the practice to be perfectly normal. People in our society hold variously that homosexuality is normal, a lifestyle choice, a mental disease, a genetic defect, or a perversion. I'm sure that, if somebody asked these NAMBLA creeps, they'd tell you that their desires (yech) are normal (or, to borrow from MJ, "Charming"). They could offer a defense of their preferences by citing history: pederasty was socially acceptable in many "advanced" ancient societies. So, are they really "perverts" or are they simply pushing for the right to practice their alternative lifestyle?

4. Would their case carry more weight if they produced a study that shows a significant fraction of our population is pedophilic? Incidentally, I question the 10% figure for homosexuals in America; as I understand it, this is based on the Kinsey report from a half-century ago, which was biased as the test subjects were prisoners.

Animals do not have morals... (Below threshold)
virgo:

Animals do not have morals or a sense of right and wrong, Men and Women do..
Homosexuality is a curse , look at the longevity records on homosexuals, their average lifespan is 30years less than non homos. males that is , the females look masculine so its hard to tell how old they are..

To stop this abuse of all ... (Below threshold)
virgo:

To stop this abuse of all thats normal visit www.stoppoopoopirates.com

The Kinsey report was reexa... (Below threshold)
blue:

The Kinsey report was reexamined in 1979 by Paul gebhard. Systematically eliminating the prisoners and other, seemingly bias populations, led to results that weren't any different statistically speaking. That is, none of Kinsey's estimates were significantly affected by this bias. The idea of the sexual "norm", is foolish. People will do whatever feels good, period. If it matters, the natural behavior of humans(primates) does not include cannabilism or infanticide. Cannabilism is a spiritual practice usually used to "absorb" the strength or soul of one's enemy, or as an act of effigy god-eating(you know, like jesus). Infanticide isn't present because we aren't a "harem" species. Killing on the other hand is totally normal for people. People ask themselves if they are capable of murder, of course you are. As far as people having morals and animals not, moral code is always changing, there is no such thing as a given action being absolutely right or wrong. Anything can be justified in the right(though possibly bizarre)circumstances. To jump from the ever changing moral code, and to reflect on the oft-repeated (yet ignored) cycles of civilization, I would put forth that it is only a matter of time before man-boy "love" becomes socially acceptable, or at least tolerated. We are not fundamentally different from the Greeks or any other major civilization. The patterns are true and unwavering.

Allright I've been delaying... (Below threshold)
mantis:

Allright I've been delaying my response to this, but I think it is necessary so here goes.

I guess the most expeditious way to start would be to answer epador's charge of logical fallacy. It seems that it is my fault for not expressing my thoughts clearly enough and I can understand how this fallacy could be perceived. Let me respond by saying that my contention is not as follows (syllogistically):

A. All that is natural is good.
B. Homosexuality is natural.
C. Homosexuality is good.

No argument so simple could reflect the inimitable truth. Gayness, or homosexuality, is not just a naturally occuring phenomenon in the animal kingdom. It is distinguished from the other natural occurences in the animal kingdom such as cannibalism and infanticide (I discount murder categorically as death by the hands of others is infinitely natural), in that it harms no other, aside from the actor in a procreative sense. The point is that sexuality is quite distinct from other activities that harm others. We, as civilized mammals, have built societies which abhor the senseless harm done to others, and thus look upon cannibalism and infanticide as morally and ethically deplorable activities, if not extinct ones. These are, among humans, essentially universal beliefs, and I believe they are so because such acts are harmful to the innocent. Homosexuality as I see it harms no one. Furthermore it is not an act, per se, but a disposition. Homosexual behavior is an act, but homosexuality is not, and thus is not comparable to act of killing others.

Allow me to illustrate my meaning by way of personal experience. I have known dozens upon dozens of gay people, many quite well (I of course am not necessarily the norm in the US, having spent all of my adult life between San Francisco and Chicago), and I have known not one single pedophile, polygamist, beastialist (is that a word?), or asexual person, that I know of. So from my personal experience I have concluded that homosexuality is quite common, whereas other, unsavory sexual proclivities are uncommon. Many of these people have divulged to me that their homosexuality first presented itself at adolescence, the dawning of sexual maturity. It has thus seemed clear to me that homosexuality is a naturally occuring sexual variance, and not an abnormality such as, say, pedophilia, cannibalism, or infanticide. Such behaviors are, if not rare, uncommon in the animal kingdom. Most species are apt to care for their young to some extent and the intraspecies killing is usually confined to territorial disputes. Interspecies "murder" is quite the norm throughout the animal kingdom inculding and especially with homo sapiens.

Thus what I am saying is that homosexuality, while not the norm in terms of population, is still quite common (whether you accept Kinsey's 10% or a more conservative 3- 5%, which is still 9-15 million Americans, notwithstanding); vastly more common than intraspecies murder, pedophilia, polygamy, cannibalism, or infanticide. Can something so common be considered a perversion except in a dogmatic religious sense? I don't think so.

(btw virgo, I don't mean to feed the troll but you truly are an asshole. Have you ever considered that the lifespan of homosexuals is decreased by the overwhelming tendency towards suicide due to moralistic bullshit prevelant in our society and peddled by close-minded fucks such as yourself? Worthless shit for brains fucktard.)

Wow. mantis just c... (Below threshold)
Jay Tea:

Wow.

mantis just called virgo a troll.

Considering that mantis started around here as a troll (before working his way up to "gadfly,") that is a definitive smackdown.

mantis, ever considered signing up for the Bomb Squad? You oughta put stuff like that out on its own, not bury it in comments.

J.

Preying Mantis wh... (Below threshold)
virgo:

Preying Mantis

where is all this rage and hatred coming from ? you had better understand it before it destroys you.

mantis are you count... (Below threshold)
virgo:

mantis
are you counting abortions into your infanticide statistics ? because it belongs there..
can suicide/homocide bombers be considered a perversion because there have been so many of them!

I think so!

Sorry to use the old cliche... (Below threshold)
Sidesteal:

Sorry to use the old cliche - but it REALLY doesnt take a rocket scientist (or other brainy individual) to work out (A) what is right or wrong... and... (B) what is natural and un-natural.

You arse is for getting rid of excrement, it has no use other than expelling human waste. It does not have "nerve endings" that give pleasure when a rodent or a c*ck is inside it.

Please, for the love of Mike, tell me how sticking a c*ck (or anything else - except on medical grounds) up anyones arse is natural?

Homosexuality is a curse on the human race. It spreads more STD's than any other form of sexual contact. Simply - being a homo is a curse of the mindset. They have a weird dirty brain/mind and therefore spend all day long trying to convince themselves and others that its natural - when all they are really doing is feeding their sickness.

Homos disgust me and so does Blogger for hosting a boy love blog which we all know is wrong.

BRAVO !!!Right on !!... (Below threshold)
mantis:

BRAVO !!!Right on !!

Whoever likes exclamation m... (Below threshold)
mantis:

Whoever likes exclamation marks and posted the above comment was not me.

Sidesteal Your rig... (Below threshold)
Joe:

Sidesteal

Your right the whole subject is grossly gay.

Cheers Joe,IMHO - ... (Below threshold)
Sidesteal:

Cheers Joe,

IMHO - I reckon so to !

Plz post more about sites w... (Below threshold)

Plz post more about sites with homosexual content. I'm having trouble finding new ones.
:)

I believe disney have a gre... (Below threshold)
Minky:

I believe disney have a great homosexual website:

http://disney.go.com




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy