So did I.

This kind of treason endangers more than New Yorkers. Their latest attempt to minimize the effect of their disclosures is that terrorists "might" have already known about this program.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/30/opinion/30clarke.html?th&emc=th

From the Times Op-Ed piece linked by epdaor:

So, too, however, are the Bush administration's protests that the press revelations about the financial monitoring program may tip off the terrorists. Administration officials made the same kinds of complaints about news media accounts of electronic surveillance. They want the public to believe that it had not already occurred to every terrorist on the planet that his telephone was probably monitored and his international bank transfers subject to scrutiny. How gullible does the administration take the American citizenry to be?

VERY gullible, is the answer to that, and that is a correct assumption. The Bush adminstration counts on it on a daily basis; they court it and play off of it. I heard Tony Snow in an interview yesterday, it was amazing what he "didn't say", chosing to evade the questions and just throw out the usual "Hate Talk Radio" buzzwords that get the gullible in an uproar.

Lee and the Times demonstrate yet again just how truly stupid they are.

It's not the fact they were being monitored that was the revelation. It was revealing the details of HOW.

It's not a crime to tell everyone a bank has security cameras. It is to tell how to disable those cameras and other security allowing anyone to rob it. That is what the traitors at the Times and complte buffoons like Lee are happy about.

Hope you cheer the next deaths that occur from the actions of the Times. Pathetic idiots. I don't question just your loyalty...I question Liberals entire humanity.

It's not the fact they were being monitored that was the revelation. It was revealing the details of HOW.

Thank you, Faith!

(I think I've said that exact same thing in different words about a billion times in recent days.)

Yes, you're both idiots. All that proves is that republican idiots travel in packs.

Faith-brains, Peter F., anyone else

1. What did the terorists learn from the NYTs article that they didn't already know? Be specific.

2. How might terrorists use that information to their advantage? Give examples.

For a person who claims that all he gets are ad homenin attacks instead of intelligent rebuttals, you're pretty good at delivering them yourself.

How many f-ing times do people have to give you specifcs of how terrorists might use this information before you actually listen. I don't know how many people have given you specifics, but I know it's quite a few in the past week. And I think we're all just damn tired of giving telling you why we're pissed off.

You're like a petulant 4-year old child who just can't accept the answers already given to him. That's pathetic and hapless for an adult.

For a person who claims that all he gets are ad homenin attacks instead of intelligent rebuttals, you're pretty good at delivering them yourself.

I receive far more than I hand out. Sometimes idiots just get the better of me...

As to your inability to back up your pathetic and hapless attacks on the NYTs with any facts, or even specific opinions, for fear of being proven an idiot - duly noted.

Lee,
I feel you missed my comment from a couple of days ago. Your consistent displeasure with the President's anti-terrorism program is evident. I simply want to get a feel for what YOU think is the best way to monitor potential terror threats to this country. You did mention previously in one post several days ago that after Bush it would be done right or something to that effect. Is it to much to ask for an outline of your recommended program for anti-terrorism monitoring????

THe dishonest NYT has been caught red-handed again. And Lee is busy defending this disgraceful newspaper. I forgot Lee was willing to participate in the Haditha smear of the US military along with the NYT and the rest of the liberal media.

http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/6/30/151423.shtml?s=ic

"Make no mistake about it, there is a war going on in this country," Horowitz advises, noting that the aggressors in this war "are Democrats, liberals and leftists who began a scorched earth campaign against President Bush before the initiation of hostilities in Iraq."

One of the most prevalent weapons in this war, according to Horowitz, is the New York Times.

You guys, dont let Lee the moron waste your precious time anymore..willful ignorance is His calling.

914, thanks for the advice. I am just having fun with Lee when I have time to post. Jay has a great post today on the Palestian-Is conflict.

Beware of travel feature stories posing as invitations to terror.

"The New York Times points cranks, radicals, al-Qaida operatives and would-be assassins to the summer homes of Cheney and Rumsfeld" ...

In the "Escapes" section of the June 30 edition, the N.Y. Times printed huge color photos of the vacation residences of Cheney and Rumsfeld, "identifying the small Maryland town where they live, showing their front driveways and, in Rumsfeld's case, actually pointing out the hidden security camera in case any hostile intruders should get careless," where the wife shops...