"They're trying to fool you. They're trying to scare you and they're not telling the truth," a fired-up Obama declared while campaigning in South Dakota. "But it's not going to work. Both Bush and McCain represent the failed foreign policy and fear mongering of the past," Obama said. "I believe the American people are ready to reject this approach and to choose the future."
9:16 PM |
0 comments
A few years ago, I had the privilege of speaking to a gentleman who worked for the Gallup Organization. We had a substantive discussion about the business and standards of...
5:33 PM |
2 comments
Sen. John McCain secured millions in federal funds for a land acquisition program that provided a windfall for an Arizona developer whose executives were major campaign donors, public records show.
12:05 PM |
2 comments
Oscar Pistorius, a double-amputee sprinter known as the fastest man on no legs, will be allowed to compete at the Beijing Olympics after a ban on his prosthetic limbs...
12:00 PM |
0 comments
A spy in the audience of this Thursdays taping of the "Ellen DeGeneres Show" tells us that after Ellen mentioned the California Supreme Court ruling striking down the state's...
11:55 AM |
0 comments
Forget the engagement buzz. Not only are Kate Hudson and Owen Wilson not getting married, they're not even an item anymore. After reuniting less than two months ago, the...
11:46 AM |
0 comments
Thou shalt find the Ten Commandments up for bid this summer. A pair of faux granite tablets that Charlton Heston cradled in the 1956 biblical epic "The Ten Commandments"...
11:41 AM |
0 comments
Actress Anne Heche has blamed the cancellation of TV series Men In Trees for her inability to pay child support. The star was granted a reprieve in the monthly...
11:29 AM |
0 comments
More secret details of Angelina Jolie's pregnancy have been exposed by a Kung Fu Panda co-star - Dustin Hoffman has revealed the actress is due to give birth to...
11:26 AM |
0 comments
A new Friday the 13th has begun shooting. Brad Fuller, one of the film's producers, writes "In this movie you will see a feral, brutal Jason who is hell-bent...
10:15 AM |
0 comments
Comments (10)
This means that that it wil... (Below threshold)1. Posted by USMC Pilot | July 30, 2006 7:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This means that that it will last for about twenty minutes.
1. Posted by USMC Pilot | July 30, 2006 7:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 19:05
2. Posted by jpm100 | July 30, 2006 7:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Prediction.
Hezbullah will take between 3-5 hours setting up in key vantage points that were previously destroyed. Do a small in initial attack. Then when Isreal resumes firing, they will blame Israel and resume full attacks. They will see if there's any solid proof they attacked first. If there is some good proof, apologists will claim it was a rogue branch of Hezbullah.
2. Posted by jpm100 | July 30, 2006 7:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 19:14
3. Posted by Kathy K | July 30, 2006 7:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Conditional. Good.
That's exactly what I hope they will do. Always, from now on.
Cease-fires MUST apply to BOTH parties. If they don't, they are surrenders. And I'm tired of watching Israel surrender again and again.
3. Posted by Kathy K | July 30, 2006 7:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 19:18
4. Posted by Lee | July 30, 2006 7:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This isn't good news. Now that Hezzbollah knows that Israel "will" stop under pressure, the question becomes "how much pressure needs to be applied?"
Hopefully Israel will stick to the hours exactly, and resume the very second the 48 hours has expired.
4. Posted by Lee | July 30, 2006 7:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 19:57
5. Posted by steve sturm | July 30, 2006 8:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Once again, Israel agrees to stop killing terrorists before the job is done. Israel did neither of the two things it set out to do; it didn't get back its kidnapped soldiers, nor did it hammer at Hezbollah to the point where Hezbollah didn't pose a threat to Israel. Unfortunately, every time Israel pulls back from trying to kill terrorists, more Israelis die in the not-too-distant future. And for what, 50 or so supposed civilians who were too stupid to heed the warning to evacuate?
More here: for those who care
5. Posted by steve sturm | July 30, 2006 8:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 20:00
6. Posted by Mac Lorry | July 30, 2006 8:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It’s only when Israel errors a bit in striking a military target Hezbollah purposely locates next to “Innocent people” that it’s a tragedy. Had a Hezbollah rocket killed 56 Israeli women and children in their sleep, it would be heralded in the Arab world as a great victory. This is known as asymmetric morality.
6. Posted by Mac Lorry | July 30, 2006 8:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 20:00
7. Posted by Scrapiron | July 30, 2006 9:22 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did Israel really kill these people or did a munitions storage area explode when the terrorist tried to recover it from a damaged building. I'm betting on the latter. Funny that the building stood for 8 hours and then fell into a heap without warning and killed all of those terrorists. Yes, anyone in the building was a terrorists as is 99.9% of those killed that the terrorists classify as civilians. The people of the free world really are suckers for a sob story, of maybe just stupid. How did the NY Terrorists Times manage to write a first hand account of the collapse of the building during the bombing if it stood for 8 hours? I knew they were in the hands (or on the payroll) of the terrorist but I didn't know they attended the terrorist planning sessions.
7. Posted by Scrapiron | July 30, 2006 9:22 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 21:22
8. Posted by LenS | July 30, 2006 9:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Now we know. The current Israeli govt. is, in the end, too weak to do what is necessary to survive. Sadly, I doubt that the US govt. has the will either. But I guess both governments are just reflections of their people's weakness.
8. Posted by LenS | July 30, 2006 9:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 21:25
9. Posted by skymuse | July 30, 2006 9:49 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What's the over-under?
I've got 18 hours.
9. Posted by skymuse | July 30, 2006 9:49 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 21:49
10. Posted by Mitchell | July 30, 2006 10:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
LenS, an even more intriguing question: what would the U.S. do in these circumstances? Are our people getting so fat and happy that they would avoid war at any cost.
The polls seem to suggest so. The West is heading toward a decadent, narcissistic end in the face of challenges from Islamic aggression.
If we were so shocked at civilian deaths in WW II, we'd be speaking German now, along with the rest of the world. We were willing to pay any price--in tens of thousands of military lives, and to kill the same number of civilians in Dresden and other parts of Germany.
Are we too weak morally to survive this new existential threat?
10. Posted by Mitchell | July 30, 2006 10:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 30, 2006 22:09