« Giuliani-Romney 2008? | Main | Last Week's Weekend Caption Contest™ Winners »

Cell Phone Terrorists Planned to Target Mackinac Bridge

According to the prosecutor, the three men arrested in Caro, Michigan planned to attack the Mackinac Bridge:

Tuscola County prosecutors filed terrorism-related charges Saturday against three men they say bought dozens of cell phones Friday in Caro in a globally coordinated plot involving the Mackinac Bridge.


They charged brothers Adham Abdelhamid Othman, 21, and Louai Abdelhamied Othman, 23, along with their cousin, Maruan Awad Muhareb, 18, with identical counts of collecting material to support terrorist acts and surveillance of a vulnerable target with intent to commit terrorism.

Prosecutor Mark E. Reene wouldn't confirm what evidence led him to believe the Dallas, Texas, men targeted the bridge that connects Michigan's peninsulas.

"All I can say is that the Mackinac Bridge is the target at issue," he said. "There's reason to be concerned."

Meanwhile, we learn that terrorists do, in fact, read the New York Times. From the Marietta Times:

Authorities say terrorist groups are illegally modifying the pre-paid cell phones to place untraceable international calls.

Now terrorists are working to evade the Terrorist Surviellance Program that they didn't have any clue about before the New York Times blew the program's cover with its NSA wiretapping article.


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cell Phone Terrorists Planned to Target Mackinac Bridge:

» Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with Texas Trio Arrested On Terror Charges

» Michelle Malkin linked with Coast Guard Picks Up Patrol of Mackinac Bridge

» ProCynic linked with Attack of the Phones

Comments (49)

I have to call BS on this o... (Below threshold)

I have to call BS on this one....

Why does anyone need 1,000 cell phones to blowup the Mackinac Bridge? Seriously, it's not like someone is going to place 1,000 charges on the bridge and then speed dial them without anyone noticing. "Hey there's Ahmed again studying every bolt on the bridge...he's been coming out here for three years studying every structural point on this bridge and he always leave a present behind..."

My guess is they were buying these phones and reselling them as untraceable. The reason to toss the charger is whoever wanted them already has a few. And if you wanted to blowup a active bridge, the only way is going to be by surprise attack (say a tractor trailer with a shape charge...even then it would almost have to be a precise hit on a specific spot). And if whoever was asking them to buy the phones told them what their eventual plans were, they are complete idots when it comes to OpSec.

Why does anyone need 1,0... (Below threshold)
cirby:

Why does anyone need 1,000 cell phones to blowup the Mackinac Bridge?

They don't. But why do you think these guys are working in isolation?

But a bunch of different terrorists could keep a bunch of different phones around, to make one-time calls to various international numbers, or as remote detonation devices. Buy a bunch, distribute them to a handful of different groups, and you have a combined comm network and demolition trigger setup.

My guess is they were buying these phones and reselling them as untraceable.

Then why remove them from the boxes and separate out the parts? The market for used cell phones isn't particularly great, and even promoting them as "untraceable" wouldn't do much (except get some nosy security guard at a flea market to call the real cops on you). Heck, used cell phones are so out of demand that stores offer the service of recycling them for free, or have donation boxes for charity groups.

And if you wanted to blowup a active bridge, the only way is going to be by surprise attack (say a tractor trailer with a shape charge...even then it would almost have to be a precise hit on a specific spot).

Nope. Considering that the Mackinac is one of the longest suspension bridges in the world, a single large explosion in the middle of the span on a busy day would be more than enough.

Perhaps. But a story I read... (Below threshold)
Delta OP:

Perhaps. But a story I read about these guys said that they claimed they were selling these phones at an almost 100% profit margin without the charger and packaging! I am calling BS on that explanation because why would people do that when they could pay almost half price at the Wal-Mart down the street? Of course, maybe these guys are buying these phones on behalf of some other people who plan to use them for terrorist activities. Needless to say, there is a lot more investigating to be done...

I'm sorry, but the idea the... (Below threshold)
Jim Addison:

I'm sorry, but the idea these guys were reselling the phones doesn't pass the laugh test.

They were discarding the packaging and charger, so the phones would have a terribly short lifespan. And they were able to sell them at a PROFIT, even though an equally "untraceable" phone WITH the charger was on sale in every Wal-Mart in creation for half the cost?

Yeah, right. Anyone who buys that story: I have a bridge in Brooklyn I just KNOW you'll be interested in.

Now terrorists are worki... (Below threshold)
Earl:

Now terrorists are working to evade the Terrorist Surviellance Program that they didn't have any clue about before the New York Times blew the program's cover with its NSA wiretapping article.

That's hilarious. I guess before the NYT article, no one knew the benefits of using untraceable phones?

Earl:Apparently, a... (Below threshold)
cirby:

Earl:

Apparently, a lot of them didn't.

Much like the finance folks behind the terrorists didn't all know about the SWIFT program, or like all of the bad guys who keep getting blown up by US weapons that they could learn about if they read the right magazines.

Or, on a simpler concept: you're playing poker, but a "reporter" is standing behind your opponent, saying things like "don't draw to an inside straight."

You're making a common mistake. Don't assume the bad guys are smart, or that they did the right kind of research. The whole "terrorists should know this" idea is a crock, and is mostly post-justification for things like leaks.

I can attest to the fact ma... (Below threshold)
Mitchell:

I can attest to the fact many didn't know what SWIFT was. I send int'l. wires frequently, so I've been aware of it for some time.

But the way some of the Lefties were talking like this was some U.S. Bank database belies the idea that "they already knew about it."

The best evidence they didn't is the recent change to tracphones. Duh.....!

What I find amazing about a... (Below threshold)
USMC Pilot:

What I find amazing about all of this, is that there are actually people who will try to find some other reason that a bunch of muslims are buying trackphones and visiting bridges. They are probably going to try and convince us that the herd rounded up in Britain were just gathering to pray. Do they not understand, that when the muslims take over, their precious "Bill of Rights", so often refered to, is going on the bond fire. Thirty three percent of all muslims in England believe that it is OK to blow up Jews. For Christ sake wakeup before they let you know that it is OK to blow you up.

You're making a common m... (Below threshold)
Earl:

You're making a common mistake. Don't assume the bad guys are smart, or that they did the right kind of research.

And the common mistake that you're making is assuming the opposite - that the bad guys are all clueless and dumb. Some of them are, thank god. But if we assume none of them know about things like wiretapping (or more generally, that people out there are trying to stop them), we risk being caught with our pants down. This isn't a left-right thing; gratuitous bashing of the NYT does nothing to improve the situation.

And the common mistake t... (Below threshold)
cirby:

And the common mistake that you're making is assuming the opposite - that the bad guys are all clueless and dumb.

Actually, I'm not making that mistake at all.

I just know that, from the evidence, enough of them are dumb to give us a bit of an edge from time to time, and we'd be really stupid not to take that advantage and use it. Of course, what's really dumb is to do things like print front-page stories in major newspapers telling the dumb ones about stuff they didn't know.

I also know that it's really stupid to give the bad guys the benefit of the doubt by believing in things like the "cell phone reseller" theory or the like.

How much brain power does i... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

How much brain power does it take to realize that the 1000 cell phones may not have been for just these two folk and not for just this potential objective.

The real question is what were the other uses for these phones? Shipping them to Pakistan or Iraq maybe? Or, how many friends to these people have here domestically?

OK. Reality check - if the ... (Below threshold)
Frank:

OK. Reality check - if the gas-station/cellphone story holds water, I should be able to walk into just about any gas-station and right next to the candy,chewing gum and cigarettes there should be a display of untraceable, used cellphones for $38 apiece. This would be right next to the recycle bin used for dropping off discarded old cellphones. Yeah, right! Somebody's logic is not quite firing on all 8.

Time to change our prioriti... (Below threshold)
`Cliff Olson:

Time to change our priorities. It should be "Guilty until proven innocent".

Cirby - I get your point, b... (Below threshold)
Earl:

Cirby - I get your point, but where do you draw the line? To take it to an extreme, should the media refrain from even mentioning there's a war on in Iraq, since the really stupid terrorist-wannabes maybe don't know there are a bunch of Americans nearby? If we follow the rule that the media shouldn't report anything that the might give ideas to the dumbest people, the media can't report anything.

For all those who are scept... (Below threshold)
Tyler:

For all those who are sceptical of the reselling scenario:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss-leader
Selling a phone whose manufacturing costs are $19 for $20 would normally suck, business-wise, but since your're the largest retailer in the world, have an existing deal to get a percentage of the ongoing revolving charges for refilling your pre-paid plan. But if you are looking to sell those phones with, say, unlocked sim cards on ebay, they immedeateately go back up to what their actual retail cost should be, $38 at 100% markup, which is market standard for cell phones, if not more.

And why remove the packaging? Hmmmm, may be because there might have been A LARGE SPLASH GRAPHIC SAYING $20 ON IT?

Remember "If (fill in the blank), then the terrorists have laready won"? Well, when our best hope for nabbing terrorist is an "observant" wal-mart employee who manages to notice that the customer bought 997 more cell phones than the 3-per-customer-limit, then, uhhhh.....yeah.

Is there someone in Texas w... (Below threshold)
Robert:

Is there someone in Texas who can find out what the Wall Mart price of these phones are there?

Maybe there is a Texas tax on them or something.

Absent that, the resell plan seems as odd as separating the phones from the chargers.

Another explaination I've read is that the chips in the phones can be used for IED's.

______

The Mackinac is a suspension one with a very long span held up by two cables, supported from two high towers. This is the guts of the thing.

A charge placed on the roadway would remove some road, but would be unlikely to bring the whole thing down. A charge placed on one of the cables on the other hand, or a ship hitting a tower...

The article about this in o... (Below threshold)
Skip:

The article about this in one of the local papers here in Dallas said that the reason they were up in Michigan was that there were a bunch of people in Dallas that did this, so the local Walmarts were always low on stock. The claim in the article was that they would sell them for $38 (or whatever) and they'd be resold for $100 each overseas.

Now, it's certainly likely in my mind that these phones were intended for terrorism, but it's at least possible in my mind that these really were people just trying to make a buck.

There's a Walmart down the street - I'll stop by there this evening and see if I can spot the phones they're talking about.

Earl:Cirby - I ge... (Below threshold)
cirby:

Earl:
Cirby - I get your point, but where do you draw the line?

Somewhere to the south of where the New York Times reports on a story and mentions that it's a "secret' program a half-dozen times in the first few paragraphs. Which sums up both the SWIFT and international call programs.

Tyler:
Since the phones in question are plain old cell phones, without the "splash graphics" you imagine, and are also available online, your "loss leader with price on it" fantasy falls apart, even without considering the fact that they were separating out the chargers and phones. If they were just reselling the phones, the would also need to sell the chargers...

One huge issue, by the way, is the fact that the low-end phones they're talking about are pretty much US-only, and work on different frequencies than much of the world uses. There are only a couple of places those GSM phones would work outside of the US, and one of those (oddly enough) is a place where they use a helluva lot of phones to set off roadside bombs (and where they're investigating people who buy more than one phone at a time).

Skip:Motorola C139... (Below threshold)
cirby:

Skip:

Motorola C139-4.

Also available online from Wal-Mart at $19.99.

It's also available from places like Cingular with a pay-as-you-go plan for $29.99, so the whole "sell them for $38" excuse is looking dumber by the minute.

Even if the twenty Dallas Wal-Mart stores were sold out, there are about a hundred other Wal-Mart stores within 200 miles or so, instead of having to drive a thousand miles north (which is what you do if you're trying to cover your tracks).

Somewhere to the south o... (Below threshold)
Earl:

Somewhere to the south of where the New York Times reports on a story and mentions that it's a "secret' program a half-dozen times in the first few paragraphs.

That's an unconvincing argument. Your earlier point was that some stupid terrorists may not know about wiretapping in general; how does this have anything to do with whether a program was secret or not?

A better link on why people... (Below threshold)
tryingtothink:

A better link on why people can make money reselling cell phones
(causing a lawsuit to stop them) is at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracfone

That's an unconvincing a... (Below threshold)
cirby:

That's an unconvincing argument. Your earlier point was that some stupid terrorists may not know about wiretapping in general; how does this have anything to do with whether a program was secret or not?

You were asking where to draw the line, and I gave you a place to start. The world isn't a binary set. It's not "either-or." Events have shown - with a high degree of certainty - that the terrorists, by and large, didn't know about the interception of international calls, or about the SWIFT banking monitoring system.

When someone knows that a program is secret (or at least unnoticed), that it's legal, and that it's doing good work in rounding up bad guys, they should NOT make it a point to tell everyone on the planet that it's going on.

Events have also shown that sales of those cheap "untraceable" throwaway cell phones have gone through the roof since the Times story, and men of Middle Eastern descent seem to be the only ones who have discovered this "magic" way to make money off of a loss-leader cell phone that sells for half of what they claim to be planning to sell them for (odd that the other 99.5% of the US doesn't seem to have anyone who's thought of this before).

Three things make a good te... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

Three things make a good terrorist target: symbolic destruction, loss of life, and economic impact.

That bridge is beautiful but with very little population. Blowing it up would only achieve one of the three criteria: symbolic destruction.

Using this criteria, I doubt it was a target from high command.

Maybe they planned to hit t... (Below threshold)
Julie:

Maybe they planned to hit the bridge on Labor Day, during the annual walk:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackinac_Bridge_Walk

tryingtothink;That... (Below threshold)
cirby:

tryingtothink;

That's a different case altogether. The Tracfone situation was one in which someone was unlocking the subsidized Tracfone units (since Tracfone is one of those "prepaid" companies, they make their money off of airtime sales on the phones they sell at a discount).

The current situation is about phones which were never locked to begin with (the cheap Motorola units in question didn't come with a service plan, and were not subsidized by a carrier).

Red Fog:For a chea... (Below threshold)
cirby:

Red Fog:

For a cheap attack, the Mackinac would be a good choice. At the right time of the day, the loss of life would compare to an airliner bomb, the chances of getting away are much higher, and the symbolic impact (blowing up America's longest suspension bridge while showing that no place is safe) would be much higher than you'd think.

Cirby - you're twisting my ... (Below threshold)
Earl:

Cirby - you're twisting my argument (or conflating it with that made by others): I personally believe that these Tracfones were not being used for some sketchy business venture, and it was something much more nefarious. My only point was that it's silly to tie this to the NYT article, and you've provided no evidence that there's a correlation (besides saying "events have shown..."). If you provide a chart showing Tracfone sales as a function of time, with a massive increase at the time of the NYT article, that would be convincing. But so far I've seen nothing of the sort.

My only point was that i... (Below threshold)
cirby:

My only point was that it's silly to tie this to the NYT article

Then your point was pretty thin. Up until the NYT article, people just plain didn't go out and buy a thousand cheap cell phones from retailers in order to resell them in the manner suggested (and nobody's been able to find anyone selling them in such a fashion since then, either - at most, people buy three or four at a time for family or friends).

It makes zero economic sense, but it makes a huge amount of sense if you need untraceable phone communications.

The FBI noted a big increase in bulk sales of these phones right after the NYT story (ABC reported on it), and there have been several cases of people trying to buy them but running away when police showed up. If it's just innocent reselling, then why run or try to hide the sales?

By the way - the newest thing on these "Texas" guys is that they were Palestinian Islamic Jihad members.

cirby,For a cheap... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

cirby,
For a cheap attack, the Mackinac would be a good choice. At the right time of the day, the loss of life would compare to an airliner bomb, the chances of getting away are much higher, and the symbolic impact (blowing up America's longest suspension bridge while showing that no place is safe) would be much higher than you'd think.

First off, all attacks are "cheap" shots. According the MDOT, the bridge had a traffic average of 12,100 vehicles per day a few years ago. There would only be 42 vehicles every 5 minutes on average. Gee, if timed well maybe a couple hundred cars would fall into the straights of Mackinaw. Okay, one full airliner's worth of human life. Julie points out the big walk but then they'd be taking out one of their supporters, Gov Jennifer Granholm. As I said before and I believe you agree, it would have a symbolic impact but mostly to deer hunters come Fall ... which is the largest annual migration of armed humans in the history of mankind (no joke). I'm just saying I don't believe taking out this bridge would be strategic nor from a high terrorist command. They know better than to mess with a redneck's favorite passtime.

Julie's got it right.... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

Julie's got it right.

During the Labor Day Bridge Walk over 50,000 people can be on the bridge at once on foot. The fall would be sufficient to kill many. The waters below are fresh water (harder to stay afloat) and cold. Many more would drown. Not to mention the ensuing panic. Take out a section and most of the rest would probably collapse.

Speaking of walking the bridge on foot, does the term sports drink mean anything to anyone?

If it's just innocent re... (Below threshold)
Earl:

If it's just innocent reselling, then why run or try to hide the sales?

You keep arguing against a point I'm not making. Do you have any links regarding the increase of sales of these things after the NYT article?

jpm100,No one</... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

jpm100,

No one could survive the fall from that bridge. Like jumping from a 40-story building. A car got blown off it a few years back and it hit the water like it was concrete. The driver was wearing a seatbelt but it didn't help at all. As for swimming in fresh cold water, I think I was in Lake Michigan for well over an hour last week and survived. My guess is that security is quite high on that bridge on Labor Day and that explosives would be found before it was too late.

You keep arguing against... (Below threshold)
cirby:

You keep arguing against a point I'm not making. Do you have any links regarding the increase of sales of these things after the NYT article?

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=1499905

That, plus the disturbing tendency of these 'innocent" guys almost always having direct ties to terror organizations.

This is how I would do it.<... (Below threshold)
robert:

This is how I would do it.

Michigan, my home, has huge ore carriers that ply the lakes and cross under the Mackinac every day.

These carriers, fully three football fields long, are so computerized that they only require a crew of less than ten. The momentum of one of these, loaded with thousands of tonnes of ore, is great.

You hijack one of these and crash it into a bridge tower, you have a big deal. Do it during the walk, and you have a 911 type deal.

From that article...<... (Below threshold)
Earl:

From that article...

"Law enforcement officials say the phones were used to detonate the bombs terrorists used in the Madrid train attacks in March 2004."

How exactly does this tie into the NYT article?

That, plus the disturbing tendency of these 'innocent" guys almost always having direct ties to terror organizations.

Did I ever even imply these guys were innocent? I've stayed on point here: this has little to nothing to do with the Times. I don't understand why you keep trying to divert this discussion to a debate about their guilt/innocence.

From that article...... (Below threshold)
cirby:

From that article...

"Law enforcement officials say the phones were used to detonate the bombs terrorists used in the Madrid train attacks in March 2004."

How exactly does this tie into the NYT article?

That one sentence doesn't other than to show alternate (and bad) uses for the phones.

But - and you really need to think about this - the surge in bulk cell phone purchases came immediately after the NYT article, not before. Sure, it's barely possible that it was all random chance that these guys suddenly, out of the blue, decided to start buying untraceable cell phones and never heard of the NYT story, but the odds are so low it's bordering on the absurd.

Did I ever even imply these guys were innocent?

Yeah, by doggedly insisting that there might be an innocent reason these guys bought 1000 cell phones, even when the justification you keep defending has more holes than a colander.

I'm just not buying it. Any... (Below threshold)
Unconvinced:

I'm just not buying it. Any of it.

If they were to be used for terrorism, why 1000? That's a lot of freaking cell phones.

If they were to be used for resale, how do you sell a phone with no charger?

It's the no charger thing that bothers me

To my little brain. The no charger thing destroys the resale story.

The only way the resale story makes sice is if they were selling the phones, the battereis and the chargers seperatly on ebay or something. I can see the pieces going for more than the whole. -- But why throw away the chargers?

-----------

BUT the charger thing harms the terror story (as told) too. How are the Johnny Jihands going to use them for terroism with no charger.....

But consider this....

They were seperating the phones from the batteries. What if they were really after the batteries? (Why I don't know) Can one make an explosive with this type batteries?

AND if so, isn't there a cheaper and easier way to buy battereis in bulk?

I think we're missing a big piece of the puzzle. Why seperate the phones from the batteries?

I do tend to believe these guys were up to no good.

But how?

I think there's a serious c... (Below threshold)
Earl:

I think there's a serious correlation/causation issue here. I don't see how 2 suspicious purchases made within a couple weeks of an article being written proves anything; particularly since we know nothing of the timing of other purchases of the same phone.

As for this...

Yeah, by doggedly insisting that there might be an innocent reason these guys bought 1000 cell phones, even when the justification you keep defending has more holes than a colander.

I've insisted nothing of the sort, and even said explicitly I thought these guys were planning something bad. Either you're not paying attention to who writes individual posts, or your reading comprehension is terrible, or you're just a jerk trying to get under my skin. Either way, it's not worth my time.

robert,You hijack... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

robert,
You hijack one of these [ore ships] and crash it into a bridge tower, you have a big deal. Do it during the walk, and you have a 911 type deal.

Nice try but a 'Laker' the likes of say the 50,000-ton 1,000 footer's bow would self-destruct on the massive point of the bridge tower base while the swift hydraulics would pull the groaning hulk around the bridge base and into her murky cold water grave for eternity. Aye, matie, might ya be a terrorist harbored in Dearborn?

These young Arabs were atte... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

These young Arabs were attepting to make a profit on cellphone batteries which have a shorter economic life than the phone itself. The batteries sell for a big profit in the right place like ... um ... Beruit, Baghdad, Tehran.

My theory: These young ente... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

My theory: These young enterprising future Arab capitalists (Bushitler's idyllic youth) were attempting to make a phat profit on cellphone batteries which, as we all know, have a shorter economic life than the phone itself. The batteries should sell for a big profit in the right place like ... um ... Beruit, Baghdad, Tehran.

Simple banana trade economics.

Red Fog,The bridge... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

Red Fog,

The bridge may be searched, but I question if they had planned on patting down 50,000+ people the morning of the walk? Let alone make them stand in line and drink their liquids.

It is a walk and the weather is unpredictable that time of year in potentially high winds, so people can dress in moderate layers of clothing or have backpacks.

Picture of Mackinac Bridge Walk

That picture also reveals a... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

That picture also reveals another interesting point, vehicles are still permitted on the bridge at the same time people are packed accross the bridge in the other lanes.

jpm100,You've got ... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

jpm100,

You've got a point about cars on the bridge with the walkers. Got a hunch the walk will have reduced numbers this year ... including Gov. Granholm.

Fog,This may inter... (Below threshold)
robert:

Fog,

This may interest you:


“On the morning of May 9th, 1980 at 07:38, during a violent rain squall producing high winds and almost zero visibility the empty phosphate freighter SUMMIT VENTURE piloted by Captain John Lerro slammed into the #2 South pier (over 700 feet from the center of the channel) of the southbound (1970) span, it knocked 1261 feet of center span, cantilever, approach and roadway into Tampa Bay. Thirty-five people, most of them on board a Greyhound bus bound for Miami plunged 150 feet to their deaths in what is now one of the worst bridge disasters in history. Rescue crews and divers were immediately dispatched to the scene, but of the victims who made the fall there was only one survivor, whose truck had luckily landed on the deck of the SUMMIT VENTURE.”

Fog,

Note that this freighter was empty and there were high winds. This was also a suspension bridge.

Well “shiver my timbers” dude, looks like you get to walk the plank.


Suspension bridges are called that because the roadway hangs from cables that drop vertically down from the main support cables. The main things are the two towers and the main cables that go from shore to shore and over the two towers. The roadway itself is only a minor part of the structure – backpacks won’t get it. The only way to bring down a bridge like this from the roadway is sympathetic vibration. Even an F18 would go for the towers.


Arrrrghhh! She'd scuttle b... (Below threshold)
Red Fog:

Arrrrghhh! She'd scuttle before she reached thar pier in them narrow n swift waters.

CARO, Mich. — The FBI said ... (Below threshold)
Ruprick:

CARO, Mich. — The FBI said Monday it had no information to indicate that the three Texas men arrested with about 1,000 cell phones in their van had any direct connection to known terrorist groups.

Also, a prosecutor in a separate Ohio case said he cannot prove a terrorism link between two men arrested after buying large numbers of cell phones and will not proceed for now with terrorism charges against them.

From Fox News
Guess we'll all have to be paranoid about something else...

AAHRGG!This is nuts!... (Below threshold)

AAHRGG!
This is nuts! They're NOT terrorists!
See Episode 034 here:
http://RadioFreeLiberty.com

It turns out that the "terr... (Below threshold)
Andrew:

It turns out that the "terrorists" were in fact just buying cell phones for re-sale.
The whole concept of the bridge being blown up was a fabrication -- by whom though? Who 1st said "they" were terroist and had the bridge as a target?
Terrorism charges changed to fraud
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060817/NEWS05/608170379/1007/NEWS

Just one more example of Al-CI-ata putting the fear to the public.

Wake up.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy