« British Airways Keeps A "Stiff Upper Lip" | Main | The Evil We Face -- II »

The Curious "Anti-Racism" of the Radical Left

Pound for pound, the "political newsletter" Counterpunch is surely one of the zanier "websites" on Al Gore's World-Wide Web. Run by Stalinoid conspiracy theorist Alexander Cockburn, Counterpunch presents a treasure trove of unhinged far-left rants, many of which take aim at the nefarious "Zionist lobby."

This radical "website's" fixation with anti-Israel apologetics demonstrates the curious "anti-racism" of the self-proclaimed progressive left. As everyone with a pulse knows, leftists constantly bleat about how gosh darn opposed to racism they are: They're so dedicated to rooting out prejudice that they even invent examples of it merely to make formal displays of their virtue.

Yet, oddly enough, one particularly noxious brand of racism seems very much off their radar screens; try as they might, these leftists simply can't find examples of it. You see, to the loveable lunatics at Counterpunch and kindred organs of left-wing radicalism, certain types of racism permeate the world, but there's no such thing as anti-Semitism.

Take, for example, the tellingly titled Counterpunch article "From the New 'Anti-Semitism' to Nuclear Holocaust," which was penned by one Jonathan Cook, a regular contributor to the "site," whose irrational rants routinely defend anti-Semitism at its most vile. In this morally obtuse, factually challenged column, Mr. Cook "argues" that contemporary charges of anti-Semitism are ineluctably an insidious Zionist ploy. To Mr. Cook, it seems, anti-Semitism, like unicorns, doesn't exist.

To this end, this pseudo-journalist-cum-degenerate informs us:

...Israeli politicians concentrated their attention on the two European countries with the largest Jewish populations, Britain and France, both of which also have significant numbers of immigrant Muslims. They highlighted a supposed rise in anti-Semitism in these two countries in the hope of attracting their Jewish populations to Israel.

Ah, so concerns about anti-Semitism is merely a scheme to maintain a Jewish majority in Israel, with which those evil Jews can oppress their peaceable Palestinian neighbors? Can an argument get any more revolting than that?

Note, dear reader, that Mr. Cook refers to the "supposed rise in anti-Semitism" in Britain and France. This isn't just obtuse, it's bad journalism: Government reports from these two countries have demonstrated a marked rise in anti-Semitic incidents in the last few years. But Mr. Cook ignores such reports, in favor of anecdotal evidence supposedly questioning the very existence of anti-Semitism in Europe.

With Mr. Cook engaging in so many willful distortions and mental gymnastics in order to defend anti-Semites, one might reasonably wonder what kind of animus toward Jews he harbors. But the unhinged nonsense of Mr. Cook isn't our major concern. Rather, we find his tortured illogic typical of the radical left's curiously selective understanding of "anti-racism."

Just imagine, dear reader, if someone argued that American blacks always use trumped-up charges of racism for sordid gains--more preferential treatment, reparations, bigger welfare checks, &c. Imagine if someone argued that Muslims always use trumped-up charges of racism to weaken the West's resolve and make it easier to conquer.

Mind you, such a critic--like Mr. Cook in regard to anti-Semitism--would have to gainsay the very existence of anti-black and anti-Muslim sentiment. Exactly how long would it take our "progressive" pals--at Counterpunch and elsewhere--to label these deeply racist views? Less than the time it takes Michael Moore to polish off a doughnut?

For some reason, however, these same radical lefties don't show such concern about anti-Semitism. To the feverish left-wing mind, anti-black racism is omnipresent, anti-Muslim sentiment is everywhere. But anti-Semitism? There's no such thing.

What chutzpah.

(Note: The crack young staff normally "weblog" over at "The Hatemonger's Quarterly," where they are currently contemplating the possibility that Alexander Cockburn was drawn to radical politics due to the rough childhood he experienced as a result of his unfortunate surname.)


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Curious "Anti-Racism" of the Radical Left:

» The Thunder Run linked with Web Reconnaissance for 09/25/2006

Comments (5)

Alexander Cockburn has been... (Below threshold)

Alexander Cockburn has been around, spouting essentially the same bile, for 25 years or more.

The main difference is that back in the '80s even Democrats recognized he was a commie nut case.

Oh no, not yet another righ... (Below threshold)
Jake:

Oh no, not yet another right wing cretin using some leftist in a global comparison. Cause everyone kows the right these dauys are populated by hypocitical stupid fascist crackpots who love Ann Coulter yet jerk themselves off on just how much more "tolerant" than the left they are. So they don't like Israel, is that something new?

Does your Mommy know you're... (Below threshold)

Does your Mommy know you're still up?

FWIW, "Cockburn" is pronoun... (Below threshold)
meep:

FWIW, "Cockburn" is pronounced "Coe-burn".

Damn limeys. They put in all these letters they never pronounce (leicester = lester) and then pronounce letters that aren't even in the words (lieutenant = leftenant). And then they say =we= screwed up the language.

I don't believe the paradox... (Below threshold)
baslimthecripple:

I don't believe the paradox is all that much. "Racism" as employed by the left is operationally defined as something one's political opponents must be exhibiting in order to account for why American blacks, for example, or Paleostinian Arabs are perennial losers. Those wascally wepublicans must be racists and conspiring to keep (fill in the blank)s down.
It presupposes that the losers must be the victims of someone or other. Since Jews in general and Israelis in particular aren't losers, no one is discriminating against them. Mundane explanations like inner-city illegitamacy lack savor, no victims, no villains, and heroic socialists rescuing the former and punishing the latter. And for the Muslim world, a seventh century outlook in a 21st century world tends to be associated with backwardness - so much so that no one needs to conspire to keep Muslims down, Jews or otherwise. They are self-sufficient in that arena.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy