Via the Associated Press:
A senior U.S. diplomat apologized Sunday night for saying U.S. policy in Iraq displayed "arrogance" and "stupidity."A day after his remarks in an interview were broadcast by the pan-Arab satellite channel Al-Jazeera, Alberto Fernandez issued a written apology through the State Department press office.
"Upon reading the transcript of my appearance on Al-Jazeera, I realized that I seriously misspoke by using the phrase 'there has been arrogance and stupidity' by the U.S. in Iraq," said Fernandez, director of public diplomacy in State's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs.
"This represents neither my views nor those of the State Department," Fernandez added. "I apologize."
U.S. officials had sought to play down Fernandez' assessment of the security situation in Iraq.
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters Saturday that Fernandez said after the broadcast he didn't think reports of his comments were an "accurate reflection of what he said." Asked whether the Bush administration believed that history will show a record of arrogance or stupidity in Iraq, McCormack replied, "No."
Fernandez spoke in fluent Arabic in the interview, which Al-Jazeera said was taped in Washington on Friday. His remarks were translated into English by The Associated Press.
I agree with Michelle Malkin that "it was where and how he chose to criticize Iraq policy--in Arabic on the terrorist propaganda network, al Jazeera, right after a terrorist spokesman called on jihadis to bring America to its knees" that makes "sorry" insufficient.
Saying "sorry" just doesn't cut it. We don't need "diplomacy" like this in the State Department. I can't help but wonder if Mr. Fernandez thought no one back home would find out about his comments since he made them in Arabic.



Comments (42)
Every time I turn around I ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Vulgorilla | October 23, 2006 9:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Every time I turn around I stumble across someone like this bozo in the State Department. Where do we get them? I'm now starting to understand why Stalin had his "purges". It does cleanse the bureaucracy.
1. Posted by Vulgorilla | October 23, 2006 9:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 09:41
2. Posted by kevino | October 23, 2006 10:05 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This guy should be fired at once, and the US should pick through everything that this person has done with an eye towward presecuting him.
And if the GOP and President had had any guts, they would have "reorganized" the State Department by legislative mandate, setting aside the usual protections on federal jobs and allowing the White House a one-time review of the top 1000 jobs at the State Department with the goal of sacking 90% of them. In the last several years we've seen a bunch of unelected twits in the State Department try to run foreign policy instead of the President. When they can't get their way they actively undermine US policy, and seniority protects their jobs no matter what. Firing these people should have been done years ago. And those they leaked information should be prosecuted. It is a just punishment, a warning to others, and essential for an elected official to make policy.
President Lincoln once said his horse caught his own hind hoof in the stirrup. He said, "If you're getting on then I'm getting off." US foreign policy can't be run by committee, particularly by a committee of people who aren't accountable for their actions.
2. Posted by kevino | October 23, 2006 10:05 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:05
3. Posted by Falze | October 23, 2006 10:05 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Purge? Nah, if he's fluent in Arabic send him over to NSA to do translations. 'From each according to his ability...' Clearly State Dept. diplomacy isn't his bailiwick and we need more translators...
3. Posted by Falze | October 23, 2006 10:05 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:05
4. Posted by Gianni | October 23, 2006 10:10 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Whaddya expct from a Klinton appointee?
Ever notice every time a lib gets caught screwing up,(i.e. Uncle Harry) they think an ooops, Im sory is sufficient?
ALL measures should be taken to fire this guy, and terminate all benefits if possible.
4. Posted by Gianni | October 23, 2006 10:10 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:10
5. Posted by Lee | October 23, 2006 10:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hopefully Fernandez is protected by the federal whistleblower statutes.
After all, all he did was tell the truth.
5. Posted by Lee | October 23, 2006 10:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:13
6. Posted by jpm100 | October 23, 2006 10:19 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I almost want the Democrats to have office just to see people like Lee do 180's on mid-level bureaucrat leakers.
6. Posted by jpm100 | October 23, 2006 10:19 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:19
7. Posted by Baggi | October 23, 2006 10:20 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Actually, the truth has nothing to do with it. What he said is an opinion. Is the left at that point now that they are not able to tell the difference? Agreeing with an opinion does not change it from opinion to fact.
7. Posted by Baggi | October 23, 2006 10:20 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:20
8. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | October 23, 2006 10:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Baggi,
The left has ALWAYS confused opinion with fact.
Leelee is just a good example.
8. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | October 23, 2006 10:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:23
9. Posted by Mark Blahut | October 23, 2006 10:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Lorie , How come when its the truth , you seem to be upset . What was said is TRUE . You are a very odd girl . You believe the bullshit and not the truth .
This is why you will loose the house and senate.
9. Posted by Mark Blahut | October 23, 2006 10:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:24
10. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | October 23, 2006 10:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
jpm100,
The problem with that is that the same mid-level bureaucrats who are doing the leaking now are loyal to the leftists and would never leak against them no matter how bad they are !@#%ing up.
10. Posted by Sheik Yur Bouty | October 23, 2006 10:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:25
11. Posted by BarneyG2000 | October 23, 2006 10:43 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Now that we know that the President was only kidding when the stated administration's policy was "stay the course", you can't blame an administration's spokesmen for tell the truth.
11. Posted by BarneyG2000 | October 23, 2006 10:43 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:43
12. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 10:54 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gee Barney, He is not a spokesman for the administration, As it turns out Hes a spokesman for Al Jazeera and knows not the truth.
12. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 10:54 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 10:54
13. Posted by Scrapiron | October 23, 2006 11:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If he is a man he will resign today. If he is a left wing democ'rat he'll keep making weasel excuses for his failure. We'll know what he is by midnight.
13. Posted by Scrapiron | October 23, 2006 11:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 11:24
14. Posted by Black Elk | October 23, 2006 11:40 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
In the words of the Donald"Your Fired"!!!
14. Posted by Black Elk | October 23, 2006 11:40 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 11:40
15. Posted by papalovesmambo | October 23, 2006 11:40 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
this was not an accident. it was merely another in the endless series of attempts by democrat partisans within the administration to influence the 2006 mid-terms. once again it comes at the cost of american safety and security. it's treason and he should be treated as a traitor. i believe the term is unlawful enemy combatant.
15. Posted by papalovesmambo | October 23, 2006 11:40 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 11:40
16. Posted by Gayle Miller | October 23, 2006 11:44 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
With "diplomats" like this sorry dude, we don't need foreign enemies - the worst of them are home grown!
What kind of brainless twit would think that giving an interview to Al Jazeera would somehow be a good thing?
Time for this idiot to take a nice lonnnnnnnnnng vacation - as in permanently!
16. Posted by Gayle Miller | October 23, 2006 11:44 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 11:44
17. Posted by jhow66 | October 23, 2006 12:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
To old "pucker puss" (lee lee): you just showed your true colors--a lowlife frigging America hating brainless traitor. (stick that up your ass-the one under your nose)
17. Posted by jhow66 | October 23, 2006 12:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 12:03
18. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 1:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Lee "Hopefully fernandez is protected by the federal whistleblower statutes.
After all, all He did was tell the truth."
Hopefully You will stop posting on this blog.
After all, all You do is lie.
18. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 1:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 13:09
19. Posted by BarneyG2000 | October 23, 2006 1:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
According to Tony Snow, at today's press briefing, "Stay the Course", left the wrong impression. So for the last 3 ½ years the President was just flat out wrong!
19. Posted by BarneyG2000 | October 23, 2006 1:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 13:18
20. Posted by BarneyG2000 | October 23, 2006 1:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
How do you righties feel now that the President has admitted that "Stay the Course" was the wrong policy in Iraq?
Cut and Run can't be far behind.
20. Posted by BarneyG2000 | October 23, 2006 1:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 13:34
21. Posted by Lee | October 23, 2006 1:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You can't trust these "cut and run" Republicans....
21. Posted by Lee | October 23, 2006 1:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 13:34
22. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 1:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Cut and run cant be far behind?"
Your right, If the dems win next month it will be cut and run.
22. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 1:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 13:39
23. Posted by nogo postal | October 23, 2006 2:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Actually, I agree, although few can argue that the Iraq situation is partly the result of "stupid" mistakes and let's face it "arrogance" a true diplomat should never say that out of context..especially to an organazation that tranmits all over the world.
He should simply be fired. Why has not he been fired?
23. Posted by nogo postal | October 23, 2006 2:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 14:16
24. Posted by sanssoucy | October 23, 2006 2:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why fire Fernandez? Is he saying anything that just about everyone at the State Department doesn't really believe? Why shitcan him and keep the rest of those loathsome clowns in business?
?
SS
24. Posted by sanssoucy | October 23, 2006 2:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 14:30
25. Posted by spurwing plover | October 23, 2006 2:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
He appoligised becuase Toe Jam and Crow dont taste all that great
25. Posted by spurwing plover | October 23, 2006 2:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 14:32
26. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 3:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Fernandez, Resign now! The U.N. has a job for You.
26. Posted by 914 | October 23, 2006 3:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 15:06
27. Posted by John Burgess | October 23, 2006 3:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This is exactly the kind of criticism that is needed, in Arabic, coming from a State Dept. official.
Does anyone here actually believe that the USG hasn't fucked up in Iraq? You don't have to agree that it's totally fucked, but it's pure delusion to think that everything is hunkey dorey. Firing the entire Iraqi Army? Good move! Total de-Baathification? Good move!
Rumsfeld isn't arrogant? That'll be news to the hundreds who work with him directly in the Pentagon--or is that dozens?
To pretend, in public, that everything is copacetic in Iraq is to mark one as either deluded or a liar. Fernandez--with whom I've worked--is neither deluded nor a liar. Nor is he unpatriotic. Further, he clearly understands how to talk credibly with Arab media. Did anyone bother to see what else he had to say in the interview?
Knee-jerk reaction, waving the bloody shirt doesn't win the war of ideas. I'm really sorry that Wizbang has slipped into the side of unconscious flag waving. It used to be real.
27. Posted by John Burgess | October 23, 2006 3:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 15:24
28. Posted by Bill | October 23, 2006 4:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
People make a big deal about W's 40 percent approval ratings, but of the 60 percent that disapproves, I would estimate that less than half is Democrats and liberals who generally would say Bush has gone too far. The other half of the disapproving population are conservatives who think he hasn't gone FAR ENOUGH. I DO hope those people are smart enough to go to the polls, hold their noses, and vote Republican anyway, as I'm going to do, but it's stories like this that depress turnout.
When Condi first arrived at State, I had high hopes of her cleaning house: Removing, or at least bringing to heel, the faction at Foggy Bottom and Langley, determined to thwart White House policy at every turn. This guy knew what he was saying, and, worse, he seems genuinely surprised that anybody at State would call him on it. This doesn't strike me as evidence that Condi runs a tight ship.
28. Posted by Bill | October 23, 2006 4:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 16:11
29. Posted by IllTemperedCur | October 23, 2006 4:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The thing that our usual troll-squad doesn't want to acknowledge is that the DoS is a part of the executive branch of government, charged with carrying out the President's foreign policy. Like it or not, that's their primary mission. Straying from or undermining the foreign policy articulated by the elected President (yes, I know, Bush stole the office, blah, blah) is an inherently dangerous situation, for obvious reasons. If you can't see the danger in that, then I pity you as I would the village idiot.
Sorry, couldn't resist the Kubrick quote...
29. Posted by IllTemperedCur | October 23, 2006 4:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 16:20
30. Posted by Ken Hoop | October 23, 2006 4:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The critics of Fernandez are mostly irrelevant except for what they reveal about Bush/neocon true believers and their capacity to continue turning the world against us. Every poll taken
of Iraq citizens find the overwhelming majority
agree with the diplomat's admissions and in fact consider them understated.
30. Posted by Ken Hoop | October 23, 2006 4:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 16:52
31. Posted by nogo postal | October 23, 2006 5:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Scrap..I never said Parents had to read Piaget..just teachers...I know i don't have to explain what cognitive development is...
As for speaker...I am not convinced of the predicted Dem landslide..it is all about GOTV..however,; the only sure thing is it won't be Tom Delay..
I have respect for Condi..but Rummy and Cheney run the show as Powell found out...
What has screwed us is the State Dept. which is geared for diplomacy has been shunted under. To me, this has been Bush's greatest failure. He has allowed Cheney to be the man...
31. Posted by nogo postal | October 23, 2006 5:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 17:26
32. Posted by Steve Crickmore | October 23, 2006 5:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Straying from or undermining the foreign policy as articulated by the elected President .. is a dangerous situation, for obvious reasons... Yes indeed, I pity any official try to understand what our strategy or policy as articulated by Bush is in Iraq, or has been? let alone try to carry it out....By the way, why is Bush turning once again to reliable James Baker for cover?..Wasn't he a former Secretary of State?
32. Posted by Steve Crickmore | October 23, 2006 5:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 17:51
33. Posted by Steve of Norway | October 23, 2006 7:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Do you just make this crap up as you go or do you literally pull out of your ass?
If November was such a sure thing for you lefty trolls, there wouldn't be any need for you to keep spamming places like this with your zombie-like talking points or "wishful" thinking.
I know you're scared. You have the MSM behind you, trying to do whatever it takes to bring Bush and the GOP down, and yet there's a HUGE chance you won't even pick up more than a few seats here and there.
33. Posted by Steve of Norway | October 23, 2006 7:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 19:13
34. Posted by IllTemperedCur | October 23, 2006 7:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Steve, you're missing the point. The question of whether the present Iraq policy is prudent or is clearly stated, or consistent is irrelevant to DoS's obligation to carry out that policy.
As to the Baker thing, so what? Presidents can call on pretty much anyone they want to provide advice. A change in foreign policy direction is still a Presidential decision, whether it's following a former SecState's recommendations, the latest poll numbers or their astrologer's tea leaf readings. It doesn't change DoS's obligation to follow the President's lead.
34. Posted by IllTemperedCur | October 23, 2006 7:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 19:23
35. Posted by IllTemperedCur | October 23, 2006 7:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Uhhh not you, Steve of Norway. Just wanted to make that clear...
35. Posted by IllTemperedCur | October 23, 2006 7:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 19:25
36. Posted by Ali | October 23, 2006 7:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why hasn't he been fired?
36. Posted by Ali | October 23, 2006 7:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 19:47
37. Posted by epador | October 23, 2006 10:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Perhpas he hasn't been fired as he'll be offered up in an exchange, for say, hostages held by an islamic militant faction in Syria or Gaza or who knows where...
37. Posted by epador | October 23, 2006 10:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 22:00
38. Posted by steak111111 | October 23, 2006 11:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
the bozo should be fired.... immediately. ....and then hung for treason.
38. Posted by steak111111 | October 23, 2006 11:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 23, 2006 23:42
39. Posted by Live@9 | October 24, 2006 1:50 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You guys are so far behind your party's new talking points I'm surprised you haven't had your wingnut licenses revoked. Face it folks, Iraq is a mess!
In recent days:
- Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, said she would not have supported the invasion had she known there were no weapons of mass destruction, and she has proposed splitting Iraq into three parts.
- Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen, in a difficult re-election battle with Democratic challenger James Webb, dropped his stay-the-course mantra to assert, ``We cannot continue doing the same things and expect different results. We have to adapt our operations, adapt our tactics.''
- Sen. Conrad Burns, R-Mont., said in a debate last week with Democratic challenger Jon Tester that he agreed with Warner's call for a change in strategy - and believed Bush already had a plan to win the war but for now was keeping it quiet. That remark drew ridicule from Democrats who likened it to Richard Nixon's ``secret plan'' to end the war in Vietnam.
Also challenging Bush's Iraq policy have been former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Republican Sens. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, and several House Republicans.
39. Posted by Live@9 | October 24, 2006 1:50 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2006 01:50
40. Posted by Steve Crickmore | October 24, 2006 8:26 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think we all need to take a step back for a moment...What Fernandez said before his retraction, wasn't much different in tone , only a little more eloquently put, than what Tony Blair and George Bush admitted in their joint Wahington press conference in May, 26, 2006 - mistakes, serious ones have been made, Abu Ghraib etc..( implicitly because of stupidity and arrogance).
40. Posted by Steve Crickmore | October 24, 2006 8:26 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2006 08:26
41. Posted by jhow66 | October 24, 2006 10:43 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh hell "stevie" lets all go commit hari karie because someone got "panties" put over their head (wringing hands). You people are dumb as dirt.
41. Posted by jhow66 | October 24, 2006 10:43 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2006 10:43
42. Posted by Steve Crickmore | October 24, 2006 2:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
My opinions are not terribly important about Abu Ghraib...but this man's presumably is "We've been paying for that for a long period of time.": George W. Bush
citing the effects of the Abu Ghraib scandal as one of the mistakes they have made in Iraq at a joint press conference with Tony Blair May 25, 2006.
"
42. Posted by Steve Crickmore | October 24, 2006 2:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 24, 2006 14:20