Update on George Allen/Jim Webb race: From Fox News: The Allen campaign says that networks transposed raw vote totals, that Allen is up 5,000 votes.
According to Carl Cameron, in Louden county, a bigger and more conservative county, the registrar packed up and went home without counting all the ballots from the original count.
From the Llama Butchers:
12:10 AM Wednesday 1865 vote spread for Allen on the state's website
Cue Twilight Zone music....
Bumped and Updated Webb pulls ahead of Allen by a few thousand votes with 99% of the precincts reporting. This race will go to a recount. Also, Fox calls Tennessee for Corker.
****
Fox News called Bob Casey the winner over Rick Santorum. That's a gain for the Dhttp://wizbangblog.com/mt-static/images/formatting-icons/bold.gif
Boldems although it's not unexpected. I don't have the numbers yet.
Also Fox called Mendendez (52% 41,672) over Tom Keane Jr. (48% 38,446) but only 3% of the precincts are reporting.
Update: Fox News has called Sherrod Brown defeating Mike DeWine in Ohio. That sucks. He's the second Tom Noe/Bob Taft casualty after Blackwell fell to Strickland. That means higher taxes here in Ohio.
Update II: Allen is up again in Virginia 50% - 49% with 65% precincts reporting. I don't know if the liberal parts of VA, the northern areas and the DC suburbs, have reported yet.
Update III: In CT, Lieberman is leading Lamont 49% - 49% with 2% precincts reporting.
Update IV: Fox has just called the race for Lieberman.
Update V: Fox is calling Cardin over Steele in MD, although Steele is ahead by 11% with only 1% of the precincts reporting. What!? Are they going on flawed exit polls again? Fox just said that the decision desk is not relying on exit polls but are only using the numbers from the precincts. The only thing I can think of is that the numbers from Steele are coming from a heavily pro-Steele areas and that they expect Steele won't maintain that lead in the other areas. Still, that's big speculation with only 1% of the votes in.
Update VI: Fox projects that R Lincoln Chafee loses. As Brit Hume noted, his views were virtually identical to those of D Sheldon Whitehouse, but the loss is, nonetheless, not good news for Senate Republicans.
Update VII: Just when I thought Bouchard could pull it off, Debbie Stabenow was projected to hold her seat. Ugh. Lorie said her heartbreak of the night was Michael Steele, Mine was Mike Bouchard. He was gaining such momentum, I thought he could win. I'm sure he got all the rural areas of Michigan, which is almost the entire state, but certainly Stabenow, got Detroit. Unfortunately, as Detroit goes, so goes the entire state of Michigan.
Update VIII: Rep. Sen. Jim Talent is leading Dem Claire McCaskill 54%-43% with 29% of the votes in. Rep. Bob Corker is still ahead of Harold Ford, Jr. 51%-47% with 69% of the votes in. No one has called either of these seats when the Republicans have comfortable leads but called others that were much tighter where Democrats were leading.
Also Rep. Sen. George Allen is leading Dem. Jim Webb with a 28,000 vote lead with 95% of votes in. Again, Fox isn't calling this because of outstanding precincts that either are not in or are too close too call. Michael Barone this race will probably trigger a recount and go to court, especially if the Senate leadership is in the balance.
Update IX: Senator John Ensign has defeated Jimmy Carter's son, Dem. Jack Carter in Nevada.
Update X: Both Democrats Daniel Akaka and Dianne Feinstein have kept their seats. Akaka's win may be surprising, but Feinstein's sure wasn't.



Comments (23)
The only Ohio results avail... (Below threshold)1. Posted by papalovesmambo | November 7, 2006 8:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The only Ohio results available seem to be from Ashtabula County and were probably released before the gag order went into effect that said, nobody reports anything until after 9pm when the polls close in Cuyagoga.
Just so you know Ashtabula went for Kerry 53-46 in '04.
He'll probably lose, Kim, but geez, have a drink or something until he actually does.
1. Posted by papalovesmambo | November 7, 2006 8:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 20:57
2. Posted by Craig | November 7, 2006 9:02 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Who would vote for someone with the name Sherrod anyway?
2. Posted by Craig | November 7, 2006 9:02 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:02
3. Posted by BrandonInBatonRouge | November 7, 2006 9:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This "exit poll" crap is getting to be unbelievably stacked against the Republicans.
I find it amazing that they can call Pennsylvania and Ohio with only 1% of the vote in, as well as calling New Jersey for Menendez with Kean up by a few percent with 20% of the vote in.
Calling Florida for Bill Nelson is more reasonable, considering that he's up by 200,000 votes with 33% of the vote in.
If these exit polls blow up on the networks for the 4th election in a row, will they FINALLY admit they're either unreliable or being used incorrectly?
3. Posted by BrandonInBatonRouge | November 7, 2006 9:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:09
4. Posted by Adam Lawson | November 7, 2006 9:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
A reasonable person would not call a race with 98% of the vote uncounted.
4. Posted by Adam Lawson | November 7, 2006 9:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:14
5. Posted by papalovesmambo | November 7, 2006 9:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The numbers on the Santorum race that are posted at the PA website come almost exclusively from Philly.
5. Posted by papalovesmambo | November 7, 2006 9:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:16
6. Posted by robert | November 7, 2006 9:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The exit polls are biased toward Dems.
Dem voters are proud of their vote and seek out the pollsters.
Nobody wants to admit they voted for a racist, homophobe, xenophobe so Republicans vote in private and skulk away into the night without speaking to the pollsters.
6. Posted by robert | November 7, 2006 9:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:32
7. Posted by Baggi | November 7, 2006 9:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Could one of the better political folks out there explain to me how it is they call Cardin in Maryland when currently Steele leads in the vote?
There's another one too where the Republican leads 54% to 46% yet the Democrat is the projected winner.
How does this happen? What is the methodology here?
7. Posted by Baggi | November 7, 2006 9:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:47
8. Posted by Dave | November 7, 2006 9:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Obviously i don't need to post this, but i would also like to add a 'wtf' to what the media is doing tonight. how are they calling all these states for democrats when under 10% of precints have even been counted. Especially with all the big deal made about absentee and early voting...
I think over the next few days and weeks the tune will change quite a bit.
8. Posted by Dave | November 7, 2006 9:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:50
9. Posted by Baggi | November 7, 2006 9:54 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Are they counting the absentee?
I thought the absentee vote was the first bit of votes that got counted. Or?
9. Posted by Baggi | November 7, 2006 9:54 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 21:54
10. Posted by seamus | November 7, 2006 10:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, lord knows I'm not a bigfan of agreeing with you nutjobson here, but I think you're exactly right. I'd love for someone to explain to me how they can call an election with 2% of the results.
10. Posted by seamus | November 7, 2006 10:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 22:07
11. Posted by Steve of Norway | November 7, 2006 10:12 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Could someone like Lee explain to me why the democrats who seem to be picking up seats are more conservative than their republican opponents?
11. Posted by Steve of Norway | November 7, 2006 10:12 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 22:12
12. Posted by Jeff | November 7, 2006 10:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Good riddance Chafee. Fricking RINO. At least we can call a lib a democrat now.
The folks in Rhode Island deserve what they ask for. Perhaps after a term of a lib who's not afraid to be called a democrat, the folks will wake up and elect a real conservative.
See ya Chafee, ya asshole. Don't bother turning out the lights.
12. Posted by Jeff | November 7, 2006 10:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 22:23
13. Posted by Paul | November 7, 2006 10:55 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jeff:
Having lived in the most corrupt state, ie Rhode Island, I'm surprised they kept electing Chafee as long as they did. Ok, they were probably thinking about his dad more than him but, nah, they'll never really vote a "real" republican.
The unions in the state won't allow it....lol
13. Posted by Paul | November 7, 2006 10:55 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 22:55
14. Posted by Jim Addison | November 7, 2006 11:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Talent needs really big margins, because the St. Louis and Kansas City Democratic fraud machines hold their votes until late so they can fake the maximum number.
14. Posted by Jim Addison | November 7, 2006 11:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 23:04
15. Posted by Lee | November 7, 2006 11:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Steve: "Could someone like Lee explain to me why the democrats who seem to be picking up seats are more conservative than their republican opponents?"
No data on conservative Democrats. Does not compute.
I know! It must be that legendary GOP Get Out the Vote! It's just too bad the GOP ignored the polling data that told them Republicans weren't happy with Bush's performance. Consequently they "got out" voters that, in a significant enough number it appears, voted against them.
And I just have to take a poke at GWB. Why in the world would he strut all over the country last week saying the GOP will hold onto both the House and Senate? Was he lying, or stupid? Or both?
Either way he was wrong, again.
In my view Crist won in Florida because he dissed President Bush. He appears to be the smartest one in the bunch. Good thing he isn't running for the White House in '08. As a Democrat I'd be worried about that one. He waited until the last day, which was the best thing for the Party, but in the end he did the right thing by flipping Rove the one-finger salute, eh?
Serious hat-fitting problem there...
Lesson learned. Steve? Is this resonating?
15. Posted by Lee | November 7, 2006 11:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 23:10
16. Posted by Steve of Norway | November 7, 2006 11:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm not so much dismayed at the elections as I am with the smarmy garbage coming from people like you Lee.
And don't worry Lee, I'm the sure the party of Jimmy Carter actually has a plan, right? I mean, need to figure out if "doing a better way" has any substance to it.
16. Posted by Steve of Norway | November 7, 2006 11:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 23:41
17. Posted by Brian | November 7, 2006 11:59 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Could one of the better political folks out there explain to me how it is they call Cardin in Maryland when currently Steele leads in the vote?
I'm not saying it's accurate, but I believe the theory is that Steele didn't win (or didn't win by enough) in some precincts that were required in order to prevail. So even with much of the vote uncounted, the predictions are that the remaining precincts will go to Cardin.
And this "call it at 10%" happens every election day, for both parties. So let's not all act like it's just for the Dems.
17. Posted by Brian | November 7, 2006 11:59 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 7, 2006 23:59
18. Posted by Brian | November 8, 2006 12:03 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Could someone like Lee explain to me why the democrats who seem to be picking up seats are more conservative than their republican opponents?
Without knowing the specific races you're referring to, my guess is that the voters realized that those Republicans were not really conservatives, but instead were Bushies. You know... they didn't leave the party, the party left them. Meanwhile, the party of the center-left was there for them.
18. Posted by Brian | November 8, 2006 12:03 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 8, 2006 00:03
19. Posted by Soupy2c2 | November 8, 2006 12:16 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hate to tell you - people are still voting in Tn!
Not reported yet are Ford strongholds, parts of Shelby and Davidson Co. as well.
Looks like we've loss both the House and Senate.
19. Posted by Soupy2c2 | November 8, 2006 12:16 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 8, 2006 00:16
20. Posted by James Cloninger | November 8, 2006 12:29 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Meanwhile, the party of the center-left was there for them
Ted Kennedy...
Nancy Pelosi...
Harry Reid...
Barbara Boxer...
Ditched Joe Lieberman...
As Lee said, DOES NOT COMPUTE.
Well, perhaps we shall finally get to hear the super-secret plan for solving the terrorist problem in the middle east, especially now with Iraq...perhaps we could send Carter over to negotiate the sale of some more nuclear plants.
Sorry, Israel, looks like for the next two years you are on your own. You know what to do, you did it in 1991.
20. Posted by James Cloninger | November 8, 2006 12:29 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 8, 2006 00:29
21. Posted by Lee | November 8, 2006 12:42 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"And don't worry Lee, I'm the sure the party of Jimmy Carter actually has a plan, right? I mean, need to figure out if "doing a better way" has any substance to it."
Steve. Glad to see that even after the voters have spoken, Republicans like you will continue to "stay the course" and ignore the simple reality that the American public is no longer willing to be terrorized by the Republican Party. Keep driving those voters in our direction. Tell them how terrorists will be knocking on their front doors now that the Democrats are back.
President Bush will start kissing some serious blue butts, beginning at his press conference tomorrow but you and your fellow Wizbangers -- I hope you knuckleheads never change.
The voters have spoken. No Carter to blame, no Clinton to blame (and we threw in John Kerry with his foot in his mouth at no extra charge). The Republicans failed.
21. Posted by Lee | November 8, 2006 12:42 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 8, 2006 00:42
22. Posted by Brian | November 8, 2006 1:05 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, perhaps we shall finally get to hear the super-secret plan for solving the terrorist problem in the middle east
You mean you think Bush will now tell us his plan?
Unlikely!
22. Posted by Brian | November 8, 2006 1:05 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 8, 2006 01:05
23. Posted by DSkinner | November 8, 2006 8:44 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Fox News has called Sherrod Brown defeating Mike DeWine in Ohio. That sucks. He's the second Tom Noe/Bob Taft casualty after Blackwell fell to Strickland. That means higher taxes here in Ohio.
Not only does Ohio get higher taxes with Strickland, but amendment 2 passed. A minimum wage indexed to inflation is now part of the constitution. Ohio just codified a poor economy into their constitution. High taxes and a creeping minimum wage, just screams 'businesses are not welcome'. Good luck with that local economy thing.
23. Posted by DSkinner | November 8, 2006 8:44 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 8, 2006 08:44