The US government has warned of possible al Qaeda cyber attacks against online stock trading and banking sites:
The source, a person familiar with the warning, said the Islamic militant group aimed to penetrate and destroy the databases of the U.S. financial sites.
The Department of Homeland Security confirmed an alert had been distributed but said there was no reason to believe the threat was credible.The U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team issued a "situational awareness report to industry stakeholders," said Homeland Security spokesman Russ Knocke.
The warning said the threat called for attacks to begin Friday and run through the month of December in retaliation for the United States keeping terrorism suspects at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba.
"Denial of service is what it called for," said a Homeland Security official who spoke on condition of anonymity.
A person familiar with the warning said the threat came from a group calling itself "ANHIAR al-Dollar." The effort was related to al Qaeda and intended to avenge "Muslim brothers in the crusaders' Guantanamo prison camp," the source said.
They can't use real bombs, so they are forced to revert to cyber bombs.




Comments (17)
My gosh! This is almost as ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by jp2 | November 30, 2006 11:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
My gosh! This is almost as scary as the DHS warning on fax machines and eco-terrorists!
Horrible tactics such as:
"sending continuous faxes in order to drain the ink supply from company fax machines"
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/dhs-extremists/?resultpage=1&
1. Posted by jp2 | November 30, 2006 11:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on November 30, 2006 23:21
2. Posted by Tony | December 1, 2006 12:21 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
jp2, you'll be whining when one of the attacks hits your bank and you can't pay for your internet to whine on wizbang.
2. Posted by Tony | December 1, 2006 12:21 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 00:21
3. Posted by Rob LA Ca. | December 1, 2006 5:53 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ha ha ha! Good one Tony ,lol.
3. Posted by Rob LA Ca. | December 1, 2006 5:53 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 05:53
4. Posted by Timmer | December 1, 2006 6:33 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"They can't use real bombs, so they are forced to revert to cyber bombs."
If they were successful, it would be more financially devastating than 9/11. I don't know about you all, but I do almost everything online these days.
4. Posted by Timmer | December 1, 2006 6:33 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 06:33
5. Posted by Steve Niles | December 1, 2006 7:32 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So long as they don't take away my porn, I couldn't give a crap. It's defending people in the real world that is my Presidents duty, not some faggot cyber geek.
-Steve Niles
5. Posted by Steve Niles | December 1, 2006 7:32 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 07:32
6. Posted by Matt | December 1, 2006 9:34 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Unfortunately a lot more damage can be done to the U.S. Econmy through the use of "cyber bombs" than through the use of conventional bombs. You don't have to martyr yourself to apply them either.
Blaming Al-Quaeda for something like this would make nice cover for other countries/entities that would like to do us grevious economic harm.
For this kind of attack, those "Cyber Geeks," are the first line of defense, and some are very, very good.
6. Posted by Matt | December 1, 2006 9:34 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 09:34
7. Posted by PoliticalCritic | December 1, 2006 10:55 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This isn't even a real threat. It's just something Al Qaeda wants to do, not something they can actually make good on.
If the threat isn't credible, as they say, why release it to the public?
7. Posted by PoliticalCritic | December 1, 2006 10:55 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 10:55
8. Posted by Rob Hackney | December 1, 2006 11:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well shucks boys, you got me! HAHAHAHA
8. Posted by Rob Hackney | December 1, 2006 11:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 11:56
9. Posted by LJD | December 1, 2006 11:57 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
On the other hand, wouldn't it also affect the NYT, CNN propaganda machine in some part?
9. Posted by LJD | December 1, 2006 11:57 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 11:57
10. Posted by Daniel | December 1, 2006 12:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Actually, I work at a bank. We're pretty dang small (only 3 branches total), but we back up all of our information every night. I'm sure larger banks back things up at least that often, so unless al-Qaeda also physically breaks into the buildings where the backup servers are and destroys those, this should be nothing more than a nuisance.
10. Posted by Daniel | December 1, 2006 12:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 12:09
11. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 1, 2006 2:01 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You can get a DSL line run into a cave or spider hole... we truly live in an age of techno-wonders
11. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 1, 2006 2:01 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 14:01
12. Posted by jp2 | December 1, 2006 4:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
How many pairs of underwear do you guys go through in a week?
Don't be so scared - we'll be ok.
12. Posted by jp2 | December 1, 2006 4:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 16:51
13. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 1, 2006 6:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Uh, jp2, dear, who's acting scared?
Seriously, ignore your preconceived narrative for once and evaluate things on their merits.
13. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 1, 2006 6:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 18:53
14. Posted by Brian | December 1, 2006 9:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Seriously, ignore your preconceived narrative for once and evaluate things on their merits.
OK, let's. A denial of service attack? Puh-lease. That's something 12 year olds do for fun. It's the equivalent of phoning a bank over and over so no customers can get through. Or tying up the phones of a Democratic campaign office.
Yes, a DoS attack can effectively disable a server so you can't connect to it. That is, until the bank's IT guy notices and routes around it. Oh, the horror!
Conservatives should learn a bit more about what frightens them before crapping their pants.
14. Posted by Brian | December 1, 2006 9:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 1, 2006 21:58
15. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 2, 2006 2:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Brian, again, who is acting scared? You and your little pal jp2 are the only two engaging in hyperbole. The next closest thing is Timmer stating that cyber attack could be more than a minor inconvenience.
Seriously. Point out who is acting so scared. Or can you?
15. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 2, 2006 2:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 2, 2006 14:00
16. Posted by Don'tConsiderThePossibilites;BuryYourHead | December 3, 2006 4:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Buncha worrywarts. Next thing you know, you're going to say they're going to try to highjack jumbo jets and fly them into skyscrapers. Or leave bombs on busses or trains.
Yeah, right. They would never try to do that.
16. Posted by Don'tConsiderThePossibilites;BuryYourHead | December 3, 2006 4:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 3, 2006 16:32
17. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 3, 2006 4:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So, the answer is "No, I cannot back up my bullshit"
17. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | December 3, 2006 4:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 3, 2006 16:56