I have not been following the Jamil Hussein case as closely as I should have so if I'm repeating someone, my apologies, but there is one point notably absent from the Jamil Hussein scandal coverage....
Why did AP stop using him as a source?
If you look at the infamous 61 stories wherein the AP used Jamil Hussein as a source, you see the following pattern of attributions:
April: 6 Attributions
May: 16 Attributions
June: 14 Attributions
July: 4 Attributions
August: 4 Attributions
September: 5 Attributions
October: 1 Attributions
November: 8 Attributions
December: ZERO Attributions.
Jan 2007: ZERO attributions (to date.)
In the 8 months AP has been using Jamil Hussein as a source, they have never gone a month without him. Only during the pre-election run up did they go to him less than once per week. (on average) Yet suddenly, he disappeared.
It should be noted the last time AP used Jamil Hussein as a source was November 26, just hours after Curt started questioning who Jamil Hussein was. Since Curt's work became noticed in media circles, AP has never again used him as a source.
It seems curious.
But then again, maybe not.




Comments (19)
He's been interviewi... (Below threshold)1. Posted by macofromoc | January 2, 2007 3:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
He's been interviewing for the Arizona Cardinal head coaching position. It all fits.
just throwing a line to the AP
1. Posted by macofromoc | January 2, 2007 3:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 15:52
2. Posted by Gianni | January 2, 2007 3:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Like a bad joke, the left will continue to milk something for all its worth, then just throw it away, never caring for it anymore.
See Sheehag, Cindy.
2. Posted by Gianni | January 2, 2007 3:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 15:53
3. Posted by cirby | January 2, 2007 4:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I just have this sneaking suspicion that the "real" Jamil Hussein was some guy who worked in or around a police station (janitor or the like), who pretended to be someone else to spread some propaganda for his side. Maybe he even put on a uniform for a few minutes and held an interview in some abandoned office.
I think they could probably find him very quickly if they started sifting through low-level employee resignations in late November. This could also point to some intel leaks, if someone put their mind to it.
3. Posted by cirby | January 2, 2007 4:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 16:24
4. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | January 2, 2007 5:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
How long before someone from DU or the 9/11 conspiracy crowd (I repeat myself) claims that "they" got to him, and put him in an unmarked grave?
4. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | January 2, 2007 5:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 17:08
5. Posted by MyPetGloat | January 2, 2007 5:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Cool! The sooner the chairborne warriors clear up this ongoing story over whether one source for one story from one major media outlet is credible, then the MSM will bow down and only report news we'll get out of Iraq!!
Teh Awesome 1!!
5. Posted by MyPetGloat | January 2, 2007 5:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 17:29
6. Posted by MikeSC | January 2, 2007 5:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The ONLY source for numerous stories from the outfit who supplies the news for most papers, mind you Gloat.
But, hey, who says the media needs to report the news? That's so passe.
-=Mike
6. Posted by MikeSC | January 2, 2007 5:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 17:37
7. Posted by Paul | January 2, 2007 5:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What a freaking idiot:
The sooner the chairborne warriors clear up this ongoing story over whether one source for one story from one major media outlet is credible,
What part of 61 stories don't you understand?
That fact you are such demonstrable moron is really amazing.
7. Posted by Paul | January 2, 2007 5:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 17:37
8. Posted by RicardoVerde | January 2, 2007 6:33 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Cirby:
The bad thing is there might never have been a Jamil Hussein. Unsourced rumors in Iraq could be posted as by "Jamil" just so those in the loop could tell the difference between documented news and hearsay. But, hey, if it matches with the party line, what's the difference between the two? Fake.
But accurate.
8. Posted by RicardoVerde | January 2, 2007 6:33 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 18:33
9. Posted by Stephen Macklin | January 2, 2007 7:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Check the date on the last entry - should be 07
9. Posted by Stephen Macklin | January 2, 2007 7:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 19:08
10. Posted by Parker | January 2, 2007 7:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Actually, Jamil Hussein is dead.
On the bright side, now Bob Woodward can interview him!
That should clear everything up nicely.
10. Posted by Parker | January 2, 2007 7:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 19:30
11. Posted by cirby | January 2, 2007 7:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The bad thing is there might never have been a Jamil Hussein.
Oh, there probably wasn't. But one of the things the AP insisted on was that they knew he was a police captain because they met him in his office.
So they either lied about that little detail as well, or they were suckers for an enemy propaganda campaign.
11. Posted by cirby | January 2, 2007 7:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 19:53
12. Posted by Robert | January 2, 2007 9:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Karen Hughes??
12. Posted by Robert | January 2, 2007 9:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 2, 2007 21:16
13. Posted by Robin Goodfellow | January 3, 2007 1:12 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This seems less likely but there is the possibility that the AP is still using him as a source but not crediting him by name. Meaning he could be just another "unnamed source(s)" now.
Either way, this pattern, especially if it keeps up, is pretty damning with regards to the AP's credulity.
13. Posted by Robin Goodfellow | January 3, 2007 1:12 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 3, 2007 01:12
14. Posted by blackcat77 | January 3, 2007 1:49 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jeez, you complained when he attributed stuff and now you complain when he doesn't... :)
14. Posted by blackcat77 | January 3, 2007 1:49 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 3, 2007 01:49
15. Posted by _Mike_ | January 3, 2007 7:06 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
(SNL mode:)
The oddest thing is that the Iraqi Police office where Jamil Hussein worked had a phone number that started +1-...
Seriously though, my feeling is that this incident, combined with the others in which the A.P. has been caught, is likely indicative of a systemic problem at the bureau.
15. Posted by _Mike_ | January 3, 2007 7:06 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 3, 2007 07:06
16. Posted by MyPetGloat | January 3, 2007 9:35 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What part of 61 stories don't you understand?
That fact you are such demonstrable moron is really amazing.
Yet it's only the one Imam story that has the wingnut brigade's knickers in a bunch and gives them carte blanche to claim that every story coming out of Iraq from AP is untrue. That would practically take shit for brains to do but then again, that would also be an insult to shit.
Still unsure? Go there yourself.
Go there yourself and see if the Evil Liberal MSM (tm) is dilberately misleading an ignorant and unsuspecting 70% of the nation. Yeah, thats it -Reuters, AP, Times, all liars. Their job is to undermine the presidency and broadcast defeatism!
The wingnuts really know whats going on in the hot zones of Fallujah from what they read from the Hot Air blog! Mortar attack in Sadir City? U.S. casualties at a rate of one battalion per month? Pfft! Charles Johnson and Michelle Malkin got a breaking story on the puppy kennels opening in Baghdad! Look!, theres a photo of John Kerry momentarily eating alone! Were winning, dude!
16. Posted by MyPetGloat | January 3, 2007 9:35 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 3, 2007 09:35
17. Posted by cirby | January 3, 2007 10:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yet it's only the one Imam story that has the wingnut brigade's knickers in a bunch and gives them carte blanche to claim that every story coming out of Iraq from AP is untrue.
Nope.
It's the one that's definitely, provably, blatantly false, that has been tracked down and nailed to the wall.
Most of the rest of those stories are unprovable, and nobody has any backup reporting that says the same events happened in most of them. "Jamil Hussein" was the only source and only reporting that claims those other attacks and deaths happened at all, and he probably doesn't exist.
17. Posted by cirby | January 3, 2007 10:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 3, 2007 10:13
18. Posted by Mitchell | January 3, 2007 3:20 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jamil must have transferred to yet another police station, as he has been reporting from several different precincts in Baghdad.
Or maybe he works at the AP, under an alias. Who knows?
18. Posted by Mitchell | January 3, 2007 3:20 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 3, 2007 15:20
19. Posted by _Mike_ | January 3, 2007 4:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If you were paying attention, you would have noted numerous stories that the A.P. has published that have be at best questionable (see the recently Isreali-Hizb'Allah clash - green helmet guy for reference). You're arguing that that the repeated demonstrably false stories does not warrant doubting the authenticity of every story ? The term for that is 'gullible'.. no wonder you're a liberal.
19. Posted by _Mike_ | January 3, 2007 4:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 3, 2007 16:40