Lorie

If you think this piece of illiterate cheap-shot crap advances your cause then your cause of securing more American troop deaths in Iraq just might proceed full steam ahead w/ an asinine piece like this one of yours.

"We of the newly entroned [sic]and coronated Democratic Party are writing to officially tell you that we can no longer support your sacrifice, or allow you to vindicate the honor of your fallen comrades by ..."

How unfortunate that the Democrats will not honor the thus far sacrificed troops by increasing the number of Bush's sacrificial lambs to his looney neo-con ends w/ his Kagan inspired New? Iraq Policy!

Yes, Lorie, let's have more dead Americans so you can continue to rationalize and justify an ongoing death toll.

Lori, someone needs to gain control over Bush. Bush has all but declared war on Iran. Does he really think that he can invade the territory of sovereign nation with out repercussions?

Last night, US forces stormed the Iranian embassy, and are holding five Iranians (diplomats) hostage.

Now we know what that carrier strike force is for.

All I hear from Dems and liberals so far: we want the US to lose and the terrorists to win so that we can slam Bush.

Using the logic here: the liberals would rather have more 9/11 and more American civilian deaths.

ha ha ha

As if "supporting the troops" meant putting them in harm's way with no plan and inadequate equipment. Even the soldiers themselves are no longer falling for that stuff.

LoveAmerica Immigrant

I imagine that their are numerous Bush-mutilated Iraqi vets that wish you "loved" US troops as much as whatever it is that you claim to "love" about America.

Yep, that says it all. Aside from "Lieb the Heb", Democrats as whole have decided to save their necks by bailing on the troops, and hope the voters don't remember they stood in the wells of the Senate and House exhorting Bush to do something about Iraq.

The Democrats will now use the legislative branch to provide theater for the '08 elections. Hearings, investigations, full body cavity searches, etc.

When I hear of all of the hand-wringing about the war, I think of Truman's 25% approval rating during the "optional and preemptive" Korea War, and see how history has vindicated his position. Same for WWII in the European theater since.... you know... Germany didn't bomb Pearl Harbor.

If the media stuck to reporting the news, instead of trying to prove Bush incompetent and help elect Dems, this war would have been over 2 years ago. But Iran, knowing most liberals have weak minds and even weaker intestinal walls, continues to fund and directly promote the insurgents in Iraq and the Israel-Hesbollah/Palestine conflict. Then Adminijhad gets a full body tongue message by Mike Wallace on 60 Minutes..... right before he invites white supremicist/Holocaust denier David Duke to his Holocaust denial forum. Nice!!

*Shaking head* Morons!!

aRepublikan (aka liberal)

You would rather see the terrorists succeed? Looks like the liberals don't seem to have any qualm or problems with the atrocities of the terrorists against westerners, Iraqui women or children. The liberals don't seem to have any problems with Iran openly calling for the new Holocaust to wipe out Israel. The liberals seem to have no problems with the possibility of more deadly terrorist attacks in the US.

All I hear is the complaint about Bush and US and not much about the terrorists and their Iranian sponsor.

If liberals care about the vets, you wouldn't see them verbally and physically attack the vets in this country. You wouldn't see them bar the military from campus. Liberals cannot be even honest about who they are and what they want.

Liberals want to the terrorists to win and the US to lose. LEt 's be honest enough to admit it.

"Even the soldiers themselves are no longer falling for that stuff."

Not even those dummies are that dumb, huh?

NeilE: The troops aren't dumb at all. They know better than the Keyboard Kommandos on EITHER side of the political divide, and they have gradually gone from strong support of the actions over there to opposition. That is not just partisanship, that's an acknowledgment of reality.

March 19,2003..Bush :"This will not be a campaign (the Iraqi war) of half measures"
Janusary 10, 2007 Bush: "Our past efforts to secure Baghdad failed for two principal reasons: There were not enough Iraqi and American troops to secure neighborhoods that had been cleared of terrorists and insurgents. And there were too many restrictions on the troops we did have"..
In other words, half measures for the troops, but full court pressure on behalf of big oil and other resource and service companies that are profiting from this war. ..No need to change strategy or admit mistakes on their behalf..

aRepukelican ought to have the decency to call himself by his right name - aCommunist.

Perfect!

We just have an example in Somalia when the Islamic terrorists tried to take over the country. Then Ethiopia went in and helped the Somalian gov to rout them. The American just completed the rout of these terrorists. Liberals seem to be oblivious to this success.

If the liberals crying out loud for the adoption of this strategy, I can see that they want us to win. Liberals don't want the US to win. As a result, they ignored any atrocities and any success against these terrorists.

Liberals want the terrorists to win in Iraq. They don't seem to have problem with the maniac Adm. and the Baathists who tried to impose their Saddam-style rule again. In fact, liberals would rather have Saddam in Iraq.

Big mistake of Bush: treating the Dems as serious about the war so didn't have a strategy to counter the propaganda effort the left and their Dem allies on behalf of the terrorists.

Even after getting the power, the Dems don't seem to be serious about the war against the terrorists at all. They only want to fight against Reps and Bush.

Nice mis-representation of the Democrats position for you to criticize.

Good luck with the President's "policy."

Lorie:

I don't know which is more frightening; that you wrote this tripe randomly or that you really believe it.
Actually I don't know why I'm bothering to respond to your tripe so I'll quit now.

H

LoveAmerica, you forgot to blame Bill Clinton and the media.

No answer to my facts yet!

Show me an example where the Dems want to win. Show me examples of the intensity the dems/liberals display towards the terrorists compared to the criticism/hate directed toward Bush.

Otherwise, the facts speak for themselves: the dems/liberals simply want the US to lose and the terrorists to win. We just have an example of how to handle the terrorists in Somalia.

Macranger's article sure seemed right on the money to me. If the left does not really think like that, I have yet to see any evidence of such.

LoveAmerica: When the goalposts keep moving, it's just about impossible to discuss the subject. I still say that Iraq has very little to do with the war on terrorists, so maybe you could give me a concrete definition of what you would call a victory and then I can respond.

LoveAmerica Immigrant

Otter change your nic to LoveAmerican blood and death.

If the drivel that you post is a demonstration of your twisted "love," I suggest you become "LoveAmerica emigrant" and foist your lunacy on some other more-deserving nation.

Wow, that first excerpted paragraph reads more true if you simply substitute "Republican" for "Democrat" (and "Mark Foley" for "Ted Kennedy"). Of course, it's no more a serious piece of work than if I posted "Bush loves Satan!" on a blog somewhere. Not sure why you chose to quote such a random screech, and one written by an apparent illiterate, at that.

Liberals have to resort to name calling when they don't have an answer to facts.

The facts on the ground show that liberals want the US to lose and the terrorists to win in Iraq.

(BTW, Brian is a typical example of another liberal who is not shy to engage in hypocritical gay-bashing when it is convenient to them)

Blackcat,

Where'd you get the statistics saying that more troops oppose our being in Iraq? I work with soldiers every day. Most of whom have been there and done that. Sure, they acknowledge that mistakes have been made (most of us think we can run things better than the previous person, until we have to), but most of them say that it was the right thing to do. I'd like to know where you got those stats, because I don't really see them as representative ot the troops I know.

Blackcat,
Here is a typical liberal tactic (what I called the perfection fallacy). Since the military doesn't support Bush or the IRaq war 100%, so the left will find someone in the military who opposed Bush to make their claim. Just follow this thread to see how some liberal tried make moral equivalency between the US and IRan for example.

I think aRepukelican and LoveAmerica Immigrant are perfect for each other. You two should head on up to Massachusetts and tie the knot (assuming, not without cause, that you're both male).

I can see it now:

What's for dinner?

There will be no dinner for terrorist lovers/dems/liberals/communists/devil worshippers who only want America to die and lose and drown in the blood of children!

The fact that there is no dinner is clearly because you are part of the Chimpy neo-con cabal of knee-jerk jingoists! Maybe you should change your name to Hate Peacemerica Alien Person!

You have not disputed my facts! It is a solid fact that you want Miss America to die!

Don't drool your fascist Limbarfian crap at me. Make dinner!

Fascists are just liberals who hate America, and all liberals are fascists, and all liberals hate America. Therefore, you love terrorist fascist America haters. No dinner for you.

(Unable to contain their lust, the two passionately kiss over their many chins.)

A kind of gay O'Neil play starring Sean Hannity and Al Franken, but fatter and dumber.

(I don't really)LoveAmericaImmigrant,

You consistently claim "liberals want the terrorists to win and the US to lose". Please provide evidence of same. Give us a quote from anyone, liberal or otherwise, saying they want America to lose; not redeploy, not phase in a withdrawal, but actually LOSE. Not your interpretation of what they said, but a word for word. Remember, demanding examples of Dems saying they want to win don't count, that's not how it works. You seem pretty certain so it souldn't be too hard to find. We'll be waiting.

Own your assertion and back it up or STFU.

Excuse me, that should read O'Neill.

Two things jumped out at me while reading this post and its comments. First, why have I never stumbled upon Macsmind? Second, "Lefty Trolls" simply do not understand satire, not one has a sense of humor.

Want to prove me wrong? Point me to one lefty blogger who has a genuine sense of humor, as opposed to being vile and hate filled...

Wait a minute. Macsmind? I thought the "message" at the head of the thread was a collaboration among scrapiron, P Bunyan, jhow66, Love America and gianni. I figured they each scraped together a few sentences, ran them through a spell/grammar check and..voila! another journalistic gem.

Chad: The source for the numbers is here
http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2006poll_iraq.php

LoveAmerica: I'm not making any such claims. What I *am* saying is that support among the troops, who know the reality of the situation better than anyone, is dropping steadily.

graucho. I follow the advice of a professor from Washington State who taught (me) effective writing several years ago. He stated that if you were standing in front of an idiot and he said something idiotic you should call him an idiot, and if you write the same person, put it in writing that he's an idiot. Well groucho, you are an idiot or worse, and I would tell you that to your face.

Hey P Bunyan, jhow66, Love America and gianni. How's that for telling this idiot that he is an idiot? We've got him on a string, keep yanking it. He is definetly one of the worst thin skinned leftie anti-american terrorists supporters on the blogs. Too bad he has to take a monthly break to visit the welfare office.

Aw c'mon scrappy, I was just trying to prove I have a sense of humor. And that's TWICE monthly breaks to visit the welfare office, thank you very much.

Now for the main comment.

I watched the most dangerous people in the United States today. The democrat members of the United States congress. They provided enough aid and comfort to the terrorists in one day to result in the death of 500 members of the American military. There is no way the terrorist will stop the slaughter with the support they got from the Dhimmi's. Some of todays statements should be cause for arrest, trial, conviction and a ride on the same rope swing used on Saddam.

Why don't the democrats just arm themselves, go to Iraq, walk up to the American soldiers and shoot them in the back of the head. The soldiers won't be any more dead than they will be as a result of the hearings today.

I'll admit it, this country has only a few more years at best as a free nation. If you have children and especially grandchildren they will witness the destruction of the country and they will either die or live in slavery. It is that bad with the cowardly democrats in charge. Anyone that can't see that is part of the problem, not part of the solution. The biggest fight will be between Russia and China to determine which one takes over the U.S. Sure makes me glad i'm over 65 and served my 22 years in the military to insured that past and part of the current generation tasted freedom and love it. The liberal cowards in the current generation have put the Future generations in deep trouble and are digging the hole deeper by the hour.

Liberals have to resort to name calling when they don't have an answer to facts.

Not name calling. The many grammatical errors in his writing support my position.

The facts on the ground show that liberals want the US to lose and the terrorists to win in Iraq.

As others have also requested, please state these "facts".

(BTW, Brian is a typical example of another liberal who is not shy to engage in hypocritical gay-bashing when it is convenient to them)(BTW, Brian is a typical example of another liberal who is not shy to engage in hypocritical gay-bashing when it is convenient to them).

Huh???

Facts: Dems are calling for running before the terrorists and we just have an example of how to handle the terrorists in Somalia. Haven't heard anything from the Dems?

I ask for examples of the Dems/liberals showing the same intensity against the terrorists as they are against Bush? Haven't heard or seen evidence yet.

On the other hand, I saw liberals showing more sympathy for Saddam. I saw liberals embracing the Iranian maniac.

You haven't shown me a single example of how the Dems want to win against the terrorists. All I heard from liberals is cut and run.

Not name calling. The many grammatical errors in his writing support my position.
-------------------------------------------
Cheap tactic to avoid confronting the facts that the Dems want the US to lose and the terrorists to win.

Thanks for proving my point about your typical liberal tactic of avoiding the real issue by sidetracking to these peripheral issues.

I'll admit it, this country has only a few more years at best as a free nation. If you have children and especially grandchildren they will witness the destruction of the country and they will either die or live in slavery.

Scrapiron, you must be the most ornery grandpa a kid could have. Are you the type of crotchity old guy who mumbles to himself at the supermarket while sifting through his coupons?

"99¢ for a loaf of bread!! Gad darmit! Why, in my day..."

On the other hand, I saw liberals showing more sympathy for Saddam.

I don't think so. What you saw was liberals decrying the fact that Bush turned Saddam into a martyr for Sunni terrorists everywhere by allowing Moqtada al Sar to throw the switch.

The execution of Saddam was just another example of the raging incompetence of this administration. They can't even execute a dictator and do it right.

What liberals did you see showing sympathy for Saddam? Who? When? Re-evaluating a deteriorating situation is not cutting and running. Those are right wing knee-jerk talking points. Who's saying that, really? Think about it. You can't make some half-assed claim and then, when asked to back it up, expect others to prove you wrong. You're doing most of the avoiding around here.

Stupid people say stupid things.

"The execution of Saddam was just another example of the raging incompetence of this administration. They can't even execute a dictator and do it right."

Who? executed Sadam? What an uninformed idiot.

Hansel , you foul mouthed little twit, have some respect for your elders.

Who? executed Sadam? What an uninformed idiot.

Moqtada al Sadr's henchman you dunce. Didn't you hear the chants of "Moqtada! Moqtada!" on the video?

That's the problem. We could and should have prevented them from turning Saddam's execution into an example of Shiite revenge against the Sunnis.

This sort of blundering incompetence has created an insurgency where there didn't have to be one and gotten 3,000 of our troops killed and tens of thousands wounded. But I guess you just don't give a damn about that?

mantis-
your post about puke and immigrant getting married was HILARIOUS! more! more!

Tired old lies about how Democrats are unpatriotic...

Hey, do you wingnuts REALLY support the war? Because if you did, there'd be a SURPLUS of volunteers to fight in Iraq. And you be pleading to show your support by paying hiring taxes to pay your fair share of the costs.

Any takers? Or will you ignore this and take another random pot shot at me or the Dems?

"Moqtada al Sadr's henchman you dunce."

No, he was sentenced to death stupid.

"This sort of blundering incompetence has created an insurgency where there didn't have to be one and gotten 3,000 of our troops killed and tens of thousands wounded."

You are a complete shit for brain.

"That's the problem. We could and should have prevented them from turning Saddam's execution into an example of Shiite revenge against the Sunnis."

Aren't you part of the retarded group that wants us to get out of there immediately? STFU idiot.

Publicus , the only ones telling lies are stupid people like you and your criminal leaders. I'm Registered Democratic and I am calling the Democrats Leadership a bunch of lying POS's . Time for you to go graze with the rest of the democrat sheep.

Ha ha ha grouchy is is an idiot,he ho hi grouchy is an idiot, de do dum grouchy is a idiot.