« Nine Phone Calls, Nine Faxes, Nine Emails | Main | "They're awful -- just take my word for it!" »

Libby Trial - Ari Fleischer Testimony

The prosecution has called Ari Fleischer, former White House Press Secretary to the stand in the Scooter Libby case. Liveblogging of the testimony continues below.

Prosecution

January 2004 - Grand jury. Did not testify. Asked for (and received) a grant of immunity.

January 2003 SOTU address. Controversy over sentence. "According to the British Iraq is seeking to by ... from Africa."

March of 2003. Part of why he said that turned out to be wrong. Fleischer maintained in briefings that President stood by the 16 words because there were other sources.

In the spring Fleischer learn of doubts about all the evidence. This information was "out there" in columns but the source wasn't known.

July 6th, Joe Wilson OpEd.

July 7th, press gaggle. Reaction to oped. "Zero new here, other than we knew the name of the person making the charges." Given the "16 words," does the WH still stand by the "16 words?" Punted on that question. That day had lunch plans with Scooter Libby - pre-existing.

Libby was not typically a "source" for Fleischer. Lunch at the WH Mess. Lunch... Talked about Ari's plans for private sector, sports (Dolphins). Talked about briefing. Libby reiterated point that VP did not send Wilson. Libby said Wilson was sent by his wife who worked in the CIA counter-proliferation division. Her name is Valerie Plame. This (name) was news to him.

"This is hush-hush, on the QT. Not very many people know about this"

Thought that it was an odd characterization, thought it meant "newsy." Did you think this was classified? "Absolutely not." There's very strict protocols for classified material whether they be printed or oral.

In regards to the Plame getting Wilson the gig at the at CIA. "My thought was that it was nepotism. That's what I thought I was hearing"

Lunch break (12:30PM)

Defense cross examination (1:35PM)

Defense attorney gets Fleisher to admit the he met several times with prosecutors prior to his various testimonies, and refused defense's request to meet with Libby defense team even though it would have been legal.

Side of the road in Uganda. Fleischer told David Gregory (NBC), John Dickerson (Time) about Wilson being sent by his wife. Any reaction? The press reaction was "so what." "like a lot of things I said to the press, they had no impact." Why is that? I had no idea about her status, but I thought if I had something to do with this I should seek council.

After meeting with council and obtaining immunity, did you answer all of the questions of the Grand Jury. Yes.

Learned of Plame from Libby prior to Uganda trip. The Wilson OpEd appeared on the Sunday before the trip.

Dan Bartlett - communications director at the time. Still in the WH, councilor to the President. Said out loud. I can't believe he saying that VP sent him to Niger. His wife sent him, she works at the CIA. Up until that point he (Fleischer) had not mentioned this to anyone. In a matter of hours after Bartlett said this (Fleischer already knew), Fleischer told the two reporters on the side of the road in Uganda mere hours after that car ride with Bartlett.

Fleischer: "Why did the President say those 16 words?" He received information from a variety of sources. NSC made him aware that the yellow cake was based on forged documents. That went into the press gaggle.

Did Wilson's report, was that one of the reasons? He wouldn't have known at the time.

Defense notes that Fleisher mispronounced Valerie Plame, and asked if that was because he read the name, not heard it. He was wishy-washy in response to that. He thinks he heard is spoken, but isn't sure.

On flight to Uganda (July 11), was the press on the flying gaggle all over the Wilson piece? The p

Ari read the CIA summary of the Wilson trip on the plane. Why? He was checking to see if there was anything the could declassify to help tell the story. Rice said the CIA document backed that up, so he was reading it. The report is by a CIA station officer based on the work of Wilson.

Former Nigerian PM quoted in report about Wilson's report that there was no current activities, but in June 1999 Nigerian businessman met with him to insist on a meeting with an Iraqi delegation to talk about "expanding relations," which he knew to mean uranium and yellow cake. That meeting did occur.

Fleischer, "The classified information in this report supports what the President said in the State Of The Union."

The document - Wilson is not mentioned by name. A contact with excellent access, and no proven reporting record.

Fleischer testified to the Grand Jury that Wilson was named in the report. Both sides stipulate that he's not mentioned by name in the report.

In response to Dan Bartlett saying, her wife worked there, he (Ari) thought "I've head this before" There was no discussion about Bartlett's blurting out (which the defense went to great lengths to show was very odd), or his lunch with Libby where the topic came up. Fleischer claims he said nothing to Bartlett.

Q: Would it be common for Dan Bartlett to make a comment like this and for you to ignore him? A: Something about reading his document and already "knowing" about what Bartlett was talking about. Here Fleischer claims he was more interested in reading a document. In short Bartlett said the wife sent him and Ari said nothing.

Senior Staff cabin - 4 seats. there were about 10 seats where Fleischer and and Bartlett were. Military aide, President's personal aide, photographer, advance person. Fleisher can't recall anyone else there.

Break

Questions about July press gaggles conducted in Uganda during, where he mentioned the information about Ambassador Wilson's wife. Fleischer doesn't recall if the information was "on background," but it was not a secret. Tamara Lipper (Newsweek) who he (Ari) recalls walked off before the wife sending (Plame) him came up.

A War on Wilson? article was by Matthew Cooper and John Dickerson, who Fleischer had talked to about Plame. There were questions about the July 12 press gaggle, where the "16 words" were a big topic of questions.

Harlow (CIA spokesman) was not happy about Rice's characterization, which made it look like it was the CIA botched things in regards to the 16 words. There was discussion (Bartlett and Fleischer) on the way back from Uganda, about a CBS report saying a CIA source said President made speech knowing the information (16 words) were wrong, which apparently really stuck in Fleischer's craw, as he's used that repeatedly.

Fleisher called Walter Pincus, he doesn't know what Bartlett did.

Harlow (CIA spokesman) was not happy about Rice's characterization, which made it look like it was the CIA botched things in regards to the 16 words.


Fleischer called Pincus because he knew he was covering the controversy (from the bylines) since the normal WaPo writers were in transit.

Your (Fleischer's) immunity, was that sought in February 2004? "The only way I would know that is through discussions I would have had with my lawyers" (big laughs in the press room).

You were asked about Mr. Pincus at the Grand Jury? Yes. And you testified you didn't mention Valerie Wilson to him? Yes. And you haven't been prosecuted for perjury? No.

(Sidebar) It looks like the defense is trying to paint Fleischer into a corner as someone who may have been quoted by a reporter as a unnamed WH source, whether or not he was actually the one who told them.

Coming out of sidebar, that line of questioning was dropped, in favor of the Miami Dolphins connection with Scooter Libby. Hey they can't all be gems.

Redirect (3:45PM)

Reaching back to Fleischer's Grand Jury testimony in regards to the report that he thought that had Wilson's name in it, but didn't. In effect he said that he had assumed Wilson's name was in there because he's already published the OpEd and he (Fleischer) already knew it was him, but even in the Grand Jury testimony he stated he wasn't completely sure....

July 7, 2003 lunch with Libby. The only thing about he's not absolutely certain about is whether Libby mention the wife (Valerie Wilson) by name.

As the proceedings head to sidebar the assembled media are small debate as to what exactly was said in Fleischer's testimony about the Libby lunch....

Jury questions - Most would have required Fleischer to speculate, which the judge wouldn't allow. He instructed the questioning jurors to disregard their own questions, at least the ones which he didn't ask. In the Rice gaggle, the judge asked why Fleisher did mention Valerie Wilson. Combination of hearing it from two people and the CBS report, Fleischer thought he'd try it out to see if it went anywhere.

How many reporters at the Rice Air Force One gaggle? 8 or so plus cameramen.

As press secretary did you think that since it was "hush hush, on the QT," that you should not have released it to reporters? In hindsight he (Fleischer) wished he had, but he did not believe that was "classified."

What makes you think the name was used at that lunch? "My memory"

Witness excused,


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Libby Trial - Ari Fleischer Testimony:

» Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with Fleischer Disputes Libby's Account of Plame Case

Comments (12)

Thank you for your efforts.... (Below threshold)
nogo postal:

Thank you for your efforts..rightly or wrongly this Administration has cloaked itself in secrecy. This trial is beginning to lift the veil..

Yeah "no go" it is showing ... (Below threshold)
jhow66:

Yeah "no go" it is showing what idiots there are on the left. All the proof you need is to look at the protest yestarday in D.C. Anyone that would spit at one of our servicemen needs to be hung on the spot. That also shows what the left is made up of.

Yes, nogo, except that it i... (Below threshold)
Mitchell:

Yes, nogo, except that it is showing how mis-managed CIA was that it would allow the spouse of an analyst to take the assignment, drop the usual non-disclosure agreements, and allow him to broadcast our intelligence activities, and mis-represent them, to all the world.

You're so obsessed with Bush, you can't see the forest for the trees. Wackjob.

"Anyone that would spit at ... (Below threshold)
anbe:

"Anyone that would spit at one of our servicemen needs to be hung on the spot. That also shows what the left is made up of."

Bullsh**. Check out the link. Same guy who claims he got spit on has made that spurious charge before and he is associated with the Free Republic. Another bullsh** talking point from the right designed to smear anyone who questions Bush or the war.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/

Thanks, Anbe -- these despe... (Below threshold)
Lee:

Thanks, Anbe -- these desperate liars need to be outed. The sliming of good Americans needs to stop and stop now.

The liberals are desperate ... (Below threshold)
LoveAmerica Immigrant:

The liberals are desperate to cover the contemptible behaviors of their corrupt leader. When will the liberals will stand up for the military recruiter on campus? I am waiting for the liberals to call for the resignation of Harry Reid. Captain Ed just posted another shady land deal.

We know the answer already. The liberals like Lee will be happy to continue swimming in the moral sewage of the Dem party. Have anyone found a widespread condemnation of Kerry by liberals yet?

Anbe, spit at, not spit on.... (Below threshold)
SCSIwuzzy:

Anbe, spit at, not spit on.
Now, I don't know which side is lying about spitting at the other's feet (again, notice the word at). Code Pink has been pretty dishonest about their activities outside WR, in my opinion. And Spurling does seem to revel in mixing it up with them.
But, the blog you link to makes the assertion that Spurling is a white supremacist because he got a hatemail from a white supremeacist. And confuses the timelines, infering that he and his father had met Hanity and Colmes and Lynn Cheney before he got the hateful little greeting card rather than because of the card.

Anyway, your link fails to prove that anything Spurling has said in the past is false. Feel free to prove otherwise.

Ummmmm? When is Patty Fitzg... (Below threshold)
914:

Ummmmm? When is Patty Fitzgerald going to be disbarred for malicious prosecution and being an all around asshole for Armitage?

And when are Lee and anbe going to wise up?

Lee and Abne will never wis... (Below threshold)
Mitchell:

Lee and Abne will never wise up. Some lunatics in the asylum never get better, even with meds.

Notice the largely fact-free nature of their posts. And Lee's repetitive non-sequiturs. You'd think they'd be embarrassed, except they're not sharp enough to know the diff.

Mismanagement at the CIA? T... (Below threshold)
nogo postal:

Mismanagement at the CIA? There could not have been...
otherwise there would have been a firestorm over our President giving the Medal of Freedom to George T.

How cool would it be for old George to throw his medal over the fence at the Whitehouse and say "I did not deserve this. I blew 9/11...I blew WMD's..look how many lives were lost because I was in charge of the CIA when gravest harm to our nation in this new century took place."

But hey..our President hung the medal around George T's neck. If we criticized him for that it would give comfort to our enemy...

Nogo is another example of ... (Below threshold)
LoveAmerica Immigrant:

Nogo is another example of another liberal who is trying to make excuse for the contemptible behavior of the liberals. I am not sure Nogo really understand the difference between criticizing your gov and aiding the enemies.

Nogo, this is the same example for you again: you criticize your wife all the time and claim that you love her and want to make her better. At the same time, you are ignoring or worse excusing the outrageous behaviors of the people trying to destroy your family.

The liberals should spend 10x the energy they are using to criticize Bush/the US towards the terrorists, the communist dictators around the world, and the UN for example. That 's what contemptible about the liberal left.

I am using Nogo 's standard... (Below threshold)
LoveAmerica Immigrant:

I am using Nogo 's standard now: let 's assume all the criticism Nogo is directing at Bush, the liberal left is far/far worse for their despicable behavior. If Nogo is honest, he would agree with me that using his own standard, the liberal left/dems are in a moral sewage.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy