What is suspicious is the omission of the al Qaeda logo in the upper left hand corner of the Logan video. This tells me that Logan did not get the video from the al Qaeda web site but probably got it straight from the source.

Kim

So what??? Malkin is a slimey slattern who thinks she has some point to prove, usually based on nothing.

What the problem is here, Kim, is that you can't tolerate Logan's reporting because it doesn't line up w/ right looney reporting from fools like Laura Lingam & Michelle Slattern , now experts on Iraq thanks to their "discover it all" Iraqi sojourns.

Logan defends herself here very well.

Kim, you are forever out there looking for the most absurd thin reeds to try to discredit anyone whose reporting conflicts with your Bush-hugging blind loyalty to the US Iraqi catastrophe.

It would be wiser to stay away from MM the Slattern who has a notorious reputation for making up shit from nothing.

Simple mix-up. She's mixing up the video she (and CBS) are taping up for Al-Qaeda with the video she (and CBS) are taping up for US consumption. Someone mislabeled the video. Happens all the time.

I wish I could take credit for the above, but it's from a comment at the link. It would be no surprise to me if it is eventually confirmed that our MSM was collaborating with our enemies.

aRepukelican: I'm calling bullshit on you, turd.

Your link is to a video of Logan whining about how difficult it is for "journalists" like her to obtain information. It provides zero information about how her supposed original report has video identical to that from al Quaeda.

How does a POS like you explain that?

Puke, you lost any chance of discussion when you lead with calling the person you disagree with a slut.
You provide no evidence or even logic to back up your assertions, only personal attacks on anyone who disagrees. Par for the course when dealing with you.

Old Coot & Sqoooozey

Frankly, I give a damn what you think of the link.

Sqoozey, I used slattern...look up the definition for "malkin." Actually, "salttern" is pretty tame for what that puike of a blogger really is.

And as to Logan's story abouth the "Battle for Haifa Street," YouTube has a number of vids depicting the battle in action over 3 weeks even, contrary to the assumptions and rampant speculations made in Kim's "Hot Air" link.

The truth of the matter is that the RWB's cannot tolerate reporting like this coming from Baghdad in a locale so near the sacred Green Zone and so reflective of Colin Powell's Pottery Barn advisory given to Bush.

Rather than acknowledge the reality of the situation, muckrakers like MM the Slattern and Laura Lingam go after the sources in order to ignore or deny reality.

What the hell difference does it make that the source of Logan's vid and the source of the AQ vid might be the same? Looks to me like one formerly unemployed Iraqi, thanks to Bush, has gotten himself a lucrative
job using his camcorder. Score 1 for the Bush Iraqi job recovery program.

There has got to be a psychological study that would explore the left's need to collaborate with this nation's enemies. From the Hollywood Stalinists in the 1930's to Kerry/Fonda with North Vietnam to Kerry/Harkin with the Sandinistas to the current crop of vermin--it is insane. What compels people to join sides with our enemies?

I'm a slut, so f yourself.

Not that we're beyond Repuke-like name-calling, let's get on with it.

Nothing like our daily dose of Liberal ad hominems to get the day going.

Puke, I've said nothing about the Logan/Al-Queda issue, only that you're unable to create an engaging discussion or debate.
From your response, a condensed version.
Short form of Puke:
I got nothing.
Yes, I think calling people I don't agree with sluts or whores is legimate debate.

It seems clear that you don't want a dialogue, you merely want to shout down anyone that doesn't think as you think, and stiffle debate.

I used slattern...look up the definition for "malkin."

"Puns are little "plays on words" that a certain breed of person loves to spring on you and then look at you in a certain self-satisfied way to indicate that he thinks that you must think that he is by far the cleverest person on Earth now that Benjamin Franklin is dead, when in fact what you are thinking is that if this person ever ends up in a lifeboat, the other passengers will hurl him overboard by the end of the first day even if they have plenty of food and water." -- Dave Barry

They're all terrorist's tools. Including arepukelican himself.

One way to stiffle debate is to leave out one side's explanation -- just as Kim as done, in leaving out CBS News' response to the allegation that they got the footage for AQ sources. CBS responded yesterday, and rather than include their explanation the breathless (and integrity-less) right-wing blogospshere keeps pushing their lie on the American public.

It's clear who is working against he best interests of the American people, and its bloggers like Kim and Michelle who are attempting to stifle the truth.

I asked CBS News Vice President Paul Friedman about the video.

"I can assure you this was not from Al-Qaeda," said Friedman, who declined to identify the source. "Whenever we can identify the source of information or video, we want to do that," he added. "There are some rare cases when we have to protect the source. In this case, we needed to do so, because it's literally a matter of life and death."

"The fact that same video shows up in more than one place is something that happens every day," said CBS News spokeswoman Sandra Genelius. "We occasionally use video from an Al-Qaeda Web site and we identify it. In this case, we didn't get it from Al-Qaeda, so we didn't identify it as such."

Desperate right-wing liars, pushing their lies and half-truths and preventing their dear readers from seeing and hearing both sides of the discussion. That's one way to stffle debate -- withhold facts and arguments presented by the other side.

This explanation came out yesterday, but for some odd reason CBS's response was left out of every right-wing story on this subject that I've seen, including Malkin's and Priestap's.

If anyone knows of a right-wing blogger who has presented the facts fairly in this issue please publish a link, and prove me wrong.

"I can assure you this was not from Al-Qaeda,"

Oh hell, that makes all the difference. Why didn't he just say so? CBS' credibility is still very much in tact. Right? Hello?

Malkin catches another MSM terrorist tool. Don't cha just love it?! No wonder the lefties loathe he.

Yahoooo!

Must use enemy propoganda...must denigrate US troops...America bad....freedom fighting terrorists good....Bush must be punished....

Most Sincerely,
MSM, including (but not limited to) CBS, al Reuters, al Associated Press, Time, and of course the New York Times!

nikkolai...you ignorant slut

"Must use enemy propoganda...must denigrate US troops...America bad....freedom fighting terrorists good....Bush must be punished"

Links please; any proof, apart from the contents of your drool cup?

you ignorant slut

How cliche. You should spend some time on your very pedestrian material. You're the one appearing callow.

If all of your news comes from right wing sources than all of your news is slanted to the right. Everyone here knows that only right wing news is patriotic in a time of war.

I hope I never see a single picture or story link associated to a MSM news source on this site ever again, otherwise I'd be led to believe you Wizzbangers are no longer good Americans.

Have a great single view only day.

A former staff seargent, Terry Welch, in Nitpicker, says this of MM Slatterb and Logan, "Logan is telling the story you didn't seem to notice during your trip to the country and she's been putting her ass on the line for the past four-plus years to do it. It's time you learned that all of us have our "betters"--as they used to say back in the small Kansas town I came from. Logan is definitely yours." Read the rest for the unmasking of a hate-slining MM Slattern.

And for any of the Wiztools used by Malkin the Slattern, you might take a look at this.

Malkin the Slattern is a 21st Century update of Sen. Joeseph McCarthy slinging shit to see what sticks.

She can always count on Wiztools like Kim or Lorie who always fancy that they've dug up something of real merit.

This may have been noted before... but if not:

aRepukelican - Logan defends herself here very well.

Did anyone notice the video Puke posted a link to was from MARCH 2006! SAo tell us ASSHAT, how is that a defense of an event that occurred this week defended in a video just short of a year old!

Lee From your quoted C-BS quote: "I can assure you this was not from Al-Qaeda," said Friedman, who declined to identify the source.

HE could be telling the truth couldn't he? However, it's also very possible his "source" obtained the vid from an al-Qaeda operative or sympathizer without the knowledge of C-BS.

Benefit of doubt given.

The problem arises because the controversy has already exploded and it's plain to see when viewed side-by-side the videos are identical.

That raises enough questions that C-BS at this point, and at minimum, should be researching their source not issuing half-assed defenses of the story.

Lets see now, aRepukelican slanders/slimes everyone on Wizbang yet he hangs out here every day. I guess Kos doen't fill his need for idiotic rants, so he makes up his own. Spending his days with people he hates must mean he has a very lonely life. Don't stop posting your comments, We do so enjoy a little comedy in our daily lives even if it does come from people who post between nut doctor appointments and drug induced coma's.

Marc -- the fact that Malkin and company intentionally and purposefully left out CBS's explanation tells me that even they have doubts.

It's looks like just another sliming by the ethically challenged (and increasingly desperate) right-wing blogoslime machine.

What reason would Malkin and her "partners in slime" have in keeping CBS's answer out of this story? Why the headline to Kim's piece CBS' Lara Logan Used Al Qaeda Video in Her Report? and yet no mention of CBS's response to that question they provided yesterday?. The right-wing blogopshere is not being honest with their readership.

Lee, have you completed your treatment or are you on a weeks release to see if you can cope with life in public? Don't worry, they will use shock treatment on you soon.

Scrapiron

Perhaps you should change your nic to "Scrapcrap," and empty your Depends...everytime you comment it sounds like your bag is full and your ass is severely chafed from it.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out the video was shot by someone WITH the "insurgents" - who seem to be al Qaeda in this case, since they took credit for the attack.

It is entirely unsurprising CBS finds such a source, and refuses to identify it. It is equally unsurprising how the left rushes to their defense.

Hey Scrappy! I see the liberals who've been slapping you around in these threads have reduced you to jhow66 troll duty. Nice of you to lend your considerable knowledge and recent experience with shock treatments to this discussion, but try to stay on topic, okay?

Meanwhile, here is Malkin in another story dated today, where she fails once again to mention CBS response from yesterday to the repeated slime attempts errrhhh... "allegations" by the right-wing liars.

Malkin has all the integrity of a snail.

"pushing their lies and half-truths and preventing their dear "Watchers" from seeing and hearing both sides of the discussion. That's one way to stffle debate -- withhold facts and arguments presented by the other side."

This is exactly what the Rats and their Liberal Lamestream Media are all about. How goes that "Fairness Doctrine" your little Martian Kook Kucinich is trying to shove down Americans throat.
You Dictacrats can't stand being exposed and proven the liars that you are. Poor babies, can't tell all your wittle little lies and feel good about yourselves.

How many times do you think the MSM can get busted repeating Democrat Lies or reporting their own fabrication stories and enemy propaganda and expect to be considered credible?

Hey Puke & Lee , how does it feel to be lying idiots with zero credibility trying to spread democrat propaganda here then having your asses handed to ya?

Tell us just how stupid do you really feel.

Addsion leaps into the fray, with his "it doesn't take a genius" argument --- of course -- it doesn't take a genius to back up your allegation that the video was shot by AQ with an argument or two that supports it -- but then he's taking to conservative morons, so they'll buy it regardless. Peak, jhow66 - speak! Good boy!!! lol.

Since the footage I saw was shot after the attack what basis does a "genius" like you, Addison, have for the statement that is was shot by someone "with the insurgents"?

Ask Scrappy for help if you need it -- his recent shock treatments have him speaking in complete sentences for a change -- take advantage of that while you can.

Addison - amatuer wanna-be slimer. Come on Jimmy, sit up straight and give us some more of your "genius" -- lol.

I have it on undisputable authority that the video in question was faxed to CBS from a Kinko's in Texas.

J.

Rob - everytime you write something I feel like a saint, but you've apparently swallowed the Scrappy/Addison kool-aid - and are totally off-topic as well.

"Tell us just how stupid do you really feel."

Well, Rob, if you translate that into english I'll be happy to try to answer it -- check in with one of your 10 year-old neighbors if you need help.

Boy, mention the words "conservative morons" and look ho shows up -- lol!

"I have it on undisputable authority that the video in question was faxed to CBS from a Kinko's in Texas."

Faxed from Texas, eh? Well that leaves out Bush. Everyone knows he could never figure out how to operate a fax machine....

Hey Puke .

"everytime you comment it sounds like your bag is full and your ass is severely chafed from it."

That pretty much describes what you do here when you begin to empty your bag of lies. How do counter the fact that Democrats are always proven wrong and they go silent and move on to the next set of lies .....I mean talking points, LOL.

That's funny , Democrats must be given instructions on what to say and when they can say it. That is why democrats in New Orleans can't fix shit while the money sits collecting dust.

Here's Glenn Greenwald with a long laundry list of lies from the right-wing blogosphere.

Packs of right-wing bloggers spent the last several weeks trying to destroy the credibility of Associated Press's war reporting by claiming that one of its sources, an Iraqi policeman named Jamil Hussein, does not exist, that AP simply invented him. As it turns out -- and as AP itself had the great pleasure of reporting (and then rubbing in the face of its irresponsible, taunting accusers) -- the Iraqi Government, which previously denied it, now acknowledges that Jamil Hussein does exist and he is a police officer in Iraq, just as AP reported accurately.

Greenwald provides update after update which includes many more examples of right-wing bloggers' slimings:

These right-wing bloggers love to piously masquerade around as "media watchdogs," keeping a watchful eye on the "MSM" and compelling them to adhere to facts. And ever since their involvement in the use by Dan Rather of fraudulent documents, and then heightened by Charles Johnson's oh-so-monumental observation that a Reuters photograph of Lebanon had been photoshopped to give the appearance of more smoke during an Israeli air strike on Beirut, the media has largely recited this storyline.

But they are nothing of the sort. Nobody is less interested in media accuracy than they are. Correcting media mistakes is so plainly not their agenda. They are nothing more than hyper-partisan hysterics who jump on any innuendo or rumor or whispered suspicion as long as it promotes their rigid ideological views and political loyalties and hatreds. They have a long, shameful and really quite pitiful history of incidents filled with ones like this Jamil Hussein debacle... [snip]

Lots more at the links above. Malkin and her wanna-be whining slimers are looking really stoopid these days.

How many months later? Why was he hiding ? Oh you now think that admission makes the story credible? No burnt bodies anywhere to be seen and what mosque was it ?

"now acknowledges that Jamil Hussein does exist and he is a police officer in Iraq, just as AP reported accurately."

Funny that's about the only thing that they have had the great plessure of reporting. It says nothing about all the unverified stories he has fed them does it?

No matter this is more than enough for you to piss your pants about. Still supporting and sticking up for the enemy , nothing new here.

And Lee provides the belly laugh of the day:

but try to stay on topic, okay?
Posted by: Lee at January 31, 2007 03:34 PM

And then has the audacity to use the word integrity in the same post.

Lee, try to look in the mirror, okay?

Oh, and BTW Lee, this from your Greenwald quote:

and then heightened by Charles Johnson's oh-so-monumental observation that a Reuters photograph of Lebanon had been photoshopped to give the appearance of more smoke during an Israeli air strike on Beirut, the media has largely recited this storyline.

Funny how the guy you're holding up as the defender of truth, honesty and the American way (hmmm sounds like Superman) fails to mention Reuters not only replaced the "smoke photo" but severed all ties to the terrorist sympathizer that provided them.

He also fails to mention that photo was only one of dozens provided by the same "reporter" that all were doctored in some way or weren't taken at the time or location described.

Talk about sliming someone....

Better find a new "counter-slime" source Lee.