Nancy Pelosi has jumped the shark with her trip to Syria. Even the Washington Post is slamming her:
HOUSE SPEAKER Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) offered an excellent demonstration yesterday of why members of Congress should not attempt to supplant the secretary of state when traveling abroad. After a meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad in Damascus, Ms. Pelosi announced that she had delivered a message from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that "Israel was ready to engage in peace talks" with Syria. What's more, she added, Mr. Assad was ready to "resume the peace process" as well. Having announced this seeming diplomatic breakthrough, Ms. Pelosi suggested that her Kissingerian shuttle diplomacy was just getting started. "We expressed our interest in using our good offices in promoting peace between Israel and Syria," she said.
Only one problem: The Israeli prime minister entrusted Ms. Pelosi with no such message. "What was communicated to the U.S. House Speaker does not contain any change in the policies of Israel," said a statement quickly issued by the prime minister's office. In fact, Mr. Olmert told Ms. Pelosi that "a number of Senate and House members who recently visited Damascus received the impression that despite the declarations of Bashar Assad, there is no change in the position of his country regarding a possible peace process with Israel." In other words, Ms. Pelosi not only misrepresented Israel's position but was virtually alone in failing to discern that Mr. Assad's words were mere propaganda.Ms. Pelosi was criticized by President Bush for visiting Damascus at a time when the administration -- rightly or wrongly -- has frozen high-level contacts with Syria. Mr. Bush said that thanks to the speaker's freelancing Mr. Assad was getting mixed messages from the United States. Ms. Pelosi responded by pointing out that Republican congressmen had visited Syria without drawing presidential censure. That's true enough -- but those other congressmen didn't try to introduce a new U.S. diplomatic initiative in the Middle East. "We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace," Ms. Pelosi grandly declared.
Never mind that that statement is ludicrous: As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush's military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi's attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.
And unconstitutional. The United States only has one president at a time, and only that president has the authority to set our country's foreign policy.
This trip did accomplish something though: it showed that the foreign policy of talking to our enemies that the left hails as being superior to President Bush's is hopelessly naive and completely unsatisfactory for dealing with our enemies. Bashar al-Assad manipulated Speaker Pelosi and made her look completely ridiculous. What's the lesson here? The Democrats need to leave dealing with our enemies to the adults.



Comments (70)
But the unfortunate thing h... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Dave | April 5, 2007 9:35 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
But the unfortunate thing here is that Pelosi as well as the rest of the left think this trip was a stunning success because it tweaked Bush and they don't think of any of the other consequences. This is very typical of the democrats and the left in everything they do. Look at how it will affect domestic politics and ignore any of the other consequences.
1. Posted by Dave | April 5, 2007 9:35 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 09:35
2. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 9:35 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Which is to say, made the United States look completely ridiculous.
Quite honestly, something needs to be done about her. This soft, sly verion of a coup should not go unnoticed.
2. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 9:35 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 09:35
3. Posted by Mnemosyne | April 5, 2007 9:50 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"The most powerful woman in the world."
Can you imagine the cat fight that will ensue if Hillary is elected president?
Pelosi already thinks she's more powerful than President Bush.
Her lust for power will be very damaging to this country.
3. Posted by Mnemosyne | April 5, 2007 9:50 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 09:50
4. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 9:51 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I would think despite the Speakers inflated ego that has led her to proclaim she's the "The Most Powerful Women in the World", or some such tripe, she has abdicated that "crown" herself.
Considering she can't match the century (plus) old traditions of the Pony Express of delivering a message as it was written her new title should be Accidental Diplomat.
That aside, next time she claims she made this trip because of a recommendation by the Iraq survey group at least one of the lilly-livered press corp should ask her to quote the portion of ISG report that specifically says the Speaker of the House should be the one opening a "dialog" with Syria.
Fat chance I know, but it sure would be funny watching her squirm like the worm she is trying to spin an answer.
4. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 9:51 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 09:51
5. Posted by Scrapiron | April 5, 2007 9:51 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
With an attorney general that has only done one thing right (firing worthless attorneys) since he's been in office, there is little hope that United States Law will be applied to Peeeeloshi. She will simply rejoin the other clowns and traitors in congress with a hero welcome.
5. Posted by Scrapiron | April 5, 2007 9:51 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 09:51
6. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 9:55 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And BTW, the over under bet is 10 comments on when one of the resident conspiracy theorists here claim this is a plot hatched by Bush and Olmert to make Pelosi look like a fool.
Like she needs the help.
6. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 9:55 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 09:55
7. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:04 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The fatuous harpy Pelosi,
Flew hatefully off to Damosci.
It raises the cry,
Exactly just why,
Would Assad aid this mafiosi?
H/T ip727
========
7. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:04 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:04
8. Posted by MyPetGloat | April 5, 2007 10:05 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What was the purpose of the trip taken to Syria by representatives Wolf (R-Va), Aderholt (R-AL) and Pitts (R-PA)?
Why were they not excoriated by the White House?
Why no reply by White House spokesperson Dana Perino about this trip?
Why no mention of it here? Sophistry?
Hello?
Anyone?
Hello?
8. Posted by MyPetGloat | April 5, 2007 10:05 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:05
9. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:09 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
MyPetGloat,
You need to give someone the chance to answer before you post your little "Hello? Anyone?" routine.
My answer is simply to quote a portion of the article that opened this thread:
9. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:09 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:09
10. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:12 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hello?
Anyone?
Hello?
10. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:12 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:12
11. Posted by Gizmo | April 5, 2007 10:13 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
MyPetGloat, perhaps you miseed this in the OpEd: "That's true enough -- but those other congressmen didn't try to introduce a new U.S. diplomatic initiative in the Middle East." That distinction seems to be more than just a small nuance. When the WaPo has to hold their nose and side with Bush, you know it's bad!
11. Posted by Gizmo | April 5, 2007 10:13 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:13
12. Posted by herzhonour | April 5, 2007 10:14 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Your description of Pelosi and the leftist
democrats was entirely too kind.
I think there should be a burrowing session to see
what laws can be applied to her for taking on the
duties of a sitting president.
It all looks very much like an attempted coup to
over throw the current government of President Bush.
Either that, are she is completely ignorant of her
duties as Speaker of the House.
There will be more governmental anarchy if this not stopped now.
12. Posted by herzhonour | April 5, 2007 10:14 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:14
13. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:19 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
RCP has a nice link to an editorial by Michael Young in the Daily Star nicely laying out what a fool for Assad Nancy played with respect to Lebanon. He calls her a diplomatic dilettante.
=====================
13. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:19 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:19
14. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm thinking that Mantis, John Irving, Synova, Jay Tea, Lee, Barney and I, will head out to Iran and completely restructure our diplomatic relationship with them. (If you're expecting to see pictures of Synova wearing a headscarf, don't hold your breath.)
14. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:23
15. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:26 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
VDH thinks this shows the mullahcracy under stress. I think there is something wack with the relationship between Ahmadinejad and the mullahs. I thought they'd heaved him, but now I'm not so sure. I will follow Teheran's future progress with great interest.
============================
15. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:26 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:26
16. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:29 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gizmo, it's also a wonderful opportunity for the WaPo to bitch slap the other bitch's object of envy. So maybe it wasn't such a bitch for 'em. Bitchin, huh?
=======================================
16. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:29 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:29
17. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:31 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Good news, it went well. Here's a picture of our delegation.
17. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 10:31 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:31
18. Posted by kim's freidy cat | April 5, 2007 10:33 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What is this? Thursday Dog Slapping?
18. Posted by kim's freidy cat | April 5, 2007 10:33 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:33
19. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 10:35 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Being made a tool by Assad was acceptable in order to show up the President.
That was the whole point.
The only point.
Like I said before, payback for this is going to be a bitch when the time is right.
19. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 10:35 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:35
20. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:35 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Whoa, it's Friday in China. Aren't you free range over there?
===================================
20. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 10:35 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 10:35
21. Posted by jpm100 | April 5, 2007 11:00 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Bush brought this on himself.
There's a been a few time he should have at least rattled the Logan Act bat, even if he didn't have 100% justification to swing it.
From what I can tell, informing Syria Israel wanted peace talks & there was no such offer from them is monkeying in foreign affairs and a true violation.
If he stays silent on this, he is destroying the jurisdiction and authority of his office.
Time to drop the act of looking 'above it all' act. That's worked out really well for him, hasn't it? Its about to do real damage now.
21. Posted by jpm100 | April 5, 2007 11:00 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 11:00
22. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 11:04 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Damages from her disruption can be shown. Let's hope it's big.
=======================================
22. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 11:04 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 11:04
23. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 11:14 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Even more good news! Pelosi is in Saudi Arabia!
Yes, reverse that one too Madame Speaker. After all, you've now abolished terrorism by renaming the War on Terror to something else...why should Saudis have to wait to enter the country for security reasons?
23. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 11:14 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 11:14
24. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 11:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, H, as usual INS is behind the 8 ball. Pre 9/11, too loose; post, too tight. The Saudis should be spending their money spreading the Enlightenment around, and they won't do that unless they come over here to be enlightened.
================================
24. Posted by kim | April 5, 2007 11:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 11:24
25. Posted by 914 | April 5, 2007 11:50 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I would think its time for peloshi to be removed from a position of power for trying to usurp the Presidents power and for Her submission to islam
25. Posted by 914 | April 5, 2007 11:50 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 11:50
26. Posted by Robert the Original | April 5, 2007 12:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
One wonders of course, if she is creating more trouble away on a junket than she would be making back home.
It might cost us Taiwan, say, but this may be a small price to pay compared to the damage a power-drunk ultra-lib egomaniac could do to our economy.
Our relations with the Saudi have always been tricky, even more so since Cheney enlisted their support to lower the oil price to help stress Iran, after the Saudi's promise to fund AQ should the US leave Iraq.
Another way to say this is that Pelosi's response to that Saudi promise was to invite them to fund AQ. That should calm things down.
26. Posted by Robert the Original | April 5, 2007 12:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:10
27. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 12:12 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Op-Ed from the WaPo? I thought that you can not trust the MSM?
To bad the opinion is based on half facts. Here is what the PM said:
"The Prime Minister clarified that by these measures it would be determined whether Syria is sincere about attaining a genuine peace with Israel."
Here is what TSOTH said her message was:
"..they had frank words with President Bashar al-Assad and other senior Syrian officials here on Wednesday, pressing the president over Syria's support for militant groups and insisting that his government block militants seeking to cross into Iraq and join insurgents there. "
Sounds like both are on the same page. Syria needs to renounce support of terrorists before Israel will resume the peace process.
Speaking of the peace processes. According to Bob Novak, there is no hope of resuming the peace process until after Bush leaves office.
At least the Speaker is trying.
27. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 12:12 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:12
28. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 12:14 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Isn't surrendering the country usually the domain of the President?
28. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 12:14 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:14
29. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Or rather, isn't surrendering a foreign nation (Israel) up to Olmert?
29. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:16
30. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 12:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, H, as usual INS is behind the 8 ball. Pre 9/11, too loose; post, too tight. The Saudis should be spending their money spreading the Enlightenment around, and they won't do that unless they come over here to be enlightened.
Kim
They're not coming here to be enlightened. They're coming here to invest- in Mosque construction and ultimately, conversion. No wonder they're complaining about this stuff taking too long.
30. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 12:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:17
31. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barney:
Nice of you to make that leap, but Iraq and Israel are two different things; likewise, are words and actions.
Come on, I even included you in my delegation to Iran...get with the program!
31. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:23
32. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 12:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Or rather, isn't surrendering a foreign nation (Israel) up to Olmert?
Good point. Maybe it was a two-for-one deal, as long as Syria promises to increase it's purchase of tuna and to direct dollars to Perini.
32. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 12:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:23
33. Posted by Althor | April 5, 2007 12:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So, what of Pelosi's "Dhimmitude" trip of appeasement to Syria? Just another Jihadist victory for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Puppet Master pulling Syrian President Al-Assad's strings, the Iranian despot Mahmoud Ahmadinejad!
But of course, since the Democrats have struck the term "War on Terror" from their vocabulary, obviously because in their leftist view they don't see us fighting such a war but only "Clintonian" sporadic localized events that in their eyes are but "Law Enforcement issues," and since with Nancy now ushering her new American Foreign Policy in the Middle East, and with the cut-and-run defeatist "Harry Reid Congress" cutting off the funds to our troops to bring about a prompt retreat that would ensure us of defeat and humiliation in Iraq, all we have to do is to hold hands and sing "Kumbaya" with Bin Laden, Nasrallah, and Ahmadinejad, even as Madam Speaker is now doing with Al-Assad and his henchmen, and we will all live "Happily Ever After" in their delusional peacenik "Pelosi Lululululand"!
Where is a heroic "rogue" Israeli renegade pilot when you need one to shoot this "Muntaz Pelosi" and her "Flying Luxury Palace" off the air over Damascus? Pffff !!!
Althor
33. Posted by Althor | April 5, 2007 12:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:31
34. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 12:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Nice of you to make that leap, but Iraq and Israel are two different things;.." herald
Herald, first of all Nancy and I were talking about Syria's support of Hamas. Have you ever heard of them?
Second, it looks like the Prez just lost another Republican on this issue:
AP: DAMASCUS, Syria: A visiting U.S. congressman held talks with President Bashar Assad Thursday, a day after a congressional delegation headed by U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sparked controversy by meeting the Syrian leader.
Commenting on Bush's criticism, California Republican Darrell Issa said the president had failed to promote the necessary dialogue to resolve disagreements between the U.S. and Syria.
That sounds like solid support for the Speaker, and big F-You to the President. Have you ever seen a lamer duck than "W"?
34. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 12:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:41
35. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barney,
What I read was:
"..pressing the president over Syria's support for militant groups and insisting that his government block militants seeking to cross into *Iraq* and join insurgents there."
Militant groups? But Barney, you've unfailingly reminded us that Hamas is not a militant group, but the democratically elected government of the mythical state of Palestine.
Were both Nancy Pelosi and Bashar al-Assad referring to Hamas as a militant group?
35. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:52
36. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'd also like to remind you that Israel had not approved anything Pelosi had said. She doesn't have the right to set foreign policy for the U.S. or Israel...yet somehow "The Most Powerful Woman in the World" has managed to do so.
And some California Republican decides for a followup visit? That sounds a little more like a "big F-You" to our country than it does to the President.
36. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 12:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:57
37. Posted by kiyt | April 5, 2007 12:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The American people overwhelmingly support Pelosi's trip. 72% in the CNN poll and 70% in the MSNBC poll. Once again, she's on the side of the American people! She can do no wrong. Darrel Issa is now in Syria meeting with Assad and bad mouthing Mr Bush. You'll just can't win!!
37. Posted by kiyt | April 5, 2007 12:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 12:58
38. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
kiyt,
Keep trotting out the "American People overwhelmingly support my agenda" roll by citing polls. I could conduct 6 polls right now that would turn that percentile on it's head. Deal with facts, not the opinions of people's opinions and you may have a leg (albiet a small one) to stand on.
38. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:04
39. Posted by Just Saying | April 5, 2007 1:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
For those of you allowed to wonder off of the RW reservation check out the front page of thinkprogress.org
39. Posted by Just Saying | April 5, 2007 1:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:05
40. Posted by Just Saying | April 5, 2007 1:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
wonder = wander
40. Posted by Just Saying | April 5, 2007 1:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:07
41. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
93% of American's support our Super Friends trip to Syria! Once again, the Super Friends are on the side of the American People!
41. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:08
42. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 1:08 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"I'd also like to remind you that Israel had not approved anything Pelosi had said" herald
How do you know? Where you there at the meeting? You keep misquoting my earlier statement, so you must have read it, so you know that Pelosi's statement was for Syria to renounce violence. That was the same statement from the PM.
"Militant groups? But Barney, you've unfailingly reminded us that Hamas is not a militant group, but the democratically elected government of the mythical state of Palestine." hearld
I got to call bullsh*t on that one. When have I said that Hamas is not a militant group? I will wait for you to provide the quote?
42. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 1:08 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:08
43. Posted by MyPetGloat | April 5, 2007 1:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh look, another tratorious moonbat!
U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa meets Syrian president in Damascus
43. Posted by MyPetGloat | April 5, 2007 1:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:19
44. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
That bastard Issa was supposed to wait for our delegation to clear out all the supervillains!
Ok, in light of the fact that so many on the right have their panties in a bunch over Pelosi wearing a scarf and meeting with Assad, yet have no problem with Sec. of State Rice wearing a Hijab or Republican congressmen meeting with Assad, can we officially get PDS into the DSM?
44. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:23
45. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 1:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Herald: "And some California Republican decides for a followup visit? That sounds a little more like a "big F-You" to our country than it does to the President."
Herald, you better add another GOP F'cker to your list.
Republican Rep Hobson:
In a telephone interview last night from Saudi Arabia, Hobson said Pelosi "did not engage in any bashing of Bush in any meeting I was in and she did not in any meeting I was in bash the policies as it relates to Syria."
Instead, Hobson said, Pelosi and the congressional delegation urged Assad to curb the number of suicide bombers who cross the Syrian border into Iraq to "murder our troops and the Iraqi people."
OOPS!
45. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 1:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:24
46. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barney:
How do I know? The Israeli Prime Minister, that's how:
Don't make assumptions Barney.
Don't wait on me, I'm not going to waste time searching the archives and combing through posts.
If that's not your position, fine. I obviously got the wrong idea from what you've conveyed before.
You keep misquoting my earlier statement, so you must have read it, so you know that Pelosi's statement was for Syria to renounce violence. That was the same statement from the PM.
46. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:31
47. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Barney,
There's no "OOPS" moment there at all. I don't give a flying swamp donkey what she actually said, or what Issa took it upon himself to say.
The entire premise is wrong, be it Democrat or Republican.
47. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:34
48. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Mmmmm....flying swamp donkeys.
48. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:37
49. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
manits:
Yeah, but we went to Iran, remember? Ahmadinejad bathed in a bright light (it was the urnanium in his pocket we discovered later), and those cute little miniature nuclear reactors we got from the airport gift shop?
49. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:38
50. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah, a flying swamp donkey is me desparately trying to resist using a generous amount of profanity.
50. Posted by Heralder | April 5, 2007 1:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:39
51. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
They sound tasty, with a little bbq sauce.
51. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 1:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:41
52. Posted by WildWillie | April 5, 2007 1:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Totally incredible. The lefties are trying so hard to justify Polosi's trip that instead of getting angry at her for her audacity, they defend her. Show's the care they have for the country as a whole. I say we change the constitution to say that all matters relating to world events should be lead by polls. No more intelligience, analysis or planning needed. That is the lefty goal. ww
52. Posted by WildWillie | April 5, 2007 1:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:43
53. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 1:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Totally incredible. The lefties are trying so hard to justify Polosi's trip.." WW
Willie, I guess you keep missing all the quotes defending the Speaker's mission from the GOP?
Anyone hear the VP on Rush today? He totally passed on bashing the Speaker. Rush kept pushing, but even Cheney knows this will not reflect well on the Prez.
When a caller was upset by the lack of "balls" on the VP Rush said the VP was too much of a gentleman to criticize the Speaker.
What a laugh.
53. Posted by BarneyG2000 | April 5, 2007 1:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 13:50
54. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 2:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This trip is nothing more than Pelosi making a spectacle of herself for political capital. She's going to achieve nothing and if she really believes her words will carry any more sway than anoyne else's she's a bigger egoistic idiot than any of us would have imagined.
If the purpose was to do nothing more than what Rice has already done, what was the point of going? Did she really need to beg Assad to stop the flow of weapons in person?
I am sure she got comforting reassurances from Assad, and maybe even a couple of promises. Now let her try to cash those checks.
This is the liberal mindset. It will accomplish nothing, but it will make Pelosi look like she cars, and looking like you care is all that matters, from Gore to Redford to Kennedy to Pelosi.
The problem is that Assad has purchased weapons offsets from Bangladesh.
54. Posted by drjohn | April 5, 2007 2:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 14:07
55. Posted by daveinboca | April 5, 2007 3:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Nancy Pelosi is a conniving idiot without brains, but with a lot of Italian chutzpah. Stick-insect boy-Assad is a liar and a murderer of Rafiq Hariri of Lebanon.
Plus the dodo from the City on the Bay misrepresents Israel's position. But no one except delusional agitpreppies take her seriously.
The Democrats are incapable of running a foreign policy and should be kept from the Oval Office. Jimmy Carter is the biggest proof of this, but Clinton ain't far behind, as Sandy Berger tried to cover up with his botched document destruction. Clinton has a lot to hide.
And the Peter Principle has proved itself in Pelosi's case when she kept her high-IQ Jane Harmon off the Intel Cte Chair cuz Jane had brains and Nancy don't. Ditto her preference for delirium-tremens victim Murtha over Steny Hoyer for Whip.
Gresham's Law works overtime in the Dem Caucus and the Dem leadership is in a race to the bottom.
How long the MSM will applaud NP's incompetent pratfalls remains the queston. The WaPo has some residual integrity, but the NYT and LAT lag behind in this respect.
55. Posted by daveinboca | April 5, 2007 3:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 15:06
56. Posted by _Mike_ | April 5, 2007 3:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
mantis:
93% of American's support our Super Friends trip to Syria! Once again, the Super Friends are on the side of the American People!
I have it on good authority that Ms. Pelosi's supa sekret identity is... Moonbat girl. Her supa sekret political powers are that she's able to talk for hours without ever saying anything!
However, I wonder why the Supa Friends didn't take Penixman (Bill Clinton) to 'work on' Assad ? Could it be that he had another assignment ?? I have a theory...
56. Posted by _Mike_ | April 5, 2007 3:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 15:35
57. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 3:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Just Saying
For those of you allowed to wonder off of the RW reservation check out the front page of thinkprogress.org
Ok for the shear comedic value I did wonder off the "reservation."(while driving a 3 mpg Hummer and sporting a bumper sticker that reads "save the planet eat more methane producing cows")
What I found was this headline: Pelosi Challenges White House: If I Gave Syria The Wrong Message, Prove It.
Who'da thunk it! Bush has been deposed, the White House is now under the direction of U.S. President Olmert!
Well...it must be so... Olmert is the one making the accusation right?
57. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 3:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 15:41
58. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 3:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Call in Damage Control!
58. Posted by mantis | April 5, 2007 3:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 15:43
59. Posted by Althor | April 5, 2007 4:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Simply stated Madam Pelosi (the term is so deliciously appropriate, since what she's running in Washington is but a "House of Ill Repute": a political whorehouse!), has not only taken it upon herself to dictate the Foreign Policy of the United States in defiance of the official Foreign Policy of the State Department, the President, and the Administration, but has even had the audacity to try and change Israeli Foreign Policy to suit her whims, by giving Syrian President Al-Assad not the message conveyed to her by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, but her own twist on said message based on her own twisted, defeatist, appeasing, terrorist ass-kissing peacenik agenda! What temerity and what insolence from this despicable woman!
Althor
59. Posted by Althor | April 5, 2007 4:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 16:09
60. Posted by nikkolai | April 5, 2007 5:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I thought "Blinky" looked good in that bhurka. Kinda submissive,and all--just like the Islamo-Nazis demand.....
Thanks, Nancy!!!!
60. Posted by nikkolai | April 5, 2007 5:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 17:11
61. Posted by pennywit | April 5, 2007 5:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm not surprised the WaPo cricized Pelosi's visit; while the editorial page does skew liberal on substance, it is often conservative (i.e., stick to the procedure) in terms of process.
I keep hoping that Pelosi's visit and the White House condemnation are all part of some carefully thought out diplomatic gambit hatched in Washington's back hallways. But I have little faith in either Bush or Pelosi on that score.
And another thing ... I actually think it's not unreasonable for a Speaker of the House to visit countries that are allies and rivals (not enemies!) of the United States. It's even more helpful if she touches base with her counterparts other nations' legislatures. But, IMO, no Speaker of the House has any business acting as a freelance diplomat. It just undermines US policy.
And this, boys and girls, is why I'm not a loyal Democrat.
--|PW|--
61. Posted by pennywit | April 5, 2007 5:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 17:58
62. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | April 5, 2007 6:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Those on the left do anything to defend the heinous behavior of thier leaders. If one swears to uphold the Constitution during the installation ceremony. Most would expect the elected person to keep their oath. Democrats are different, re: Harry Reid's statement about troop financial support dated 30 Nov. 2006. That is what happens when moveon.org's agenda becomes that of a major polical party. Totally gutless. Pelosi was elected with slighly less that a total 400,000 votes, including the the votes she got making her Speaker of the House. George W. Bush, on the other hand, received 62,000,000 votes. Somewhat larger don't you think. Once every 4 years we elect a new leader. The powers of that leader are sent in stone via the Constitution. Likewise, the powers of the Congress are outlined in that document. Nowhere is it stated that congress is to involve itself in setting foreign policy. I Pelosi, in her zeal for power, feels that she is the person who should set foreign policy, she can pony up the tuna money she rips off the people of Guam for and run for President. For those of you, and you know who you are as I have identified before those who so hate Bush that it clouds what limited judgement they were ever capable of, just Google the Logan Act. Call an attorney and have him explain what that says to you. Then return here and defend the Whore of Babylon (of the west). I dare you.
62. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | April 5, 2007 6:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 18:05
63. Posted by Althor | April 5, 2007 6:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Zelsdorf, your very enlightened rant wanes so "Apocalyptical"!
Truly, the "False Prophet" of the Apocalypse must be Mohammed, as even almost a thousand years ago Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Paleologos so aptly pointed out:
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached"
which sounds so self-evidently true every time an Islamist suicide bomber, or murderous Jihadist terrorist, kills multitudes of innocent people, bystanders, and spills the blood of the "innocent" to achieve the Satanic goals of Shaitan and his false prophet Mohammed; and the "Whore of Babylon" (the seat of world power: Washington) must surely be "Madam" Pelosi, whose appellation of "Madam" is so deliciously approipriate, since what she is running in Washington is but a political whorehouse! And her cup (from homosexual San Francisco) "runneth over with all sorts of abominations"!
Think about the imagery, and tell me how befitting it is....
Althor
63. Posted by Althor | April 5, 2007 6:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 18:30
64. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 7:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
A special note to those that have taken great pleasure in defending Pelosi by equating her visit to those of the Republican persuasion in Syria.
1. Pelosi was specifically told by the White House not to go. The Republican delegation was given no such directive.
2. Gov. Richardson (D) is currently on a tour of Asia in an effort to move along the DPRK 6 party talks with the full approval and consent of the White House.
64. Posted by marc | April 5, 2007 7:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 19:34
65. Posted by jhow66 | April 5, 2007 10:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You are not going to believe this but I just got back the results from a poll I ran that says 100% of doctors polled believe that when Peelosser had her facelift that they pulled something besides her mouth up under her nose.(margin of error + or - .00000)
65. Posted by jhow66 | April 5, 2007 10:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 22:51
66. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | April 5, 2007 11:24 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Althor, get to rehab quickly. The delusions you are experiencing are serious. BDS has truly damaged you. Sorry. I did not mention Mohammed, Satan, and incase you are not capable of understanding. Babylon of the west refers to Sin Franciso, you know, the Gay Bay. If you are fooling enough, and I have no doubt that you are, to believe Assad is not aware of which district in California she represents and in how much distain Muslims have for the acts common there. Some of you people on the left are really bizzare. I thing you are an enemy soldier in the war on drugs.
66. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | April 5, 2007 11:24 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 5, 2007 23:24
67. Posted by ryan the filthy centrist | April 6, 2007 1:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
damn, i cant believe i missed the superfriends delegation....
2 cents: i think that the last thing we need is someone hauling off and doing this free-wheeling diplomacy thing, a la peloshi. just not the right way to go about things. while i certainly have my disagreements with the current foreign policies of the admin, i definitely dont agree with this whole "soft coup" thing that peloshi is running around doing.
peloshi is the speaker of the house, not the secretary of state, and certainly not the POTUS. bad form on her part, IMO.
67. Posted by ryan the filthy centrist | April 6, 2007 1:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 6, 2007 01:24
68. Posted by kim | April 6, 2007 8:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
You know, althor, back around 9/11 I remarked to several people that what we need now is a few good extremists.
===========================
68. Posted by kim | April 6, 2007 8:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 6, 2007 08:24
69. Posted by Althor | April 7, 2007 8:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Zelsdorf I was trying to be sarcastic. And was making certain parallels in a manner similar to those famous "coincidences" between Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy, such as being assassinated, that Johnson was part of the names of both of their successors, etc., which they used to sell printed on cards in novelty stores. Finding such seemingly coincidental parallels can usually be made about almost anything! I was not being
"literal."
Now, stop taking yourself so seriously and lighten up!
Althor
69. Posted by Althor | April 7, 2007 8:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 7, 2007 08:41
70. Posted by Althor | April 7, 2007 8:47 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
By the way, isn't "REHAB" for "Hollywood Celebrities Gone Wild," and people who call homosexuals "faggots", and or use the dreaded "N" word?!?! I did not use those words in my little tirade.
Althor :)
70. Posted by Althor | April 7, 2007 8:47 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 7, 2007 08:47