In my Townhall column today I do a wrap up of some of the stories that caught my eye this week.
« How Do You Know When You've Lost? | Main | Good coach, bad coach »
In my Townhall column today I do a wrap up of some of the stories that caught my eye this week.
Send e-mail tips to us:
Get Wizbang in your inbox by submitting your email address below.
Section Editor: Maggie Whitton
Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert
Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port
In Memorium: HughS
All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.
Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361
Hosting by ServInt
Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.
Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.
Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.
Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.
Comments (4)
It's a very good column...c... (Below threshold)1. Posted by -S- | April 27, 2007 3:09 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's a very good column...covered much territory very succinctly.
I doubt, however, that the O'Donnell thing was as it's been annonced (so far, everyone's saved face and that's about it). If Disney/ABC had wanted her, they'd have met her demands. In this case, I initially thought Disney/ABC was taking the lower way out by not being forthright about parting the ways with O'Donnell, but now (another day to think this over) I think they've taken the nicest possible way out: let O'Donnell work her explanation as it suits her while Disney/ABC remains silent otherwise.
Reid: we can only hope he'll resign and the sooner the better. It's tough to continue to hear someone quite so obtuse and conflicted actually being paid by the taxpayers while working so hard not to represent the country.
Guiliani's statement about the Democrats: I completely agree with him. But otherwise, I wish he'd stop supporting so many of their pet projects and objectives. I'd enjoy hearing/listening to Guiliani on the news, in the media for the next eight years (that's an important quality to electing a President that many voters overlook during the campaigns: who'll be most interesting, tolerable and "entertaining" -- to be frank -- for the whole spate of two Presidential terms [I can say right now that the Clintons for another eight years, with Hillary's bobbing head, shrill voice and ever changing accents would be intolerable for me]), anyway, Guiliani would be infinitely interesting in the media, BUT, he's got a lot to prove to me in the next few months that he's not a Democrat in yet another costume. Just saying.
Good column, Ms. Byrd.
1. Posted by -S- | April 27, 2007 3:09 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 27, 2007 03:09
2. Posted by ted | April 27, 2007 3:57 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I heard Rudy being interviewed today on Michael Medved show. He was terrific. As a supporter of Romney, I am persuaded that Guiliani is the guy!
2. Posted by ted | April 27, 2007 3:57 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 27, 2007 03:57
3. Posted by WildWillie | April 27, 2007 8:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The Rosie deal is a farce. Barbara Walters has the nerve to say she had nothing to do with the decision not to renew her contract. It was between ABC and Rosie. So, Barbara can arrange for her to be on the show, but not have anything to do with her renewing? ABC was tired of Rosie. If she made the ratings rise, ABC would never get rid of a cash cow, no pun intended, unless it brought too much baggage. ww
3. Posted by WildWillie | April 27, 2007 8:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 27, 2007 08:02
4. Posted by Pat Curley | April 27, 2007 5:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"The right to free speech comes with responsibility and even if ABC had decided to fire O'Donnell because she did not put forth the image they wanted, it would not have been a blow to free speech. It would have just been a blow to ignorant speech."
Nothing but net!
4. Posted by Pat Curley | April 27, 2007 5:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on April 27, 2007 17:39