If you have not been to Hot Air to see Dennis Miller's lambasting of Harry Reid, you must do so now.
« The Sopranos? Get Real! | Main | Gonzales No Confidence Vote Stymied »
If you have not been to Hot Air to see Dennis Miller's lambasting of Harry Reid, you must do so now.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dennis Miller Exposes Harry Reid for what he is: nothing of any importance:
» Bill's Bites linked with A Quick Index To Today's Posts, Quick Hits, Open Post
» Old War Dogs linked with Bill's Nibbles, Open Post
Comments (104)
Dems have a knack for picki... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Dirk | June 11, 2007 4:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dems have a knack for picking incredibly annoying Senate leaders. I actually long for the (relative) dignity of Tom Daschle.
1. Posted by Dirk | June 11, 2007 4:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 16:34
2. Posted by JFO | June 11, 2007 4:51 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dennis Miller? The lousy comedian, the right's version of Rosie, an even worse fottball commentator? That Dennis Miller? As with Rosie, who in the world cares what he thinks about anything, any time, anywhere?
Hot Air couldn't be a better named site for this guy to say nothing about nothing.
2. Posted by JFO | June 11, 2007 4:51 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 16:51
3. Posted by Peter F. | June 11, 2007 5:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
...who in the world cares what he thinks about anything, any time, anywhere?
Sort of like your post.
He tore Reid a deserved new one.
3. Posted by Peter F. | June 11, 2007 5:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 17:03
4. Posted by Lee Ward | June 11, 2007 5:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Miller made the rubes stand up on their hind legs and bark. What's new?
4. Posted by Lee Ward | June 11, 2007 5:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 17:09
5. Posted by TR19667 | June 11, 2007 5:15 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Lee, kinda like what markos does to you assclowns. We think it's funny, you take it as marching orders.
5. Posted by TR19667 | June 11, 2007 5:15 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 17:15
6. Posted by langtry | June 11, 2007 5:17 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Can anybody quote a few of his rants? I don't have a soundcard on my computer here at work!
6. Posted by langtry | June 11, 2007 5:17 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 17:17
7. Posted by Ran | June 11, 2007 5:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Lee==wizbang's harry reid.. by the by Lee, did he say anything that wasn't true? LOL!
7. Posted by Ran | June 11, 2007 5:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 17:23
8. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 5:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
JFO
The lousy comedian, the right's version of Rosie
No, he's the right's real life example of a liberal who paid attention on 9/11. Before that he was insufferable.
8. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 5:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 17:41
9. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 5:44 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dirk
I think you have to go back to George Mitchell to use the word dignity in the same sentence with the term "(Democrat) Senate Leader"
9. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 5:44 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 17:44
10. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:04 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Looks like Harry Reid is angering all the Right people.
10. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:04 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:04
11. Posted by LoveAmerica Immigrant | June 11, 2007 6:12 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Looks like Harry Reid is angering all the Right people.
-----------------------------------------------
So Harry Reid is pleasing all the wrong people (including the terrorists).
11. Posted by LoveAmerica Immigrant | June 11, 2007 6:12 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:12
12. Posted by 89 | June 11, 2007 6:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The laughs sounded canned. So what if Miller's right, that wasn't funny. Yawn.
12. Posted by 89 | June 11, 2007 6:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:21
13. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So Harry Reid is pleasing all the wrong people (including the terrorists).
I didn't realize they were voters.
13. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:28
14. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 6:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jim
Looks like Harry Reid is angering all the Right people.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117752895118782401.html?mod=politics_primary_hs
"Approval for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) slipped to 22%, from 23% in February but up from 19% a year ago."
These numbers are two weeks old ...still searching for the google bombed results from today that reflect immigration...think they are around 17%
14. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 6:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:32
15. Posted by Rob LA Ca. | June 11, 2007 6:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"I didn't realize they were voters."
If they asked , I have no doubt the Democrats would send them an Absentee Ballot with return postage paid if they haven't already.
Dick Tracy , Mickey Mouse and Daffy Duck are all known to vote Democrat.
15. Posted by Rob LA Ca. | June 11, 2007 6:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:39
16. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If they asked , I have no doubt the Democrats would send them an Absentee Ballot with return postage paid if they haven't already.
Well, considering how great Bush has been for Al Qaeda, including pulling US troops out of Saudi Arabia just like Bin Laden wanted, it seems just as likely Bin Laden et al might vote for the GOP.
Quid pro quo, you know...
16. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:46
17. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well Hugh, looks like he's still up from February, doesn't it? At least until the new figures are in.
17. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 6:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:47
18. Posted by Ken McCracken | June 11, 2007 6:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yeah Dennis Miller is mildly funny.
But he's no Keith Olbermann.
Now some funny stuff.
18. Posted by Ken McCracken | June 11, 2007 6:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:47
19. Posted by Ken McCracken | June 11, 2007 6:48 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
>that's
You know what I mean.
19. Posted by Ken McCracken | June 11, 2007 6:48 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:48
20. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 6:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jim
Well Hugh, looks like he's still up from February, doesn't it? At least until the new figures are in.
Well, they're in. At 19%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/harry_reid_s_favorables_fall_to_19
20. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 6:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 18:52
21. Posted by jennifer | June 11, 2007 7:02 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Thanks so much, that was a breath of fresh air!
21. Posted by jennifer | June 11, 2007 7:02 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 19:02
22. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 7:03 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, considering how great Bush has been for Al Qaeda, including pulling US troops out of Saudi Arabia just like Bin Laden wanted, it seems just as likely Bin Laden et al might vote for the GOP.
Quid pro quo, you know...
No,Jim
AQ has been voting consistently Democrat since the early 1990's:
WTC Bombing I
African Embassy Bombings
Khobar Towers Bombing
USS Cole Attack
WTC attack 9/11
They lost the Afghanistan Primary post 9/11 and have been running a foreign financed campaign in the Iraq primary.
What's really interesting is that I don't see any AQ marching around Iraq with painted fingers...except the unfortunate ones from Anbar and Falluja (bad choice of colors, those guys)
22. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 7:03 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 19:03
23. Posted by Rob LA Ca. | June 11, 2007 7:15 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"it seems just as likely Bin Laden et al might vote for the GOP."
Now this is exactly how Jim and his Crats have earned the tiitle "Lying Criminal Frauds". The Terrorists are pissed off you did not carry your part of the deal for their part in putting you into power. Democrats not only betray their Country they betray anyone who partners up with them or peuts the slightest amout of trust in them. The Rats are incompetant and untrustworthy which is why they must lie to get elected.
Democrats are ripping the people off any way they can. It's what they do , it's all that they do. Oh besides buying votes with said money.
23. Posted by Rob LA Ca. | June 11, 2007 7:15 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 19:15
24. Posted by LoveAmerica Immigrant | June 11, 2007 7:35 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So Harry Reid is pleasing all the wrong people (including the terrorists).
I didn't realize they were voters.
------------------------------------------------
Obviously there are liberal voters.
24. Posted by LoveAmerica Immigrant | June 11, 2007 7:35 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 19:35
25. Posted by LoveAmerica Immigrant | June 11, 2007 7:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, considering how great Bush has been for Al Qaeda, including pulling US troops out of Saudi Arabia just like Bin Laden wanted, it seems just as likely Bin Laden et al might vote for the GOP.
-------------------------------------------------
This is simply another example of the hypocritical dishonesty of the liberals. Liberals have been criticizing the US for having an airbase in Saudi Arabia where our female soldiers don't have the freedom to drive around. Now one of the windfall of the Iraq war is to allow us to take our troops out of Saudi Arabia.
Jim,
If you don't know about this, then it can be forgiven. If you do, then this is simply dishonest doublespeak again. As another poster has pointed out, if Bush didn't remove Saddam Hussein, liberals would have attacked him all these years for not taking out Saddam when he had the best chance. Liberals can not simply be honest and consistent. They are still trying to defend the liberal culture of corruption by Reid/Pelosi.
25. Posted by LoveAmerica Immigrant | June 11, 2007 7:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 19:39
26. Posted by Gmac | June 11, 2007 7:56 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"Thats going to leave a mark..."
I do so like seeing a politician getting busted for what he is and it got delivered in spades by Dennis Miller.
BTW, Reid believes the illegal immigrants are "undocumented Americans" a direct quote.
26. Posted by Gmac | June 11, 2007 7:56 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 19:56
27. Posted by xray | June 11, 2007 8:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
LOL, couldn't have been said about a nicer criminal/traitor.
Funny watching liberals going ape crazy when a public person disembowels one of their political leaders. It forces them out of their realm of relatively and into the black and white area that makes them look so very weak.
27. Posted by xray | June 11, 2007 8:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 20:05
28. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 8:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
So much disinformation, so little time...
WTC Bombing I
You mean the one where all the attackers were caught, prosecuted, and jailed?
USS Cole Attack
Right - so Clinton is to blame for not responding to this attack in October of 2000; but Bush is not to blame for doing nothing in January of 2001.
Embassy bombings
Do you mean the Somalia attacks, where the GOP started panicking and demanded Clinton leave the next day?
WTC attack 9/11
Nope, wrong President. And I do mean, the wrong one in every sense of the term.
Let's not forget that Osama Bin Laden is still alive in Pakistan. Heckuva job...
Oh, and as usual, you forgot the Anthrax terrorist attacks, which have yet to be solved.
Now let's look at what else the Bush administration has done for Al Qaeda:
1) increased their funding, in real numbers
2) increased their recruiting, in real numbers
3) increased their prestige
4) taken Iraq, one of the few places that Al Qaeda was not welcome, and made it a place where Al Qaeda can train against US soldiers as live targets.
So, if Clinton is somehow to blame for terror attacks in his administration, then Bush is responsible for all the ones under his - including every single one against our soldiers in Iraq.
Quite a record to stand behind - but feel free if you want to.
28. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 8:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 20:23
29. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 8:26 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Hi, Rob. I fixed your fact-less post again.
Now this is exactly how Rob and his Repugs have earned the tiitle "Lying Criminal Frauds". The Terrorists are overjoyed you carried out your part of the deal for their part in putting you into power. Republicans not only betray their Country they betray anyone who partners up with them or peuts the slightest amout of trust in them. The Pugs are incompetant and untrustworthy which is why they must lie to get elected.
Republicans are ripping the people off any way they can. It's what they do , it's all that they do. Oh besides buying votes with said money.
29. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 8:26 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 20:26
30. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 8:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Now one of the windfall of the Iraq war is to allow us to take our troops out of Saudi Arabia.
It allows us to? riiiight. More like, we are in such desperate need of soldiers that we need to take them from Saudi Arabia; **and** Bush's invasion of Iraq has so increased anti-US hatred in Saudi Arabia, that we're safer without soldiers there.
As another poster has pointed out, if Bush didn't remove Saddam Hussein, liberals would have attacked him all these years for not taking out Saddam when he had the best chance.
Were liberals calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein by unprovoked invasion, when Clinton was President? No.
There goes that theory. Got any others?
30. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 8:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 20:30
31. Posted by LAB | June 11, 2007 9:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dennis Miller is kinda funny, and actually kinda good-lookin' (better with age)
Aside from that, what he said about Reid is right on!
"Vague, translucent shade that barely matters..."
Excellent!
31. Posted by LAB | June 11, 2007 9:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 21:05
32. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 9:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jim
In your own words....
"Quite a record to stand behind - but feel free if you want to."
Thanks, and I will.
You mean the one where all the attackers were caught, prosecuted, and jailed?
No, I mean the one (WTC I) where we did not declare war on the attackers. The attackers that were subsequently jailed were no risk to our country, but their brothers who saw jail as a cowardly response by the US did attack us.
Right - so Clinton is to blame for not responding to this attack in October of 2000; but Bush is not to blame for doing nothing in January of 2001.
No, Jim. By then Clinton was a disgraced and impeached president who bore no resemblance to Bush in 2001. And Bush certainly had no evidence to anticipate 9/11...unless you have some Truther info for us.
Nope, wrong President. And I do mean, the wrong one in every sense of the term.
I won't bite on this one. Bush won the election. Go eat at the children's table.
Let's not forget that Osama Bin Laden is still alive in Pakistan. Heckuva job...
Is he alive? Hell if know, but if he is, WHAT A LIFE! Call Regis.
Oh, and as usual, you forgot the Anthrax terrorist attacks, which have yet to be solved.
Good point: do you have a lead? I think we should kill the perps. What do you think we should do with them?
1) increased their funding, in real numbers.
By whom and by how much? I really want to know the answer to this.
2) increased their recruiting, in real numbers.
By whom and by how much? I really want to know the answer to this.
3) increased their prestige...only among your own Jim.
32. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 9:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 21:09
33. Posted by Jo | June 11, 2007 9:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dennis Miller ripped Harry a new one, and HughS just ripped Jim a new one as well.
This is fun. :)
33. Posted by Jo | June 11, 2007 9:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 21:13
34. Posted by Jo | June 11, 2007 9:15 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Dennis gets huge laughs when he appears on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno. He regularly rips the Clintons and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and the audience goes wild with laughter and applause.
I love it!
34. Posted by Jo | June 11, 2007 9:15 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 21:15
35. Posted by BB | June 11, 2007 9:19 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I don't know which is funnier: the "with no due respect" line or that Reid is at 19%. Actually both are hilarious.
35. Posted by BB | June 11, 2007 9:19 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 21:19
36. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 9:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jim
Embassy bombings:
Do you mean the Somalia attacks, where the GOP started panicking and demanded Clinton leave the next day?
Oh my, I left bait on the table: THESE US territories,
I meant Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya. Not Somalia, where the Commander in Chief did in fact leave post haste.
Jim, OWN your leadership. OWN your vote. OWN you opinion.
36. Posted by HughS | June 11, 2007 9:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 21:30
37. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 9:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jim, OWN your leadership. OWN your vote. OWN you opinion.
OK, sounds good.
How about: I voted for Clinton, twice, so I own responsibility for the good and bad that Clinton did while in office.
And you (I presume) voted for Bush twice, so you own responsibility for the good and bad that Bush has done while in office.
Fair?
37. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 9:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on June 11, 2007 21:52
38. Posted by jim | June 11, 2007 9:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)