John McCain and Airhead Palin take great pride in repeating the claim that John McCain is a maverick, but those days are long gone. John McCain sold his soul to get this chance at the White House, and threw his principles out the window in the process.
8:26 PM |
0 comments
The Obama campaign is weighing in on the McCain/Palin 'guilt by association' game, providing starting linkage between John McCain and his "anti-semite pals" with the introduction of the following regarding U.S. Council for World Freedom founder John Singlaub.
1:06 PM |
22 comments
Got a finicky billionaire to buy for? How about getting them the Neiman Marcus, once in a lifetime, Dallas Cowboys® Texas Stadium® End Zone Package? Don't be stingy... it's only...
12:28 PM |
0 comments
Jennifer Lopez says she would send her kids to Scientology school and suggest people not judge the religion without knowing about it. Oh ok JLo. Next you'll be telling...
10:57 AM |
0 comments
You may have seen Pierre Cardin's Spring Summer 09 collection in the news the last few days b/c of it's futuristic spin on high fashion. But what you may...
9:42 AM |
0 comments
One important area that Senator Barack Obama is devoted to that has received little press attention is his strong commitment to disabled workers. There are currently as many as fifty four million Americans who suffer from disabling medical or physical...
9:22 AM |
4 comments
A group of fairgoers caught and saved a toddler who was dropped nearly 40 feet from a carnival ride as her mother dangled above the crowd. "It was very...
9:15 AM |
2 comments
Superstar composer Andrew Lloyd Webber has amassed a fortune of $1.3 billion - but the "Phantom of the Opera" creator doesn't plan to pass any of the money along...
9:06 AM |
0 comments
Just as the McCain/Palin desperation flop-sweat starts to really stink up the country, good news arrives in this afternoon's release of new polling results showing Barack Obama and Joe Biden are widening their lead over John "What Economic Problems?" McCain and Sarah "I can see Russia from my House!" Palin.
4:51 PM |
8 comments
How does John McCain react to the bad economic news? He changes the subject! In late afternoon trading, the Dow Jones industrial average fell 800 points, then recovered slightly in erratic trading to a loss of 764.38, or 7.40 percent,...
3:45 PM |
2 comments
Comments (22)
Here's a question for all t... (Below threshold)1. Posted by El-ahrairah | July 5, 2007 5:35 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Here's a question for all the people who think the Clinton's should be back in office, which one will be in charge? Isn't his wife running for office just backdoor way of Bill Clinton getting around the 22nd amendment? How will we know that the descisions coming out the White House are actually coming from the current president and not the former president? Enquiring minds would like to know.....
1. Posted by El-ahrairah | July 5, 2007 5:35 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 05:35
2. Posted by Gianni | July 5, 2007 6:28 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Maybe the Klinton's want to steal the rest of the stuff from Air Force One.
BTW
2. Posted by Gianni | July 5, 2007 6:28 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 06:28
3. Posted by Ryan | July 5, 2007 6:36 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think we have people spamming the ratings now on posts. ..
3. Posted by Ryan | July 5, 2007 6:36 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 06:36
4. Posted by Robert the Original | July 5, 2007 6:57 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yes, we are all sure that those pardons were issued under the most pure of ethical standards.
All pardons are pure, but some pardons are more pure than others.
Take the pardons that were issued in approximate concurrence with large contributions to the library or hefty fees to family members.
Now what could be more pure than that?
4. Posted by Robert the Original | July 5, 2007 6:57 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 06:57
5. Posted by RobLACal. | July 5, 2007 6:58 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"people who think the Clinton's should be back in office"
People who think the Clintons should be in office shouild be shot. Wait a minute , let me rephrase that. People who think these dirty rotten criminals should be back in the White House they looted and damaged on their way out should be required to take a crash course on the Clintons Crimes and Corruption , be made aware of all the facts and every low down despicable lies they have hold. At this point if People still think the Clintons should be in office , not only should they be shot they should be charged for the bullet beforehand.
5. Posted by RobLACal. | July 5, 2007 6:58 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 06:58
6. Posted by WildWillie | July 5, 2007 7:32 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If Hillary wins, we should require a security deposit before they move in. ww
6. Posted by WildWillie | July 5, 2007 7:32 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 07:32
7. Posted by Gianni | July 5, 2007 8:06 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What makes you think they'd use their own money??
7. Posted by Gianni | July 5, 2007 8:06 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 08:06
8. Posted by Bill Clinton | July 5, 2007 8:42 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Boy, I can't wait for all those interns. Hill will probably get all lesbians, but if they are hot, I'd be happy just watching.
8. Posted by Bill Clinton | July 5, 2007 8:42 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 08:42
9. Posted by Falze | July 5, 2007 9:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did I not catch the whole story on some morning show...or did they really say that Bill was mistaken for Bob Barker at some Iowa event he was attending with Hillary? Something about a couple of women yelling 'come on down!' at him? Or do they know something we don't about Bob's replacement? All those women running up and kissing him...hmmm...
9. Posted by Falze | July 5, 2007 9:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 09:02
10. Posted by Frank | July 5, 2007 9:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I cannot wait for the astonishing list of pardons sure to come down at the 11th hour of this administration and for all of the hours of enjoyment I'll get reading the apologists defending the Executive privilege as a sacred right to be used at the pleasure of the president. I will revel in the certain amnesia that will befall 50% of the country in the same way that the once profound belief in the criminality of perjury has escaped them of late. I'm sure that the pardoning of guys like Duke Cunningham, Ken Lay (post-humously, for "his family"), Dennis Kozlowski, etc. will all come as a result of righting the miscarriage of justice in their convictions by activist judges. You all know it's coming, I just hope you all have the integrity to remember.
10. Posted by Frank | July 5, 2007 9:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 09:41
11. Posted by Robert the Original | July 5, 2007 10:25 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Frank,
You dream up some fantasy pardons and you use them to rationalize all that Clinton crap?
I bet you think you are quite a clever guy, eh Frank?
I mean, just asking, how clever would you rate yourself on a scale of 1 to 10?
11. Posted by Robert the Original | July 5, 2007 10:25 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 10:25
12. Posted by Oyster | July 5, 2007 10:52 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"You had some controversial pardons during your presidency; what's your reaction to what President Bush did?"
Got that? "...what President Bush did."
What did President Bush do? He commuted an excessive prison sentence, keeping intact a $250k fine and the guilty charges which would result in Libby's disbarment as further punishment. He did not pardon Libby. So it's really an apples and oranges question.
It would have been more in keeping with the true nature of the issue to ask Clinton something in regards to the fact that HE was found guilty of virtually the same charges yet received different treatment. I would have asked him if he would consider a 30 month prison sentence excessive were it applied to his own case and if he would consider a commutation of his sentence unreasonable.
12. Posted by Oyster | July 5, 2007 10:52 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 10:52
13. Posted by Steve L. | July 5, 2007 11:05 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did I not catch the whole story on some morning show...or did they really say that Bill was mistaken for Bob Barker at some Iowa event he was attending with Hillary?
Drudge has the story.
13. Posted by Steve L. | July 5, 2007 11:05 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 11:05
14. Posted by kim | July 5, 2007 11:46 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It's Freudian; they want him to be retired.
=======================
14. Posted by kim | July 5, 2007 11:46 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 11:46
15. Posted by vnjagvet | July 5, 2007 12:23 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
While considering the merits of Bill's defense, consider three words:
Puerto Rican Terrorists.
Then ask why.
15. Posted by vnjagvet | July 5, 2007 12:23 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 12:23
16. Posted by C-C-G | July 5, 2007 12:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
To determine how a lefty is going to come down on just about any issue, just follow two simple rules:
1. Clinton did it = good.
2. Bush did it = bad.
And, if needed, a third rule:
3. If Bush does something that Clinton also did, Bush still = bad.
16. Posted by C-C-G | July 5, 2007 12:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 12:47
17. Posted by John in CA | July 5, 2007 5:27 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The despicable thing about Bill Clinton,(yeah, I know, how can I pick only one) is that he longs to be back in the White House.
After all, he has said he wished there was no 22nd Amendment. If there hadn't been, he would have run again. He is a narcissist. He HAS to be in the spotlight. He craves it.
17. Posted by John in CA | July 5, 2007 5:27 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 17:27
18. Posted by John in CA | July 5, 2007 5:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Bush would never have commuted Libby's sentence if the judge had left him out of jail during his appeal.
Whether Bush will pardon Libby at the end of his term, remains to be seen. I, for one, will applaud him if he does.
18. Posted by John in CA | July 5, 2007 5:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 17:29
19. Posted by Virgil Starkwell | July 5, 2007 5:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I see, we are constitutionalists when we want to be. Just like the outrage in the 90's over Clinton's assault on the second amendment. Hell, even I joined the NRA.
Here's a question for all the people who think the
Clinton's should be back in office, which one will be in charge? Isn't his wife running for office just backdoor way of Bill Clinton getting around the 22nd amendment? How will we know that the descisions coming out the White House are actually coming from the current president and not the former president? Enquiring minds would like to know.....
Posted by: El-ahrairah at July 5, 2007 05:35 AM
And Kim, don't speak with your mouth full. I can hear the bag rustling from here.
19. Posted by Virgil Starkwell | July 5, 2007 5:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 17:40
20. Posted by C-C-G | July 5, 2007 6:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Clinton's pardons were perfectly legal, Virgil.
So is Bush's.
In fact, I'd like to thank you for the opportunity to bring this up. Did you know that Mr. Clinton pardoned someone for (gasp!) perjury? And it was (double gasp!) a member of his own administration?
Look up "Henry Cisneros."
20. Posted by C-C-G | July 5, 2007 6:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 18:50
21. Posted by C-C-G | July 5, 2007 11:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And the crickets are chirping. The lefties don't wanna discuss Henry Cisneros' case, I guess.
21. Posted by C-C-G | July 5, 2007 11:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 5, 2007 23:18
22. Posted by kim | July 6, 2007 7:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Moi, VS? Those are stones rattling.
=====================
22. Posted by kim | July 6, 2007 7:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on July 6, 2007 07:56