« Democratic Whip: Good News in Iraq Would be a "Problem for Us" | Main | Announcement: Comments System Broken »

How Times Have Changed

Mary Katharine Ham uses the recent controversy on the television show, So You Think You Can Dance?, to show how much things have changed since the days of the Glenn Miller Band.

  • Currently 3.7/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3.7/5 (10 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://wizbangblog.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/23067

Comments (8)

Who cares?... (Below threshold)
Reagan:

Who cares?

"I care" - Luke Skywalker.<... (Below threshold)
Eric Forhan:

"I care" - Luke Skywalker.

This whole thing has been totally off my RADAR until now. That's pretty cool that they hit such a hard backlash.

She rocks as always.... (Below threshold)
Paul:

She rocks as always.

MKH is HOT!... (Below threshold)
pretzel_logic:

MKH is HOT!

People even watch TV anymor... (Below threshold)
Joe:

People even watch TV anymore? I think I turned mine on briefly last week to watch local coverage of the welding supply plant explosions...... TV executives keep that kind of cr*p up and they'll be wondering where their audience went....just like the newspapers are wondering.

There are:Good and... (Below threshold)
WildWillie:

There are:

Good and bad people.
Good and bad books.
Good and bad teachers.
Good and bad web site
Good and bad television.
I strongly support all the good ones above and I am not embarrassed that I watch television. ww

There is some excellent tel... (Below threshold)
Lorie Byrd:

There is some excellent television, actually, and some really crappy television, too. I am hooked on the new show Damages on FX. It is intense. I also love The Dead Zone, Monk, Psych and about a dozen others.

Re comment #4, MKH is hot, but more than that she is an incredible writer and a great friend.

The shows producer (from MK... (Below threshold)
_Mike_:

The shows producer (from MKH's article):
Even though it may be argued that some wars are necessary, I don't know anybody who's pro-war. Who wants a war?

If there's no such thing as pro-war, then anti-war (in the definition the producer is attempting claim) has no meaning. The meaning that 'anti-war' has and was used by the producer is 'pro-pacifism' or 'anti-military', which is why they got the reaction that they did. Does Nigel really think that claiming 'we were just stating we're against the thing that no one is for' is believable ?


Post a comment




Advertisements








rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

tips@wizbangblog.com

Categories

Archives

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Section Editor: Jay Tea

Comment Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Jim Addison, Charlie Quidnunc, Jayson Javitz, Cassy Fiano

All original content copyright © 2003-2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login

Site Meter


Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice