God doesn't care what we call Him, this priest argues. And if we're going to pray anyway, why not at five specific times during the day and facing a particular direction. After all, God doesn't really care when or in what direction we pray, right?
A proposal by a Roman Catholic bishop in the Netherlands that people of all faiths refer to God as "Allah" is not sitting well with the Catholic community.Tiny Muskens, an outgoing bishop who is retiring in a few weeks from the southern diocese of Breda, said God doesn't care what he is called.
"Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? ... What does God care what we call him? It is our problem," Muskens told Dutch television.
"I'm sure his intentions are good but his theology needs a little fine-tuning," said Father Jonathan Morris, a Roman Catholic priest based in Rome. Morris, a news analyst for FOX News Channel, also called the idea impractical.
"Words and names mean things," Morris said. "Referring to God as Allah means something."
Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington, D.C.-based Islamic civil liberties and advocacy group, backs the idea as a way to help interfaith understanding.
"It reinforces the fact that Muslims, Christians and Jews all worship the same God," Hooper told FOXNews.com. "I don't think the name is as important as the belief in God and following God's moral principles. I think that's true for all faiths."
If the name isn't as important as the belief in God, then why doesn't Hooper recommend that Muslims drop the word Allah in favor of the more accepted "God" for the sake of "interfaith understanding"?
Mark Steyn at The Corner continues:
The question is: At what point do you stop? If it's only being "sensitive" to insist that Belgian police officers not be seen eating donuts during Ramadan, when will sensitivity require that female police officers adopt Muslim-sensitive headscarves? If it's only being "sensitive" to ask Catholic worshippers in the heart of European Christendom to call God "Allah", why not rename churches "mosques" and disavow Jesus' divinity? These small groveling unreciprocated concessions that do nothing but provoke further demands communicate the same big message: We're losers, and the best we can hope for is that you'll let us lose gradually.
Indeed. It's been accepted that Christianity died in Europe a while ago, but if it still exists even in a small part, that will be wiped out soon enough with this attitude.
Comments (39)
How about Barry?--... (Below threshold)1. Posted by pennywit | August 15, 2007 7:40 PM | Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
How about Barry?
--|PW|--
1. Posted by pennywit | August 15, 2007 7:40 PM |
Score: 0 (6 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 19:40
2. Posted by Tom Blogical | August 15, 2007 8:24 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
I find it odd that he made this ridiculous statement on a Holy Day of Obligation for the Catholic Church; the Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
2. Posted by Tom Blogical | August 15, 2007 8:24 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:24
3. Posted by the wolf | August 15, 2007 8:27 PM | Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Bend over and grab your ankles, Father Tiny.
3. Posted by the wolf | August 15, 2007 8:27 PM |
Score: 5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:27
4. Posted by Abigail | August 15, 2007 8:34 PM | Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Considering the importance placed upon names in the Bible, I don't think the Almighty would take to kindly to having His name changed to that of an idol's.
4. Posted by Abigail | August 15, 2007 8:34 PM |
Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:34
5. Posted by JLawson | August 15, 2007 8:34 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Step by step, they're slowly being conditioned to accept Shari'a in Holland. Ten years, twenty - they're patient.
Damn. 6 years back, I was pretty certain that Islamic funadmentalism wouldn't gain any real footholds in the West. I didn't think that there would be folks who, in the name of accomodation and 'just trying to get along', would give in to it without even attempting to fight.
Mark Steyn has it right. "At what point do you stop?" If enough Islamic organizations raise a significant stink, would there be people advocating Dutch girls be forced into burquas?
Or should we simply dismantle our culture (with all it's faults, foibles and fantasies) and go wholly into a 7th-Century social order?
Islam's going to have to learn to coexist. And if that means calling 'God' 'God' - then let them translate it in their own minds.
5. Posted by JLawson | August 15, 2007 8:34 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:34
6. Posted by Abigail | August 15, 2007 8:34 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Ugh, that should be "too kindly," not "to kindly."
6. Posted by Abigail | August 15, 2007 8:34 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:34
7. Posted by marc | August 15, 2007 8:37 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
I hope the Father wiped the "sweat" of his lips after this very large smooch on Allahs ass.
One things for sure... he won't be beheaded anytime soon.
7. Posted by marc | August 15, 2007 8:37 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:37
8. Posted by Master Shake | August 15, 2007 8:49 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
The bishop seems to be confused. The correct translation of "Allah" is "Satan".
8. Posted by Master Shake | August 15, 2007 8:49 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:49
9. Posted by RB | August 15, 2007 8:50 PM | Score: 0 (4 votes cast)
Few things here.
Firstly, Muskens has a point. "Allah" is merely Arabic for "God", and if you pray to Him in Arabic, you pray to Allah. The central tenet of Islam is not Allah, but that Muhammed is his prophet.
But it's a really stupid argument. If you don't pray in Arabic, why pray to Allah? Why not to Dieu, Diós or Yahweh? It doesn't really matter what language you pray in, but why change the word for God? It just makes no sense.
Finally, I'd like to see the full context of his statement before I pass judgement. I've done a quick Google search, but I don't exactly what he said and the context under which he said it. He could well have said "we might just as well call God Allah - it's the same word", which then got latched on and quoted out of context. If that's the case, consider the following statement retracted: he's an idiot.
9. Posted by RB | August 15, 2007 8:50 PM |
Score: 0 (4 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 20:50
10. Posted by Justrand | August 15, 2007 9:13 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
his name was actually "ALLEN"...it's a typo in the Koran (Ver. 1.0)
...now back to the debate
10. Posted by Justrand | August 15, 2007 9:13 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 21:13
11. Posted by The Listkeeper | August 15, 2007 10:43 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
It's important because names have power. If you refer to Allah, you're NOT referring to Yahweh or Jehovah.
11. Posted by The Listkeeper | August 15, 2007 10:43 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 22:43
12. Posted by pudge | August 15, 2007 11:26 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
In My house, they call Him pudge.
12. Posted by pudge | August 15, 2007 11:26 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 23:26
13. Posted by Linoge
| August 15, 2007 11:49 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Pudge controls the weather.
13. Posted by Linoge
| August 15, 2007 11:49 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on August 15, 2007 23:49
14. Posted by Houston | August 16, 2007 1:32 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
The Listkeeper has it exactly right. Because of the power of the name this becomes an issue. This is why many Jews today will use the word G-d out of respect when writing.
While others may not feel it is a big deal, I do. As others have stated if it's not that big of a deal why not have the Muslim community refer to Allah as Jehovah or Yaweh? That would be utterly rejected because that would acknowledge the correctness of the Torah and Bible and open the possibility of fallacy in the Koran. I really don't think it's just because of a language difference.
The only way we will all get along is when people realize that we all think differently, have different beliefs and can live with that.
14. Posted by Houston | August 16, 2007 1:32 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 01:32
15. Posted by ODA315 | August 16, 2007 2:17 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Nice try pudge.....but we all know it's really "wife".
15. Posted by ODA315 | August 16, 2007 2:17 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 02:17
16. Posted by Richard Romano | August 16, 2007 2:28 AM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
This priest is an apostate -- plain and simple. He has no clue what's expected of believers; he is more interested in amalgamating than being "light in the darkness." Very sad.
16. Posted by Richard Romano | August 16, 2007 2:28 AM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 02:28
17. Posted by rb | August 16, 2007 2:59 AM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
You're absolutely right that names have power, and that if you refer to Allah in ENGLISH, then it refers exclusively to the God of Islam.
BUT... an Arabic speaking Christian prays, presumably in Arabic, to "Allah", referring to the Christian God. The difference is in Islam that prayers are almost exclusively in Arabic, as opposed to the local language (Turkish, Farsi, Indonesian, etc) and furthermore, in a dialect of Arabic that is pretty much incomprehensible to the average Arabic speaker on the street. It's comparable to the way that church services used to be in Latin, which is why their God is referred to almost universally as "Allah" regardless of which language they speak. But Allah is merely the Arabic word for God, and that stays the same whether the Arabic speaker is Islam, Christian or Jewish.
17. Posted by rb | August 16, 2007 2:59 AM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 02:59
18. Posted by harshmellow
| August 16, 2007 7:59 AM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Sorry, everyone, but God's name is Harold.
As in- Our Father who art in heaven, Harold be thy name.
As in- Hark, the Harold angels sing.
What?
18. Posted by harshmellow
| August 16, 2007 7:59 AM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 07:59
19. Posted by langtry | August 16, 2007 9:11 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
One of the many reasons I no longer call myself a Catholic. Too much sexual and moral deviancy to warrant my endorsement. It's times like this that I miss the later Cardinal Joseph Bernardin whom, while practically inventing interfaith cooperation, would never go so far as to advocate (agitate?) calling God "Allah".
19. Posted by langtry | August 16, 2007 9:11 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 09:11
20. Posted by langtry | August 16, 2007 9:12 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry. "Late" Cardinal Bernadin. RIP.
20. Posted by langtry | August 16, 2007 9:12 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 09:12
21. Posted by kim | August 16, 2007 9:36 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
It seems obvious to me that Allah is testing the Muslims for their fitness for world domination, by tempting them with the mirage of oil wealth. Is there a chance a sharia driven culture can beat one with the underpinnings of the enlightenment? Islam needs a prophet, and now.
===========================================
21. Posted by kim | August 16, 2007 9:36 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 09:36
22. Posted by 914 | August 16, 2007 11:58 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I suppose this genius "priest" is also advocating calling child molesting "interfaith healing".
Lets just get along..
22. Posted by 914 | August 16, 2007 11:58 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 11:58
23. Posted by Jamal | August 16, 2007 12:03 PM | Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
I am pleased Bishop, Martinus "Tiny" Muskens, has rightfully called on all faithful people of all religions to call God by the name Allah. This can be seen as a positive shift.
For those that want to disagree, be aware that Allah is an Arabic word that doesn't simply mean "God", but "The God".
Al=The ilah=God
Therefore Bishop Muskens is quite correct to call on all faithful people of all religions to call God by the name Allah as more accurate translation of the word "Allah" into English might be "The One-and-Only God" or "The One True God". The Arabic word "Allah" stems from the Arabic verb ta'Allaha (or alaha), which means "to be worshiped". The Aramaic word for God is "ALAHA" ....and we all know who spoke Aramaic.
Regarding use of the word Jehovah, early bible manuscripts do not spell out the word J-e-h-o-v-a-h but instead use a 'tetragrammaton' from which the word Jehovah is derived. The tetragrammaton simply means a four letter word (YHWH, JHWH, YHVH or JHVH) from which you cannot read the word Jehovah, no matter how the vowels are added. Since the Jews did not articulate the word YHWH for centuries, and since even the Chief Rabbis would not allow the ineffable to be heard, they have forfeited the right to claim dogmatically how the word is to be sounded, thus making the popular use of the word Yahweh null and void. Nevertheless, YHWH occurs in the Hebrew (Jewish) Scriptures many times, in combination with the word "Elohim", and we all know that the commonality between "Allah" and "Elohim" is "eloah" and "ilah".
The combination YHWH/ELOHIM has been consistently translated in the English Bible as "Lord God,". Therefore, YHWH, Yehova, Yahweh and Yahuwa all mean the very same thing. "Ya" is a vocative and an exclamatory particle in both Hebrew and Arabic, meaning Oh! and "Huwa" or "Hu" means He. Together they mean Oh He! and so instead of 'YHWH ELOHIM' we now have 'Oh He! ELOHIM';
YaHuWaH Eloh(im) = HuwaAllah = He is Allah (He is The God).
23. Posted by Jamal | August 16, 2007 12:03 PM |
Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 12:03
24. Posted by SPQR | August 16, 2007 12:28 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Jamal, how is it better that people use a word for God in a language they don't speak? Except of course for the illegitimate purpose of Arab cultural domination.
24. Posted by SPQR | August 16, 2007 12:28 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 12:28
25. Posted by kim | August 16, 2007 12:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
He? What use would God have for a sex?
==========================
25. Posted by kim | August 16, 2007 12:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 12:42
26. Posted by Peter F. | August 16, 2007 12:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
God.
(BTW. "Netherlands Catholic priest" is almost an oxymoron.)
26. Posted by Peter F. | August 16, 2007 12:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 12:50
27. Posted by drjohn | August 16, 2007 1:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
It would no doubt also be better if we all submitted to Islam.
27. Posted by drjohn | August 16, 2007 1:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 13:11
28. Posted by Linoge | August 16, 2007 1:13 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Ok, so why do we not make this simpler, and you all call Allah "God" (or "The God", if that would suit you better)?
Would that be an equally positive shift? By your own words, they both mean the same thing, so why is one better than the other?
I mean, after all, English is pretty much the international language these days...
28. Posted by Linoge | August 16, 2007 1:13 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 13:13
29. Posted by spurwing plover | August 16, 2007 2:36 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
How about if we call this bishop NUTS and excummunicate him instead
29. Posted by spurwing plover | August 16, 2007 2:36 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 14:36
30. Posted by Oyster | August 16, 2007 3:25 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Jamal, while you are no doubt pleased, your reasoning is flawed. It's not so much that Islam tries to tell us we are praying to the same God, but the fact that Muslims have a totally different interpretation of "God's will" and what God intends for each of us.
No sir, I will not be calling God "Allah" for that very reason. For using "Allah" to refer to our creator is to imply an acceptance of Muhammed as his final prophet and all that he claims is God's word.
No sir - no thanx.
30. Posted by Oyster | August 16, 2007 3:25 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 15:25
31. Posted by kim | August 16, 2007 3:52 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jamal, has your linguistic analysis made a mockery of 'and Mohammed is his prophet', or is it the 'one and only God' part that is in error?
=======================
31. Posted by kim | August 16, 2007 3:52 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 15:52
32. Posted by Fred | August 16, 2007 4:35 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
We should all call God Allah? And then comes breaking down further barriers, until we have a one-world religion... just like the Bible prophesizes... it's coming.
32. Posted by Fred | August 16, 2007 4:35 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 16:35
33. Posted by nikkolai | August 16, 2007 5:30 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I don't want anything to do with the teachings of a pedophile false prophet. Is it also true that Mohammed comitted genocide on the Jews in Medina? And the Koran is heavily plagerized from the Old and New Testaments?
33. Posted by nikkolai | August 16, 2007 5:30 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on August 16, 2007 17:30
34. Posted by Jamal | August 17, 2007 10:57 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Using the Arabic language the name is more specific and is only used in relation to Allah (The God). We cannot use god, God, The God, Jehovah, etc in the same way due to the existence of trinities, etc existing as a result of modern Christianity. Therefore, to use the term Allah is more specific.
I have studied his issues and am leaned in religious studies.
34. Posted by Jamal | August 17, 2007 10:57 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 17, 2007 10:57
35. Posted by Jamal | August 17, 2007 10:58 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"learned"
35. Posted by Jamal | August 17, 2007 10:58 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 17, 2007 10:58
36. Posted by SPQR | August 17, 2007 1:16 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jamal, your comment does not make sense because you are proposing to alter other people's meaning to match your own. That is not acceptable.
The west believes in religious liberty, that does not mean that you get to coerce others into following your practices.
36. Posted by SPQR | August 17, 2007 1:16 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 17, 2007 13:16