You know what? They're right, it IS easy and fun to play on names. Of course, it makes more sense when you are targeting a malicious group of screaming malcontents whose ability to comprehend an issue rarely extends beyond echoing the screeds of their propagandists, rather than falsely defaming the honor and mission of a man who has spent his life in honorable service defending our country and all its citizens, and a man impeccably capable of explaining the scope and requirements of the present war in Iraq.
Permalink | E-mail This | Technorati Links | Sphere: Related Content | Digg this! | FARK It!
Filed under:
Asshats
Comments (84)
Sooooooo....Can we... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Falze | September 13, 2007 5:00 PM | Score: 11 (13 votes cast)
Sooooooo....
Can we say they don't support the troops, yet?
Reading about the Petraeus hearing/circus I found myself wondering if he was thinking the following:
"Wonder if I should walk over to those screaming pinkos and ask them in front of this packed Senate hearing if they'd care to take the opportunity to spit on me?"
1. Posted by Falze | September 13, 2007 5:00 PM |
Score: 11 (13 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 17:00
2. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 5:06 PM | Score: 13 (15 votes cast)
"Can we say they don't support the troops, yet?"
Don't have to, they're doing a good enough job of that, on their own.
2. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 5:06 PM |
Score: 13 (15 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 17:06
3. Posted by Rory | September 13, 2007 5:23 PM | Score: 12 (14 votes cast)
Ghhhad-
Somehowm that's pretty damn satisfying....
Thanks DJ-it's the laugh of the day.
Damn they're pathetic.
3. Posted by Rory | September 13, 2007 5:23 PM |
Score: 12 (14 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 17:23
4. Posted by Mitchell | September 13, 2007 5:39 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Since NYT gave them such a huge discount, I suppose we can also say that the NYT is a Moron.org, as well.
4. Posted by Mitchell | September 13, 2007 5:39 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 17:39
5. Posted by Zaugg | September 13, 2007 5:41 PM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
I think you are giving them TOO much credit. /snark
5. Posted by Zaugg | September 13, 2007 5:41 PM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 17:41
6. Posted by Rory | September 13, 2007 5:57 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Watch this liberal logic on the Petraeus Report if you can stomache it.
Let's see Petraeus can't use statistics that's crass even though the Liberals have been counting down the soldier's deaths to the level of 9/11's like it was New Year's Eve.
This is where the Liberals get their "facts" to counter Petraeus and fight back with the resident Liberal "expert" Comedy Central's John Stewart. (He's better than us all because not only is he their brightest "light" but- damn it- he's the host of the Oscars.)
Watch this crap he schmoozes against Petraeus-
Comedy Central-War Experts
6. Posted by Rory | September 13, 2007 5:57 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 17:57
7. Posted by Gmac | September 13, 2007 5:57 PM | Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
They give morons worldwide a bad name.
7. Posted by Gmac | September 13, 2007 5:57 PM |
Score: 9 (9 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 17:57
8. Posted by pudge | September 13, 2007 6:01 PM | Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
modern political discourse, an example:
leftist, "Thothe troopth! Ooo, thothe darn troopth! I juth get tho angry! Ooo I hate them and all of their baby killing, woman raping, liberty thpreading, real man following wayth! I think I'll thee if I can thtop them and their thtupid mithion!"
rightwing "counter" to the above, "Say their buddy, you have every right in the world to express your opinion, but don't you think it's a little iresponsible to blast this stuff to the world during time of war ?"
lefty, "Oh my God! Oh my God! Did anyone juth thee that !?! He attacked me! He quethtoned my patwiotithm! NATHI - NATHI - NATHI!!! Repubwicanth are terrorith and Natheeth! I do believe I've got a cathe of the vaporth!"
Now, I know what you're thinking: "What the hell was that !?!" But that is what I hear every time some creepy peace perv like upchuck rangel, or jaff sadeki, or anyone of a hundred of their pundits (did you see Kirsten Powers state, with a straight face, that it is a "basic human right" for ANY foriegner to enter this country whenever they feel like it ? Lost my taste for blondes after that.) participates in a "debate" on one of the crucial issues of our time. The left should be ignored, not engaged. At least not until such time as they decide to grow up and join the real world.
And that goes for "Dubya" and his inclusive little, "Religion of peace", or, "Doing the jobs that Americans won't do", mantras that he is want to spew at us from time to time.
8. Posted by pudge | September 13, 2007 6:01 PM |
Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 18:01
9. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:06 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
How dare you insult morons like that DJ. Clearly they are imbiciles, not morons!
9. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:06 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 18:06
10. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:32 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
I think Movewaytotheleft.org or Movebehindtheironcurtain.org would be good ones, too.
10. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:32 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 18:32
11. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:41 PM | Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
I wonder, is regressing societal development and moral values to those of 5000 years ago, really moving on?
11. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:41 PM |
Score: 3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 18:41
12. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:42 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
I seem to have come down with the "kims"...
12. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 6:42 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 18:42
13. Posted by Mark L | September 13, 2007 7:03 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Well, some groups are more off than on.
MoveOn is well -- moron.
13. Posted by Mark L | September 13, 2007 7:03 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 19:03
14. Posted by jp2 | September 13, 2007 7:25 PM | Score: -12 (14 votes cast)
As the very, very wise Lorie Byrd said:
"Don't you realize that gives you zero credibility? If you have enough facts on your side to make a coherent argument, then why resort to nasty name calling?"
-jp2
14. Posted by jp2 | September 13, 2007 7:25 PM |
Score: -12 (14 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 19:25
15. Posted by Jim Addison | September 13, 2007 7:42 PM | Score: 14 (14 votes cast)
jp2 ~ Someone should slap both your faces.
15. Posted by Jim Addison | September 13, 2007 7:42 PM |
Score: 14 (14 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 19:42
16. Posted by Jumpinjoe | September 13, 2007 7:51 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
The fact is MoveOn did some name calling, which you can defend or denounce. Or you go with the subject line of the thread as DJ points out:
Personally I like Dennis Miller's take which was MoveOn wouldn't have even bothered until someone realized there was a rhyme. Betray Us.....hahahahah!!!
They would have had NOTHING and no ad if the General's name was Pickory.
16. Posted by Jumpinjoe | September 13, 2007 7:51 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 19:51
17. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 8:13 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
movesofartotheleftthatfromourvantagepointbill'swifelookslikenixon.org
17. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 8:13 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 20:13
18. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | September 13, 2007 8:36 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Moveon does not have the slightest concept of what a fact is and really does not care. It is all about political outcome. They hate America and are against anything positive. Years ago, they would have been subject to investigation by the House Committee on UnAmerican activities. They are nebulous scum that hide on the internet. In real life they appear to be worms.
18. Posted by Zelsdorf Ragshaft III | September 13, 2007 8:36 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 20:36
19. Posted by Mitchell | September 13, 2007 8:42 PM | Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
Moron.org=barneymoron.org
Barney's got a red phone line to Centcom. . .[lmfao]
19. Posted by Mitchell | September 13, 2007 8:42 PM |
Score: 6 (8 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 20:42
20. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 8:50 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Barney
I choose to believe this:
http://www.blackfive.net/main/2007/09/lefty-slur-abou.html
20. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 8:50 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 20:50
21. Posted by Jumpinjoe | September 13, 2007 8:56 PM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Debunked already.
If You Don't Like the News, Make Stuff Up
NEXT!!!
21. Posted by Jumpinjoe | September 13, 2007 8:56 PM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 20:56
22. Posted by Jumpinjoe | September 13, 2007 8:58 PM | Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
You beat me to the draw HughS.
I gotta remember to hit that refresh button.
Anyway Barney, where did you say your information came from?
22. Posted by Jumpinjoe | September 13, 2007 8:58 PM |
Score: 8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 20:58
23. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 9:03 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Jumpinjoe
Barney and Jim are just the warm up part of the game. Nobody actually lets them play.
23. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 9:03 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:03
24. Posted by Mitchell | September 13, 2007 9:32 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Barney gets everything from Google. Thus his alias, "BarneyGoogle2000times"
24. Posted by Mitchell | September 13, 2007 9:32 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:32
25. Posted by Dave W | September 13, 2007 9:32 PM | Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Barney.value=tool
Ok, Barney... You used to be good at coming up with this trash but i think you've really given up lately... At least give me a story about how Bush was delivering a subliminal message to vote for him for supreme ruler of the world in '08 or something. Or maybe give me one that Bush is just going to call off the '08 elections! Oh wait. that one is already out there i think...
25. Posted by Dave W | September 13, 2007 9:32 PM |
Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:32
26. Posted by Clay | September 13, 2007 9:33 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
"an ass-kissing little chickenshit"
Oh yeah, Barney. And you're dumb, too.
26. Posted by Clay | September 13, 2007 9:33 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:33
27. Posted by Just John | September 13, 2007 9:37 PM | Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
Making fun of someone's name is a bit childish.
But saying that thousands of dead and wounded American soldiers is "a small price to pay" is abslutely reprehensible! It's not a small price.
27. Posted by Just John | September 13, 2007 9:37 PM |
Score: -3 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:37
28. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 9:40 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
"Where is the denial of the comment?"
Where's the proof that it was ever even said?
28. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 9:40 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:40
29. Posted by nehemiah | September 13, 2007 9:42 PM | Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
MoveOn has become a de facto group of traitors to the U.S. It's not different than if al Qaeda had bought the ad in the New York Times. The left, including al Qaeda tool Barn, would defend that ad the exact same way had it been al Qaeda paying to ad fee.
29. Posted by nehemiah | September 13, 2007 9:42 PM |
Score: 6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:42
30. Posted by Eric | September 13, 2007 9:43 PM | Score: 11 (11 votes cast)
Blarney:
LCDR Scott Miller
CENTCOM Public Affairs
30. Posted by Eric | September 13, 2007 9:43 PM |
Score: 11 (11 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:43
31. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 9:44 PM | Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Barney,
I looked at your last post .. long and hard .. and guess what? There's a pony wearing a hat in there.
Neato!
(other than the pony and the hat, there wasn't anything else. "which is currently being drafted and is expected to be completed by the beginning of next year" ... yawn).
31. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 9:44 PM |
Score: 10 (10 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:44
32. Posted by marc | September 13, 2007 9:51 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Baghdad barney:
NEWSWEEK has learned that a separate internal report being prepared by a Pentagon working group will "differ substantially"
And so... your point for posting that is what?
If it's some kinda sideways attempt a saying Petraeus is a liar just come out and say it, quit "hiding in the weeds."
NOTE this report, assuming it's not a figment of imagination by those who speak on "condition of anonymity" isn't to be published for another three months. (isn't that what some of you idiots say about Bush he failed to predict correctly what would happen after the fall of Saddam? Yet here you are BB hanging you hat on a report three months from hitting the streets)
Things change on the ground week-to-week and month-to-month.
Also how do you spin "getting alternative views" is a bad thing?
Back away from that knife BB, you're in a gunfight.
32. Posted by marc | September 13, 2007 9:51 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:51
33. Posted by Justrand | September 13, 2007 9:53 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
BarneyG2000, let's examine the "stuff" you pasted in...and take it at FACE VALUE (which it doesn't deserve...but let do it anyway...ok?
Here goes:
according to an official who is privy to the ongoing discussions ["privy to the discussions", as opposed to a PARTICPANT IN THE DISCUSSIONS. So this appears to be is hearsay to begin with] but would speak about them only on condition of anonymity. [Ah! The old "unnamed source" gag. So somebody who is "anonymous" offers hearsay from a conversation that they did not necessarily particpate in. Always hard to refute "anonymous sources" who offer unsubstantiated "information"] An early version of the report, which is currently being drafted ["early version" of a "DRAFT" of a report not even due out for at least 4 months??? Damn...this IS "BREAKING NEWS!!"]
33. Posted by Justrand | September 13, 2007 9:53 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:53
34. Posted by marc | September 13, 2007 9:54 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
WOW Yo, I missed the pony.
Ya sure it wasn't a unicorn?
34. Posted by marc | September 13, 2007 9:54 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:54
35. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 9:56 PM | Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Yo
I looked at your last post .. long and hard
Just as his high school teacher did...and found no sources...
Term papers are a bitch...and trolling on blogs is worse: the grade shows up in real time.
35. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 9:56 PM |
Score: 7 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:56
36. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 9:57 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
38. Posted by marc | September 13, 2007 9:54 PM
You gotta' pay attention, man. Anytime Barney posts that much text, you need to cross your eyes a little, and look throooough the text, you'd be amazed what you see. Otherwise, it's a complete waste of time.
It might have have been a unicorn. it was wearing a hat.
36. Posted by yo | September 13, 2007 9:57 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:57
37. Posted by marc | September 13, 2007 9:59 PM | Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Baghdad barney may I suggest you get some velcro and place a small strip on your hands and a like sized amount on your ass.
You just got your ass handed to you three posts in succession, the velcro may assist you in carrying your ass outta here.
37. Posted by marc | September 13, 2007 9:59 PM |
Score: 5 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 21:59
38. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 10:04 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Barney reminds me of a festering zit I once had on my ass.
Other then that, his comments need no further repy or rebuttal.
38. Posted by P. Bunyan | September 13, 2007 10:04 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 22:04
39. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 10:08 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Not to drag this far off topic but, the NYT has marched squarely into the shit here.
My opinion of them has always been this:
http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?C6=2007&PeriodType=7&D3=0&CP=0&PT=7&CE=0&&ShowChtBt=Refresh+Chart&DateRangeForm=1&Symbol=NYT&C8=2007&C5=9&C7=9&ComparisonsForm=1&D5=0&D4=1&ViewType=0&C9=1&DisplayForm=1
But they may have done more than punish their shareholders this time.
http://www.blackfive.net/main/2007/09/ny-times--stand.html
39. Posted by HughS | September 13, 2007 10:08 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 22:08