« NPR: Despite the rising cost of energy, the global economy keeps growing | Main | Mummy Dearest »

Just Say No to the National Intelligence Academy

Hugh Hewitt has suggested that the United States Government establish a 'National Intelligence Academy'. I do not doubt that the idea will have a number of supporters, including some in Congress, because at first glance it seems to make sense. Unfortunately, I strongly doubt the practical efficacy of such an institution, for reasons I shall submit here.

Let's start with why we have Intelligence services in the first place. The United States government admits to fifteen official agencies and offices whose primary role is Intelligence; the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which used to be the overseer of Intelligence for the President of the United States (that role has been assumed by the office of National Director of Intelligence (NDI); the National Security Agency (NSA), who handle electronic intercepts and codes; the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), which handles satellite imagery for the most part; the National Geo-Spatial-Intelligence Agency, which handles high-altitude activity and analysis; the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR); Intelligence organizations controlled by the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps have been around for more than a century, and even the Coast Guard has an Intelligence arm. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has a Counter-Intelligence unit, as do the Departments of Energy and the Treasury. And finally, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) has an Intelligence office.

But we're just warming up, because there are some other agencies and offices which do not officially exist, but are quite real, for all of that. For example, remember the Intelligence Support Activity (ISA) from the 1980s, which existence was denied by the government, then admitted but later retracted as a mistake, then officially was said to have been shut down? There is also the Diplomatic Security Group (DSG), the State Department commando force which was - supposedly - absorbed into the INR, although a bunch of the DSG's best simply vanished from sight; and Delta Force of course, which is alleged to have its own Intelligence resources, having a strong distrust of any Intel weenies who have been in contact with Congress. Or what about the National Infrastructure Defense Office set up during the Clinton years to guard against things like Cyberwarfare? Come to that, ever wonder what old ex-spooks do in their 'golden years'? Spooks are not like most veterans, because while their bodies age, in many cases their minds remain very sharp and they know things, valuable things, which their nation may call upon at need.

- continued -

What I am saying with all that, is that it's a tall order to imagine creating a single place to teach men and women what they need to become effective Intelligence agents. For a long time, we had to send people behind the Iron Curtain, so whites who could pass as Slavic folks were in high demand. Nowadays, we need folks who can pass as militant Muslims, not only by race and language, but who know the ins and outs of the "Death to America" crowd. And it's pretty obvious that we need a cadre of Asians, able to blend in at Pyongyang, or at Beijing, or in Manila. And by the way, if you think the agent who fits in Com-China can also be equally accepted in NorKorea, you need some remedial World Culture, buddy. We also need experts in South American culture and practices, and just because we always seem to get into wars there, we can't forget about Europe. So, right from the get-go, our campus is going to need six departments just to handle continental distribution. From there, we need to figure out what sort of Intelligence work our agent will handle. In the bad old days it was all about the military plans, baby, specifically weapons and intentions. Not so simple, now. There are still tactical and strategic weapons to chase, as well as operational and contingency plans, but just as vital now are financial strategies and political operations; for some reason, people don't realize that our enemies would - very much - like to influence the outcome of our elections, and indeed have been working hard to that end. Ahhh, ahh, ahhh Hsu!! Sorry about that, darn allergies, where was I? Oh yes, categories of Intelligence operations. The reason we have so many different Intelligence agencies, after all, is because there are so many areas where we need diligence and attention. We have to watch skies and e-mails, we have to consider money and material and weapons and speeches, we have to track cultural and political and religious climate changes, and we have to do it all in a way that keeps us from being set up for a sucker punch. It is all but impossible for one school to do all it is needed, and that does not consider the fact that as the world changes, our Intelligence agencies need to keep up with technology and capabilities.

And then there is that little matter of Congress. A National Intelligence Academy would have to be set up and have funds allocated for it by Congress. Anybody want to guess how long it would take for the NIA to become a political football, subject to the Macchiavellian maneuvers of the personalities in vogue at a given moment? Or how long the headmaster at that academy would enjoy anything like autonomy, with a sub-committee holding the final vote on funds each year? It's hard enough as it is for Intelligence professionals to make the hard call without playing up to a political patron, and that's with the budgets for each agency set up on a much more pragmatic approach. I mean really, in the end a National Intelligence Academy would be little more than a marketing tool for whichever party controls the Hill, because with Congress voting into existence, there is no chance they would ever hand over control to the President, the Military, or the people who actually know what to do to train agents.

By the way, where do you suppose they'd build the thing? The East Coast already has West Point, Annapolis, and the Coast Guard Academy and the Air Force Academy is in Colorado. Since the logical place to train agents in secret operations and handling classified information would be a remote and well-guarded place, we can expect such an academy would most likely be built in California or somewhere on the West Coast, instead. With the present Blue majority and spineless character of the Right in Congress just now, that goes almost without saying. And with the high-profile image the place has, how long do you figure before someone sues the Academy for discrimination? After all, Sandy Berger will eventually be allowed to apply for a security clearance again, so who's to say that someone can't be a secret agent, even if they hate the United States?

As bad as things are now in trying to recruit, train, and equip agents and Intelligence operations, the only sure results from a National Intelligence Academy, is that it would make things worse for National Security, that it would be expensive and wasteful, and that it would be spun like a top on an almost daily basis.



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/24239.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Just Say No to the National Intelligence Academy:

» Murdoc Online linked with Friday Linkzookery - 21 Sep 2007

Comments (11)

100% agree with your evalua... (Below threshold)
Jeff:

100% agree with your evaluation ...

I would add that the current academies train managers/leaders for the services. Intelligence agents are tip of the spear folks who need to be highly trained in very specialized skills/knowledge.

Besides, having all of your secret agents funneling thru one location can't be the best way to keep their idenities secret.

Just so. Also, putting all... (Below threshold)

Just so. Also, putting all the spooks through a single institution would tend to limit their training and approach to the particular areas favored by the leadership. With numerous different agencies training and operating their own cadres of agents, a wide range of strategies are employed, increasing the likelihood we will have an effective one for any given circumstance.

Centralized bureaucratic control may be great for bureaucrats, but it's never been necessarily more effective. For example, look at public education since the formation of the Department of Education in the '70s. Not exactly an adventure to be emulated for success, efficiency, or accountability . . .

From what I've seen, much o... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

From what I've seen, much of the intel community acts like a bunch of snotty know it all teenagers in cliques already.

We don't need to re-inforce that by starting them sooner.

Don't be spooked just becau... (Below threshold)
nogo war:

Don't be spooked just because I agree with your articulated analysis.

Of course we need a Nationa... (Below threshold)
crazy:

Of course we need a National Intelligence Academy. We wouldn't want our adversaries to have to work too hard identifying all the future 00-Val's of the IC. Identifying, penetrating, recruiting US intelligence assets would be so much easier if all they had to do was hang out at the Academy or the nearest bar.

As smart a guy as Hugh Hewitt is sometimes you've just got to wonder if he's been a lawyer too long.

I think you got too much in... (Below threshold)
Dave W:

I think you got too much into the details and substance of the argument, and didn't give enough rhetoric. Lib trolls need to argue with rhetoric and you gave them nothing...

I mean seriously.. No Blood for Oil, and Don't taze me, bro...

Anyways, very good analysis and i learned a lot of things i didn't otherwise know, or hadn't necessarily thought of. Thanks for the info. And remember to ramp up the rhetoric next time. It's time for change, and that requires a willing suspension of disbelief... *sarcasm*

OK, we already have places ... (Below threshold)
MunDane:

OK, we already have places that train intelligence analysts, managers and linguists.

They are called "colleges".

And LO!, they get money from the government to do so.

After the students graduate, the Alphabet Soup recruits them.

The biggest problem is, you want people who know their crap in these fields, and this may mean that they are not choir members. Which tends to make the GS14's mighty fucking nervous when the Nation As We Know It, depends on some geek wearing flip-flops and a Che T-shirt listening to Dragonforce on her Ipod.

See the West Point turns out soldiers, who look like soldiers, Annapolis likewise Navy and Marines, Zoomies from the USAF Acad, and so on. Intelligence agencies need to Humint that blends into the background of the places they are placed and ELINT types just need to know their stuff, not how to properly wear Brooks Brothers suits and Allan Edmonds shoes.

Welcome to 1950, Hugh.

Remember, a good deal of th... (Below threshold)
JP:

Remember, a good deal of the work is done by enlisted members of the Armed Services. While a Good Will Hunting type does have a place coming out of college, many civilian positions are filled by those leaving the enlisted ranks. They have the clearances and the requisite experience in the field. Recent college grads have neither.

As we know there no inteleg... (Below threshold)
spurwing plover:

As we know there no intelegence left in our nations capital

Trackbacked by The Thunder ... (Below threshold)

Trackbacked by The Thunder Run - Web Reconnaissance for 09/21/2007
A short recon of what's out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often.

Barney2000 actually has a p... (Below threshold)
89:

Barney2000 actually has a point, I think, if this is a school where you are sent after recruitment to learn the intelligence related stuff that you CAN'T teach to people in a normal college.

After all, we don't so much send agents out there as recruit them where they live.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy