We have breaking news from the insane morons crack research staff at Wizbang Blue. They have uncovered a conspiracy... And not any conspiracy mind you but an evil twisted conspiracy by the likes of Rudy Giuliani to -GASP- remind people he has a family.
That's right, Rudy is soooo eeevil that he staged that embarrassing phone call from his wife at the NRA convention just to prove he had a wife! -- Oh, the humanity!
So says the insane moron crack researcher Larkin at Wizbang Blue:
It's pathetic that Giuliani feels he has to stage these absurd fake phone calls in order to prove to Republican primary voters that he is dedicated to his wife. It's even more pathetic that the Republican base puts such importance on a candidate's family when everything they know about that subject is carefully filtered, controlled and presented by the campaigns themselves and might have absolutely no relation to reality.
Maybe the insane moron crack researcher missed the response from the "Republican base".
Other than an unusual amount of crack cocaine, why does the insane moron crack researcher think it was staged? See if you can spot it:
It's obvious of course... Rudy knew who it was before he even took the phone out of his pocket. IT'S PROOF!
Of course the fact that it was a lucky guess or that Rudy probably (like millions of other busy people) has a distinctive ring set up for his wife's phone never occurred to the conspiracy kook.
BTW you'd think Larkin would have learned his lesson when his grand conspiracy last week blew up in his face.
Is the left so insane that even a simple phone call is now proof a grand conspiracy? It's amazing.
Comments (37)
I still think the classic i... (Below threshold)1. Posted by SPQR | September 24, 2007 3:19 AM | Score: 4 (8 votes cast)
I still think the classic is when Hooson blamed Giuliani for not stopping both the first WTC bombing and the 9/11 attack on the WTC. This despite the fact that Giuliani was not yet Mayor for the first, and that the second was launched from several airports - none of which were withing New York city jurisdiction.
1. Posted by SPQR | September 24, 2007 3:19 AM |
Score: 4 (8 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 03:19
2. Posted by Jim Addison | September 24, 2007 3:52 AM | Score: 5 (11 votes cast)
The reason we had to come up with the term, "moonbat," is that the blithering idiots and the drooling morons kept threatening to sue for defamation when we used those terms to describe the left.
Clearly, the left is far dumber and far loonier than any typical moron or idiot. They rise to a level of stupidity approaching the sublime.
Of course, it IS Larkin, after all. I've heard that when he briefly went missing as a child, his parents spent a fortune on Sharpies® to draw beards and mustaches on his pictures on the milk cartons. Sadly, he turned up with his head stuck in a sewer grate. It seems to have permanently affected his brain (which reportedly wasn't much to begin with).
2. Posted by Jim Addison | September 24, 2007 3:52 AM |
Score: 5 (11 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 03:52
3. Posted by marc | September 24, 2007 4:17 AM | Score: 5 (9 votes cast)
SPQR:
Or when hooson claimed when Lee "The Thief" Ward stole an entire mag article in violation of copyright he was "ably" defended by hooson with this reason: "the government made him do it!"Larkin, you and the rest of Blue are a disgrace to Earth and all that live on it.]
(Including the amoebas.)
3. Posted by marc | September 24, 2007 4:17 AM |
Score: 5 (9 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 04:17
4. Posted by Bullwinkle | September 24, 2007 5:27 AM | Score: 4 (8 votes cast)
Liberals learning lessons? Who are you kidding, Paul? Name one that ever did, or ever wanted to.
4. Posted by Bullwinkle | September 24, 2007 5:27 AM |
Score: 4 (8 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 05:27
5. Posted by Vinny | September 24, 2007 7:33 AM | Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Ummmm... It's because he did the exact same thing on two different occasions...
See for yourself.
5. Posted by Vinny | September 24, 2007 7:33 AM |
Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 07:33
6. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 7:46 AM | Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
Vinny, the exact same thing looks unscripted both times to me. How often does your wife call you? Are a lot of the conversations about the same?
OK, shred on, punk.
==========================
6. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 7:46 AM |
Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 07:46
7. Posted by chaz | September 24, 2007 7:50 AM | Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
Is anyone really surprised? I mean, they ignore their own scandals such as money-in-the-freezer, docs-in-the-socks, etc and grasp at anything they possibly can on the other side, looking to make mountains out of molehills. It's what they do.
7. Posted by chaz | September 24, 2007 7:50 AM |
Score: 3 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 07:50
8. Posted by Vinny | September 24, 2007 8:04 AM | Score: -1 (5 votes cast)
How often does my wife call me? Plenty.
Are a lot of my conversations the same?
Yep.
I also don't take calls when in meetings or giving presentations. Doing so looks a lot like a certain person making a big effort to show off his wife is calling.
Kinda like in the 1980's when beepers were big and kids made that sweeping motion to take it out of their pocket so everyone would see it.
I don't think it's some huge scandal, but I think it does show a certain amount of image rehab on Giuliani's part. He's too much of a control freak to have spontaneous phone calls interrupt a stump speech.
8. Posted by Vinny | September 24, 2007 8:04 AM |
Score: -1 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 08:04
9. Posted by Jose Kanusee | September 24, 2007 8:59 AM | Score: -5 (7 votes cast)
And Vinny busts up this circle jerk masturbation session with just 16 words in comment number 5 just when you guys were ready to explode.
9. Posted by Jose Kanusee | September 24, 2007 8:59 AM |
Score: -5 (7 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 08:59
10. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 9:12 AM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Now you're projecting Vinny. Maybe his wife called him, and it wasn't set up. In fact, if it were set up, why would it be so lame?
============================
10. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 9:12 AM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 09:12
11. Posted by wavemaker | September 24, 2007 9:16 AM | Score: 2 (4 votes cast)
Gee, far be it for any campaigning politician to "stage" some bit of family harmony. Like every time Hillary kisses that %^&* husband of hers on stage.
11. Posted by wavemaker | September 24, 2007 9:16 AM |
Score: 2 (4 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 09:16
12. Posted by marc | September 24, 2007 9:55 AM | Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
vinny:
Ummmm... It's because he did the exact same thing on two different occasions...
WOW... 2, count'em two times.
Out of how many hundreds of speeches and appearances he has made in the last 6 months.
Jose (Cuervo?)
And Vinny busts up this circle jerk masturbation session with just 16 words in comment number 5 just when you guys were ready to explode.
Yep, guess you "caught" us. We were about to explode.
With laughter that idiots like Larkin, and I guess you two, can walk and chew gun simultaneously.
12. Posted by marc | September 24, 2007 9:55 AM |
Score: 2 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 09:55
13. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 9:56 AM | Score: 1 (5 votes cast)
So, you lose either way, vinny. Hey, go shred some paper.
==================
13. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 9:56 AM |
Score: 1 (5 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 09:56
14. Posted by Paul | September 24, 2007 10:11 AM | Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Boy the left really is lost....
I call out Larkin for being a delusional moron and Viniee jumps up and says "Hey, don't forget me, I'm a delusional moron too."
14. Posted by Paul | September 24, 2007 10:11 AM |
Score: 4 (6 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 10:11
15. Posted by epador | September 24, 2007 10:24 AM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
What is this, National Whack-a-Troll day?
15. Posted by epador | September 24, 2007 10:24 AM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 10:24
16. Posted by Vinny | September 24, 2007 10:33 AM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Wow Paul...
Amazing how you can spell delusional but not something much simpler like Vinny. And my explanation was REALLY delusional...
Wow. I'm way out there. Nothing rational about that paragraph. Nothing at all.
It's fine. I get it. You all clicked on my site and saw the Hillary banner there and drew all kinds of conclusions without actually reading any of the posts, so I've been deemed a left-wing troll. It's all good. Kim Priestap knows who I am and knows I'm anything but. In fact, so anything but am I that she was on my podcast talking with us about the illegal immigration thing the first time they tried to drop it all on our heads.
Go listen. And if you still think I'm some kind of leftwing troll after that, fine, but I have a feeling you guys (if you bother) are going to realize how dumb you sound when you pigeonhole me that way.
16. Posted by Vinny | September 24, 2007 10:33 AM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 10:33
17. Posted by epador | September 24, 2007 10:38 AM | Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
I think its cute, not pathetic, and though maybe a little lame, no more or less so than many other campaigning gimmicks. What is pathetic is that this is the BEST Larkin, Lee, et all can find to circle jerk to.
17. Posted by epador | September 24, 2007 10:38 AM |
Score: 0 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 10:38
18. Posted by Rance | September 24, 2007 10:39 AM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
One would think that a politician going on stage to deliver a major speech would turn his/her cell phone off. Especially after being interupted while he was on stage the first time. It could have been embarrassing if the call had been from his mechanic, doctor, dentist, or one of ex-wives or ex-mistresses.
18. Posted by Rance | September 24, 2007 10:39 AM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 10:39
19. Posted by Paul | September 24, 2007 10:49 AM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
>Wow. I'm way out there. Nothing rational about that paragraph. Nothing at all.
Vinniee- You're int he "The phone calls are staged camp."
That pretty much defines loony tune.
If you don't like the label don't be a whack job.
19. Posted by Paul | September 24, 2007 10:49 AM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 10:49
20. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 10:59 AM | Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
"One would think". Rance, that's the problem. Y'all project what you would do, and you have little idea of the truth of the Giulianis' intramarital communication.
That's why you're shredded, Vinny, not because of ideology. I didn't notice Hillary, I noticed 'shred', punk.
===============================
20. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 10:59 AM |
Score: 1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 10:59
21. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 11:02 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Shall I shred your sock puppet, too? Same thinking, might as well be.
============================
21. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 11:02 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 11:02
22. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 11:05 AM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Heh, heh, Paul. Soon, marital phone calls will be 'staged camp'. Hillary really ought to use one. Maybe Rudy's pre-empting.
===============================
22. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 11:05 AM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 11:05
23. Posted by Oyster | September 24, 2007 11:50 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Boy, people are having a heyday. Google has so many hits on this one I couldn't count them all. Must be a slow news day for the libs.
23. Posted by Oyster | September 24, 2007 11:50 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 11:50
24. Posted by FreedomFries | September 24, 2007 12:32 PM | Score: -3 (3 votes cast)
The moron(s) is the one who wrote the above crap as well as those in his pack of slavering Pavlovian puppies salivating their drooling comments as Paul rings the bell.
The Mdm. Drag Queen Rudy phone call was as phoney as they come and any amoeba w/ 2 neurons can see and hear that.
Not unlike Mdm Drag Queen Rudy's post 9/11 NYC continual walkabout to posture himself as some sort of mythical terror-dragon slayer as he masnufactured a "tough-on-terror" credential.
Totally as phoney as the Megaphone Chimp atop the WTC rubble w/ his bullhorn representing leadership in tragedy.
If they were seals, you'd toss them a fish for a bullshit trick.
24. Posted by FreedomFries | September 24, 2007 12:32 PM |
Score: -3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 12:32
25. Posted by Brian | September 24, 2007 12:32 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Maybe his wife called him, and it wasn't set up.
Do you think he might have mentioned to his wife that he was giving a speech to the NRA? If so, why would she call him right when she would have known he was in the middle of it?
Oh, and Paul...
Rudy probably (like millions of other busy people) has a distinctive ring set up for his wife's phone...
Listen to the ring. It's the default ring tone for Motorola phones.
25. Posted by Brian | September 24, 2007 12:32 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 12:32
26. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 12:41 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Freedom Fries must have eaten a three day old fish.
Brian projects along with the rest. Why don't you have a way only your wife can get hold of you?
==============================
26. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 12:41 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 12:41
27. Posted by Brian | September 24, 2007 12:57 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Why don't you have a way only your wife can get hold of you?
I don't know what that means. My wife can reach me same as anyone else. Except that when I tell her I'll be giving a speech from 1-2, she knows not to call then.
27. Posted by Brian | September 24, 2007 12:57 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 12:57
28. Posted by Rance | September 24, 2007 1:06 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Would any of you find it disrespectful if a speaker stopped to take a phone call, from anyone, during his/her speech to you?
28. Posted by Rance | September 24, 2007 1:06 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 13:06
29. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 1:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
In case y'all haven't noticed, cell phones have changed a lot of behaviour. Your projecting about Rudy and his cell phone behaviour is fairly humourous. Are you going to insist that everyone act like you around phones?
====================
29. Posted by kim | September 24, 2007 1:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 13:11
30. Posted by Paul | September 24, 2007 1:24 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
So there's Brian and FF..
"I'm a moron too, don't forget me...."
You guys need mental help.
30. Posted by Paul | September 24, 2007 1:24 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 13:24
31. Posted by Jason | September 24, 2007 2:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm no Rudy supporter, but Siddhartha H. Buddha, these Blue losers need to get a life!
31. Posted by Jason | September 24, 2007 2:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 14:09
32. Posted by nogo war | September 24, 2007 3:30 PM | Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
moving past the simple...I'm giving an important speech...let me take this call...
Given his established governmental past positions on guns...
I am assuming no one hearing this speech ever
chanted or thought flip-flop, flip flop when ever the name Kerry was mentioned in 2004.
(or is that chant only meant for Dems?)
Speaking only for myself,(a proud moonbat) outside Of Fred...there is no one I hope to be the leader of the traditional values in Republican Party in November 2008 than Rudi.
But hey...Newt is only $30 million away from offering a real leader.
32. Posted by nogo war | September 24, 2007 3:30 PM |
Score: -2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 15:30
33. Posted by Brian | September 24, 2007 4:29 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Paul, looks like someone is masquerading as you and posting inane and silly comments.
33. Posted by Brian | September 24, 2007 4:29 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 16:29
34. Posted by marc | September 24, 2007 4:51 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
34. Posted by marc | September 24, 2007 4:51 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 16:51
35. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 24, 2007 10:28 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
No, actually marc, Brian's comments are normally silly and inane.
35. Posted by SCSIwuzzy | September 24, 2007 10:28 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 22:28
36. Posted by FreedomFries | September 24, 2007 10:49 PM | Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Paul, your post is a bullshit WHINE because your favorite drag queen, Mdm Rudy, was exposed as a simpleton fraud w/ his 2nd time phoney phone call from his beloved woman, as he played the adoring family man after making a mess of 2 prior marriages. The only question is: Can Mdm Rudy make this 3rd marriage work long enough to get the Grand Old Potty's nomination or will he find another twenty-something cousin to marry for a 4th go-round?
Actually, w/ Mdm Rudy's stable of wives, he might make a better Mormon than Mutt Romney.
36. Posted by FreedomFries | September 24, 2007 10:49 PM |
Score: -1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on September 24, 2007 22:49
37. Posted by kim | September 25, 2007 11:16 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, you know, they say, more than thrice,'Third Time's the Charm' Also 'Marrying and Hanging go by Fate'.
=========
37. Posted by kim | September 25, 2007 11:16 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2007 11:16