« Will You Answer What Congress Won't? The Top 20 Questions pt 1 | Main | Ted Rall... he's ba-a-ack... »

The Best Government Money Can Buy

There's a bit of a political squabble going on in Massachusetts right now. Under the current law, members of the Governor's Council are legally forbidden from practicing law in front of state agencies. The notion is that it's kind of hard to keep the two hats separate -- it could be tough for judges to distinguish between Attorney Joe who wants to win his case and Councilor Joe, who approves judges, votes on court budgets, and the like.

The tiny minority of Republicans in the legislature are pushing to expand the ban to include legislators, who pass laws and hold the purse strings of the Courts. On the other side, some Democrats (who hold 85% of each house, as well as the governor's office and the Governor's Council) are pushing to lift the ban entirely.

In Massachusetts, "elected official" is a pretty good profession. Starting pay for a legislator is around $55,000 a year, and I believe Councilors make around $100,000 (I can't find the precise amount). the theory is that if you want the best people, you have to pay enough for them to be worth their time and compete with the private sector.

One of the problems with this is that lawmakers who think of themselves as "professional lawmakers" tend to think that they need to constantly justify their pay by making laws. So you end up with a tremendous amount of silly and busybody laws.

Another is that if you get lawmakers who are in it for the money -- and look for ways to make more. This is just one of them.

Here in New Hampshire, we have a different attitude. We don't want "professional" lawmakers. We want legislators who have no incentive to stay in Concord any longer than necessary. So we have a huge legislature (400 in the House, 24 in the Senate) and pay them virtually nothing -- $100.00 per year, plus mileage and expenses. If some don't show up on occasion, no big deal --- we got plenty more to make a quorum. And most of them have real jobs that they have to get back to, or their families don't get fed.

And it's worked out pretty well for us.

Politics is funny. There's an old saying that "you get what you pay for." Here in New Hampshire, we don't pay very much for our government, and we don't get very much of a government for that. But there seems to be a inverse relationship between AMOUNT of government and QUALITY of government.

Down in Massachusetts, they get all the government they can afford -- and then some. And they're welcome to it.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/25068.

Comments (4)

Every time you write about ... (Below threshold)
mantis:

Every time you write about the New Hampshire legislature I get jealous. Here we have the idiots in Springfield to deal with, in addition to the Chicago machine (a ban on foie gras!). We're getting what we pay for, alright.

I'd be more interested in r... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

I'd be more interested in restricting former members of the legislatures working as lobbyists back to the government.

BTW, which loser seems to hang around waiting for a new Wizbang post and 1-stars it, particularly JT's? Or is that a bot someone setup.

The current House Speaker, ... (Below threshold)

The current House Speaker, Sal DiMasi, was practicing as a criminal defense attorney while he was the chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He used to make sure there was some court reform measure always pending and he used to brag about how a judge would "shit his pants" when Sal made an appearance for a client. He had a booming DUI practice, and apparently they were all falsely charged because few of them ever went to trial.

The dems gained the majorit... (Below threshold)
Farmer:

The dems gained the majority in the NH state gov't in 2006. This past year, the managed to still be working into the summer, they are supposed to only be working Jan-Apr... In 2007 they rammed through all sorts for granny state laws, smoking ban, tax increases, a ban on mylar balloons. It makes me wonder what tricks they have up their sleeves for 2008... full time legislature, a big legislator pay raise for a "living wage?" The stuff they got done with one party rule is truly scary. Make no mistake, in 2007/2008 NH is just northern Mass, western Maine, and south Canada, the liberals have landed and are taking what they can by legislative fiat




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy