« Don't Tell the Pro-Illegal Immigration Crowd: The Border Fence is Working | Main | Business News You Might Have Missed »

Major newspapers bleeding readers

The Audit Bureau of Circulation released circulation figures for the nation's daily newspapers based on the reporting period ended in September, and the news isn't good. Only four of the top 25 showed any gains and, of those, only USA Today managed an increase of even 1%. CORRECTION: As noted by ExSubNuke in comments, The Philadelphia Inquirer posted a daily gain of 2.31%. The numbers were even worse for Sunday circulation, the key day for advertising revenue. Jennifer Saba reports for Editor and Publisher:


According to an analysis of ABC figures, for 538 daily U.S. newspapers, circulation declined 2.5% to 40,689,617. For 609 papers that filed on Sunday, overall circulation dropped 3.5% to 46,771,486. The percentages are based on comparisons from the same period a year ago and represent the majority of the paper's reporting into ABC -- less than half in the country.

For The New York Times, daily circulation fell 4.51% to 1,037,828 and Sunday plunged 7.59% to 1,500,394, at least partly due to a price increase though executives with the paper say the decline from the hike was less than anticipated.


Read the full story at the link above. A list of the top 25 dailies' numbers is here.

This is not a new trend, of course: newspapers have been losing readership as an industry since the peak in 1975. The first casualties were the afternoon dailies, many of whom were published by the same companies which put out the morning dailies in their cities, so "consolidation" saved the companies some costs. Afternoon papers had traditionally been targeted to a more blue-collar audience, including factory shift workers who didn't have time to read the morning editions before going to work.

Functional literacy has been declining in this country for roughly the same period (mirroring, perhaps not coincidentally, the creation and expansion of the federal Department of Education), and undoubtedly played a part as more and more people began to get their news from television, including cable news networks which could deliver breaking news instantly.

It has been the proliferation of news sources on the internet, though, which has probably driven the stake through the heart of newspaper readership. The most faithful newspaper readers are (and have been for decades) the older segment of the population - also the least likely to take advantage of computer capabilities. They aren't getting any younger, of course, but many of them are now also discovering the internet.

As fast as technology advances, no one can safely predict the future of news and information, but it is safe to say it will not involve cutting down trees to deliver it the next day.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/25262.

Comments (5)

Look a little closer, and t... (Below threshold)
ExSubNuke:

Look a little closer, and the Philly Inquirer went up by +2.31%.

Since USA Today is stuffed ... (Below threshold)

Since USA Today is stuffed under practically ever hotel room in America (where it remains most of the time, I suspect), that number is bogus.

"As noted by ExSubNuke i... (Below threshold)

"As noted by ExSubNuke in comments, The Philadelphia Inquirer posted a daily gain of 2.31%."

That's because they placed the paper near the checkout stand at grocery stores and people thought they were buying the Enquirer.

Why people spend money on b... (Below threshold)
Piso Mojado:

Why people spend money on biased trash is beyond me. More and more figure it out every day. I'm sure Time & Newsweek lib mouthpiece rags are dropping as well.

exsubnuke-How much... (Below threshold)
Rory:

exsubnuke-

How much you want to bet they gotta hold of the Democratic "voter" registrations, and "sold" subscriptions to them?

You know -the dead ones.

Wouldn't put it past them to inflate their sales....

Hell the various "military" times owned by Gannett that also owns the USA Today sends multitudes of free subscriptions to various addresses on base -no one 'pays" for them, and a lot of "copy" ends up in the trash.

But when they tell advertisers how many subscriptions they actually have- bet they count them.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy