What's another word for thesaurus?

Talk about projection !

I congratulate Mr Durst for his "relatively" restrained post. His leftist buddies tend to really go "off the deep end" on their rants.

heh.

You know, they'd have been well served by looking through this list one more time and thinking about how many of these descriptions could apply to their own party and/or those they choose to root for.

When you start attributing opposition to your politcal positions on virtually any issue to a combination of stupidity and laziness, then you have left the field of rational debate.

I'm not a republican. Obviously, I am a progressive or a democrat either.

When I read a screed like this, even if I might agree with some points of it, I come to one conclusion:

I. Cannot. Work. With. These. People. You simply cannot get through to them for any sort of actual debate. This cannot end well.

"lawyer-shooting".

the bush administration is holding lawyer shoots?? why wasn't i notified of this? how can i wrangle an invitation? do ya suppose a large cash contribution would help?

seriously, though, do liberals ever NOT whine & snivel like little girls?

My bad, "laziness" should read "evilness". That's what I get for typing while eating a sandwhich.

Truer words were never spoken in such eloquent and accurate ways.

JFO the idiot: "Truer words were never spoken in such eloquent and accurate ways."

Perhaps JFO will take a moment to address Mr Durst's complaint of "domestic spying" with JFK's wiretapping and monitoring of Martin Luther King.

How 'bout it JFO. Care to take a shot at that one?

How 'bout this one: FDR's internment of over 100,000 Japanese American's during WWII?

Not to worry, it's all down the leftist memory hole with the morons like JFO.

Can you imagine how fun it must be to be a Dem leader and know, just know, that your base is as dumb as a box of rocks and can be told that history started yesterday....and that they'll buy it hook, line, and sinker?

By the way JFO, have you accepted yet that fire can indeed melt steel?

.....cuz it can, you know.....

It sure is nice to (figuratively) see spittle come from the mouth of folks like Drago when a little satire is demonstrated. You know Drago, well you probably don't, that satire isn't fact.

Oh, and as Bill Orally would say: what say you Drago about that heroine of everything right (pun intended) Ms Malkin's whole damn book about how right it was to intern the Japanese??? I surely won't hold my breath on that one.

JFO, I understand completely your unwillingness to address several very important historical examples of Democrat led Governmental behavior that the modern claims to lament in the Bush administration.

I can also understand your NEED to refocus this obvious intellectaul hypocrisy by use of non-sequitor, straw-men, red herrings, etc.

Still, it would be nice if you take another dose of your daily medication, focus like a laser-beam for a moment, and try to tell us all what you THINK about the two examples I provided of (JFK and FDR respectively) engaging in behavior that the left claims to deplore.

Do you think you can do that? Can you tell us what you "think" without referencing some modern conservative or Republican?

Is that possible?

BTW JFO, do you really believe that Mr Durst's rant is "satire"?

Really?

So, you are claiming that Mr Durst doesn't really believe what he wrote, he is just being "funny"?

hmm, I don't think he would agree with you.

Dang, how'd he know I was xylophonic?

JFO loves this projection of the liberal sewage onto others since he is totally immersed in it.

the spittle-flecked JFO: "..what say you Drago about that heroine of everything right (pun intended) Ms Malkin's whole damn book about how right it was to intern the Japanese??? "

Uh, could you please list what Governmental policies that Michelle Malkin has been responsible for implementing and can you also provide a link to the evidence that "Ms Malkin" is a "heroine of everything right"?

I'm a little fuzzy as how Malkin fits into a discussion of the relative perfidies of different American administrations.

Easy answer Drago. JFK's wiretapping, his attempts to assassinate Castro, his involvement in covert CIA operations in Vietnam and other countries was a disgrace and a significant blemish on his legacy.

Similarly, FDR's internment of the Japanese was racist, undemocratic and a disgrace to his legacy.

Satisfy you now>

How about a little truthiness from you about Malkin's book?

Oh, and if you don't think his piece was satire, you're an idiot.

JFO: "Satisfy you now>"

Why, yes. JFO, for your future reference, direct and relevant answers to on-topic questions are usually appreciated. I'm surprised that you do not know this. On the other hand, being a lefty, I know how difficult it must be for to "confine" yourself to a dialogue.

JFO: "How about a little truthiness from you about Malkin's book?"

Hmm, I'm not sure how to answer this question as I've not read her book. JFO, for your future reference, it's best not to lob in non-sequitors as they tend not to advance the dialogue or the march to "understanding".

Further, what possible relevance can Michelle Malkin have to FDR's policies? (hint: "none")

JFO: "Oh, and if you don't think his piece was satire, you're an idiot."

I believe that Mr Durst would be surprised to see you misinterpreting and mischaracterizing his comments. Since you do not realize you are doing that, I guess that makes you an idiot.

I like the Oil Company Hugging...if they are so against the oil companies get off the roads, and out of the airlines so I do not have to deal with them on the roads, and at the airports.

Oh well, I also am a religious nut, recognized life in my womb 4 times, and a stay home mousewife, how on earth could he have missed that?

HATE SPEECH!

Of course you wouldn't answer the question. Who didn't know that?

As for your weasel excuse to get out of the answer, i.e. what does Malkin have to do with FDR I'd only say this:what did Durst's piece have to do with FDR? Are you that stupid and that much of a weasel? I guess so.

But let me make it easy even for someone like you. Malkin;s book justified the internment of the Japanese. Do you agree or disagree that FDR was right in doing it? And why. Simple questions for a simple person. Can't wait for your weasel non-answer.

Based on the near-pointlessness ("near-" since JFO did answer a few direct questions! Kudos JFO!!) of engaging JFO in meaningful conversation, I'd like to formally request mantis to pop by for some elevated disagreement.

drago

You are such a weasel. How pathetic that must be. Kinda sad.

Come on you can weasel better than that.

JFO: "Of course you wouldn't answer the question. Who didn't know that?"

Hmmm. Let me get this straight. You ask me to consider the content of book by a current-day political pundit (that I haven't read) in addressing a larger point about specific Governmental actions taken 65 years ago.

And then you characterize that as a refusal to "answer the question."

Wow. Why couldn't we just discuss where WE stand on a particular policy?

Would that be so difficult?

Seriously?

I was wondering who crashed thesaurus.com ....

I'd like to invite that guy to take off his jacket and step into a voting booth and say that. "People's justice", snort!

No, Because you said you hadn't read her I asked you to answer an easy question.

I'll do it again so you can't change the subject or content again.

Do you, or do you not agree with FDR's internment of the Japanese? And why or why not?

JFO: "But let me make it easy even for someone like you."

Easy for "someone like me"? You mean, someone who hasn't read Malkin's book, right? Is not reading a Malkin book considered poor scholarship by you?

JFO: "Malkin;s book justified the internment of the Japanese."

I'll take your word for it.

JFO: "Do you agree or disagree that FDR was right in doing it?"

Wow!! Congratulations! Finally, a simple, direct question!! What a day!!

My answer is, I disagree (within the comfort of my hindsight and y greater historical understanding of the domestic threat posed by some actual Japanese-American saboteurs) with FDR's wholesale internment of Japanese-Americans on the West Coast. I think it's clear that one of the major reasons why the Japanese-Americans were rounded up (as opposed to German-Americans or Italian-Americans) was cultural. There was so little "general" (national) understanding of the Japanese or their culture, in addition to the Japanese living in large but confined areas of te states, that it made it easier to single them out.

Of course, the fact that it was the Japanese that bombed the homeland and not the Germans or Italians cannot be discounted.

But again, note my caveat. Could you really say that if you were just the same old JFO you are today but living in 1941 that you would not have supported such a policy at that time? I don't think either of us is really in a position to answer that.

JFO: "Can't wait for your weasel non-answer."

JFO, for your reference, if you ask non-weaselly direct questions, you are much more likely to get direct answers.

JFO: "I'll do it again so you can't change the subject or content again."

JFO, for your future reference, having someone address your comments/assertions/assumptions etc, in a methodical and sequential manner is generally not considered "changing the subject or content".

Didn't you know that?

"seriously, though, do liberals ever NOT whine & snivel like little girls?"

Um, no.

Thanks for the answer Drago. I have pretty much the same view as do you.

William Faulkner would be proud of such a rant, but only for the lack of periods.

Adjectives and adverbs...
Reality..
Pakistan.
Again..we kiss the ass of someone who represents everything we are supposed to stand against.
..and please don't talk about "earmarks " when we have given this dictator billions...
Let's see...our troops are over extended and being killed and wounded to promote "democracy" in Iraq.
Is Pakistan the Middle East model we are shooting for?
We all want it both ways...but life is not like that. Either you you support our tax $$ going to Pakistan or you don't.
This is no liberal/conservative issue.
but hey..reduce yourselves to sound bites you feel obligated to copy.

JFO: "Thanks for the answer Drago. I have pretty much the same view as do you."

No kidding.

Look JFO, you're on the left (at times I'd say far left). I'm on the right (you'd claim,probably, that I'm on the far-right).

Be that as it may, you've got to learn to stop throwing everything including the kitchen sink into a Q & A with someone else.

I'll bet that if I read Malkin's book, her point would be that if you are the US Gov't which:

-had just been attacked at Pearl Harbor, and
-your FBI and intelligence services had no real idea of the threat posed by Japanese-Americans on the West Coast, but
-you knew there were in fact some spies and saboteurs at work, and
-your Admirals just told you that having your the majority of the power of your Pacific Fleet destroyed and that the West Coast was "wide open" to attack, ..

well, life and decisions ain't always so easy for the CinC.

no-go logic: "Adjectives and adverbs...
Reality..
Pakistan."

Stupidity and inanity.....
nogo..
war.

No-go logic: "Again..we kiss the ass of someone who represents everything we are supposed to stand against."

Says the representative of the left which revered and loves Lenin, Stalin, Mao, kim, Castro, Kim, Che, Lon Nol, Chavez, etc.

no-go logic: "..and please don't talk about "earmarks " when we have given this dictator billions..."

Yes, lets not talk about earmarks (a subject that Dems made great hay out of during the last election) now that the Dems are in charge and earmarking more than ever.

hey nogo, consistency much?

no-go logic: "Let's see...our troops are over extended and being killed and wounded to promote "democracy" in Iraq."

And are reenlisting and volunteering to return to the combat zones in record numbers to kill nogo's friends on the Al Qaeda side.

no-go logic: "Is Pakistan the Middle East model we are shooting for?"

No, but neither was East Germany, yet the left loved Honneker and the gang.

no-go, hurry back to class, recess is almost over.

BTW Nogo, you forgot the part where Karl Rove took away your pony.....

drago:

know that you were not necessarily defending butI have to respond to your theories that may have been used to justify the interments.

120,000 Americans, not Japanese but Americans were interred, Of that number about 70% were American-born US citizens. The average age was about 18. We're not talking about "foreigners" here, we're talking about folks born here. I just needed to say that.

Cool. Karl Rove has become a verb.

JFO, you're duplicity is showing.

First, you don't really think that Durst's rant is "satire," do you. Come on.

And your comment, "Truer words were never spoken in such eloquent and accurate ways," was not intended to be satirical either, was it?

You really believe it, don't you.

You can do it, JFO. You'll feel better about it if you just type it out, right here, right now...

I

AM

A

MOONBAT