Obviously you have never read the insane ranting of some of the (wing)nuts who regularly comment here as well as some of the posters (well one) who is too cowardly to admit what he really stands for. You should some time. You'd be enlightened.

JFO:

Are you trying for the Best Imitation of Kostard Paranoia on Wizbang Award? It's a gallant attempt, and may get some style points for being first out the gate, but it's not yet a winner.

You need to reach deep inside and give it your very best effort to produce a true masterpiece of Kostardity at which everyone on Wizbang can marvel.

"Friends, the most important moral decision a man makes in the course of a day is "Who am I going to kill today?" That's a decision you should agonize over, dream about, rehearse in your mind for hours, not just leave up to some hare-brained President you didn't even vote for.

"A man's killing list is a very personal matter. It should be between him and those persistent voices in his head."

Being a woman, am I allowed to have a killing list? Because goodness knows, I get up every morning and agonize over mine. I ask myself: Is it for a good reason? Is it strictly personal? Have I rehearsed it sufficiently? Do the voices in my head approve?

JFO, if you are hurt that one of your quotes did not make the list, we are demanding an investigation on your behalf.

Because you earned that honor.

JFO:

"Obviously you have never read the insane ranting of some of the (wing)nuts who regularly comment here as well as some of the posters (well one) who is too cowardly to admit what he really stands for. You should some time. You'd be enlightened."

We all await your definitive list, with links to the original please.

Are there ANY Kosites that wouldn't greatly improve the world by departing it immediately?

Now the funny thing is I've visited Kos once or twice. Like Wizbang they have some reasonable comments and some crazy comments. I don't particularly like the blog. I prefer sites like The Moderate Voice. I understand some of you (wing)nuts wouldn't have any idea what being a moderate is all about.

marc, your schtick is old and worn out. Just scroll through the comments, any day would be fine, and if you exercise just at tad of intellectual honesty you'll find plenty of what I'm talking about. I'm not holding out much hope for your intellectual honesty however. You've never demonstrated any before.

JFO, they were not comments, but the postings of the writers on the blog.

Obviously you have never read the insane ranting of some of the (wing)nuts who regularly comment here as well as some of the posters (well one) who is too cowardly to admit what he really stands for. You should some time. You'd be enlightened...JFO

Right at the very beginning Right Wing News has this:

Keep all of that in mind as you read these excerpts and quotes, all of which come from the Daily Kos writers, not from commenters on the blog

These are the actual articles posted. Not the comment section.

Speaking of cowardly, why don't you enlighten us on who this poster is on Wizbang is to which you refer and how that poster is in keeping with this moonbattery from Kos. Speaking in generalities in a comment section coupled with insults is pretty weak knee.

Come on and be a stand up guy/gal/it and share who it is and what they wrote so we can judge.

slw0606 sounds like they should be in one of those camps in Idaho looking for the black helos.

marc, your schtick is old and worn out. Just scroll through the comments, any day would be fine, and if you exercise just at tad of intellectual honesty you'll find plenty of what I'm talking about. I'm not holding out much hope for your intellectual honesty however. You've never demonstrated any before

There is a huge difference between commenter's that link to articles, relay personal experiences or anything of value verses someone whose only comments are "you're a poo-poo head" in every single comment posting.

You are one those that think they are "hot snot on a silver platter", but to the rest of us reading your poo-poo head posts, you come off as "cold boogers on a paper plate".

Time to track these people down and put them in the re-education camps President Bush didn't build. No problem, President Bush will go back to Texas and enjoy life, the KOS Kids will go to a mental facility and beg
to be let in.

These are the actual articles posted. Not the comment section

No, genius, they're from the diaries. Anyone can post a diary at DK. The main articles are written by 4-5 people.

Hawkins is either lying or being stupid.

No, genius, they're from the diaries. Anyone can post a diary at DK. The main articles are written by 4-5 people.
------------------------------------
So I see. DK is a depository for this garbage. Surprised that DK is willing to be such a dump. But looks like a lot of liberals are going there for this kind of garbage.

who is too cowardly to admit what he really stands for
------------------------------------
This is exactly what JFO has done. JFO is too cowardly to admit that he is a moonbat.

Geewhiz? I thought the moonbat kooks that comment on here like JFO were far left? these nutjobs at KOS literally would make Chavez, lil Kim and Ahmajimmyjab envious of their socialist agenda and vitrolic hatred for America.

No, genius, they're from the diaries. Anyone can post a diary at DK. The main articles are written by 4-5 people

Whatever, they both have comment sections and they are usually in agreement with "the diarist". Everyone in their group think post basically the same thing whether it's the "main" article or a "diary".

I was going to troll through the comments on the winning entries to compare and contrast those comments from the "main" articles.

But I see they have temporarily shut down the site.

Probably time to do a little aisle clean up since so many are peeking in right now.

One need only check in at Kos or DUh any day to find dozens of similar entries. I suspect John just selected and saved a few along the way, knowing it would be physically impossible for anyone to wade through all the tripe and find objectively "worse" entries.

JFO makes a general statement, but refuses to back it up with specifics. Sure, we have the occasional comment here about "Clinton death lists" and other weird ideas, but nowhere near the percentage of sheer nonsense posted at Kos - and no one, to my knowledge, has yet claimed "Hillary ruined my marriage," although thinking about her at inappropriate times could easily have that effect.

While Kos "diarists" aren't quite the same as our "editors," it wasn't necessary to wade through the fever swamp to find the entries Hawkins selected: they were "promoted to the main page" either by a Kos editor or by reader approval votes. These are NOT "extreme examples;" they are at least commonplace - if not "mainstream Kos" (if that isn't a contradiction in terms).

JFO:

"marc, your schtick is old and worn out. Just scroll through the comments, any day would be fine, and if you exercise just at tad of intellectual honesty you'll find plenty of what I'm talking about."

My "schtick" as you call it may be old and worn out, but it far exceeds anything you have posted on a regular basis.

And of course it's in opposition to your schtick that includes making wild, and at times false statements and when respectfully asked to back them up with proof you respond like you have in this instance, like a 6 year-old screaming "'cause I SAID SO!"

Tell me JFO from the normal placement of eye eye sockets do you have a prime viewing spot to see your colon?

Listkeeper asked:

"Are there ANY Kosites that wouldn't greatly improve the world by departing it immediately?"

A thought about your question, Listkeeper: Do you believe in an afterlife?

And if you do, would you want to inflict this kind of crazy on those in charge of the afterlife?

You gotta think these things through, chum...

J.

"No, genius, they're from the diaries. Anyone can post a diary at DK. The main articles are written by 4-5 people"

Ah, I get it. They're "diaries". That means there's an excuse for the insanity. They're not "authors" they're "diarists".

ha-ha

And no - NOT anyone can post a diary at DailyKos. They have to be sufficiently to the left of center all the way to so far left that operating under a pseudonym on the internet is the only way they can communicate that crap.

Next we'll hear that Rove has planted right-wing operatives there to say these crazy things to make them look bad.

JFO frequently if not always, proves the point of the post without knowing he is. That is how bad his BDS and self loathing is. ww

JFO = JAFL

So...crazies at Kos?

Talk about Krazies. This one circulates in the innermost circles of the White House.

How about the ultimate Krazy, the neo-con kook advisor to both Bush and, currently, Benito Ghouliani, Norman Podhoretz, "Dark Suspicions About the NIE."

"[The NIE] has just dealt a serious blow to the argument some of us have been making that Iran is intent on building nuclear weapons and that neither diplomacy nor sanctions can prevent it from succeeding...
...I entertain an even darker suspicion. It is that the intelligence community, which has for some years now been leaking material calculated to undermine George W. Bush, is doing it again. This time the purpose is to head off the possibility that the President may order air strikes on the Iranian nuclear installations."

Look to your own house, Cassy.

Considering the track record of the CIA on Pakistan's nuclear program (CIA said they weren't even close until they did their tests) and Saddam's WMDs (CIA said he had them until we actually looked) and on the fall of the USSR (rock solid, according to the CIA, until it imploded)...

Anything the CIA puts out as gospel ought to be taken with a VERY large amount of skepticism. If they say the Iranian program isn't a threat and hasn't produced anything - I'd consider it a much better than even chance they're getting ready to pop off a test shot. Maybe on Israel. (Hey, it's a two-fer - if the bomb works, they wipe out a lot of Jews. If it doesn't, then they spread radioactive crap over a wide area, hopefully killing a lot of Jews. Win-win either way if you're of that mentality...

I just think it'd be a real good idea to distrust anything out of the CIA, without independent verification. And with nukes - well, who's going to get fired at the CIA if they're wrong?

Am I paranoid about nukes? Fuckin' A, you betcha. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the only two times nukes have been used on a civilian (or military) target. You thought Katrina was a catastrophy for New Orleans? You ain't seen nothin' - and I for one don't WANT to see it. If that means we've got to be a hell of a lot more proactive with nutjob countries slavering after the nuclear bone, so be it - but if you block it as hard as you can politically don't come bitching and crying after a city in the ME or Europe gets lit up saying you didn't mean for THAT to happen, and why didn't someone DO something before it did!

It was crazy believe that 9/11 could happen. Now it is crazy not to assume that a nuclear 9/11 could happen. If the NIE is correct, we all should thank Bush for taking out Saddam. That should be a major factor for Iran 's decision to halt their nuclear program. But it will be crazy not to assume that the intelligence may be wrong again.

Has anyone signed up at that place and tried to comment? I have and it's like the people on the Truman Show that were trying to tell him he was on TV. Same thing, after few comments some guys start flagging your comments and wham-you're gone. It's a real scary place.

"after a few comments some guys start flagging your comments and wham-you're gone. its a real scary place."

Its called the fairness doctrine dontcha know..