« Sunday Afternoon Round up | Main | The Fog of Politics »

He died defending our country and now we're going to deport his widow

Yesterday's Miami Herald had an article on Dahianna Heard, widow of Jeffrey Heard. Heard who spent 12 years in the Army, was killed in Iraq while working as a contractor there.

Because of 'The Widow Penalty', Dahianna faces deportation because she wasn't married to Jeffrey the required two years at the time of his death. Caught in the middle of this insanity is Bryan Harley Heard, Jeffrey's and Dahianna's son. If Mrs. Heard is deported, Bryan will be leaving with his mother.

This is all insane. I blogged about the Widow Penalty here at Wizbang in this post. At present Mrs. Heard's deportation is on hold, but even the threat is a travesty. Her husband died for this country so we can deport his widow. What is just about that?

I'm putting the Miami Herald article below the fold. This is a minor error, the widows who are immigration limbo aren't in the thousands but hundreds.

Full disclosure- I've been in email contact with Ralph Pineda, Mrs. Heard's attorney, but not since May 07. This posting was in no way made at his or Dahianna's request.

Dahianna Heard's life changed forever when she heard the doorbell ring and learned that her husband, a security contractor in Iraq working with American troops, had been shot in the head and killed in an ambush.

'When I saw them and they told me, `We're very sorry,' I knew he had been killed. It was horrible. I went crazy,'' Heard, a native of Venezuela, said, recalling that March 2006 day.

A few months later, the nightmare got worse when immigration officials said that she, along with her two kids, faced deportation. The reason: The couple hadn't been married for at least two years, which was necessary for Heard to obtain permanent U.S. resident status.

The couple would be celebrating their second wedding anniversary on July 2006, four months after Jeffrey Heard's death at age 42. The couple's son, Bryan Harley Heard, was only 5 months old when his father died. The widow has a 14-year-old son, a permanent resident, from a previous marriage, but the kids would have to leave the country with their mother, who cares for them.

''It is unfair,'' said Dahianna Heard, 36, from her Casselberry house, near Orlando. ``My son was born here. My husband was buried here, and I want my son to be able to see him.''

Immigration administrators declined to comment, citing privacy reasons.

Heard is possibly one of thousands of immigrant widows and widowers in the United States who are in an immigration limbo after the death of their American spouses before their petition process has ended, which would grant them a ''green card'' or a permanent residence.

Under the law, for a citizen to petition their foreign spouse, the couple has to be married at least two years. The USCIS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, generally denies applications of foreigners if their American spouses die before they reach the minimum time required. Exceptions include widows or widowers of active military personnel and applications that had been approved before the citizen's death.

Heard received her first notification about her case two months after the death of her husband.

''In May, I got the immigration letter, a letter we both had to sign, and there I realized I could have problems,'' Heard said. She requested the help of lawyer Ralph Pineda, who accompanied her to meet with USCIS administrators.

Her petition was turned down, and her lawyer appealed the case. Now, USCIS is considering reopening the case if Pineda can prove that Heard served in the U.S. Army before his death and died in combat.

''What's really unfair is that if Jeffrey had been an active military, or if they had been married a few months more, they would have given it a special consideration,'' Pineda told El Nuevo Herald. ``We hope they open the file, reevaluate the situation and reconsider the case.''

Pineda is in the process of gathering all the information related to Jeffrey Heard's military service. His family says he was part of the Army's Special Forces unit and the Florida National Guard. Heard served a total of 12 years in the Army and got an honorable discharge in 1992.

When he left the military, Heard became a security contractor for the armed forces in anti-drug operations. In 2003, Heard left for Iraq as part of his job.

According to a press release about Heard's death given by SOC-SMG, the company he worked for, Heard was part of the security personnel who transported provisions from Baghdad to Fallujah. The unit was ambushed. Heard died at the scene; two of his colleagues were injured.

''Jeff's family is in shock that our country wants to deport a member of our family,'' said Cathie Baisley, Jeffrey Heard's mother. ``It is unfair, preposterous and unacceptable.''

Baisley, who lives in Arizona, started a campaign to try to prevent the deportation of her daughter-in-law and her grandsons. They frequently visit them and have sent letters to legislators to raise awareness of the case.

''If my son hadn't died defending his country, he and Dahianna would still be married and there wouldn't be any problem,'' Baisley said.

If Heard is deported, the future of her two sons is uncertain.

Dahianna Heard is part of a civil case against the federal government consisting of some 80 widows who are in a similar situation. They call it the ''widow's penalty.'' Brent Renison, an Oregon lawyer who represents the widows, said he sued because the federal government has failed to reform its immigration policy on the issue.

A hearing is scheduled later this month.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/26724.

Comments (7)

Don't think for a second th... (Below threshold)
LiveFreeOrDie Author Profile Page:

Don't think for a second that this isn't being prosecuted for polical reason by "Lettuce Head" Chertoff.

We have 20 million illegals, and the feds, while the issue is being defined before the public and during the debates, decide now is a good time to press this issue, but only selectively enforce it where it will do damage.

Chertoff's a scum-bag.

Here's the problem with thi... (Below threshold)
Mitchell:

Here's the problem with this--in the throes of a tremendous loss, of a man who served his country with honor, some bureaucrat sends you a notice that you're shit out of luck, and by the way, don't let the door hit you on the way out.

You're a LEGAL alien, living her peacefully and observing our laws. With a small child, a product of you marriage with the deceased gentleman.

I would think this country is capable of much better.

It will be capable of much ... (Below threshold)
JFO:

It will be capable of much better when the current incompetents boobs manning the executive branch when are cutting brush permanently and trying hard not to shoot a friend in the face.

By the way is Cheyney still alive? Can't remember the last time I saw his snarl. Well, actually that's a gift.

Disgusting.... (Below threshold)
914:

Disgusting.

In support of my hypothesis... (Below threshold)
LiveFreeOrDie Author Profile Page:

In support of my hypothesis in the first comment.

One of the candidates - can't remember which - I think it was McCain, brought up that we shouldn't be deporting the relatives of those who fought for our country.

To be clear, I don't think we should either. I just think it's interesting that Homeland Security tends to enforce LAWS ON THE BOOKS only when it will help to undermine those very laws. And that the Herald article was run at a time which appears to be designed to aid in UNDERMINING laws on the books.

It's not healthy.

It seems to me that if an a... (Below threshold)

It seems to me that if an alien spouse has a legitimate, lawful application in processing when the citizen spouse dies, it should be processed as if the citizen spouse were still alive. IOW, if it would have been approved had he/she lived, it should be approved after he/she dies. If it would have been declined anyway, it should be declined.

We're not talking about millions of people here. It wouldn't hurt us in any way, and would be the fair and just approach. Those who have followed the rules should not be penalized for "acts of God."

That law is messed up, hope... (Below threshold)
Veeshir:

That law is messed up, hopefully we can change it.
I would like to point out the absolute hilarity of blaming this on the current administration unless the law was proposed by Bush, passed by the Republican Congress at his urging and signed by him.
Somehow, I doubt that.
But then, I also laugh at all the people who blame everything on Bush as if nothing happened anywhere before January, 2001.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy