« ". . . what a 'Comeback' looks like!" | Main | Hampshire huge for Hillary »

Never mind...

When he was running for president in 1932, Franklin Roosevelt made a stirring speech in Pittsburgh where he promised to slash the government's spending by 25% and balance the budget. He went on to win the presidency.

Then, in 1936, he was running for re-election. Instead of slashing spending and reining in the budget, spending had skyrocketed and the deficit had ballooned. He and his staff discussed how best to address this failure to keep his commitment.

The best advice his staff could offer? "Mr. President, deny you were ever in Pittsburgh."

In that spirit, I hereby deny that I ever made any postings between this one and the one time-stamped 3:00. Specifically, I made no postings at 7:42 p.m. where I speculated about the outcome of the New Hampshire primary.

Anyone who says otherwise is obviously delusional.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/26802.

Comments (6)

Can we say NH never happene... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

Can we say NH never happened, too?

It's cool, man. You at lea... (Below threshold)
yo:

It's cool, man. You at least dropped a chad for Fred.

I made the point before... ... (Below threshold)
Dave W:

I made the point before... Any state that Ron Paul takes 8% of the vote in is irrelevant. Especially if Thompson takes only 1%. Obviously not a big difference maker.

McCain won New Hampshire in 2000 right? Got him pretty far didn't it?

What other state will McCain take?? Any other states? I doubt it.

At least 32% of the people ... (Below threshold)
914:

At least 32% of the people in New Hampshire are intelligent. scary however that at least 68% are idiots.

Well, if you are denying yo... (Below threshold)

Well, if you are denying you were in New Hampshire, we are going to need to interview Mr. Ducky.

Unfortunately, in his case, waterboarding may not be as effective as usual . . .

Roosevelt also said, when c... (Below threshold)

Roosevelt also said, when challenged on his 180-degree turn from his campaign promises, that the party platform was just a political instrument -- a device for getting elected -- and that private citizens should have known better than to take it seriously. At least we can't tar you with that brush, Jay.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy