In this update we've got musings about the administration's fiscal stimulus package, jobless claims, existing home sales, Starbucks, the Democrats' failed attempt at creating a federally-socialized medicine program for children, an anti-illegal immigrant state law, TV sports ratings and indirect connections with electoral politics, and business law, i.e., medical malpractice reforms.
Click the below link if you're interested in reading more.
Ohio Medical Malpractice Claims Drop
21% decrease in claims filed against physicians
A new report from the Ohio Department of Insurance says that medical malpractice lawsuits dropped 21 percent from 2005 to 2006.
Did doctors in Ohio suddenly get really, really careful?
Um, no, not necessarily:
The department attributed the drop in claims to changes made several years ago to medical malpractice laws by Republican lawmakers in charge of the former GOP state legislature. Some of those changes included caps on so-called 'pain and suffering' damages and restrictions on frivolous lawsuits against physicians.
Go figure.
Here's a link to the AP's report.
P.S. -- California is way ahead of the curve on that issue. The Golden State enacted its medical malpractice lawsuit reforms -- the so-called "MICRA" statute -- over 25 years ago.
* * *
Vox Populi
Last Sunday 54 million people watched the NFC Championship Game between the New York Giants and the Green Bay Packers.
Fifty...four...million.
Why am I mentioning that?
Well, let's put those 54 million football viewers into a bit of political perspective:
Most conservative Internet blogs have audiences under 0.02 million. The "big" conservative blogs, in fact, on a good day, will draw around 0.1 million readers. Many of whom are young liberal students.
In other words, cocoons are not merely for caterpillars and bubbles are not merely for chewing gum.
* * *
Indiana Senate Panel Advances Bill to Punish Employers of Illegal Immigrants
* * *
Here's a link to the AP's report, which for obvious reasons is couched in terms of its agenda, but still is worth a close perusal. There are some interesting quotes from supporters of the bill and from business leaders opposed to it.
* * *
House GOP Defeats Socialized Medicine Program,
2nd time in three months presidential veto upheld
For the second time in three months House Republicans upheld the president's veto of the Democrats' desired expansion of the SCHIP program:
99% -- 218 / 219 -- Democrats in favor of socialized medicine for children
22% -- 42 / 193 -- Republicans in favor of socialized medicine for children
1% -- 1 / 219 -- Democrats opposed
78% -- 151 / 193 -- Republicans opposed
* * *
A Dollar For Your Thoughts
Starbucks Tests $1 Cup of Coffee
* * *
Mmmm, Starbucks.
* * *
Existing Home Sales
Existing homes sold in December were 4.89 million units (annualized). That was below expectations and well below November's sales figure of 5.0 million units.
The real estate markets might not bottom out until 2009. Ironically enough, the administration's misguided deal with mortgage lenders to freeze ARM loans only will exacerbate the problem, not solve it.
* * *
Jobless Claims
Fewer people today are being laid off from their jobs when compared to the halcyon days of the late-1990's:
315,000 -- four-week avg. of initial claims for jobless benefits, January 19, 2008
322,000 -- four-week avg. of initial claims for jobless benefits, January 17, 1998
That's despite the fact total employment is higher today by upwards of 16 million net jobs.
For obvious reasons the media will report those numbers to the general public when pigs fly over hell's frozen pond.
* * *
Tax Cut Plan
Here's a link to the AP's version of events regarding that tentative tax cut deal in Congress.
Some of you might be thinking to yourselves: "Hey, wait a minute. Why are liberal Democrats agreeing to tax cuts? What gives?"
Hello, it's an election year. There's a vast chasm between "Democrat" and "liberal." Quite unlike their elected brethren, most Democrats out there on Main Street are not anywhere near liberal. In fact, a material percentage of people who reflexively vote for the label of Democrat -- or against the label of Republican -- are as conservative on the issues as Tom DeLay or Newt Gingrich. That's one of the sheer ironies of American politics: the left relies on subterfuge and party labels to get elected and tries to impose their agenda by stealth; but when the lights are on and people actually are paying attention liberal politicians have no choice but to sign onto the conservative agenda. Whereas the general public wouldn't know SCHIP from the old TV show CHIPS, they most certainly pay attention to taxes.



Comments (4)
Look you lead me in with a ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Rory | January 24, 2008 3:11 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Look you lead me in with a promise of talk on Starbucks and that's all you got!
OK Let me just hijack the thread to talk about ummmmmmm,-
Rudy damn it!
The Mason Dixon poll that K-Lo is humping-
Only 400 surveyed.
{Never mind that I think K-Lo went to school with a Donny Osmond lunch box....}
Even if you take this Mason Dixon poll in the fine print it says that Rudy's support is the most solid.
The poll that Captain's Quarters links to that the NRO "conveniently" ignores?
Strategic Vision with a sample of 300, or 400?
Ahhhhh NO! a sample of 1,450-with Rudy's support climbing and an honest blurb about fluidity.
Also in the Mason Dixon-McCain's support was the least stable with 33% indicating they wanted to possibly jump.
Oh ya let me get this back on topic Rudy would be the best for the economy, taxes and is the candidate with a proven record of turning around a huge economy.
Ya I said it!
New York.
New York is the 17th largest economy in the world.
And if you know anything about New York before Rudy took over, taxes and unemployment were huge.
1. Posted by Rory | January 24, 2008 3:11 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 24, 2008 15:11
2. Posted by DJ | January 24, 2008 5:50 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I love tax rebates.
Why don't they come out and say what it really is? Its nothing more than a short-term no-interest loan of tax you've already paid until April next year. Leave it to a politician to let you have some of your OWN money and then expect you to return it in a couple months, all the while, they're patting themselves on the back for their brilliant plan.
For me, a real stimulus package would be cutting the income tax rates by a fixed percentage. Nothing beats a raise in take-home pay without having to do anything in return.
2. Posted by DJ | January 24, 2008 5:50 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 24, 2008 17:50
3. Posted by John F Not Kerry | January 24, 2008 8:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Uh, Hooverville?
3. Posted by John F Not Kerry | January 24, 2008 8:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 24, 2008 20:47
4. Posted by hcddbz | January 25, 2008 10:00 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Indiana Senate Panel Advances Bill to Punish Employers of Illegal Immigrants
The argument didn't sway Kathleen Paul, of Columbus, who said the bill was simply unnecessary.
"For me as a taxpayer, this is not a priority," she said. "I don't want my taxes spent for this
Well as taxpayer who do you think is footing the bill for all those illegals if they get sick, have a kid,got to jail or prison The money spent on getting a bill passed vs the cost of illegal immigration is a dust particle vs a sandstorm. Also if firms in your state hire legal workers it will improve standard of living and require less services making your tax dollars work better. (well maybe not we still have office holders)
4. Posted by hcddbz | January 25, 2008 10:00 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 25, 2008 10:00