I had the opportunity this afternoon to sit in on a conference call hosted by Brett McGurk, Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Iraq and Afghanistan, who discussed the portion of tonight's address that dealt with Iraq and Afghanistan. Mr. McGurk described the broad outlines of the President's speech. We took notes and asked some questions at the end.
The President will take us back to a year ago, when Al Qaeda in Iraq was on the ascendancy, the Shia militias were taking over neighborhoods with violence and mayhem, and Iraqi's were dying by the hundreds. Today, Al Qaeda is on the run, the militias have stopped fighting, and casualties are down among the military and civilian populations. The Al Qaeda rat lines that used to bring in foreign fighters have been cut. A new offensive has begun in the last Al Qaeda holdouts in Mosul. It is too early to say that we have turned a corner, but we expect to see more and more good days and fewer and fewer bad days
ahead.
He also said that by promising to be there for the Iraqi's, by "proving our presence", the population responded favorably. He scoffed at the recent Democratic claim that it was their call for withdrawal that drove the Iraqis politicians to implement political progress. (see Lorie Byrd's post on Wizbang on 1/5/08 for details, and after the jump for a quote from Obama.) McGurk said that if you signal you are leaving, the Iraqis would retreat to their sectarian corners and refuse to negotiate. The notion that we can do less with fewer troops and things will get better is false.
Don't expect any major initiatives on Iraq and Afghanistan in the speech, just a summary of what has happened and what it means for the future.
Here's what Obama said in one of the Democratic debates:
I welcome the genuine reductions of violence that have taken place, although I would point out that much of that violence has been reduced because there was an agreement with tribes in Anbar province -- Sunni tribes -- who started to see, after the Democrats were elected in 2006, you know what, the Americans may be leaving soon, and we are going to be left very vulnerable to the Shi'as. We should start negotiating now. That's how you change behavior.




Comments (8)
I also hear that Bush is go... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Dave W | January 28, 2008 5:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I also hear that Bush is going to praise Pelosi tonight... I think this just shows us how lucky we got with a political moderate who just wants to play nice with the other party. Don't think that the next guy who is out to make nice is going to do as good a job as Bush... (IE McCain, The Huckster)
1. Posted by Dave W | January 28, 2008 5:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 28, 2008 17:31
2. Posted by jp2 | January 28, 2008 6:02 PM | Score: -8 (8 votes cast)
5 soldiers died today. RIP.
2. Posted by jp2 | January 28, 2008 6:02 PM |
Score: -8 (8 votes cast)
Posted on January 28, 2008 18:02
3. Posted by Vegas Vic | January 28, 2008 6:41 PM | Score: -6 (6 votes cast)
I have not been this dissapointed in a president since Jimmy Carter. I expect we will be paying a high price for Mr.Bush's incompetence for years to come.
3. Posted by Vegas Vic | January 28, 2008 6:41 PM |
Score: -6 (6 votes cast)
Posted on January 28, 2008 18:41
4. Posted by Rovin
| January 28, 2008 7:58 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
I afraid there are around 50 million Iraqis and Afghanis released from tyranny that would label the comment above moronic and self-centered. And for that matter incompetent.
4. Posted by Rovin
| January 28, 2008 7:58 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on January 28, 2008 19:58
5. Posted by DSkinner | January 28, 2008 8:13 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
So Vic, I take it from your quote you either had no confidence in Clinton or you expected him to be a complete cock-up. Either way he wouldn't be a disappointment to you.
5. Posted by DSkinner | January 28, 2008 8:13 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on January 28, 2008 20:13
6. Posted by epador | January 29, 2008 12:15 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Pelosi's Botox had her frozen smile and blinking uncontrollably. I hipe she could swallow. Maybe that's why they had the Kansas lady offer the reply...
6. Posted by epador | January 29, 2008 12:15 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 29, 2008 00:15
7. Posted by Charlie Quidnunc | January 29, 2008 12:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did anyone notice that Cheney blinked about once a minute, compared to Nancy's once a second?
7. Posted by Charlie Quidnunc | January 29, 2008 12:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 29, 2008 00:23
8. Posted by epador | January 29, 2008 5:49 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
No Botox 4 Cheney. QED Charlie.
8. Posted by epador | January 29, 2008 5:49 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on January 29, 2008 05:49