« Are we required to remove our shoes before visiting? | Main | The Knuckleheads of the Day award »

"Trust Me!"

Last week, one of the diarists over at Daily Kos named "KibbutzAmiad" published the results of a year-long study of Little Green Footballs and Free Republic. To my great astonishment, Kibby discovered that the authors and commenters of those sites are evil, hateful, sexist, homophobic, racist, vile, depraved, delusional, and probably mean to puppies and kittens.

This is a remarkable coincidence. A mere one day and two years before Kibby published that study, another Kos Kiddie named "Maccabee" published a very similar piece. That one, however, studied ten blogs -- including this one. I took that author to task for his very shoddy research, and think I did a pretty thorough job.

Then, last September, "Maccabee" published another article -- this one cited a US Navy sailor who reported that the US Navy was on the verge of launching an attack on Iran. There were so many flaws in that story that it was instantly torn apart and revealed as an utter fabrication -- and such a bad fabrication that the Powers That Be deleted the article and banned the author.

Now it's a new January, and we have another Jewish-named Kos diarist who has claimed to make an extensive study of right-wing blogs. The conclusion is much the same, as is the refusal to cite any of the alleged extensive supporting evidence.

I'm tempted to blame this on the television writer's strike. Why else would Kos be running this rerun?

But in an even more astonishing coincidence, this study by Kibby came out just as I was finishing my own lengthy study. I reviewed the last seventeen years of the Daily Kos, as well as Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf and the classic anti-Semitic forgery, The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion. And below the fold I am publishing the results of that study.

  • First up, there is the common thread of Anti-Semitism. It seems that the Jews are heavily involved in pretty much everything that goes wrong around the world. Sometimes the names change -- "Jew" becomes "Zionist" becomes "neocon" -- but the underlying sentiment remains the same.
  • Then there's the obsession with freedom. But it's highly directed -- only those who truly "deserve" freedom are entitled to absolute freedom. Those who are not worthy -- usually identified by their dissent from the obvious enlightenment of the deserving -- have virtually no rights whatsoever.
  • Also, that sort of freedom is rather oddly circumscribed. Sexual freedom is one of their biggest issues. They believe that anyone should have the right to do whatever they like with their naughty bits, whenever and wherever they wish, and anyone who expresses disapproval or offense is being brutally suppressive. The exception here, of course, is when one of those whom they dislike try to exercise those rights -- they must be exposed and mocked and derided and hounded and scorned.
  • There's also a remarkable dichotomy when it comes to language. Profanity is not only tolerated, but welcomed. A good cussing is a great icebreaker, and a way of quickly bonding. But it must be based on scatalogical or sexual references; terms that denigrate racial, national, sexual, or other forms of identity are brutally suppressed. For example (and I apologize to the language) here, a reference to a "motherfucking cocksucker" would pass without mention, but a mention of even the most mild of racial terms -- "macaca," for example, or sometimes a reference to "rejiggering" or "niggardly" or "spic and span" -- drives them into absolute paroxysms of fury.
  • The grand conspiracy is also a key element. There are great forces moving throughout the world, tying together disparate events into some diabolical master plan that, in the end, will result in the plotters garnering great wealth and power and influence. And the people who discover these plots are braving great danger in exposing these schemes.
  • There is also a cliquish element to them. There is a brotherhood (I'm sorry -- "familiality" -- "brotherhood" is a sexist term) among the cognoscenti, a sense of common cause, of "us against them."
  • But woe betide those that depart from the orthodoxy. The backers of the Protocols, the believers of Mein Kampf, the Kossacks are all united in brutally turning on those who do not subscribe to every aspect of the established doctrine -- even (and especially) when it changes. Those who do not keep up with the latest updates run the risk of being cast out and castigated and treated even worse than the nominal enemies. Because as bad as the enemies are, even worse are the traitors.

Phew. That's just the barest overview. I barely touched the surface of the 83 megabytes of the notes I compiled, which would take about seven reams of paper were I to print them out. They're full of quotes, citations, links, and all the necessary evidence I need to back up my conclusion: the people I studied are among the nastiest, meanest, cruelest, dumbest, most vicious, most despicable, most loathsome, most contemptible, and just plain icky ever to curse the earth.

Out of consideration for all of you, though, I'm not going to show you any of this extensive proof. It's just too nasty; I wouldn't want to inflict that on you.

But you can trust me. I have it, and it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that every single thing I say is true. If anything, I have understated the case.

But if you insist, go on over to Kos and poke around. If you don't find proof that what I say is true, go looking through the Protocols and Mein Kampf, and their devotees. Look hard enough, and you'll find it.

Don't bother, though. Just trust me. Just take my word for it. Don't go to the trouble of thinking for yourself, of evaluating my mind-bendingly thorough research and mind-bogglingly thorough documentation. Remember, I had to force myself to wade through all of it, and I'm still scarred by the experience -- there's no need for you to suffer like that, too.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/27566.

Comments (13)

Jay, your continued self-sa... (Below threshold)
epador:

Jay, your continued self-sacrifice for the better good should earn you a Pulitzer or Nobel Peace Prize.

Jay...lol, for some reason ... (Below threshold)

Jay...lol, for some reason that last bit seemed a bit tongue in cheek.

From article:"...com... (Below threshold)

From article:
"...commenters of those sites are ... racist ..."

Remember, when the politically correct use the term racist, they simply mean white Gentiles who discriminate.

It is a racial slur selectively given to white Gentiles.

Racist = honky.

A good white Gentile, a PC white Gentile, is not a honky. A bad white Gentile, one that discriminates, is a honky.

So, the proper translation for the headline should be: "...commenters of those sites are ... honky ..."

I had a good laugh over thi... (Below threshold)
COgirl:

I had a good laugh over this. I was drinking coffee and managed not to spurt it all over the pc. Of course, what you wrote about your study was funny too. ;-)

Funny but didn't someone ju... (Below threshold)

Funny but didn't someone just write a book on this?

http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0385511841/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201975618&sr=8-1

Seems like a meme that needs spreading...

Well done, Jay. You nailed... (Below threshold)
Son Of The Godfather:

Well done, Jay. You nailed it.

1) Jay, I think you missed ... (Below threshold)
epador:

1) Jay, I think you missed the fact that this fellow was writing satire. I mean, he couldn't be serious. Klonopin prescription running our?!?

2) Jay, I loved your attempt to respond. You gave me a reason to wish I had a kos account to put my 2 cents in.

3) I still think your effort deserves a Pulitzer or Nobel Prize (not for literature, but for Peace).

Even a casual wade through ... (Below threshold)
irongrampa:

Even a casual wade through Kos will reveal that the "reality based community" operated from a fiction-based reality. Once through that swamp was more than sufficient to realize this.

yes, we must all think for ... (Below threshold)
ryan a:

yes, we must all think for ourselves...

Jay, you're right. Long-winded slanderous articles about a mythical enemy--without any real kind of data or proof--is absolute trash. And that kind of thing is plentiful around the internet.

When a politically situated author (from any side) does "research" and then happens to conclude that his/her opponents are the epitome of all evil, well, that tends to cast some doubt upon what they have done. At least for me.

Self-serving results are fine and all, but they should at the very least have some substance.

And nice job with the oh so subtle satire/sarcasm. Ha.

Not to worry. As soon as Is... (Below threshold)
Ken Hoop:

Not to worry. As soon as Israel quits oppressing the rightful owners of Palestine, levels of world anti-semitism will reduce markedly, as Jewish writers like Tony Judt
concede.

One hopes that Ken is merel... (Below threshold)
SPQR:

One hopes that Ken is merely attempting a failed parody.

I was disappointed to find ... (Below threshold)

I was disappointed to find that the author forgot the one most important conclusion of all (although he did refer to it in a roundabout way at the end):

These right wingers are more a danger to us than terrorists!

Please disregard the fact that I have called them fearmongers over and over, yet imply that we should fear them.

Please disregard the fact that I've taken the very worst of any comments I have ever come across, multiplied it by a factor of [number too big to type here] and painted an entire segment of the American public with that brush.

Please disregard all my hyperbole, irony and misrepresentations.

Please disregard the fact that Charles Johnson emphatically rejected a proposed alliance with the very people who embody the things he has charged "rightwingers" are - NeoNazis.

Wouldn't people have been better served if he had monitored, say, Stormfront or even UseNet? Or maybe one or two of thousands of websites promoting Islamic radicalism?

Nah. They might actually DO something.

Who knows what happens next... (Below threshold)

Who knows what happens next... All I know is:

When in doubt empty the magazine.




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy