For over a year now, I've been getting TruthOut's steaming crapfests dumped in my e-mail box at least once a day. Some joker thought it would be fun to sign me up to their mailing list, and those imbeciles apparently can't imagine that anyone would NOT want their turds because they don't bother to verify subscriptions.
No, I've never been asked to be taken off their list. My position (and it's shared by many) is that 1) you should never ask to be taken off any list you never asked to be on; and B) if they want me to help them clean up their e-mail list, they can pay me.
It's been fun, on the rare occasions they send out their beg letters. Occasionally, when I'm feeling particularly vindictive, I'll call them up and offer them a hefty donation -- as soon as Karl Rove is indicted.
That's usually when they hang up on me.
Well, earlier this week the turd they dumped in my inbox had a rather unusual waft to it. I hereby reprint it in its entirety:
To Our Readership and Friends,Jason Leopold is no longer employed by Truthout.
Jason is a truly gifted reporter, and his efforts on behalf of Truthout
have been greatly appreciated.There may be some speculation that this announcement is connected in
some way to Truthout's reporting of the Karl Rove indictment matter. It
is not. At the time of our reporting on the Rove matter we stood by the
factual accuracy of our reports, and we stand by them now.We sincerely wish Jason the best of luck.
Marc Ash, Executive Director - t r u t h o u t
director@truthout.org
(Yes, they really do spell out their name with those oh-so-pretentious spaces between each letter. And no, they don't see the humor when you ask them why they're so proud of being out of truth.)
Yes, almost two years after they breathlessly reported that Karl Rove had been secretly indicted, they still stand by those reports. Never mind that the grand jury itself has said they did no such thing, no matter that the grand jury has been dismissed, no matter that Rove instead resigned at his own discretion, they still stand by those reports.
Well, I was worried about Jason. How will he ever recover from this tremendous fall from such lofty heights?
Well, I think I've found out.
Jason, I suspect, found a new job fairly quickly. In fact, I think I know where. It's nowhere as prestigious as TruthOut. In fact, it's a hell of a step down on credibility and respect and prestige, and he must really need the money to prostitute his credibility to take it, but these days a job's a job.
I would not be a surprised if he has ended up at the New York Times, covering John McCain's alleged "improper relationship" with a lobbyist.
Hey, the facts hang together. The report has all Jason's hallmarks. The mysterious unnamed sources, the vague accusations, the absolute lack of substance, and the fulfillment of the far left's most fabulous fantasies (OK, I'll take it easy on the alliteration). The story is a blue dress of reporting, and it doesn't take the FBI labs to see Jason's DNA.
In fact, I have all kinds of proof for it. I have eighty-three disgruntled former New York Times interns and 347 ex-TruthOut volunteers who have all told me, on condition of anonymity, that Jason often spoke wistfully of working for the Gray Lady, that the New York Times editors spoke lovingly of his work, and both Jason and the editors would go to bed and fantasize about catching John McCain in something truly scandalous.
If that isn't absolute iron-clad proof of the story, then you obviously haven't read the Times story on McCain's alleged "affair."




Comments (12)
Now that he is freelancing,... (Below threshold)1. Posted by chsw
| February 22, 2008 8:26 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Now that he is freelancing, did Leopold contribute to the McCain article at the NYT?
chsw
1. Posted by chsw
| February 22, 2008 8:26 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 08:26
2. Posted by Jeff Medcalf | February 22, 2008 9:47 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
When I read the Times article, my first reaction was: let's see, anonymous sources say that anonymous campaign aides might have been concerned about the appearance of an affair — now that's some solid reporting my friends.
Why again is the New York Times even read these days?
2. Posted by Jeff Medcalf | February 22, 2008 9:47 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 09:47
3. Posted by Spurwing Plover | February 22, 2008 10:02 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Frankly i hope the NEW YORK SLIMES loses several more subscribers
3. Posted by Spurwing Plover | February 22, 2008 10:02 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 10:02
4. Posted by Son Of The Godfather | February 22, 2008 10:04 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jay,
You forgot to end your quote of the letter (part of your article is included in the blockquote).
4. Posted by Son Of The Godfather | February 22, 2008 10:04 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 10:04
5. Posted by Jay Tea | February 22, 2008 10:23 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
SOTG, it looks right to me... the ending of the quote is the guy's e-mail address, and my commentary in italics is the resumption of my article.
And I just went back and reviewed source posting, and it looks right there, too.
Dunno why you're seeing it differently...
J.
5. Posted by Jay Tea | February 22, 2008 10:23 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 10:23
6. Posted by fg | February 22, 2008 11:18 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Trouthout's claim of rendition flights has a picture of B-1 bombers which carry a crew of 4 and no other seats as proof.
"February 22, 2008 | View of an air base in Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean in 2001. In a serious embarrassment to the CIA's official record on rendition flights, the agency acknowledged yesterday a UK territory was twice used as a stopover point for planes transporting rendition victims, in contradiction to previous statements."
6. Posted by fg | February 22, 2008 11:18 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 11:18
7. Posted by Jayemay | February 22, 2008 12:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
There's definately a blockquote tag open somewhere. I'm running IE 6.0 and everything after the beginning of the truthout email appears in one big blockquote.
7. Posted by Jayemay | February 22, 2008 12:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 12:21
8. Posted by Mike G in Corvallis | February 22, 2008 12:29 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Jay, it looks OK in Safari, but you're missing the close-anglebracket "<" in the close-blockquote ">/blockquote<" tag.
I was put on thruthout.org's mailing list about the same time you were, and I've stayed on it for much the same reasons. Although I hardly ever read the messages, the subject titles make entertaining reading and serve as probess into the fever swamps of the left.
8. Posted by Mike G in Corvallis | February 22, 2008 12:29 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 12:29
9. Posted by Mike G in Corvallis | February 22, 2008 12:33 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Aargh. Reverse those angle brackets, OK? I didn't see the Comment Preview box below the comment field.
PIMF, dammit.
9. Posted by Mike G in Corvallis | February 22, 2008 12:33 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 12:33
10. Posted by Jay Tea | February 22, 2008 12:37 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
MikeG, SOTG, it's fixed now.
Hey, Kevin, I found a NEW way to bork the page!
J.
10. Posted by Jay Tea | February 22, 2008 12:37 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 12:37
11. Posted by Scrapiron | February 22, 2008 2:05 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Has anyone located Dan 'Blather' Rather? He may be writing for the NYSlimes. He has a great source of news at the stockyard in Tx.
11. Posted by Scrapiron | February 22, 2008 2:05 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 14:05
12. Posted by Jason
| February 22, 2008 2:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Five bucks says Leopold is stuck in a sh*thole apartment watching reruns of "Mama's Family" while drowning his sorrows in cheap liquor and Ho-Hos.
12. Posted by Jason
| February 22, 2008 2:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 22, 2008 14:30