« The Shape Of Things To Come | Main | How Will Al Gore Explain This One? »

One Score And Nine Years Ago...

When one thinks about the Powerline blog, run by three lawyers, one normally doesn't think about them as cutting-edge vidbloggers. But they have two videos up right now that have fired up my imagination and blogging instincts. (The second video I'll discuss later.)

Thanks to their article, I read the full story at Pajamas Media -- and it gave me chills.

I've often said that the Iranian government is performing one of the most delicate balancing acts I've ver seen -- one that puts "riding a tiger" to shame. They exist between two tremendous pressure forces, pushing in opposite directions, and they need to keep them as close to equal to prevent either exploding or imploding.

On the one hand, they have the focus of a good chunk of the world, leaning on them. They royally pissed off the US back in 1979, when they handed us one of the biggest humiliations in our nation's history when they overran our embassy and took our citizens hostage. (Thank you, President James Earl Carter.) A lot of us haven't forgiven them since then, and a lot of us don't think we ever will as long as the government of Iran claims any kind of linkage or responsibility for that act. They've since gone on to bigger and better things, garnering the focus of the world as they work on (or sometimes not work on) nuclear weapons, threatened much of the world's oil supply (during the "tanker wars" phase of the Iran-Iraq war), subsidize and sponsor terrorism around the world, and in general act like the malignant tumor on the world stage that they are.

In brief, most of the world doesn't like them, and would be very happy if they were to fall.

On the other hand, they have a civilian population that is growing more and more discontented with the mullah's rule. For years I've been told that the Iranian people are nowhere near as anti-American as they seem (for some reason, I tend to get a bit miffed and judgmental over people that routinely hold "death to America" rallies," and take it a tad personally), and that they are far more Western-friendly than I give them credit for being. I've also been told that they are growing more discontented with the current government, and growing more and more willing to express that discontent in ways that should terrify any dictator.

That video, embedded at both Powerline and Pajamas Media, shows me -- quite graphically -- that the mullahs who run Iran ought to be terrified. It shows an utterly spontaneous uprising by the people of Iran, turing en masse against the "morality police." Not only is one of those thugs brutally beaten by the mob, his co-thugs are chased away from the scene.

As Mr. Hinderaker points out, the mob's chant ought to give fear to any dictator: "How many people do you think you can kill?"

These are the young people of Iran. These are not the same people who overthrew the Shah in 1979 -- those people are the ones who govern Iraq Iran. But they are the same demographic group -- the "heirs" of the students who led the Islamic Revolution. And they are slowly coming to realize that they just might be able to do the very same thing.

Back to my "pressure" metaphor: the government of Iran is under tremendous pressure from both within and without. They only survive by keeping the pressures roughly equal in both directions. Should the balance shift too much in either direction, they will fly apart.

That leads to two questions. The first is, how can we best achieve that goal? I happen to think I would be much happier if they were to "explode" rather than "implode" -- if the pressures from within prevail.

That means that there has to be some way to increase the differential on the government, to cause the internal prssures to overcome the "shell" of the existing government. That can be done by decreasing the external pressure, increasing the internal pressure, or both.

Achieving the first goal is tough. With Iran's nuclear program (which, it being Wednesday, means I think it is back "on"), we simply can't afford to give them too much breathing room to develop the bomb. And it seems that it's a catch-22 -- if we work to keep them from getting the bomb, we heighten their paranoia and motivation to get the bomb. If we ease off, we give them greater opportunities to develop the bomb.

But there has to be some way we can undercut the mullah's main "club" -- the threat of an attack by the West. There has to be some way we can simply cut that leg out from under them (or, at least, whittle it down somewhat) so their paranoia suddenly loses a great deal of its persuasiveness to the Iranian people.

The second goal is also challenging. We need to find a way to foment even more dissatisfaction among the Iranian people with their government, and to help them continue to "feel their oats" and act out against the mullahs. I think one of the best ways we can do that is to bring more and more "sunlight" into the country. They've already embraced the high-tech communications revolution that has swept the world -- the video was shot on a cell phone, and uploaded to YouTube. Satellite TV dishes are incredibly common, and the government can't filter the internet enough. The young people of Iran have tasted the future, and they like it.

I think we need to find ways to remind the Iranian people of the one thing that gives the mullahs the greatest nightmares: that they have the same power today that their fathers held in 1979 -- the ability to overthrow an oppressive government. And we need to encourage them -- not with weapons and money, but with promises to welcome them into the 21st century and all that that entails.

Because the one thing that must never be forgotten when plotting the overthrow of a government is the one thing we didn't take into account in 1979, when Jimmy Carter encouraged the overthrow of the Shah and the return of the Ayatollah Khomeini: that the new government is actually an improvement over the old. We've been paying the price for that appeasement, that concession to militant Islam, for almost 30 years, in blood over and over and over again.

And so have the people of Iran.

Update: Once again, I confused Iraq and Iran, and thanks to yetanotherjohn for catching me on it. Why, oh why, did we allow two countries with virtually the same name to exist right next to each other? My fingers protest strenuously.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/28152.

Comments (7)

I've been thinking that a C... (Below threshold)

I've been thinking that a CIA which said Saddam had WMD (instead of intentions to seriously restart his programs at a high rate as soon as the UN santions were lifted, and had prototypes and other 'goodies' socked away, but no mass quantities) and turned out to be wrong...

May very well be wrong when they say Iran's stopped working on THEIR nukes.

They are indeed riding a tiger. If I were them, I'd be negotiating somewhere to bug out to, and have jets waiting at the airport.

There was a proposal for a ... (Below threshold)
jpm100:

There was a proposal for a radio free Iran that was killed in the State Department.

So it appears the SD has no intention of helping to foment anything. I'd even propose they abhor the 'instability' of a new regime.

We have managed to collect ... (Below threshold)
Mark L:

We have managed to collect a lot of Iranian weapons in Iraq (I wonder how they ever got there). Seems to me the neighborly thing to do would be returning these lost weapons to their home country.

Since the Iranian government does not seem to want them (otherwise how did they get to Iraq?) we need to find means to return them directly to Iran's citizens, especially its young, college-educated population. After all, a well-regulated militia (in the 18th sense of the term "regulated") being necessary to the security of a free State, we need to do our best to see that their right to to keep and bear Arms is not infringed.

Worked for us in 1776 (or rather by 1782). Let's export the concept.

Most the world may hate the... (Below threshold)

Most the world may hate them but liberals love them so nothing will be done.

These are the young people ... (Below threshold)
yetanotherjohn:

These are the young people of Iran. These are not the same people who overthrew the Shah in 1979 -- those people are the ones who govern Iraq.

I think you have a typo in this paragraph. The reference to Iraq should be to Iran (or I am entirely missing the point you are trying to make).

The Thunder Run has linked ... (Below threshold)

The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - Web Reconnaissance for 02/27/2008 A short recon of what's out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often.

"...that the new gov... (Below threshold)
Mike:


"...that the new government is actually an improvement over the old."

Fortunately the people of Iran are intelligent and educated. I believe they understand that history teaches us that when an oppressive government is overthrown by force, the new government built from that force soon becomes yet another oppressor. Hopefully they will not be fooled twice.

Christians, you and I should be praying daily for the liberation of Iran, for a peaceful revolution from within that topples the mullahs, just like the force of freedom toppled the evil regimes of Eastern Europe twenty years ago. A peaceful revolution would spare the world the dire consequences of forcing the current Iranian government into collapse through a nuclear standoff or military attack.

If the government of Iran is peacefully overthrown, the US should spare no effort to build a strong friendship with the Iran that emerges.

Has anyone asked Barak Obama or John McCain to comment on these things?




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy