It looks like Republicans in the Senate are finally getting it. Jim DeMint, who was a hero in fighting the shamnesty movement last year, has introduced legislation to finally get the damn fence finished.
Today, U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) introduced the "Complete the Fence Act" that will require the completion of 700 miles of reinforced pedestrian fencing along the nation's southern border by December 31, 2010. The bill also requires the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to report to Congress by June 2009 on fence construction progress and how it plans to complete the full fence by the 2010 deadline."Americans demand a secure border and the first step is to complete the fence," said Senator DeMint. "Our nation's borders are fundamental to our national security and our sovereignty, and we can't delay any longer. If we want to have a legal immigration system that works, we must have a secure border so we know who is entering and leaving the United States."
In September 2006, Congress overwhelmingly passed and the President signed a bill that required 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The "Complete the Fence Act" will require DHS to complete the 700 miles fence by December 31, 2010, using only reinforced pedestrian fencing, not vehicle barriers or "virtual" fencing.
In direct conflict with the requirements set by Congress in 2006, DHS Secretary Chertoff has recently attempted to count vehicle barriers that stand only a few feet high and can easily be walked around as part of total fencing completed. DHS claims to have completed 302 miles of fencing by counting 134 miles of vehicle barriers. DHS has actually only completed 167 miles of physical, pedestrian fencing.
Last week, at a U.S. House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee hearing, U.S. Border Patrol officials admitted that the "virtual fencing", which was to account for nearly 300 miles of the 700 mile fence, is not working as promised and will not be operational for at least 3 more years. The technology encountered numerous problems that included: software integration, synching cameras with the radar systems, trouble identifying objects among desert trees, rain interference, and easy targets for drug traffickers to disable.
"Border security cannot wait any longer and we cannot depend on failed virtual fencing or vehicle barriers that won't stop pedestrians," said Senator DeMint. "We must keep our promise to America and build a real fence to secure our borders immediately."
"Over half a million new illegal immigrants enter our nation every year. But this is more than an immigration problem. The southern border is where the majority of cocaine is smuggled in, and where heroin, marijuana and crystal meth flood into our country. It's where the disgusting and immoral practice of human trafficking happens, with thousands of people sold into modern day slavery and prostitution. And most importantly, the border is a national security threat that leaves America vulnerable to terrorists and weapons of mass destruction," said Senator DeMint.
What the heck has taken them so damn long to figure it out? We showed them our outrage when they tried to force amnesty down our throats, we should show them our support for finally cluing in.
This is just another sign that Republicans got the hint last year. They're ready to get tough.
Senate Republicans are set to announce Wednesday the hardest-hitting package of immigration enforcement measures seen yet -- one that would require jail time for illegal immigrants caught crossing the border, make it harder for them to open bank accounts and compel them to communicate in English when dealing with federal agencies.Most of the bills stand little chance of being debated in the Democrat-controlled Congress, but the move by some of the Senate's leading Republicans underscores how potent the issue of immigration remains, particularly during a presidential election year.
The bills give Republicans a way to put pressure on the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates to take a tougher stance on immigration. They also reflect a shift toward harsher immigration rhetoric and legislative proposals from both parties since Congress failed to pass a comprehensive overhaul in 2007.
The package, an enforcement smorgasbord assembled by at least eight lawmakers, consists of 11 bills, but could expand to include as many as 14. Some elements echo House bills, but others go beyond House proposals.
One would discourage states from issuing driver's licenses to illegal immigrants by docking 10 percent of highway funding from states that continue to do so. Another would extend the presence of National Guard on the border and a third would end language assistance at federal agencies and the voting booth for people with limited English ability.
A bill by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., who is leading the effort, would impose a maximum two-year jail sentence on someone caught crossing the border for a second time.
... Other bills in the package would:
• Block federal funding from cities that bar their police from asking about immigration status.
Give the Department of Homeland Security the authority to use information from the Social Security Administration to target illegal immigrants.
• Require construction of 700 miles of fencing along the Southern border, not including vehicle barriers.
• Impose sanctions on countries that refuse to repatriate their citizens.
• Deport any immigrant, legal or illegal, for one drunken-driving conviction.
• Enable local and state police to enforce federal immigration laws
And we now have the Senate Border Security Caucus:
Today, U.S. Sens. David Vitter (R- Louisiana), Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma), Elizabeth Dole (R-North Carolina), Saxby Chambliss (R-Georgia), Johnny Isakson (R-Georgia), Richard Burr (R-North Carolina) and Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi) announced the formation of the Border Security and Enforcement First Caucus.The U.S. illegal immigrant population is the highest it has ever been. One in 25 residents currently living in the United States is here illegally. Over the last seven years, immigration has been the highest in history - 10.9 million immigrants arrived, over half of them (five million plus) without legal status.
The Caucus members recognize that Congress has presented the American people with a false choice in solving the illegal immigration problem - give illegal aliens amnesty or round them up and deport them en masse. The principle mission of the Caucus is to promote a true, achievable alternative: attrition through enforcement and border security. Living illegally in the United States will become more difficult and less satisfying over time when the government - at ALL LEVELS - enforces all of the laws already on the books.
The Caucus will be a platform to let Americans know that some in the U.S. Senate are continuing to make sure that the laws already on the books will be enforced, act as the voice of those concerned citizens who have expressed their opinions time and time again for interior enforcement and border security, push for stronger border security and interior enforcement legislation, and work together in the U.S. Senate to defeat future legislation that offers amnesty.
Gee, and what a surprise -- all Republicans, no Democrats.
I don't want to get too excited, but this all looks very promising. I think it wouldn't be a bad idea at all to send these Senators calls and/or e-mails of support -- like I said, we railed on them for amnesty, we should let them know that they'll have our support for giving us good policy. You can get their e-mail addresses and phone numbers here. We shouldn't only be active in politics when things are going badly; all politicians are supposed to be public servants, so don't hesitate to tell them your opinion on an issue, and don't only express the negative opinions, either.
In any case, this makes me very hopeful. It's unlikely that we'll see many results from this, given that Dems are all for open borders, rampant multiculturalism, and lax national security, but who knows what could happen if our guys keep the pressure on? Feel free to e-mail the Senators with the (D) next to their name and encourage them to vote for the Complete the Fence Act, too.




Comments (15)
Eh. Sounds good, but it's c... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Les Nessman | March 5, 2008 3:30 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Eh. Sounds good, but it's coming from the Minority side of the aisle. It's easy to propose things when you know they'll never happen.
I'll believe it when I see it.
1. Posted by Les Nessman | March 5, 2008 3:30 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 15:30
2. Posted by bill-tb | March 5, 2008 3:41 PM | Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Not going to happen, I wonder if McCain is a co-sponsor? Maybe McCain would like to weigh in, he has said recently that we need to secure the border first. What about it John, you in?
2. Posted by bill-tb | March 5, 2008 3:41 PM |
Score: 2 (2 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 15:41
3. Posted by Conservachef | March 5, 2008 3:55 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I'm happy to see Roger Wicker (MS) on that list, which is a turnaround from Trent Lott's stance. (Isn't this the issue where Lott went after the eeeeevil talk radio?)
I also note that all of those in this "Border Security Caucas" are from pretty much the same area- the Southeast. I can easily picture some people making an issue out of that.
I have to say, though, that any enthusiasm this stuff might generate is quickly stamped out when I look at the current presidential nominees.....
3. Posted by Conservachef | March 5, 2008 3:55 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 15:55
4. Posted by drjohn | March 5, 2008 4:46 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Why exactly is a bill required for the House to complete what it promised to do?
How about a jail sentence for those who fail to live up to their jobs?
4. Posted by drjohn | March 5, 2008 4:46 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 16:46
5. Posted by Brian | March 5, 2008 4:52 PM | Score: -1 (3 votes cast)
What the heck has taken them so damn long to figure it out?
You later provided the answer to your own question:
Most of the bills stand little chance of being debated in the Democrat-controlled Congress
In other words, illegal immigration was hardly given a thought when the Republicans controlled the presidency and both houses of Congress and were actually in a position to do something. Now that they know nothing will come of it, suddenly it's the most pressing issue facing America.
5. Posted by Brian | March 5, 2008 4:52 PM |
Score: -1 (3 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 16:52
6. Posted by Matt | March 5, 2008 5:12 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Did you notice that the "Senate Border Security Caucus," doesn't include senators from any of the border states? Conspicous by their absence (big suprise) is Senators Kyl and McCain.
6. Posted by Matt | March 5, 2008 5:12 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 17:12
7. Posted by Rich | March 5, 2008 5:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Now that they are the minority and could possibly lose the whitehouse. Now they feel the need to listen to people. Can you see them scratching their heads with each other and asking"what can we do?..what would get more people behind us?". Must have scared them to step out of the land of Oz to find out what the little people were interested in the country.
7. Posted by Rich | March 5, 2008 5:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 17:25
8. Posted by John F Not Kerry | March 5, 2008 5:35 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Why couldn't one of these guys be the Republican nominee? Geez...
8. Posted by John F Not Kerry | March 5, 2008 5:35 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 17:35
9. Posted by jbw | March 5, 2008 5:43 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I am a little skeptical of some of the members of the 'Border Security Caucus'
While several are great and did powerful work last year, if I recall correctly both Chambliss and Isakson were on the McCain-Kennedy bandwagon last year till the folks in Ga freaked out. Also Burr was very late arriving to the party; till after the avalanche had started against amnesty.
9. Posted by jbw | March 5, 2008 5:43 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 17:43
10. Posted by anonymous | March 5, 2008 6:09 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Mark Sanford on Illegal Immigration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHJohB8htGk
10. Posted by anonymous | March 5, 2008 6:09 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 18:09
11. Posted by Brian | March 5, 2008 6:32 PM | Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
Must have scared them to step out of the land of Oz to find out what the little people were interested in the country.
Actually, it ranks very low on the list of issues people think are important.
11. Posted by Brian | March 5, 2008 6:32 PM |
Score: -2 (4 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 18:32
12. Posted by fiona | March 5, 2008 8:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I did better - I sent DeMint money. Also always comment to the Party whining for more dough that I am saving my funds to donate to individual Republicans who actually act like Republicans. Wish I had more money...
12. Posted by fiona | March 5, 2008 8:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 20:39
13. Posted by P. Bunyan | March 5, 2008 8:45 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I agree with your #11 comment Brian, but you had this part 180 degrees from reality as ususal:
Brian: "In other words, illegal immigration was hardly given a thought when the Republicans controlled the presidency and both houses of Congress and were actually in a position to do something."
Reality: The House passed legislation securing the boarder. The DEMOCRATS in the Senate, which operates under rules that give more power to the minory turned it into an unpassable bill.
13. Posted by P. Bunyan | March 5, 2008 8:45 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on March 5, 2008 20:45
14. Posted by Rich | March 6, 2008 12:07 AM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
I personally think that border security is something that more independants and democrats agree with republicans. They might disagree more on the treatment of the immigrants already here,but I believe that keeping more from coming in is still a priority. I doubt the issues that had higher priority in those polls shared the same degree of unity between all the different political factions.
14. Posted by Rich | March 6, 2008 12:07 AM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on March 6, 2008 00:07
15. Posted by Spurwing Plover | March 6, 2008 11:34 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
A moat full of monsters a fence that disintagrates all who touch it underground traps that fill the tunels with goof gas
15. Posted by Spurwing Plover | March 6, 2008 11:34 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on March 6, 2008 23:34