« American Idol - Top 8 Week | Main | Honoring Michael Monsoor »

"Stupidity Should Be Painful"

"Stupidity Should Be Painful."

I saw that slogan years ago -- I dunno if it was online, on a T-Shirt, on a bumper, or somewhere else -- and it stuck with me. It, like all great aphorisms, summed up an essential truth in a few concise words.

So many people do stupid things precisely because they aren't painful. Or, in a few rare cases, aren't painful enough. Ever feel a muscle that's on the verge of painfully cramping? The temptation to tense it right up to the point of spasm is tremendous. Everyone picks at boo-boos. And that's just the literal interpretations.

That thought kept coming to me as I read several articles recently in the Boston Globe. None of them quite triggered enough interest in me for a full posting, but after a while I had enough pieces that they qualified for this little themed round-up.

For example, this editorial from last week. "Taxation Without Exasperation." They think that preparing one's own tax is too onerous, and since the IRS usually has all the info they need about us anyway, they should simply prepare our returns for us and have the whole thing done without us having to trouble our pretty little heads about the whole thing. It's one of Barack Obama's planks in his campaign.

Thanks, but no. Far, far too many people already don't think too clearly about their taxes, preferring to look ahead to filing for their refund as "the government giving me money" when they should be thinking "the government giving me my own money back after I loaned it to them, interest-free, all last year." (Yeah, I do it, too. I'm not proud of it, but I won't deny it.) The Globe is honest enough to include some of the reasons why some people think it's a bad idea, but pooh-poohs their concerns.

For example, they mention that the IRS has a history of giving taxpayers wrong answers about taxes. They don't mention, however, that under current tax law, if you are unsure about something and you ask the IRS for help, and they give you a wrong answer, you're still the one liable for the mistake. Under that precedent, if you have the IRS prepare your "simple return" for you and they screw it up, it's still your fault.

(The cynic in me kind of likes that. I find it appealing that "you should know better than to trust the IRS" should be a fact of law. It ties in with my theme about "stupidity should be painful." But I digress.)

Similarly, the Globe has come out courageously in jacking up taxes in Massachusetts. Under the title "Fair Taxes For Tough Times," they endorse a whole slew of changes in the Bay State's tax code that will shift another half a billion dollars from the people and businesses and into the coffers of the Commonwealth.

So, let me get this straight; the economy's heading into a slowdown (I'll let others debate the technicalities of "recession" and whatnot), so they think that that is a grand time to shift over half a billion dollars from the private sector into the public sector? Massachusetts' budget is already pretty substantial, at $28 billion a year.

Just for giggles I ran the numbers. (I tend to do that, you may have noticed.) New Hampshire has a population of 1.3 million and an annual budget of around $4.5 billion. (That's with a 17.5% increase in just the last year -- thank you, Democrats.) That means the state spends about $3,500 dollars per resident. (Rounded.) Just to the south, Massachusetts has a population of 6.4 million, so they spend about $4400 per resident. And they certainly get so much for for their additional bucks.

The first element the Globe mentions is a $1.00 tax hike on cigarettes. They don't say specifically, but I'm guessing that is per pack -- that's usually how they figure it. That will raise the price per carton another $20.00 $10.00. (Thanks, Darby. I knew I shoulda consulted a smoker on that point...)

This one is a fun one to predict. Even with rising gas prices, it'll soon become more and more tempting for Massachusetts smokers to drive across the state borders to New Hampshire or Vermont or Connecticut or Rhode Island or New York (mainly New Hampshire -- our taxes are the lowest, and most of Massachusetts' population is in the eastern half of that state) and stock up. Consequently, the revenues this tax generates wil take a hit.

Also, cigarette taxes are often the most regressive. Far more poor people smoke than wealthy ones. Even with the "sin tax" rationale, it's still not a nice thing to do to poor people.

And I say that as a militant anti-smoker who wouldn't mind seeing the goddamned things outlawed entirely.

Finally, we have a case where something genuinely stupid is proving painful, and the Globe doesn't see the connection.

Ever since the state decided that every single resident would have health insurance OR ELSE, the actual costs have continually outstripped even the most pessimistic projections of the harshest critics. It's currently reached the level of about 5.7 metric assloads of cash, and is showing no signs of slowing.

The Globe's response: "suck it up."

OK, that's a little harsh. But as far as I can tell, they're saying "it ain't working, but we need to keep trying to make it work!" I'm taking certainly liberties in translating that as "we're going to need even more money and more intrusive laws," but that's a fairly safe interpretation when you're talking about the Boston Globe and Massachusetts politics.

"Stupidity should be painful." As good a thing as that would be, it wouldn't be a panacea. Sometimes it just isn't painful enough.

Either that, or there are too many masochists running things in places like Massachusetts.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/29124.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Stupidity Should Be Painful":

» The Thunder Run linked with Web Reconnaissance for 04/09/2008

» Conservative Dialysis linked with Obama: Let the IRS Do Your Taxes

Comments (8)

This is what the left wants... (Below threshold)
SteveC:

This is what the left wants...to make us as miserable as they are on the inside.

Jay...20 smokes pe... (Below threshold)
Darby:

Jay...

20 smokes per pack...

10 packs per carton...

A buck a pack raises $10.00, not $20.00, but it's a moot point really. Smokes down there are already disgustingly high priced to begin with. Enough of those southerners come up here to begin with to buy smokes.

You forgot a very important aspect of all these taxes...

Mass is just going to drive even more people out of their state into ours. Making Good Ole New Hampshire even more blue then it already is.

RE: Raising cigarette taxes... (Below threshold)
kevino:

RE: Raising cigarette taxes

First of all, we in NH need MA to increase these taxes. We finance a great deal of NH state government from MA residents driving to NH to buy smokes, but the new Democratic leadership is raising the cigarette tax in NH. If MA doesn't raise them again, we stand to loose a great deal of tax revenue.

Also, notice that every time these idiots raise taxes like this it is supposedly to raise revenue. However, they raise the sin taxes or sales taxes, the revenue goes does, and they never seem to figure it out.

There's a difference between ignorance and stupidity: ignorance is curable.


RE: "Stupidity should be painful"

I agree. Unfortunately, many upper-middle class residents in MA can afford to move to NH, where they repeat the mistakes that made life difficult in their former state. And they leave behind the lowest classes and working class people with tax burdens they cannot easily pay.

$28B? That's it? The late... (Below threshold)

$28B? That's it? The late (as usual) budget for NY is coming in around $121B. Yes...$121B. Oh, and they're going to raise taxes here, too...including on cigarettes. And I think health care. Cuz that'll help. Yeah.

The really stupid th... (Below threshold)
Eric:

The really stupid thing is people will leave MA for lower tax states, and when they get to their new homes the first thing they'll do is vote in people who promise to raise taxes. That's what's happening in the west as wage-earners flee California.

Stupidity is painful. It ju... (Below threshold)
Joe Miller:

Stupidity is painful. It just isn't painful to the folks who commit it. Not a day goes by that someone doesn't do something that makes me grab my head and go "Oww!" If stupidity were painful, it would save a lot of time. If you walk up to somebody to ask a question and they're mumbling as if they're in some kind of pain, you could simply pass them by and ask somebody else.

One of my major believes is... (Below threshold)
louisianaLightning:

One of my major believes is:
Terminal Stupidity should be Terminal!

Similar idea, but more extreme.

the stupidity of continuing... (Below threshold)
kepa poalima:

the stupidity of continuing to elect tax & spend liberals is painful - to your wallet/bank account




Advertisements









rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Follow Wizbang

Follow Wizbang on FacebookFollow Wizbang on TwitterSubscribe to Wizbang feedWizbang Mobile

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Fresh Links

Credits

Section Editor: Maggie Whitton

Editors: Jay Tea, Lorie Byrd, Kim Priestap, DJ Drummond, Michael Laprarie, Baron Von Ottomatic, Shawn Mallow, Rick, Dan Karipides, Michael Avitablile, Charlie Quidnunc, Steve Schippert

Emeritus: Paul, Mary Katherine Ham, Jim Addison, Alexander K. McClure, Cassy Fiano, Bill Jempty, John Stansbury, Rob Port

In Memorium: HughS

All original content copyright © 2003-2010 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

Powered by Movable Type Pro 4.361

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Author Login



Terms Of Service

DCMA Compliance Notice

Privacy Policy