Wow.
I am almost dumbfounded.
The Boston Globe has managed to convey almost everything that's wrong with themselves -- and Massachusetts in general -- in a single editorial.
A bit of context, first: Newton, Massachusetts is a very wealthy suburb of Boston. And "Proposition 2 1/2" is one of the few successes of the forces of sanity in the Bay State. An initiative passed by the voters (the politicians hate it, and would have never passed it on their own), the measure states that no community can raise property taxes more than 2.5% in a year without a special vote by the people.
OK, that's all the info you need for the story. And to prove it, I'm only going to use only information from the editorial to make my points.
In the year 2001, Newton's mayor proposed renovating Newton North High School. The price tag he hung on this plan was $39 million. Remember that number, it will come back frequently.
Well, the plans for renovating kept getting revised and tweaked and upgraded and adjusted and modified. In 2007, the plans called for not a renovation, but a whole new school, at the price of $154 million -- almost FOUR TIMES as much as the original estimate the people had been sold six years prior.
But that wasn't the final number. We ain't anywhere near a final number yet. The latest figures put the price tag at almost $200 million.
(I'm going to cheat here. I heard one radio report on this that put that number at $195 million, and I'm going to use it, because it makes my math that much more elegant.)
$195 million. Almost a fifth of a billion dollars. And more relevantly, FIVE TIMES the original selling price.
Alternately, take in the original estimate of $39 million. Add in the "revised" number from just a year ago of $154 million. Add 'em together, and you STILL are short of the current figures.
So, what is the solution the city government is proposing, and the Globe endorsing? Keep forking over money, people of Newton. We'll let you know when we've taken enough. Until next year, when we'll want more.
And, naturally, the city leaders are resorting to the traditional approach for shaking down the voters: threatening the city services that the people hold near and dear:
Mayor David Cohen and the Board of Aldermen would still need to cut library hours, police and school staffing, and services for the elderly...
It's political blackmail at its most primal. When it's time to cut the budget, don't look for waste or fraud or padded payrolls or worthless bureaucrats. Make the first cuts the ones that will give the people the most pain. Cuts in school staffing will NEVER be in bureaucrats, but in those that will directly affect the students most. Elderly services are also threatened, because the elderly tend to vote in greater numbers. Threats to cut police and fire are also common, because they go right for the jugular -- people's sense of physical security.
That's how things are done in Massachusetts.
To be fair, that's how it's done in politics in most places. But in Massachusetts, they're a hell of a lot more blatant about it. In Newton, they sell the voters on a $39 million project, then proceed to run it up to FIVE TIMES that without ever even offering the voters a little K-Y to ease the discomfort.
And that's just fine with the Boston Globe. Indeed, they seem to think that it should not even be questioned. Just keep giving your money to the government, don't ask questions, and shut up or we'll call you hateful and intolerant and ignorant and selfish and all sorts of other bad things.
With a few notable exceptions, of course. We mustn't ask the institutions that inflicted blessed the nation with people like the Clintons, the Obamas, the Kennedys, and the like to pay "their" fair share.
That's only for the plebians. The Beautiful People, the Enlightened Elite, make their contributions through far more important ways.
Personally, if I lived in Newton (insert huge guffaw here), I'd be bucking for either some criminal investigations into that school funding mess -- or a tree that looked like it could hold up some nooses.




Comments (11)
Thanks for once again expos... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Gmac | May 14, 2008 12:09 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Thanks for once again exposing the primary reason why I'll *never* visit MA. They have absolutly no fiscal responsability and use tactics that would make Jimmy Hoffa blush.
Just remember one thing though, these are the people they elected doing this to them.
1. Posted by Gmac | May 14, 2008 12:09 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 12:09
2. Posted by Mattnu | May 14, 2008 12:28 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Jay Tea,
You can't hook nooses up to trees, You'd horribly offend the enviromentalist, and ACLU! You might scuff the tree, and oh, the symbolism of the noose might damage somebodies pyschie.
I'd suggest a firing squad.
2. Posted by Mattnu | May 14, 2008 12:28 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 12:28
3. Posted by SarahConnor2 | May 14, 2008 12:57 PM | Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
I don't know how a school can possibly cost that much. Our town recently built a new school after determining it was cheaper to build than renovate. The cost was 40 million and the school has all the new bells and whistles.
Another problem with the Newton situation is that this school will only serve half of the town's high schoolers. There is another high school and you can bet they are going to want a new building too when this is all over.
3. Posted by SarahConnor2 | May 14, 2008 12:57 PM |
Score: 4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 12:57
4. Posted by ravenshrike | May 14, 2008 1:10 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Eh, at least in Lake Forest all they did was stick a bunch of those temporary trailers out in front of the school to piss off the old people into voting for the tax hike. Of course, that was a much lesser amount of money, but still.
4. Posted by ravenshrike | May 14, 2008 1:10 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 13:10
5. Posted by SPQR | May 14, 2008 1:33 PM | Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
A lot of state, county and municipal governments have adopted the extortion method of getting voter approval of tax increases, threatening the most prominent of their departments rather than actually doing their jobs of prioritizing spending.
This will continue until voters catch on, and vote out of office those who use the tactic to engorge the tax revenue.
5. Posted by SPQR | May 14, 2008 1:33 PM |
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 13:33
6. Posted by uhh... | May 14, 2008 2:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Gmac, you only visit places that are fiscally responsible and not run by thugs/bullies/thieves/liberals?
So... never going to Italy, then?
6. Posted by uhh... | May 14, 2008 2:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 14:07
7. Posted by Piso Mojado | May 14, 2008 3:42 PM | Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
And massholes thought the Big Dig was bad.
They must enjoy bending over and grabbing the ankles.
7. Posted by Piso Mojado | May 14, 2008 3:42 PM |
Score: 1 (1 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 15:42
8. Posted by Francis W. Porretto
| May 14, 2008 5:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
"And, naturally, the city leaders are resorting to the traditional approach for shaking down the voters: threatening the city services that the people hold near and dear..."
This is known as the Washington Monument Defense. It's being deployed here in an aggressive fashion, but the pattern still holds true.
8. Posted by Francis W. Porretto
| May 14, 2008 5:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on May 14, 2008 17:38
9. Posted by Jay G | May 15, 2008 11:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Typically in my town the first thing they threaten is to take away garbage pick-up.
I have no idea what they'd expect us to do if they actually followed through on the threat, as our dump closed years and years ago.
So our options would be to take our trash to work with us or to let it pile up in the back yard...
9. Posted by Jay G | May 15, 2008 11:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on May 15, 2008 11:24
10. Posted by Robert in BA | May 16, 2008 1:22 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
That's like believing the Iraq War could be fought for $50 Billion.
What kind of moron would fall for that?
Jay Tea, why are you raising both your hands so high?
10. Posted by Robert in BA | May 16, 2008 1:22 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on May 16, 2008 01:22
11. Posted by Mark D | May 16, 2008 11:27 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I moved from Ne England nearly 9 years ago. I still haven't found a reason to go back. It's nice to know some things never change.
11. Posted by Mark D | May 16, 2008 11:27 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on May 16, 2008 11:27